SOU 1997:132

Executive summary

During the accession negotiations with the European Union, Sweden was granted a derogation from community legislation to maintain national legislation within the area of feed additives of the groups antibiotics, chemotherapeutics, coccidiostats and growth promoters. In Sweden, the use of such substances is restricted to the purpose of curing or preventing diseases, i.e. used as veterinary medicines according to the Feedingstuffs Act of 1985. The Swedish government has appointed a commission to evaluate the hazards and risks associated with use of antimicrobial feed additives in animal production.

Our conclusions can be summarised as follows:

·Antibacterial feed additives have favourable economic effects on livestock production, but from a long term perspective these are questionable, especially regarding animal welfare and animal health. Antibacterial feed additives can, at levels permitted in feedingstuffs, be used for treatment or prevention of animal diseases, which is in violation of directive 70/524/EEC.

·The quinoxalines and the nitroimidazoles are potentially genotoxic and may be regarded as an occupational hazard.

·Halofuginone and the quinoxalines are toxic for target species. This is deleterious for animal well being.

·The risk of increased resistance associated with the general use of antibacterials as feed additives are far from negligible and the potential consequences are serious for both animal and human health. Antibacterials that are presently not used as therapeuticals in human or veterinary medicine are valuable templates for future drugs. As emergence of resistance is considered to be a threat to animal and human health, all AFA should be restricted to medical and veterinary purposes.

It is the conclusion of this commission that the benefits of antibacterial feed additives do not outweigh the risks.

With regard to coccidiostats and other medicinal substances, they are specifically used to prevent disease and should therefore be treated as pharmaceutical specialities, i.e. as medicated feed.

2 SOU 1997:132
SOU 1997:132 Contents 3

%XECUTIVE SUMMARY )NTRODUCTION

1.1 The Swedish derogation.......................................................................... 9

"ACKGROUND

2.1 Introduction........................................................................................... 11
2.2 Role of antibacterials in animal husbandry........................................... 12
2.2.1 Therapeutic and prophylactic use of antibacterials......................... 12
2.2.2 Chemoprophylaxis of protozoal diseases........................................ 13
2.2.3 Antibacterials as performance enhancers ....................................... 13
2.3 Community legislation.......................................................................... 15
2.3.1 Antibiotics and growth promoters .................................................. 15
2.3.2 Coccidiostats and other medicinal feed additives........................... 17
2.4 Current Swedish legislation .................................................................. 20
2.4.1 Antibiotics and growth promoters .................................................. 20
2.4.2 Coccidiostats and other antiprotozoals ........................................... 20
2.4.3 Antibacterials for use in therapy or prophylaxis............................. 21
2.4.4 Distribution of medicinal products ................................................. 21
2.4.5 Control ............................................................................................ 22
2.5. The Swedish ban .................................................................................. 22
2.5.1 The preambles................................................................................. 22
2.5.2 Effects on animal health ................................................................. 23
2.6 Sales of antibacterials for veterinary use in Sweden............................. 27
2.6.1 Materials and methods .................................................................... 27
2.6.2 Total consumption .......................................................................... 28
2.6.3 Flock treatment ............................................................................... 31
2.6.4 Coccidiostats ................................................................................... 32
2.6.5 Some comments on the Swedish consumption statistics ................ 33
2.7 Prevalence of bacterial resistance ......................................................... 36
2.7.1 Zoonotic pathogens......................................................................... 36
2.7.2 Animal pathogens ........................................................................... 38
2.7.3 Animal commensals........................................................................ 40
2.7.4 Some comments on the resistance figures ...................................... 43
2.8 Summary comments.............................................................................. 43

-ODE OF ACTION AND EFFECTS OF ANTIBACTERIAL FEED ADDITIVES

3.1 Mode of action ...................................................................................... 49
3.1.1 Effects ............................................................................................. 49
3.1.2 Suggested main mode of action ...................................................... 50
3.2 Prophylactic and therapeutic effects of AFA........................................ 55
3.2.1 Introduction..................................................................................... 55
3.2.2 Necrotic enteritis in poultry ............................................................ 57
3.2.3 Swine dysentery .............................................................................. 57
3.2.4 Porcine proliferative enteritis (PPE) ............................................... 59
3.2.5 Other bacterial enteritis in swine .................................................... 59
3.3 Growth and feed efficiency responses to AFA in pigs and poultry ...... 60
4 Contents SOU 1997:132
3.3.1 Growth and feed efficiency responses to AFA in pigs ................... 60
3.3.2 Growth and feed efficiency responses to AFA in poultry .............. 62
3.4 Alternatives to AFA.............................................................................. 63
3.4.1 Enzymes.......................................................................................... 63
3.4.2 Probiotics ........................................................................................ 64
3.5 Addendum: A benefit cost analysis of reintroduction of AFA in  
Sweden........................................................................................................ 65
3.5.1 Executive Summary........................................................................ 65
3.5.2 Introductory comments................................................................... 66
3.5.3 Gains if AFA were to be used in Sweden....................................... 67
3.5.4 The pig industry.............................................................................. 68
3.5.5 Egg production ............................................................................... 71
3.5.6 Production of poultry meat (broilers) ............................................. 72
3.5.7 A brief comment on an earlier report ............................................. 73

-ICROBIOLOGICAL ASPECTS ON ANTIBACTERIAL FEED ADDITIVES

4.1 Introduction........................................................................................... 83
4.2 Antibacterial activity of AFA ............................................................... 83
4.3 AFA and development of resistance..................................................... 85
4.3.1 Prospective studies ......................................................................... 87
4.3.2 Retrospective studies ...................................................................... 89
4.3.3 Point-prevalence studies ................................................................. 90
4.3.4 Some comments on study design.................................................... 92
4.4 Acquisition of resistance in bacteria..................................................... 93
4.4.1 Transfer of resistance genes ........................................................... 93
4.4.2 Bacterial interspecies transfer of resistance genes ......................... 97
4.4.3 Co-transfer of genes and multiresistance........................................ 97
4.4.4 Resistance genes and animal hosts ................................................. 98
4.4.5 The encumbrance of resistance for bacteria ................................. 100
4.4.6 Some remarks on horizontal transmission of genes ..................... 100
4.5 Transfer of resistance between various host species .......................... 101
4.5.1 Transmission of bacteria............................................................... 102
4.5.2 Transfer of genes .......................................................................... 103
4.5.3 Routes of transmission - food as a vehicle ................................... 107
4.5.4 Likelihood of resistance being transferred from animals to man . 108
4.6 Epidemiology of antibacterial resistance............................................ 109
4.6.1 Reservoirs - the gene pool ............................................................ 109
4.6.2 Risk factors for spread of resistance............................................. 110
4.6.3 Persistence of resistance ............................................................... 111
4.6.4 Some comments on epidemiology................................................ 112
4.7 Effects of an increase in resistance ..................................................... 113
4.8 Other effects on the microflora........................................................... 115
4.8.1 Salmonella .................................................................................... 115
4.8.2 Other pathogens ............................................................................ 122
4.8.3 Other alterations of the microflora ............................................... 122
SOU 1997:132 Contents 5
4.9 Summary comments............................................................................ 123
4OXICOLOGICAL AND RELATED EFFECTS OF ANTIBACTERIAL FEED ADDITIVES  
5.1 Introduction......................................................................................... 141
5.2 Toxicity for target species................................................................... 141
5.3 Toxicity for non-target species ........................................................... 142
5.4 Adverse effects in humans .................................................................. 143
5.4.1 Exposure to residues ..................................................................... 143
5.4.2 Allergy .......................................................................................... 147
5.5 Interactions.......................................................................................... 148
5.6 Summary comments........................................................................... 148
%NVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS ON ANTIBACTERIAL FEED ADDITIVES
6.1 Introduction......................................................................................... 153
6.2 Exposure of the environment to AFA ................................................. 154
6.3 Effects of AFA on the environment.................................................... 155
6.3.1 Disruption of microecology .......................................................... 155
6.3.2 Decreased nutrient losses.............................................................. 156
6.4 Antimicrobial resistance genes in the environment ............................ 157
6.4.1 Persistence of resistant bacteria in the environment ..................... 157
6.4.2 Gene transfer in the environment.................................................. 158
6.4.3 Persistence of resistance genes in environmental bacteria ........... 159
6.4.4 Possible implications for the environment................................... 159
6.5 Summary comments............................................................................ 159

#OCCIDIOSTATS

7.1 Introduction......................................................................................... 165
7.1.1 The parasite and the disease.......................................................... 165
7.1.2 Prevention and chemoprophylaxis................................................ 166
7.2 Microbiological aspects ...................................................................... 169
7.2.1 Parasitological aspects .................................................................. 169
7.2.2 Bacteriological aspects ................................................................. 170
7.3 Toxicological aspects.......................................................................... 171
7.3.1 Toxicity of ionophores.................................................................. 171
7.3.2 Toxicity of other coccidiostats...................................................... 174
7.3.3 Residues ........................................................................................ 175
7.3.4 Allergy .......................................................................................... 176
7.4 Environmental aspects ........................................................................ 177
7.4.1 Environmental aspects on ionophores .......................................... 177
7.4.2 Environmental aspects on other coccidiostats .............................. 178
7.5 Alternatives to coccidiostats ............................................................... 178
7.5.1 Improved hygiene ......................................................................... 179
7.5.2 Genetic resistance to coccidiosis .................................................. 179
7.5.3 Immunoprophylaxis ...................................................................... 180
7.6 Summary comments on coccidiostats ................................................. 181
7.7 Addendum: dimetridazole, ipronidazole and ronidazole .................... 181
7.7.1 Introduction................................................................................... 181
6 Contents SOU 1997:132
7.7.2 Histomoniasis - the parasite and the disease ................................ 182
7.7.3 Toxicological aspects on 5-nitroimidazoles ................................. 182
7.7.4 Summary comments on nitroimidazoles....................................... 184

!SSESSMENT OF THE USAGE OF ANTIMICROBIAL FEED ADDITIVES

8.1 Introduction......................................................................................... 195
8.2 Some comments on risk analysis ........................................................ 196
8.3 Safety for animals and humans........................................................... 198
8.3.1 Increased resistance ...................................................................... 199
8.3.2 Suppression of pathogens ............................................................. 208
8.3.3 Favouring of enteric pathogens .................................................... 208
8.3.4 Toxicological aspects ................................................................... 211
8.4 Safety for the environment ................................................................. 213
8.5 Prophylactic effects of AFA ............................................................... 214
8.6 The risks and the benefits ................................................................... 215
8.6.1 The benefits .................................................................................. 215
8.6.2 Indirect long-term losses and animal welfare aspects .................. 216
8.6.3 The risks ....................................................................................... 217
8.6.4 Conclusions .................................................................................. 219
8.6.5 Considerations for risk management decisions ............................ 219

!NNEX ! !VILAMYCIN

A.1 Introduction........................................................................................ 225
A.2 Mode of action and resistance mechanisms...................................... 225
A.3 Development of resistance................................................................. 227
A.4 Acquisition of resistance.................................................................... 228
A.5 Impact of resistance on animal and human health ............................. 228
A.6 Other effects on the microflora .......................................................... 228
A.6.1 Salmonella ................................................................................... 228
A.6.2 Other enteric pathogens ............................................................... 229
A.7 Effects on specific animal diseases.................................................... 229
A.8 Toxicological aspects......................................................................... 229
A.9 Environmental effects ........................................................................ 230
A.10 Summary comments......................................................................... 230

!NNEX " "ACITRACIN

B.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 233
B.2 Mode of action and resistance mechanisms ...................................... 234
B.3 Development of resistance ................................................................. 235
B.3.1 Prospective studies....................................................................... 235
B.3.2 Point-prevalence studies .............................................................. 236
B.4 Acquisition of resistance .................................................................... 238
B.5 Effects on specific animal diseases .................................................... 239
B.6 Impact of resistance on animal and human health ............................. 240
B.7 Other effects on the microflora .......................................................... 240
B.7.1 Effects on salmonella colonisation .............................................. 240
B.7.2 Other enteric pathogens ............................................................... 242
SOU 1997:132 Contents 7
B.8 Toxicological aspects ......................................................................... 242
B.8.1 Adverse effects in ruminants........................................................ 242
B.8.2 Allergy.......................................................................................... 243
B.9 Environmental effects ........................................................................ 243
B.10 Summary comments ......................................................................... 244

!NNEX # &LAVOMYCIN

C.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 250
C.2 Mode of action and resistance mechanisms ...................................... 250
C.3 Development of resistance ................................................................. 251
C.3.1 Prospective studies ....................................................................... 251
C.3.2 Point-prevalence studies............................................................... 253
C.4 Acquisition of resistance .................................................................... 253
C.4.1 Influence on resistance against other antimicrobials ................... 253
C.5 Effects on specific animal diseases .................................................... 254
C.6 Impact of resistance on animal and human health ............................. 254
C.7 Other effects on the microflora .......................................................... 255
C.7.1 Salmonella.................................................................................... 255
C.7.2 Other enteric pathogens................................................................ 256
C.8 Toxicological aspects ......................................................................... 256
C.8.1 Allergy.......................................................................................... 256
C.9 Environmental effects ........................................................................ 256
C.10 Summary comments ......................................................................... 257

!NNEX$!RDACIN AND AVOPARCIN

D.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 261
D.2 Mode of action and resistance mechanisms ...................................... 261
D.3 Development of resistance ................................................................. 264
D.4 Resistance genes and gene transfer .................................................... 266
D.5 Effects on specific animal diseases .................................................... 272
D.6 Impact of resistance on animal and human health ............................. 272
D.7 Other effects on the microflora .......................................................... 273
D.7.1 Salmonella.................................................................................... 273
D.7.2 Other enteric pathogens ............................................................... 276
D.8 Toxicological aspects ......................................................................... 276
D.9 Environmental effects ........................................................................ 277
D.10 Summary comments......................................................................... 277

!NNEX % 3PIRAMYCIN TYLOSIN AND VIRGINIAMYCIN

E.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 285
E.1.1 Macrolides (tylosin and spiramycin) ............................................ 285
E.1.2 Streptogramins (virginiamycin).................................................... 288
E.2 Mode of action and resistance mechanisms ...................................... 288
E.3 Development of resistance ................................................................. 289
E.3.1 Prospective studies ....................................................................... 290
E.3.2 Retrospective studies .................................................................... 292
E.3.3 Point-prevalence studies............................................................... 292
8 Contents SOU 1997:132
E.4 Resistance genes and acquisition of resistance .................................. 295
E.4.1 Target modification ...................................................................... 297
E.4.2 Enzymatic inactivation................................................................. 302
E.4.3 Active efflux ................................................................................ 302
E.4.4 Co-transfer of resistance genes .................................................... 303
E.4.5 Exposure to AFA and resistance .................................................. 303
E.5 Effects on specific animal diseases .................................................... 304
E.6 Impact of resistance on animal and human health ............................. 306
E.6.1 Consequences of MLS resistance................................................. 306
E.6.2 Influence of AFA usage ............................................................... 306
E.7 Other effects on the microflora .......................................................... 309
E.7.1 Salmonella.................................................................................... 309
E.7.2 Other enteric pathogens................................................................ 311
E.7.3 Other effects ................................................................................. 312
E.8 Toxicological aspects ......................................................................... 312
E.8.1 Residues ....................................................................................... 312
E.8.2 Allergy.......................................................................................... 313
E.8.3 Other immunological effects........................................................ 314
E.9 Environmental effects ........................................................................ 314
E.10 Summary comments ......................................................................... 315

!NNEX & #ARBADOX AND OLAQUINDOX

F.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 327
F.2 Mode of action and resistance mechanisms ...................................... 327
F.3 Development of resistance ................................................................. 329
F.4 Acquisition of resistance .................................................................... 332
F.5 Effects on specific animal diseases .................................................... 333
F.6 Impact of resistance on animal and human health.............................. 335
F.7 Other effects on the microflora .......................................................... 336
F.8 Toxicological aspects ......................................................................... 336
F.8.1 Target species ............................................................................... 336
F.8.2 Adverse effects in humans ........................................................... 337
F.9 Environmental effects......................................................................... 340
F.10 Summary comments ......................................................................... 340

!NNEX ' "UGET SHEETS TO

G.1 Budget sheets for piglet production ................................................... 349
G.2 Budget sheets for pig meat production .............................................. 351
G.3 Budget sheets for egg production ...................................................... 353
G.4 Budget sheets for poultry meat production........................................ 355
SOU 1997:132 9

1 Introduction

1.1The Swedish derogation

In 1986, the Swedish Parliament imposed a ban on antibacterial growth promoters. During the accession negotiations with the European Union Sweden was granted a derrogation from Community legislation concerning the use of antibiotics, chemotherapeutics, coccidiostats and growth promoters as feed additives. Before December 31, 1998 the Commission shall decide on the applications for adjustment to be submitted by Sweden. These applications are to be accompanied by a detailed scientific report on motives for the applications. The decision shall be taken in accordance with the procedures laid down in article 7 of the directive 70/524/EEC concerning additives in feedingstuffs.

In 1995 the Ministry of Agriculture appointed a Commission (Commission on Antimicrobial Feed Additives) to collect and review scientific data which are relevant for a decision on the above mentioned feed additives. Professor Lars-Erik Edqvist was appointed chairman of the commission and Laboratory Veterinary Officer Christina Greko was appointed scientific secretary. Laboratory Veterinary Officer Susanna Sternberg was appointed assisting scientific secretary. The following experts have been appointed to deal with particular areas of the work of the commission: Professors Sigvard Thomke and Klas Elwinger to conduct a scientific review for Chapter 3; Laboratory Veterinary Officer Desirée Jansson to undertake a similar review for Chapter 7 and Associate Professor Ivar Vågsholm to undertake the economic analysis in Chapter 3.

The appointed Commission has gathered the scientific data which it has found appropriate in two reports, one in English (SOU 1997:132) and one in Swedish (SOU 1997:133). The Swedish report is an abstract the English report.

Among the feed additives dealt with, the coccidiostats hold a specific position since they are used to prevent specific diseases and not as growth promoters. They are according to 705/524/EEC classified as medicinal substances. As the indications for use of these substances are specifically to prevent disease, they are treated separately.

Chapters 3-7 of the report provides scientific documentation on hazards and risks of using antibiotics, chemotherapeuticals, coccidiostats and growth promoters as feed additives. In Annexes A-F is a case by case review of substances which are used as feed additives within the European Union. In chapter 8 the assessment of identified hazards is undertaken.

10 1. Introduction SOU 1997:132
SOU 1997:132 11

2 Background

2.1Introduction

Antimicrobials are probably the single most important discovery in the history of medicine. The antimicrobial era began in the 1930s when the first sulphonamides made their way into clinical use in human medicine. Penicillin, the first antibiotic, was discovered in 1929 but was not introduced for therapy until 1940. Shortly after its introduction into human medicine penicillin was used in animals for the treatment of different bacterial diseases. Since these early discoveries, a large number of antimicrobial substances have been discovered or developed. Although some of these drugs have been developed specifically for animal use, the substantial costs for development are often not covered by profits from the veterinary market alone.

Table 2.I. Some terms used and corresponding definitions

4ABELL ) .¥GRA ANV¤NDA TERMER OCH DESSAS DEFINITION

4ERM !BBREVIATION $EFINITION
Antibiotic   Substance produced by a microorganism, with an
    inhibitory effect on other microorganisms
Chemotherapeutical   Chemically synthesised substance with an
    inhibitory effect on microorganisms
Antibacterial   Antibiotic or chemically synthesised substance
    with an inhibitory or lethal effect on bacteria
Antiprotozoal   Antibiotic or chemically synthesised substance
    with an inhibitory or lethal effect on protozoa
Antimicrobial   Substance with an antibacterial and/or
    antiprotozoal effect
Anticoccidial   Antiprotozoal with inhibitory or lethal effect on
    coccidia
Coccidiostat   Anticoccidial used specifically for prevention of
    coccidiosis
Antihistomonal   Antiprotozoal with inhibitory or lethal effect on
    histomonads
Antibacterial feed AFA Antibacterials used as feed additives for the
additives   purpose of performance enhancement
    (corresponds to antibiotics and growth promoters
    in Directive 70/524/EEC)
Medicinal feed MFA Antimicrobials used as feed additive for the
additives   purpose of preventing a specific disease
    (corresponding to medicinal feed additives
    according to Directive 70/524/EEC)
12 2. Background SOU 1997:132

An antibiotic is defined as a substance produced by living micro-organisms that inhibits or kills other micro-organisms. Synthetic antimicrobial substances, such as the sulphonamides and the quinolones, are referred to as chemotherapeuticals. The word ”antimicrobial” (as a noun) is often used to encompass any substance of natural, semi-synthetic or synthetic origin that kills or inhibits the growth of a microorganism. With respect to spectrum of activity, antimicrobial substances may be divided into antibacterial, antiprotozoal, antifungal and antiviral drugs. In the following, the term antibacterial will be used for antibiotics and chemically synthesised substances that have an inhibitory or lethal effect on bacteria. Terms used in the text are defined as shown in table 2.I.

2.2Role of antibacterials in animal husbandry

A better understanding of many aspects of animal husbandry have resulted in a development towards improved productivity. Such factors include the combat of epizootic diseases, control of parasitism, improvements in animal nutrition, genetic improvements and the use of antimicrobials.

Antimicrobial agents are used for three major purposes in domestic animals:

1Therapy, to treat an identified illness

2Prophylaxis, to prevent illness in advance

3Performance enhancement, to increase feed conversion, growth rate or yield

2.2.1Therapeutic and prophylactic use of antibacterials

Therapy usually involves an individual animal or a defined group of diseased animals while prophylactic treatment involves the treatment of a herd or group of animals. The aim of the latter is to prevent diseases that might otherwise occur. A special form of prevention, also called metaphylaxis, is when all animals in a herd or group of animals are medicated, in situations when the proportion of animals diseased during a defined time period reaches a threshold value. In such situations, the probability of most, or all, of the animals getting infected is high. In both therapy and prophylaxis, the drug is administered over a defined, preferably short, period of time and in both instances the drug is used upon prescription by a veterinarian. The dosages used must be high enough so that concentrations that are inhibitory for the infectious agent are reached at the site of infection (e.g. the lung).

The animal diseases currently requiring the most extensive use of therapeutic or prophylactic drugs are respiratory and enteric diseases of pigs

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 13

and calves, and mastitis in dairy cattle. Prophylactic treatment is particularly common during periods when stress is imposed on the animal, e.g.. changes in diet and loss of maternal interaction at weaning, after transport and commingling. Although in recent years much emphasis has been placed on disease prevention through improved management and environmental conditions, intensive animal production systems still depend on antimicrobials, as shown by the continuously growing market for antibacterials.

2.2.2Chemoprophylaxis of protozoal diseases

In the case of certain protozoal diseases, the probability of clinical outbreaks or production losses due to subclinical disease is so high that chemoprevention has become standard practice. The main diseases in question are coccidiosis of poultry and rabbits and histomoniasis of turkeys and pheasants. The appropriate drugs for prophylaxis are referred to as anticoccidials (coccidiostats) and antihistomonals.

Anticoccidials and antihistomonals are medicinal substances preventing specific diseases with a high probability of occurrence. In that respect, they are by definition veterinary medicines. On the other hand, in most parts of the world they are used as standard feed additives and are, from a regulatory point of view, treated as such.

2.2.3 Antibacterials as performance enhancers

The growth-promoting properties of antimicrobials for farm animals were discovered in the late 1940s. Trials where fermentation waste from tetracycline production were fed to chicken as a source of vitamin B12 revealed that the chickens fed the fermentation waste grew more rapidly than did the controls. It was soon found that this effect was not due to the vitamin content of the feed but to residual tetracycline (Stokestad and Jukes, 1949; Stokestad and Jukes, 1950). This growth promoting effect of tetracyclines was soon confirmed for other antibacterials and other animal species.

Growth enhancement in children

The findings of improved growth as an effect of administration of subtherapeutic doses of antibiotics led to investigations on possible similar effects in humans. In 1952, Snelling and Johnson reported lowered morbidity, increased growth rate and shortened hospital stay of premature infants following daily administrations of 50 mg chlortetracycline. Similar results, from a controlled trial in twins and triplets, were also reported by

14 2. Background SOU 1997:132

Robinson (1952). MacDougall (1957) found that low doses of chlortetracycline given to hospitalised malnourished children resulted in, among other effects, improved weight gain. Positive effects on the weight gain of undernourished school children have also been reported (Mackay ET AL , 1956; Guzman ET AL , 1958). MacDougall (1957) concluded that chlortetracyclines could prove a valuable adjunct to dietary therapy in clinical practice under the conditions described. In contrast, both Mackay and co-workers (1956) and Guzmán and co-workers (1958) concluded that there was no justification for considering continued administration of antibacterials to children in underdeveloped areas. Subsequent research with focus on the relative impact of improved nutrition and control of infectious diseases on the growth of children demonstrated, among other things, the

absolute necessity of maintaining adequate nutrition during weaning (Taylor, 1967; Behar ET AL , 1968).

Growth enhancers in animal husbandry

In animal husbandry, the early findings initiated an intensive area of research. The practice of feeding subtherapeutic doses of antibiotics was readily adopted and AFA soon became an integrated part of the systems developed in the animal industry. Apart from increased growth rate and/or increased feed conversion, examples of other observed effects of antimicrobials at low doses are improved egg production in laying hens, increased litter size in sows and increased milk yield of dairy cows. When antimicrobials are used for the latter purposes the term yield promoters has been used. Alternative terms proposed for growth promoters such as ”growth permitters” or ”digestive enhancers” appear misleading. ”Growth permitters” would imply that growth of animals is not permitted without these additives. The term ”digestive enhancers” indicates that the effect of AFA is primarily on the digestion of feed. This is not in line with the, admittedly scarce, knowledge on the mode of action of AFA (see chapter 3).

The various claimed benefits of antibacterial performance enhancers have been listed by the European Animal Health Federation (FEDESA) as:

·To improve feed utilisation

·To improve growth rate

·To improve carcass quality

·To improve rate of throughput of livestock

·To improve farm economics

·To improve building utilisation

·To reduce labour

·To permit economical redeployment of resources

·To help indebtedness of farmers

·To permit controlled production from fewer stock to achieve quotas

·To reduce energy consumption

·To conserve natural fuels

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 15

·To reduce waste

·To reduce environmental contamination

·To reduce livestock numbers and slurry disposal problems

·To improve the environment

(Source: FEDESA 1994 cit. by Colegrave and Wesley, 1995)

The exhaustive nature of this list is due partly to the fact that some effects have been duplicated using different phrasings, and partly to the listing of various secondary and tertiary effects. If feed utilisation and/or growth rate of the animals is improved, the throughput of animals on a specific premise will increase. The latter is equal to improved building utilisation. From this follows an economic benefit, which, for indebted farmers certainly will mean an improvement. Improved use of buildings and feed would, in certain situations, reduce energy consumption which normally is the same as conservation of natural fuels. Reduced waste, reduced slurry disposal problems, reduced environmental contamination and improvement of the environment also appear synonymous and are sequels to improved feed

utilisation. The statement ”improved carcass quality” is doubtful. In some cases, a higher fat content of the carcass has been noted (FiemsET AL, 1995).

A list encompassing only the primary effects attributed to of AFA would read:

·Prevention of disease

·Improved feed utilisation

·Improved growth rate

2.3Community legislation

2.3.1 Antibiotics and growth promoters

In the EU, feed additives (AFA and MFA) are regulated separately from veterinary medicines (including medicated feed).

Approval of feed additives is co-ordinated through Directorate General VI of the European Commission. The basic Council Directive concerning AFA is 70/524/EEC, with amendments (especially 84/587/EEC and 96/51/EC).

Certain provisions of the latest amendment will be in force on April 1 1998 and the remaining provisions by October 1 1999.

When the ”5th amendment” (Council Directive 96/51/EC) takes force, some important changes will follow. Approvals of high technology additives will be brand-specific. The responsibilities of all involved parties have been clearly defined. Further, possibilities of periodical renewal of authorisations are provided.

16 2. Background SOU 1997:132

In article 3 of this Directive (formerly Article 7 of Directive 84/587/EEC) important conditions that must be fulfilled are listed.

It should be noted that, although the phrasing of some of the conditions has been altered (cf. Article 7, 2A of 84/587/EEC), the spirit is essentially the same as in the directive presently in force.

$IRECTIVE %%# AS AMENDED IN %# !RTICLE A

#OMMUNITY AUTHORISATION OF AN ADDITIVE SHALL BE GIVEN ONLY IF

A WHEN USED IN ANIMAL NUTRITION IT HAS ONE OF THE EFFECTS REFERRED TO IN !RTICLE A

B TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE CONDITIONS OF USE IT DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT HUMAN OR ANIMAL HEALTH OR THE ENVIRONMENT NOR HARM THE CONSUMER BY ALTERING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS

C ITS PRESENCE CAN BE MONITORED

AS AN ADDITIVE PER SEIN PREMIXTURES

IN FEEDINGSTUFFS OR WHERE APPROPRIATE IN FEED MATERIALS

D AT THE LEVEL PERMITTED TREATMENT OR PREVENTION OF ANIMAL DISEASE IS EXCLUDED THIS CONDITION DOES NOT APPLY TO ADDITIVES BELONGING TO THE GROUP OF COCCIDIOSTATS AND OTHER MEDICINAL SUBSTANCES

E FOR SERIOUS REASONS CONCERNING HUMAN OR ANIMAL HEALTH ITS USE MUST NOT BE RESTRICTED TO MEDICAL OR VETERINARY PURPOSES

)N ARTICLE OF THIS DIRECTIVE FAVOURABLE EFFECTS OF ADDITIVES ARE SPECIFIED

According to Council Directive 95/69/EC, establishments where AFA are produced or mixed need specific approval.

Council Directive 94/40/EEC (amending 87/153/EEC), presently under revision, fixes standard data requirements for dossiers used to support approval of additives, so called guidelines. Specified data with relevance for the conditions cited above are to be provided.

After consulting the Member States in the Standing Committee, and evaluation by the Scientific Committee of Animal Nutrition (SCAN) the Commission may, if the substance if found to meet the requirements of the directives, be authorised for use.

If, as the result of new information or a reassessment of existing information, a Member State has specific grounds for establishing that the use of one of the authorised additives (or its use in specified conditions) constitutes a danger to animal or human health or the environment, the Member State may temporarily suspend or restrict the application (so called ”safe guard clause”, Article 11 of Council Directive 70/524/EEC). The other Member States and the Commission shall immediately be notified and informed of the reasons for the decision. The Commission shall examine the grounds cited by the member state and consult the Member States. The

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 17

Commission shall then deliver its opinion and take appropriate measures. If any of the conditions laid down in the article cited above are no longer met, a regulation shall be adopted to withdraw the additive.

Presently authorised AFA (annex I or II of 70/524/EEC) are bacitracin, flavomycin, avoparcin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin, carbadox, olaquindox, monensin, salinomycin and avilamycin (table 2.II). Ardacin has been approved under Annex II but the authorisation is not expected to be prolonged.

A number of additives have, since the original list in 1970, been withdrawn from the list of authorised additives because of a decision to restrict certain antibiotics to therapeutic use (e.g. penicillin, streptomycin and tetracyclines) .

2.3.2Coccidiostats and other medicinal feed additives

The anticoccidial agents authorised for use in poultry within the EU (Council Directive 70/524/EC) are listed in Table 2.III. Apart from being used as anticoccidials in poultry some coccidiostats are also approved for the prevention of coccidiosis in rabbits. Some ionophores are also approved for growth promotion (see table 2.II). The other medicinal substances include the antihistomonals which are mainly used in turkeys.

18 2. Background SOU 1997:132

Table 2.II. Antibacterial feed additives authorised for growth promotion, including most of the applications (Council Directive 70/524/EEC)

4ABELL )) !NTIBAKTERIELLA FODERTILLSATSER GODK¤NDA SOM TILLV¤XTBEFR¤MJANDE MEDEL SAMT FLERTALET GODK¤NDA APPLIKATIONER R¥DSDIREKTIV %%'

3UBSTANCE !NIMAL SPECIES -AXIMUM -IN MAX %XAMPLES OF OTHER
  OR CATEGORY AGE CONTENT PROVISIONS
      MG KG  
!.4)")/4)#3        
!VILAMYCIN piglets 4 months 20-40  
  slaughter pigs 4-6 months 10-20  
  chickens   2.5-10  
"ACITRACIN layers   15-100  
ZINC turkeys 4 weeks 5-50  
BACITRACIN turkeys 26 weeks 5-20  
  other poultry 16 weeks 5-20 certain species excepted
  piglets 4 months 5-50  
  calves 16 weeks 5-50  
  calves 6 months 5-20  
&LAVO layers   2-5  
PHOSPHOLIPOL turkeys 26 weeks 1-20  
FLAVOMYCIN other poultry 16 weeks 1-20 certain species excepted
BAMBERMYCINS piglets 3 months 10-25 milkreplacements only
  slaughter pigs 6 months 1-20  
  calves 6 months 6-16  
  beef   2-10  
3PIRAMYCIN turkeys 26 weeks 5-20  
  other poultry 16 weeks 5-20 certain species excepted
  calves 16 weeks 5-50  
    6 months 5-80 milkreplacements only
  piglets 4 months 5-50  
  slaughter pigs 6 months 5-20  
4YLOSIN piglets 4 months 10-40  
TYLOSIN   6 months 5-20  
PHOSPHATE        
6IRGINIAMYCIN layers   20  
  turkeys 26 weeks 5-20  
  other poultry 16 weeks 5-20 certain species excepted
  piglets 4 months 5-50  
  slaughter pigs 6 months 5-20  
  calves 16 weeks 5-50  
  beef   15-40  
-ONENSIN beef   10-40  
3ALINOMYCIN piglets 4 months 30-60  
  slaughter pigs 6 months 15-30  
'2/74( 02/-/4%23      
#ARBADOX piglets 4 months 20-50 withdrawal time 28 days
/LAQUINDOX piglets 4 months 15-50 withdrawal time 28 days
  piglets 4 months 50-100 milkreplacements only
SOU 1997:132 2. Background 19

Table 2.III. Coccidiostats and other medicinal substances authorised as feedadditives within the European Union (Council directive 70/524/EEC)

4ABELL ))) +OCCIDIOSTATIKA OCH ANDRA MEDICINSKA SUBSTANSER GODK¤NDA SOM FODERTILLSATSER INOM DEN %UROPEISKA 5NIONEN R¥DSDIREKTIV

'ENERIC NAME 3PECIES CATEGORY -AXIMUM #ONTENT IN 7ITH
    AGE FEED DRAWAL
      MG KG DAYS
!MPROLIUM poultry from laying 62.5-125 3
    onwards    
!MPROLIUM chickens for laying, from laying 66.5-133 3
ETHOPABATE turkeys, guinea fowls onwards    
!RPRINOCID chickens   60 5
  chickens for laying 16 weeks 60 5
$ECOQUINATE chickens for fattening   20-40 3
$ICLAZURIL chickens for fattening   1 5
$INITOLMIDE poultry from laying 62.5-125 3
$/4   onwards    
(ALOFUGINONE chickens for fattening   2-3 5
  turkeys 12 weeks 2-3 5
,ASALOCID chickens for fattening   75-125 5
  chickens for laying 16 weeks 75-125  
  turkeys 12 weeks 90-125 5
-ADURAMICIN chickens for fattening   5 5
-ETICLORPINDOL chickens for fattening laying and 125 5
  guinea fowl onwards 125 5
  rabbits   125-200 5
-ETICLOPRINDOL chickens for fattening   110 5
METHYLBENZOQUAT chickens for laying 16 weeks 110 -
  turkeys 12 weeks 110 5
-ONENSIN chickens for fattening   100-125 3
  chickens for laying 16 weeks 100-120  
  turkeys 16 weeks 90-100 3
.ARASIN chickens for fattening   60-70 5
.ARASIN chickens for fattening   80-100 7
NICARBAZIN        
.ICARBAZIN chickens for fattening 4 weeks 100-125 9
2OBENIDINE chickens for fattening   30-36 5
  turkeys   30-36 5
  rabbits   50-66 5
3ALINOMYCIN chickens for fattening   50-70 5
3EMDURAMICIN chickens for fattening   25 5
/4(%2 -%$)#).!, 35"34!.#%3      
$IMETRIDAZOL turkeys from laying on 100-200 6
  guinea fowl from laying on 125-150 6
)PRONIDAZOL turkeys from laying on 50-85 6
2ONIDAZOL turkeys from laying on 60-90 6
.IFURSOL turkeys   50-75 5
20 2. Background SOU 1997:132

2.4Current Swedish legislation

2.4.1Antibiotics and growth promoters

The basic Swedish legislation with relevance for AFA and medicinal feed additives is the Feedingstuffs Act (SFS 1985:295), that came into force in 1986. According to this act, antibiotics and chemotherapeuticals may only be incorporated in animal feed for the purpose of preventing, alleviating or curing disease, i.e. not for growth or yield promoting purposes.

2.4.2Coccidiostats and other antiprotozoals

In Sweden, as in other countries, the coccidiosis control in broilers relies primarily on coccidiostats. The drugs approved in Sweden for this purpose are listed in table 2.IV.

In accordance with the Feedingstuffs Act, coccidiostats are available as pharmaceutical specialities (veterinary medicinal products), on veterinary prescription only. As a result of the legislative changes in 1986, some coccidiostats earlier approved as feed additives are today instead authorised for use as medicated feed.

Table 2.IV. Coccidiostats approved as pharmaceutical specialities in Sweden

4ABELL )6 +OCCIDIOSTATIKA GODK¤NDA SOM L¤KEMEDEL I 3VERIGE

'ENERIC NAME 3PECIES -AXIMUM #ONTENT IN FEED 7ITH
(ATCvet code) CATEGORY AGE MG KG DRAWAL
        TIME
        DAYS
!MPROLIUM chickens for 14 weeks 125+8 in starter feed, 3
ETHOPABATE laying   75+4.8 in grower feed  
(QP51A X59)      
       
(ALOFUGINONE poultry   3 3
(QP51A X08)        
,ASALOCID chickens for   75-125 3
(QP51 A H02) fattening      
-ADURAMICIN chickens for   5 3
(QP51A X10) fattening      
-ONENSIN chickens for   100-120 3
(QP51A H03) fattening      
.ARASIN chickens for   70 3
(QP51A H04) fattening      
SOU 1997:132 2. Background 21

Ronidazole (Ridzola® vet.) and dimetridazole (Emtryl® vet.) were approved as pharmaceutical specialities for use against swine dysentery and, for dimetridazole, also against histomoniasis in poultry, until 1995. Ronidazole and dimetridazole were then withdrawn from the market in accordance with the provisions of the Committee of Veterinary Medicinal Products (CVMP). Ipronidazole has never been approved in Sweden.

2.4.3Antibacterials for use in therapy or prophylaxis

Antibacterials for use in animals are authorised by the Medical Products Agency. Withdrawal times, based on the maximum residue limits (MRL) fixed by the CVMP, are assigned by the National Food Administration. All antibacterials, including dermatological and other formulations, for use in animals are available on prescription only.

Veterinary prescriptions are subject to the regulations of the Medical Products Agency. All veterinarians are under the supervision of the Swedish Board of Agriculture, that also issue regulations pertinent to antibacterials. The general veterinary regulations of the Board of Agriculture (LSFS 1982:43) state that ”the usage of medicinal products shall be well motivated. When choosing type and dosage of a medicinal product the risk of residues in food of animal origin shall be taken into account”. Further, in the regulations for veterinarians with special reference to prescriptions of medicinal products (LSFS 1979:8), it is stated that ”prescribing and handing out medicinal products shall be done with great restrictivity and only when the need is apparent...”. According to the same regulations, medicinal products may, on each occasion, be prescribed or handed out only after careful examination of the diseased animal or herd, on the premises, except in the case of general prophylactic measures other than antibiotics and chemotherapeuticals, or if other special circumstances are at hand.

Regarding medicated feed, the provisions of Directive 90/167/EEC are implemented.

Of the antibacterials authorised as feed additives in the EU, tylosin and virginiamycin are presently available in Sweden for use in medicated feed. Olaquindox was withdrawn from the market in 1997. Spiramycin is authorised for use in food animals for injections only.

2.4.4Distribution of medicinal products

All prescriptions and deliveries of drugs are administered by the pharmacies which all belong to Apoteksbolaget (The National Corporation of Swedish Pharmacies). This means that all prescriptions of drugs for therapeutic use,

22 2. Background SOU 1997:132

including those mixed by the feed mills, are handled by the Swedish pharmacies. From the above follows that veterinarians are not allowed to sell or dispense medicinal products but may, for practical reasons, hand out the products to the end-user. In such cases, the quantity delivered may only satisfy the need for treatment of the animal or group of animals in question.

2.4.5Control

The manufacturing of animal feed is supervised by the Board of Agriculture. As part of the supervision, annual statistics on quantities of feed delivered and on specifics such as medicated feed are gathered.

All veterinarians are, as mentioned, subject to supervision by the Board of Agriculture. On a regional level, the County veterinarian (an official employee) is in charge of supervision of the work of the veterinarians, animal welfare and disease control. Traditionally, most of the veterinarians in food animal practice are employed by the Board of Agriculture. However, private practice in food animals is becoming more common.

Sales statistics of antibacterials for use in animals is an indirect way of control. As mentioned above, the Board of Agriculture gathers annual statistics on sales of medicated feed. The National Veterinary Institute has, based on data provided by Apoteksbolaget, calculated the total sales of antibacterials for veterinary use in Sweden (see 2.6). Recently, Apoteksbolaget has initiated yearly surveys of all veterinary prescriptions of medicated feed. By combining these three sources of statistics, the surveillance is maximised. Discrepancies or undesired trends may be detected and their causes found and corrected (see 2.6.5).

2.5.The Swedish ban

2.5.1The preambles

Similar to the situation in other countries, some Swedish scientists viewed the practice of routine addition of antibacterials to animal feeds with scepticism. The knowledge of the transmissibility of resistance between bacteria through plasmids led to exhortations for a restrictive use of antibacterials in animals (Rutqvist, 1970). Following the recommendations of the Swann Committee in the UK, a broader debate was initiated, which eventually led to a reassessment of the use of antibacterials as feed additives (LBS, 1977).

A working group of the Board of Agriculture concluded, among other things, that ”the use of AFA entails a risk of increased resistance in bacteria but as the substances in use are mainly active against gram-positive bacteria

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 23

from which resistance is not transferred, the impact of such development is negligible”. On the other hand, a negative attitude to all kinds of additives among consumers was noted by the group. The benefits, in terms of increased production and prevention of certain diseases, were also acknowledged (LBS, 1977). Legislative changes, especially in the requirements for approval, were proposed in order to mitigate possible risks.

At the same time, the farmers were growing increasingly sceptical towards feed antibiotics. They were concerned that the continued use of antibiotics might harm consumer confidence. The Federation of Swedish Farmers (LRF) made a policy statement, declaring that Swedish agriculture aimed towards a more restricted and controlled use of antibiotics. In a letter to the Ministry of Agriculture in 1984, the LRF requested a ban on the use of antibacterials as feed additives.

In response to the above, the Ministry of Agriculture drafted a new Feedingstuffs Act (Government Bill 1984/85:146, Swedish Government). Among other things, the draft proposed that the use of antibacterials in feed should be restricted to treatment, prevention or cure of diseases, i.e. their use for growth promotion should not be allowed. The grounds cited for this amendment was the risk for increased resistance, especially the risk for cross-resistance to other substances and the risk of increased susceptibility of animals to salmonella and other enteric pathogens.

The Feedingstuffs Act was accepted by the parliament in November 1985 and came into force in January 1986 (SFS 1985:295).

2.5.2Effects on animal health

The effects of the ban on AFA on animal health has recently been reviewed by Wierup (1996). In essence, the following is based on his review.

Calves

In the 60s and 70s different AFA (bacitracin, flavomycin, oleandomycin, spiramycin) were used in concentrate and milk replacers for calves. However, the effect was considered doubtful and documented improvements

in animal growth was not always seen in repeated experiments (e.g. Jonson and Jacobsson, 1973; WierupET AL, 1975). Due to this scepticism, the use of

AFA in calf rearing had more or less come to an end before the ban in 1986. Negative clinical or other effects as a consequence of the ban have not been reported.

24 2. Background SOU 1997:132

Chickens

The antibacterial feed additive nitrovin came into use in the 70s and through this, existing problems with necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens were almost completely eliminated. Later, nitrovin was gradually replaced by avoparcin. Reports on an effect of avoparcin on salmonella colonisation and excretion (e.g. Smith and Tucker, 1978; Smith and Tucker, 1980) gave rise to concern, as the broiler production put considerable efforts into the salmonellosis control programme. This prompted a change from avoparcin to virginiamycin in the early 80s. In the autumn of 1985 (before the ban), outbreaks of necrotic enteritis were reported with increasing frequency. This was dealt with by increasing the dosage of virginiamycin from 10 to 20 ppm.

At the time of the ban, the chicken producers identified the occurrence of clinical or subclinical necrotic enteritis as the main problem to tackle. A committee with representatives of the producers, the feed industry and veterinarians from animal health areas as well as from the meat inspection services was put together. The aim of the committee was to initiate studies and to suggest appropriate solutions to the problem. It was agreed that a transition period would be necessary and that virginiamycin would be prescribed during this period, in the dose of 20 ppm.

Field trials where no medicated feed was used indicated that a number of factors needed correction. It was concluded that the construction and climate of stables, hygiene, management and feed composition all contribute to the occurrence of necrotic enteritis in broiler production. Further, it was found that coccidiostats of the ionophore type also prevent necrotic enteritis. Strong emphasis was placed on improving animal environment because many diseases, including necrotic enteritis, have a multifactorial background. A special bonus was given for good animal management and care which also led to improvements in the total level of quality of the production.

In 1988, all prophylactic medications were abandoned and, in case of outbreaks, a two day treatment with phenoxymethyl penicillin in the drinking water was applied. The amount of active substance of antibiotics which was used for treatment decreased from about 2 000 kg of virginiamycin in 1987 to 100 kg of phenoxymethyl penicillin in 1988 (expressed as active substance, Wierup, 1989). Today the need for such treatment of necrotic enteritis is more or less completely eliminated.

More formal, scientific studies were also initiated to find alternative ways to control necrotic enteritis. Studies on animal feed included effects of enzymes and certain probiotics, the structure of the feed, different levels of protein and different sources of proteins and coccidiostats (Elwinger and Teglöf, 1991; Elwinger ET AL , 1992; Elwinger ET AL , 1994; Elwinger ET AL , 1996).

The results indicated that additions of enzymes acting on carbohydrates and the addition of certain probiotics to develop an adequate intestinal

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 25

bacterial flora reduced the incidence of necrotic enteritis. Dietary levels of protein were reduced and amino acids were added which also resulted in an improved hygiene and health.

In retrospect the most important changes were related to feed, involving a reduction of protein content, a higher fibre content and supplementation with enzymes together with the utilisation of ionophores for prevention of coccidiosis. The feeding strategies employed were developed through close collaboration between the feed industry and the farmers.

As mentioned, the coccidiostats of the ionophore type that are now used do have antibacterial effects and act prophylactically against necrotic enteritis. However, the sanitary situation of broiler chicken rearing in Sweden today would not have been reached without the above mentioned enforcements.

After the ban, coccidiostats were prescribed as medicated feed. Close monitoring of the efficiency of coccidiostats was introduced in Sweden in 1986. Since 1991, the efficiency of the drugs is studied by lesion scoring (according to methods described by Johnson and Reid, 1970) in approximately 5% of the Swedish broiler flocks, representative of all individual feed mills. The results are used for surveillance of the coccidiosis situation and to adapt the coccidiostatic regimen accordingly. In addition, all broiler flocks are under direct veterinary supervision as part of the salmonella control programme.

Egg production

AFA have never been authorised for use in laying hens in Sweden. Consequently, the ban in 1986 had no impact on the egg production. Following the ban, coccidiostats were prescribed as medicated feed to replacement birds. This practice is now being gradually replaced by the use of vaccines.

Turkeys

The situation for turkey producing units was similar to that for production of broiler chickens. Before 1986, AFA were used for prevention of necrotic enteritis. The ban did not result in noticeable clinical problems or reduced growth rate.

Weaner pigs

Before 1986, practically all piglets were given AFA (olaquindox or carbadox), from weaning until delivery to the finishing units at the age of 10- 12 weeks. Slaughter pigs were, to a lesser extent, given AFA (avoparcin or virginiamycin) until slaughter.

26 2. Background SOU 1997:132

Production averages from 220 piglet producing herds from the years 1985 and 1986 have been assessed statistically (Robertsson and Lundeheim, 1994). For piglet production, problems emerged as a consequence of the removal of olaquindox which was used for weaning piglets. However, the pre-weaning piglet mortality, and the number of piglets produced per sow and year, did not show significant differences between the two years. In contrast, postweaning mortality was significantly higher (p<0.001), about 1.5 percentage units, during 1986 than in 1985. The time to reach 25 kg increased by 5-6 days. Total efforts to prevent post-weaning diarrhoea, including advisory and preventive measures and treatments, increased four-fold. Data from units which were used for the above evaluation has now also been evaluated for the 10-year period 1986-1995. A comparison of the average values for 1994- 1995 and 1986-1987 reveals post-weaning mortality to have decreased with 0.9 percentage units and the age at 25 kg to have been reduced by 1-2 days (Wierup, 1996).

In connection with the ban of AFA it became obvious that clear guidelines for veterinarians on how to prescribe antibiotics as medicated feed were lacking. Such guidelines were adopted by the Swedish Veterinary Association in 1990 (SVS). The guidelines emphasise that the prescription of feed antibiotics should always be based on a diagnosis together with a thorough evaluation of contributory factors and accompanied by recommendations on hygienic and other prophylactic measures.

In a study from 1994, Holmgren and Lundeheim analysed the results from 55 piglet producing units in the western part of Sweden. They concluded that the medicated feed prescribed to weaning pigs was clinically motivated and in accordance with the guidelines formulated by the SVS. The need for medicated feed differed markedly between herds and this could be ascribed to weaning and management systems. The production results were highly correlated to the rearing systems and to the level of hygiene. In herds rearing post weaning pigs on deep litter bedding the use of medicated feeds was three to four times lower than in herds with pigs in traditional post weaning pens. The study also underlines the problem with preventing weaning diarrhoea in units with limited facilities to arrange satisfactory sectioning and hygiene.

Efforts have also been undertaken to make adjustments in the composition of pig feed. The most prominent changes have been a lowering of the protein content, use of water soluble fibres and supplementation with amino acids (Göransson ET AL , 1995). An antisecretory factor, preventing liquid penetration to the gut induced by enterotoxin, has also been explored as a preventive measure (Göransson ET AL , 1993).

A notable effect on weaning diarrhoea through addition of high levels of zinc oxide has been reported (Holm, 1989; Poulsen, 1995). Zinc oxide has a preventive effect on weaning diarrhoea equal to the effect which is reached

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 27

when using olaquindox (Holmgren, 1994b). Since 1992, zinc oxide is approved for incorporation into piglet feed, at 2000 ppm of zinc. Not all piglet feed contains high levels of zinc, as many producers do not experience problems with weaning diarrhoea. The intention was that the use of zinc oxide would only be temporary, until other measures to prevent weaning diarrhoea had been developed. Presently, the long term impact of the use of zinc oxide is under debate, and the Board of Agriculture is currently considering a phase-out and subsequent ban on the use of zinc oxide in high doses.

After the ban of AFA numerous measures have been, and are continuously, undertaken to optimise rearing and production systems and to employ available techniques (e.g. sectioning of buildings, age segregation, planned production). The ban also stimulated a development towards new rearing systems. The weaning of piglets on deep litter in large groups is one example and the so called birth-to-slaughter system which is based on production in the same pen from birth to slaughter is another. The adjustment of old buildings and pens to the new production system is expensive and until such adjustments can be done antibiotics are used to combat weaning diarrhoea in some units.

The experiences from the clinical problems which emerged after the ban indicate that single environmental or rearing measures are seldom enough to correct the situation. A combination of efforts aiming towards a healthorientated production system is often necessary. Many problems have been solved while others await solution.

Slaughter pigs

The ban of AFA did not create obvious clinical problems for growing or finishing pigs. The production results from this sector are comparable to those from, for example, the Danish production (source: Advisory Service Optima).

2.6Sales of antibacterials for veterinary use in Sweden

2.6.1Materials and methods

Data for 1980-1993 have been compiled from earlier publications (Wierup ET AL , 1987; Björnerot ET AL , 1996). For the years 1994-1996, data have been calculated from the same sources as these authors have used (see table 2.V).

All data on pharmaceutical specialities are based on the sales statistics in the Central Statistics System of Apoteksbolaget (National Corporation of Swedish Pharmacies). This system contains registers of all sales from the

28 2. Background SOU 1997:132

wholesalers to the local pharmacies (all belonging to Apoteksbolaget), and to the feed companies. As all pharmaceutical specialities are distributed from these wholesalers to local pharmacies or to authorised feed companies, these figures represent the total consumption in Sweden.

The local pharmacies normally have short storage periods for these products, so it can be assumed that the products sold were also consumed during the respective periods.

With regard to antibacterials used as feed additives before 1986, data has been gathered from the Board of Agriculture. Additionally, for 1980-1993 data on sales of unlicenced pharmaceutical specialities, sold with special permission from the Medical Products Agency were gathered from the respective pharmaceutical companies.

The antibacterials included are pharmaceutical specialities approved for general or local use in veterinary medicine (ATCvet1 code QJ01, QJ51, QA07A, QG01A, QP51AA and QP51AG). For 1980-1993, preparations for dermatologic use (ATCvet code QD06, QD07C, QS02C) are also included. For 1980-1984, feed additives not approved as pharmaceutical specialities and thus not delivered through pharmacies were also included. Thus, the statistics show the total amount of antibacterials sold by pharmacies or delivered by feed mills during the specified time period. It was assumed that the whole amount sold was used for animals. The figures include antibacterials for all animal species (food animals, fish, pets and horses).

All data are expressed as kilogram of active substance. In formerly published data, the weight of the procaine part of procaine penicillin was included in the presentations. As the procaine part of the molecule is not active in an antibiotic sense, procaine penicillin has been calculated to benzyl penicillin as 0.6 times the weight of procaine penicillin. Further, some corrections have been made of erroneous macrolide figures.

2.6.2Total consumption

The total usage of antibacterials is presented in table 2.Va. For clarity, table 2.Vb lists examples of pharmaceutical specialities included in the different groups in table 2.Va.

Since 1986, the total usage has decreased from a mean on 45 tonnes/year during 1980-1984 to 20 tonnes in 1996 (a decrease by 55%). The total sales of formulations intended for treatment of groups of animals, i.e. through feed or water, was about 6 tonnes in 1996 (sum of figures in table 2.VI). This means that more than two thirds of the total consumption in 1996 was in the

1 ATC = Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 29

form of formulations for treatment of individual animals (e.g. parenteral drugs, intramammaries or tablets).

As the different substances in question are not equal in their biological activity per weight unit, total figures might be misleading (i.e. if a substance requiring high dosages for full efficacy is replaced by a more active substance, a false impression of a reduction could be given). Therefore, each substance group should be assessed separately for trends.

Of the pharmaceutical specialities that were authorised at the time of the ban, the sales of G- and V-penicillins, macrolides and trimethoprimsulphonamides have increased over time. Among the penicillins, only formulations suitable for treatment of single animals (parenteral drugs, tablets) are presently approved. The group consists mainly of formulations for injection and are therefore assumed to be used largely for the treatment of mastitis in dairy cattle (Nilsson and Greko, 1997).

Similarly, the trimethoprim-sulphonamides are only available for treatment of individual animals. About 15 to 20 years ago, the main indication for trimethoprim-sulphonamides in pigs, namely neonatal piglet diarrhoea, was very common. However, due to improved management and housing conditions in combination with efficient vaccines, neonatal piglet diarrhoea is no longer a major clinical problem. The observed increase in consumption is therefore likely to be derived from an increased usage of trimethoprimsulphonamides in dairy cows and lately, following the introduction of formulations for oral use, in horses.

Although the amount of macrolides sold as formulations for injection increased in the beginning of the 90s (Nilsson and Greko, 1997), the major part of this increase derives from macrolides for oral use (mixed in feed or water). This increase, and that of the pleuromutilins, is believed to reflect an increase in the incidence of swine dysentery (the major indication for those drugs). The increase during 1995 and 1996 is likely to be explained by the fact that the nitroimidazoles, the third category of drugs (formerly) available for this indication, were withdrawn from the market in 1995.

The usage of tetracyclines and aminoglycosides has decreased. The changes in the latter group is partly explained by a decrease in usage of the combination of penicillin and dihydrostreptomycin. The usage of tetracyclines will be further commented on below.

The consumption of substances formerly approved as feed additives and subsequent to the ban approved as therapeuticals (quinoxalines and streptogramins) has decreased substantially in spite of higher doses being given for therapy than for growth promotion.

Table 2.Va. Total animal usage of antibacterials in animals Sweden during 1980-1996 expressed as kg active substance (Data for 1980-1993 from Wierup ET AL , 1987; Björnerot ET AL , 1996 and for 1994-1996 Greko, unpublished)

4ABELL 6A 4OTAL F¶RBRUKNING AV ANTIBIOTIKA F¶R ANV¤NDNING TILL DJUR UTTRYCKT SOM KG AKTIV SUBSTANS $ATA FR¥N

FR¥N 7IERUP ET AL "J¶RNEROT ET AL OCH FR¥N 'R EKO OPUBLICERAT

!CTIVE SUBSTANCE 9EAR(kg active substance)                        
                                 
G and V penicillins1   3232 4153 4788 5934 7144 7007 7414 7423 7446 8301 10374 9082 8555  
Aminopenicillins 60 248 714 540 655 681 738 769 837 859 941 928 829  
Aminoglycosides 5274 4776 5608 2885 3194 2823 2539 2255 2139 1938 1696 1342 1066  
Tetracyclines 9819 10765 12955 6585 4691 4624 4572 5414 8023 8815 7730 4968 2733  
Macrolides 603 616 887 1144 1205   1156 1399 1478 1701 1562 1701 1803 1486  
Fluoroquinolones           1 84 123 147 173 246 200 173  
Sulphonamides 6600 4931 4325 3093 3072 2988 2510 2372 2362 2045 2323 2135 2198  
Trimethoprim incl. derivatives 134 142 186 197 250 282 272 257 284 303 352 331 339  
Pleuromutilins         124 140 229 236 268 384 465 889 1142  
Quinoxalines2 6250 7700 9900 1300 7164 7202 5778 5128 4917 3523 1904 1191 1098  
Streptogramins2 0 0 8800 1610 1088 2388 2413 1350 1275 550 600 575 525  
Feed additives3 8380 9370 700 870                      
Other substances4 918 869 1688 1616 1603 1871 2326 2666 1644 1627 1915 1125 163  
TOTAL 41270 43570 50551 25774 30190 31164 30274 29274 31043 30080 30247 24569 20307  

1Procaine penicillin has been calculated to and expressed as bensylpenicinllin as 0.6 times total weight of procaine penicillin

2For 1980-1984 used as feed additives, 1986-1996 on veterinary prescription only at therapeutic dosages

3Including avoparcin, bacitracin, nitrovin, oleandomycin and spiramycin

4For 1980-1995 mainly nitroimidazoles (withdrawn in 1995)

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 31

Table 2.Vb. Explanations of groups in main table (table 2.Va)

4ABELL 6B &¶RKLARINGAR TILL DE GRUPPER SOM ING¥R I TABELL 6A

!CTIVE SUBSTANCE %XAMPLES OF SUBSTANCES INCLUDED

G and V penicillins procaine penicillin, benzyl penicillin, phenoxymethyl
  penicillin
Aminopenicillins ampicillin, amoxicillin
Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin, gentamicin, neomycin
Tetracyclines oxitetracycline, chlortetracycline
Macrolides spiramycin, tylosin
Fluoroquinolones enrofloxacin
Sulphonamides sulphadiazine, sulphadoxine, formolsulphatiazole
Trimethoprim incl. derivatives trimethoprim, baquiloprim
Pleuromutilins tiamulin
Quinoxalines olaquindox, carbadox
Streptogramins virginiamycin
Feed additives avoparcin, bacitracin, nitrovin, oleandomycin and
  spiramycin as feed additive for growth promotion
Other substances nitroimidazoles, clindamycin, cephalosporins
   

2.6.3Flock treatment

Of special interest is the consumption of antibacterials intended for group or flock medication. When considering the risk for development of resistance, it is unimportant whether these medications take place by feed or water.

Sales data on formulations of antibacterials intended for such use have therefore been extracted from the data on total consumption shown in table 2.Va for the years 1993-1996. In table VI, some trends can be observed. The consumption of tetracyclines and quinoxalines has decreased sharply during the period. The usage of macrolides and streptogramins show only minor fluctuations. The pleuromutilins seem to have replaced the nitroimidazoles following the withdrawal from the market of the latter substances in 1995.

Olaquindox

Olaquindox is exclusively used in pigs. The only indication is diarrhoea around weaning but some off label use against swine dysentery is likely to occur. The usage of olaquindox was reduced by 82% (total quantity of active substance per number of pigs produced) from 1985 to 1987. Thereafter, however, more antibiotics were prescribed and the total amount used during the subsequent years 1988 and 1989 was 5 and 6%, respectively, higher than

32 2. Background SOU 1997:132

in 1985 (Björnerot ET AL , 1996). Considering that the dosage prescribed in from 1986 and onwards was about three times higher than the AFA dosage employed before, a smaller fraction of the weaning pigs was treated with olaquindox. Calculated this way, the proportion of pigs that were treated was 12% in 1986 and 76% in 1989 and 12% in 1995 (Wierup, 1996). As mentioned, olaquindox is no longer available in Sweden.

Table 2.VI. Sales of formulations of antibacterials intended for treatment of animals through feed or water (flock or group medications) during 1993- 1996 expressed as kg active substance

4ABELL 6) &¶RS¤LJNING AV BEREDNINGSFORMER AV ANTIBAKTERIELLA MEDEL AVSEDDA F¶R BEHANDLING VIA FODER ELLER VATTEN FLOCK ELLER GRUPPMEDICINERING UNDER UTTRYCKT SOM KG AKTIV SUBSTANS

           
!4#VET CODE !CTIVE SUBSTANCE 9EAR      
           
QJ01AA Tetracyclines 8106 7036 4243 2088
QJ01FA Macrolides 959 791 1029 975
QJ01XX91 Streptogramins 550 600 575 525
QJ01XX92 Pleuromutilins 344 422 815 1069
QJ01MA Fluoroquinolones 13 30 31 27
QJ01MB Quinoxalines 3523 1904 1191 1098
QP51AA Nitroimidazoles 1490 1764 953 0

2.6.4Coccidiostats

The combination of amprolium and ethopabate has been the drug of choice for prevention of coccidiosis in chickens intended for laying in Sweden. During the last few years, this product has been largely replaced by vaccination of replacement breeders.

For broilers, a limited number of ionophores have been available to the during the past ten years. Narasin is, by far, the most widely applied product.

The total usage of anticoccidials in feed has been calculated from the same sources as the antibacterials (see 2.6.1). Presently, approximately 13 500 kg active substance of coccidiostats is used annually in Sweden. The quantities in kg active substance sold from 1980-1996 have then been calculated to tonnes medicated feed on basis of recommended dosages. For the year 1986, an apparent error in the reports to the Board of Agriculture was discovered. Therefore, all figures for that year have been excluded. In figure 2, the results are compared with the number of broiler chickens produced in Sweden are shown in figure 2.I.

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 33

2.6.5Some comments on the Swedish consumption statistics

The consumption statistics from Sweden show that the usage of antibacterials in animals can, and has been, reduced substantially. Little data are available on consumption statistics other than from the Nordic countries. Comparisons between countries are difficult, as no generally accepted method of correcting for differing numbers of animals of different species is available. The total numbers of animals in Sweden during 1988-1995 are presented in table 2.VII.

As mentioned, figures on the total usage of antibacterial drugs should be interpreted with caution. Each substance group should be assessed separately, and knowledge on common indications is necessary in order to interpret the figures. In attempts to control resistance to antibacterials and to minimise the environmental impact of these drugs, monitoring systems for both usage of antibacterial drugs per animal species and for resistance to antibacterials in animal microbiota are crucial. Whenever undesirable trends are observed, activities to disclose underlying causes and, if possible, corrected.

During the years 1980-1984, the consumption of tetracyclines in animals in Sweden increased markedly. Thereafter, the usage of these products decreased until 1988. From 1988-1993, an increase was again noted. The latter could not be connected to an altered disease situation, and therefore no obvious explanation was at hand. Further investigations into the precise origins of this were initiated in 1994 by the Board of Agriculture. It was revealed that the increase could almost entirely be explained by the prescriptions of one veterinarian to one herd. The veterinarian was reported, the cause corrected, and the tetracycline consumption is now 50% lower than before 1986.

The comparison of statistics from different sources can also be a valuable asset. Results from the recently introduced system for statistics on prescriptions of medicated feed (Odensvik, 1997), were compared to data on sales from wholesalers and to data on sales of medicated feed reported by feed mills to the Board of Agriculture. An excellent agreement between the different systems for statistics was found in question of antibacterial substances. However, for coccidiostats a major discrepancy was noted. The quantity covered by prescriptions in 1995 was about 65% of the quantities registered in the two other systems. The amounts used, according to the latter, match well the number of chickens produced in that year (figure 2.I). Therefore, it can be assumed that one or more feed-mills have delivered coccidiostats without veterinary prescriptions. One such case has been identified and legal action has been taken.

  200               60  
  180                 millions
  160               50
                 
                   
Feed, 1000 tonnes 140               40 chickens slaughtered,
               
120                
100               30
80                
60               20
               
                 
  40               10 of
                  No.
  20                
                   
                  0  
  1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996  
          Year          
    Non-ionophoric coccidiostats   Ionophores       Chickens slaughtered
           
                 

Figure 2.I. Usage of coccidiostats in Sweden expressed as quantity of medicated feed expressed as 1000 tonnes (left axis), and number of broiler chickens

slaughtered in millions (right axis)

&IGUR ) !NV¤NDNING AV KOCCIDIOSTATIKA I 3VERIGE UTTRYCKT SOM M¤NGD FODER UTTRYCKT SOM TAL TON MED TILLSATT L¤KEMEDEL V¤NSTER AXEL OCH ANTALET SLAKTADE SLAKTKYCKLINGAR I MILLIONER H¶GER AXEL

Table 2.VII. The number of foodand fur-producing animals and horses in Sweden during 1988 to 1995 (from Björnerot, 1996)

4ABELL 6)) !NTAL LIVSMEDELSPRODUCERANDE DJUR P¤LSDJUR OCH H¤STAR I 3VERIGE UNDER FR¥N "J¶RNEROT

        9EAR        
                 
Dairy cows1 564 550 568 857 576 409 528 212 525 948 524 520 509 431 482 118
Beef cows1 56 412 64 199 74 544 97 653 135 791 153 555 164 578 157 128
Heifers, bulls, bullocks1 527 522 533 296 543 458 543 418 565 463 548 620 560 911 595 521
Calves1 513 044 521 298 524 032 537 495 548 100 580 671 591 569 542 328
Ewes and rams1 159 107 160 647 161 974 168 178 180 067 188 944 195 736 195 439
Lambs1 235 606 239 859 243 621 250 605 267 394 281 743 287 692 266 410
Sows and boars1 242 872 239 482 229 683 226 839 233 133 249 314 249 171 244 950
Pigs slaughtered2 (fattening) 3 551 360 3 642 213 3 471 482 3 224 570 3 297 326 3 483 439 3 657 067 3 634 837
Layers1 6 411 821 6 366 499 6 391 943 6 145 174 6 063 357 5 764 401 5 918 015 6 100 270
Pullets1 2 274 343 2 267 732 2 175 676 2 579 920 2 166 105 1 908 371 2 175 337 1 811 509
Broilers slaughtered3 32.8 x 106 36.4 x 106 38.7 x 106 43.0 x 106 44.1 x 106 49.3 x 106 55.8 x 106 60.3 x 106
Turkeys slaughtered4 790 387 673 011 660 396 590 733 610 700 719 950 685 727 458 516
Domestic geese slaughtered4 22 290 18 512 22 186 20 813 15 771 20 823 22 140 29 962
Ducks slaughtered4 97 142 83 516 49 003 30 207 61 508 52 410 32 796 78 839
Horses2 (estimated figures) ~180 000 ~180 000 ~180 000 ~180 000 ~180 000 ~180 000 ~180 000 ~180 000
Minks5 (breeding females) 490 324 439 271 285 589 255 037 260 919 184 741 ~212 450 ~244 320
Foxes5 (breeding females) 19 463 13 028 9 052 4 554 5 239 3 627 ~ 3 600 ~3 600

Sources: 1Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics, 1989-1994. The numbers of individuals of different animal species are counted at a certain time (in June) every year, which means that the total numbers are not always included, for example calves born in the autumn that year are missing. Note, only animals on farms with more than 2.1 hectare land or in herds with at least 50 dairy cows or 250 cattle (bovines) or 250 pigs or 500 sheep (including lambs) or 1000 poultry (including chickens) are counted. 2Swedish Board of Agriculture. 3Swedish Poultry Meat Association, 4National Food Administration, 5Swedish Fur-breeding Association - estimated figures for 1994 and 1995.

36 2. Background SOU 1997:132

2.7Prevalence of bacterial resistance

Acquired resistance in bacteria to antibacterials is the results of reflects the exposure to the substances in question. Therefore statistics on prevalence of resistance in various bacterial species is an indirect way of assessing the consumption of antibacterials. Trends over time in prevalence of resistance among bacterial populations are likely to reflect quantities and patterns of usage.

2.7.1Zoonotic pathogens

Salmonella

In accordance with the recommendations of WHO, antibiotic resistance in 3ALMONELLA spp. isolated from animals in Sweden has been monitored since

1976. Salmonellosis in animals is a notifiable disease in Sweden. All strains from animals isolated at or sent to the National Veterinary Institute are included. This surveillance is mainly motivated by the implications of resistant zoonotic bacteria for human health .

Table 2.VIII. Antibacterial resistance in 3ALMONELLA Typhimurium from animals in Sweden (Data from Franklin, 1997 unpublished and Franklin and Wierup, 1987; Franklin ET AL , 1994; Franklin, 1995)

4ABELL 6))) 2ESISTENS MOT ANTIBAKTERIELLA MEDEL HOS Salmonella 4YPHIMURIUM ISOLERADE FR¥N DJUR I 3VERIGE $ATA FROM &RANKLIN

UNPUBLISHED AND &RANKLIN AND 7IERUP &RANKLIN ET AL &RANKLIN

3UBSTANCE "REAKPOINT 2ESISTANCE  
  uG ML 9EAR    
    .O OF ISOLATES INVESTIGATED
         
    (n=117) (n=62) (n=108)
Ampicillin >8 2 2 3
Streptomycin >32 78 32 25
Tetracycline >8 14 6 8
Trimethoprim-Sulphonamides >0.5 0 0 23
Enrofloxacin >0.5 ND2 0 14

1Breakpoint = value above which the isolate has been classified as resistant; 2 ND = not

determined; 3 Isolated from a pigeon; 4 Isolated from a horse

"RYTPUNKT V¤RDE ¶VER VILKEN ISOLATET BETECKNATS SOM RESISTENT .$ EJ UNDERS¶KT )SOLAERAD FR¥N EN DUVA )SOLERAD FR¥N EN H¤ST

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 37

The antibiotic resistance in 3 Typhimurium in different time periods is shown in table 2.VIII. In the period 1978-1986, most strains were isolated from cattle. In 1988-1991 and 1992-1996, 43 and 36%, respectively, of the isolates were of bovine origin. In the last period, 45% were isolated from other sources than production animals, mostly wild birds. As apparent from the table, the number of resistant 3 Typhimurium has decreased since the surveillance programme was initiated. All investigated 3. Typhimurium strains and 3. Dublin strains isolated in 1988-1996 were sensitive to modern quinolones, trimethoprim-sulphonamides, neomycin and gentamicin, except one isolate of 3. Typhimurium from cattle which was resistant to trimethoprim-sulphonamides and one isolate of 3 Typhimurium from a horse that was resistant to modern quinolones. The low prevalence of resistant salmonellae can probably be ascribed to the fact that antibacterials are not used to eliminate salmonella infections in animals.

Campylobacter

The frequency of resistance in #AMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI isolated from chicken was investigated by Berndtsson (1996). Data on obtained minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) values are given in table 2.IX. Antibacterials are rarely used in broiler production in Sweden and the low proportion of resistant isolates seems to confirm the absence of a selective pressure. From other countries, quinolone resistance has been reported following the introduction of this drug (Endtz ET AL , 1991).

Table 2.IX. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antibacterials against 200 strains of #AMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI isolated from chickens in

Sweden

4ABELL )8 -INSTA H¤MMANDE KONCENTRATION AV ANTIBAKTERIELLA MEDEL F¶R Campylobacter jejuni ISOLERADE FR¥N KYCKLINGFLOCKAR I 3VERIGE

3UBSTANCE -INIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATIONuG ML            
                             
                             
Ampicillin           9 28 82 60 14 5 2 0  
Cephalotin                   5 11 59 111 14
Doxycycline 15 18 99 40 23 3 1   1          
Enrofloxacin 4 71 91 18 7         9        
Erythromycin       7 39 92 39 21 2          
                             
38 2. Background SOU 1997:132

2.7.2Animal pathogens

Escherichia coli

%SCHERICHIA COLI strains with ability to cause piglet diarrhoea and edema disease are among the most important intestinal pathogens in piglets. Weaning diarrhoea in pigs has also been associated with % COLI but the role of % COLI in that disease is not clear. In order to assess the development of resistance over time, three different investigations regarding antibiotic resistance in porcine % COLI were compared. The majority of the included strains originated from pig herds with diarrhoea problems.

From table 2.X, it is apparent that the frequency of antibiotic resistant strains has not changed dramatically over the last ten years. The number of strains resistant to trimethoprim was unexpectedly high in 1981 to 1982 (9%), taking into account the fact that trimethoprim had only been used for 6 to 7 years in Sweden at that time. A further increase was expected but, as shown, did not take place. This might be explained by the improved health situation in piglets which presumably has been accompanied by a similar decrease in the usage of this particular combination of drugs.

Resistance to streptomycin and tetracycline is still high, but compared to results from other countries (e.g. Pohl ET AL , 1991; Morvan and Moisan, 1994) the overall figures indicate a favourable situation.

Table 2.X. Antibiotic resistance in porcine % COLI strains isolated in Sweden during different time periods (%). (From Franklin unpublished data and Franklin, 1984; Melin ET AL , 1996)

4ABELL 8 !NTIBIOTIKARESISTENS HOS E. coli FR¥N SVIN ISOLERADE I 3VERIGE UNDER OLIKA TIDSPERIODER &R¥N &RANKLIN OPUBLICERADE DATA OCH &RANKLIN

-ELIN ET AL

3UBSTANCE "REAK 2ESISTANCE  
  POINT 9EAR    
  uG ML .O OF ISOLATES INVESTIGATED
         
    N N N
Ampicillin >16 8 6 8
Streptomycin >32 56 44 41
Tetracycline >8 40 28 38
Trimethoprim-Sulphonamides >82 9 15 10
Enrofloxacin >0.5 ND4 <1 <1

1Breakpoint = value above which the isolate has been classified as resistant; 2 Denotes the trimethoprim concentration; 3 Denotes number of investigated isolates; 4 ND= not

determined

"RYTPUNKT V¤RDE ¶VER VILKEN ISOLATET BETECKNATS SOM RESISTENT !VSER KONCENTRATION TROMETOPRIM N ANTAL UNDERS¶KTA ISOLAT .$ EJ UNDERS¶KT

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 39

Staphylococcus aureus

Table 2.XI. Proportion of 3TAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS (isolated from clinical mastitis in dairy cows in Sweden during different years) with resistance to different antibacterials (Data from Franklin and Horn af Rantztien, 1983; Robertsson and Franklin, 1987; Nilsson, 1996)

4ABELL 8) !NDEL AV S.aureus ISOLERADE FR¥N KLINISK MASTIT HOS N¶T I 3VERIGE UNDER OLIKA ¥R VILKA UPPVISAR RESISTENS MOT VISSA ANTIBAKTERIELLA MEDEL $ATA FR¥N &RANKLIN AND (ORN AF 2ANTZTIEN 2OBERTSSON AND &RANKLIN

.ILSSON

3UBSTANCE   "REAK 2ESISTANCE    
    POINT 9EAR .O OF ISOLATES INVESTIGATED  
    uG ML      
      N N N
Penicillin   - 2 10 10 6
Oxacillin >2 0 3 0
Erythromycin >4 1 3 1
Spiramycin >16 ND3 ND 1
Tetracycline >8 1 3 1

1Breakpoint = value above which the isolate has been classified as resistant; 2 Resistant

isolates determined on the basis of b-lactamase production; 3 ND = not determined

"RYTPUNKT V¤RDE ¶VER VILKET ISOLATEN BED¶MTS SOM RESISTENTA 2ESITENS BEST¤MD SOM PRODUKTION AV b LAKTAMAS .$ EJ UNDERS¶KT

Among the udder pathogens causing bovine mastitis, 3 AUREUS is the most important causative agent. It gives rise not only to severe acute inflammation

but also to chronic subclinical conditions. In Sweden, about 25% of clinical mastitic cases are caused by this species. Besides 3 AUREUS, a number of

other staphylococcal species are associated with bovine mastitis. About 5 to 10% of the 3 AUREUS isolates from clinical cases of mastitis are resistant to

penicillin due to penicillinase production (Table 2.XI). Penicillin resistance is more common in coagulase-negative staphylococci (about 25%, L. Nilsson, personal communication2)

Serpulina hyodysenteriae

3ERPULINA HYODYSENTERIAE is the causative agent of swine dysentery. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for 67 Swedish strains were determined for seven antibiotics. The strains were isolated from herds with and without dysentery problems in the period 1988 to 1990 (Gunnarsson ET AL , 1991). The distribution of MIC values are shown in Table 2.XII. The MIC values of tylosin and virginiamycin indicate that these drugs would no longer be effective for treatment of swine dysentery.

2 Lolita Nilsson, Laboratory Veterinary Officer, Department of Mastitis, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Sweden

40 2. Background SOU 1997:132

Table 2.XII. Antibacterial sensitivity of 67 isolates of 3ERPULINA HYODYSENTERIAE from Swedish pigs (Data from Gunnarsson ET AL , 1991)

4ABELL 8)) +¤NSLIGHET F¶R ANTIBAKTERIELLA MEDEL HOS ISOLAT AV Serpulina hyodysenteriae FR¥N SVENSKA GRISAR $ATA FR¥N 'UNNARSSON ET AL

!NTIBACTERIAL -)# OF DIFFERENT ANTIBACTERIAL SUBSTANCES uG ML  
SUBSTANCE .O OF ISOLATES          
Carbadox              
  36 2 15 9 2 1 2
Olaquindox              
  14 2 19 19 2 1 0
Tylosin              
  5 1 7 15 11 14 14
Virginiamycin              
  4 1 19 25 11 3 4
Tiamulin              
  4 4 32 20 3 0 4
Tetracycline              
 
  27 4 19 8 5 4 0
Ronidazol              
 
  35 1 19 10 2 0 0
Dimetridazol              
 
  0 1 0 2 4 11 49
               

2.7.3Animal commensals

Surveys for antimicrobial resistance in commensals, i.e. non-pathogenic bacteria, have only recently been initiated in Sweden. Preliminary results from these studies are given below.

In a study on poultry bacteria, enterococci and % COLI were isolated on selective media from neck skin and hindgut samples representing 52 poultry

flocks slaughtered in 9 different slaughterhouses (Greko, 1996). A total of 207 isolates of %NTEROCOCCUS spp. and 194 isolates of % COLI were

investigated for MIC values for a range of antibacterials. Results from this study are shown in table 2.XIII and 2.XIV.

The figures show an overall low level of resistance for both enterococci and % COLI. The one exception is the prevalence of resistance against

tetracyclines in enterococci. Tetracyclines are not frequently used in Swedish

poultry production, and corresponding figures for other bacteria isolated from chickens (#AMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI, % COLI) do not indicate a high exposure

to this drug.

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 41

Table 2.XIII Resistance in %NTEROCOCCUS spp. isolated from chicken (neckskin and faecal samples). No. of isolates = 194

4ABELL 8))) 2ESISTENS HOS Enterococcus SPP ISOLERADE FR¥N KYCKLING HALS SKINN OCH FECES PROV !NTAL ISOLAT

3UBSTANCE "REAKPOINT 0ROPORTION OF ISOLATES RESISTANT
  uG ML  
Vancomycin >4 0
Erythromycin >2 17
Spiramycin >16 15
Spiramycin >8 15
Ampicillin >8 0
Neomycin >128 0
Streptomycin >128 2
Chloramphenicol >8 0
Tetracycline >4 64
Trimetoprim-Sulphonamide >0.5 0

1Breakpoint = value above which the isolate has been classified as resistant

"RYTPUNKT V¤RDE ¶VER VILKET ISOLATEN BED¶MTS SOM RESISTENTA

Table 2.XIV. Resistance in % COLI isolated from chicken (neck-skin and faecal samples). No. of isolates = 194

4ABELL 8)6 2ESISTENS HOS E.coli ISOLERADE FR¥N KYCKLING HALS SKINN OCH FECES PROV !NTAL ISOLAT

3UBSTANCE "REAKPOINT 0ROPORTION OF ISOLATES RESISTANT
  uG ML  
Ampicillin >8 5
Neomycin >64 0
Streptomycin >64 7
Gentamicin >8 0
Tetracycline >4 17
Trimethoprim-Sulphonamides >0.5 4
Chloramphenicol >16 1
Enrofloxacin >0.25 4
Nalidixic acid >32 6
Olaquindox >32 <12

1Breakpoint = value above which the isolate has been classified as resistant; 2One isolate,

also resistant to enrofloxacin (MIC=1µg/ml)

"RYTPUNKT V¤RDE ¶VER VILKET ISOLATEN BED¶MTS SOM RESISTENTA %TT ISOLAT ¤VEN RESISTENT MOT ENROFLOXACIN

The antibacterial resistance of enterococci and % COLI isolated from piglets has recently been investigated in a cohort study (Greko, 1997; Melin ET AL , 1997). Briefly, in a study aiming to investigate the possible occurrence of resistance to zinc oxide among commensal % COLI of piglets in Sweden, a

42 2. Background SOU 1997:132

total of 300 faecal samples were examined. The samples were collected 2-3 weeks after weaning from piglets in a total of 30 herds; 10 herds were using olaquindox as medicated feed (160 ppm), 10 herds were using zinc oxide (2500 ppm) and 10 herds used no medication. No isolates of coliforms with resistance to zinc oxide were found (Melin ET AL , 1997). All samples were also cultured on selective media containing 50µg/ml of vancomycin. No vancomycin-resistant enterococci were found.

From non-antibiotic containing media, enterococci and coliforms were selected at random from each sample for further investigation. Table 2.XV

shows the results of determinations of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of different antibiotics for %NTEROCOCCUS spp. and table 2.XVI the

corresponding results for % COLI.

Taken together, the figures are comparatively favourable. The number of isolates investigated from each group is too small to validate any conclusions with regard to differences between groups. Some conflicting observations on differences between groups can be made. For enterococci, the figures on resistance to neomycin and streptomycin in the non-medicated group seem higher than those from the other groups. On the other hand, such differences cannot be observed for % COLI. Similar observations can be made for % COLI and tetracycline resistance. Resistance to macrolides in enterococci seem to be more frequently of constitutive type in non-medicated groups. A lower prevalence of resistance to chloramphenicol in % COLI from the nonmedicated group is not reflected in the figures for enterococci.

Table 2.XV. Resistance to different antibacterials in %NTEROCOCCUS spp. isolated from weaned pigs in herds using different regimes

4ABELL 86 2ESISTENS MOT OLIKA ANTIBACTERIELLA MEDEL HOS Enterococcus SPP ISOLERADE FR¥N AVVANDA GRISAR I BES¤TTNINGAR MED OLIKA REGIM

3UBSTANCE "REAK 2ESISTANCE IN ISOLATES    
  POINT FROM SAMPLING GROUP  
  uG ML /LAQUIN :INC   .O MEDI 4OTAL
    DOX OXIDE CATION  
    n=69)2 n=57) n=92) n=218)
Erythromycin >2 29 33   36 33
Spiramycin >16 6 12   22 14
Spiramycin >8 14 26   38 27
Ampicillin >8 0 4   0 0
Neomycin >128 3 2   10 6
Streptomycin >128 9 5   18 12
Chloramphenicol >8 0 2   1 1
Tetracycline >4 42 54   33 41
Trimethoprim-Sulphonamide >0.5 0 0   0 0

1Breakpoint = value above which the isolate has been classified as resistant; 2 n= number

of isolates

"RYTPUNKT V¤RDE ¶VER VILKET ISOLATEN BED¶MTS SOM RESISTENTA N ANTAL UNDERS¶KTA ISOLAT

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 43

Table 2.XVI Resistance to different antibacterials in % COLI isolated from weaned pigs in herds using different regimes

4ABELL 86) 2ESISTENS MOT OLIKA ANTIBAKTERIELLA MEDEL HOS E. coli ISOLERADE FR¥N AVVANDA GRISAR I BES¤TTNINGAR MED OLIKA REGIM

3UBSTANCE "REAK 2ESISTANCE IN ISOLATES    
  POINT FROM SAMPLING GROUP  
  uG ML /LAQUIN :INC   .O MEDI 4OTAL
    DOX OXIDE CATION  
    n=60)2 n=73) n=85) n=218)
Ampicillin >8 2 4   2 3
Neomycin >64 10 12   8 10
Streptomycin >64 13 26   13 17
Gentamicin >8 0 4   0 1
Tetracycline >4 12 4   26 10
Trimethoprim-Sulphonamides >0.5 2 7   0 3
Chloramphenicol >16 15 26   7 16
Enrofloxacin >0.25 0 1   1 1
Enrofloxacin >0.12 15 11   1 8
Nalidixic acid >32 2 1   1 1
Olaquindox >32 35 19   32 28

1Breakpoint = value above which the isolate has been classified as resistant; 2 n= number

of isolates

"RYTPUNKT V¤RDE ¶VER VILKET ISOLATEN BED¶MTS SOM RESISTENTA N ANTAL UNDERS¶KTA ISOLAT

2.7.4Some comments on the resistance figures

As shown above, available data indicate that antibacterial resistance is comparatively low in most bacteria from Swedish food producing animals. For most substances this reflects the consumption figures. However, other factors than antimicrobial usage may also contribute to keeping resistance to certain substances at a high level (see chapter 4). Continuous monitoring for antimicrobial resistance is necessary for detecting trends in resistance development. It is important to remeber, though, that resistance data only shows the phenotypic expression of resistance traits. Thus, further research on the genes behind the resistance is also necessary.

2.8Summary comments

Antibacterial substances are valuable therapeutic tools in both veterinary and human medicine. Their use both as therapeuticals and as feed additives have contributed to the development of the contemporary animal industry.

44 2. Background SOU 1997:132

In Sweden, all antimicrobial substances used in animals are classified as pharmaceutical specialities and are only available on veterinary prescription. The ban on antimicrobial feed additives in 1986 was associated with animal health problems in certain production systems. These health problems have to a large extent been overcome, and today’s total consumption of antibacterials in veterinary medicine is considerably lower (50%) than what was used before the ban. The lower consumption is reflected in a comparatively favourable resistance situation in most animal bacteria. The Swedish experience shows that changes in production systems are necessary in order to adjust to animal production without antimicrobial feed additives, but also that such adjustments are possible and might pay off in a better situation regarding antibacterial resistance among zoonotic and animal bacteria.

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 45

References

"EHAR - 3CRIMSHAW . 3 'UZMAN - ! AND 'ORDON * % , 1968. Nutrition and infection

field study in Guatemalan villages, 1959-1964. VIII. An epidemiological appraisal of its wisdom and errors. !RCHIVES OF %NVIRONMENTAL (EALTH 814-827.

"ERDTSSON % , 1996. Campylobacter in broiler chickens- The mode of spread in chicken flocks with special reference to food hygiene. (Thesis). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

"J¶RNEROT , , 1996. Sverige förbjöd antibiotika i tillväxtstimulerande syfte 1986 - vad hände med förbrukningen? +UNGLIGA 3KOGS OCH ,ANTBRUKSAKADEMIENS 4IDSKRIFT 57-68.

"J¶RNEROT , &RANKLIN ! AND 4YSEN % , 1996. Usage of antibacterial and antiparasitic drugs in animals in Sweden between 1988 and 1993. 6ETERINARY RECORD 282-286.

#OLEGRAVE 4 AND 7ESLEY 4 1995. 4HE FEED ADDITIVES MARKET PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT AND

DISEASE CONTROL 32 Animal Pharm Reports. PJB Publications Ltd.

%LWINGER + %NGSTR¶M " "ERNDTSON % &OSSUM / AND 7ALDENSTEDT , , 1996. Effect of growth promoters and coccidiostats on performance and growth of #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS in the caeca of broilers. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 88 7ORLD S 0OULTRY #ONGRESS 2-5 September,

New Delhi. p. 219.

%LWINGER + %NGSTR¶M " &OSSUM / (ASSAN 3 AND 4EGL¶F " , 1994. Effect of coccidiostats on necrotic enteritis and performance in broiler chickens. 3WEDISH *OURNAL OF !GRIULTURAL 2ESEARCH 39-44.

%LWINGER + 3CHNEITZ # "ERNDTSON % &OSSUM / 4EGL¶F " AND %NGSR¶M " , 1992. Factors affecting the incidence of necrotic enteritis, caecal carriage of #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS and bird performance in broiler chickens. !CTA 6ETERINARIA 3CANDINAVICA

361-370.

%LWINGER + AND 4EGL¶F " , 1991. Performance of broiler chickens as influenced by a dietary enzyme complex with and without antibiotic supplementation. !RCHIV FUR 'EFLUGELKUNDE

69-73.

%NDTZ ( 0 2UIIS ' * VAN +LINGEREN " *ANSEN 7 ( VAN DER 2EYDEN 4 AND -OUTON

2 0 , 1991. Quinolone resistance in campylobacter isolated from man and poultry following the introduction of fluoroquinolones in veterinary medicine. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY 199-208.

&IEMS , / "OUCQUE # 6 AND #OTTYN " ' , 1995. Effect of feed antibiotics on animal

performances, meat quality and health in ruminants, and on aspects of environmental pollution. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 3CIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON GROWTH PROMOTION IN MEAT PRODUCTION REPORT AND CONCLUSIONS November 29 -December 1, Brussels.

&RANKLIN ! , 1984. Antimicrobial drug resistance in porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli of O- group 149 and non-enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. 6ETERINARY -ICROBIOLOGY 467-475.

&RANKLIN ! , 1995. Antibiotikaresistens hos salmonellastammar isolerade på SVA 1992-1994, rapport till Statens Jordbruksverk. Statens Veterinärmedicinska Anstalt.

46 2. Background SOU 1997:132

&RANKLIN ! 'UNNARSSON ! AND 2EHBINDER 6 , 1994. Antibiotic resistance i Salmonella isolated from animal sources in Sweden. )N PROCEEDINGS OF !NTIMICROBIALS IN ANIMAL INTENSIVE PRODUCTION October 25-27, 1994, Ploufragran. pp. 288-289.

&RANKLIN ! AND (ORN AF 2ANTZTIEN - , 1983. Antimicrobial drug sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine milk. .ORDISK 6ETERIN¤RMEDICIN 447-454.

&RANKLIN ! AND 7IERUP - , 1987. Antibiotikaresistens hos salmonellastammar isolerade från nötkreatur åren 1978-1986, Rapport till Lantbruksstyrelsen. Statens Veterinärmedicinska Anstalt.

'REKO # , 1996. Inventering av resistens mot antibakteriella medel hos enterokocker från kyckling (rapport). Statens Veterinärmedicinska Anstalt, Uppsala.

'REKO # , 1997. Sensitivity to antibacterials in % COLI and enterococci isolated from piglets in Sweden (in manuscript). .

'UNNARSSON ! &RANKLIN ! (ORN AF 2ANTZIEN - ,ANDEN ! AND 2ANTZIEN - ( A , 1991.

Resistensundersökning av svenska isolat av Treponema hyodysenteriae. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING 349-352.

'UZMAN - ! 3CRIMSHAW . 3 AND -ONROE 2 * , 1958. Growth and development of Central

Americam children. I. Growth responses of rural Guatemalan school children to daily administration of penicillin and aureomycin. !MERICAN *OURNAL OF #LINICAL .UTRITION 430-

438.

'¶RANSSON , ,ANGE 3 AND ,ONNROTH ) , 1995. Post weaning diarrhoea: focus on diet. 0IG .EWS AND )NFORMATION 89N-91N.

'¶RANSSON , -ARTINSSON + ,ANGE 3 AND ,¶NNROTH ) , 1993. Feed-induced lectins in piglets.

*OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY -EDICINE " 478-484.

(OLM ! , 1989. Zinkoxid tilsat foderet til forebyggelse af % COLI-betinget fravenningsdiarre.

(YOLOGISK 4IDSKRIFT 42-43.

(OLMGREN . , 1994a. Djurhälsomässiga behobet av fodermedelsantibiotika i smågrisproducerande besättningar. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING 57-65.

(OLMGREN . , 1994b. Profylaktiska effekter av zinkoxid eller olaquindox mot avvänjningsdiarré hos svin. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING 217-222.

*OHNSON * AND 2EID 7 - , 1970. Anticoccidial drugs: lesions scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens. %XPERIMENTAL 0ARSITOLOGY 30-36.

*ONSON ' AND *ACOBSSON 3 % , 1973. Foderantibiotikas inverkan på kalvdödlighet. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING 17-22.

,"3, 1977. Utredning avseende utnyttjandet av specialämnen såsom antibiotika/kemoterapeutika, vilka i tillväxtbefrämjande syfte inblandas i foder. Lantbruksstyrelsen, Jönköping.

-AC$OUGALL , , 1957. The effect of aureomycin on undernourished african children. 4HE *OURNAL OF 4ROPICAL 0EDIATRICS 74-81.

-ACKAY ) & 3 0ATRICK 3 * 3TAFFORD $ AND #LEVELAND & 3 , 1956. The influence of vitamin B12 and aureomycin upon the growth of protein deficient children. *OURNAL OF .UTRITION

155-170.

SOU 1997:132 2. Background 47

-ELIN , &RANKLIN ! (ORN AF 2ANTZIEN - AND 7ALLGREN 0 , 1996. MIC values of faecal isolates of % COLI isolates from piglets in Sweden. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS

July 7-10, 1996, Bologna, Italy. p. 671.

-ELIN , (OLMGREN . 7ALLGREN 0 AND &RANKLIN ! , 1997. Sensitivity to olaquindox and zinc oxide in coliform bacteria from weaned piglets. submitted to the 15th IPVS congress (1998).

-ORVAN ( AND -OISAN * # , 1994. Sensibilite des salmonelles aux antibiotiques en elevage industriel. )N PROCEEDINGS OF !NTIMICROBIALS IN ANIMAL INTENSIVE PRODUCTION ISPAIA-

Zoopole, October 25-27, 1994, Ploufragran. pp. 299-301.

.ILSSON , , 1996. Mastiter - infektionspanorama och antibiotikaresistens (att publiceras).

.ILSSON , AND 'REKO # , 1997. Survey of the use of antimicrobial drugs in veterinary medicine with special emphasis on mastitis treatment. )N PROCEEDINGS OF .ORDIC 3EMINAR 2EGARDING THE &UTURE 5SE OF !NTIBIOTICS IN -ASTITIS 4HERAPY .-3- January 21-22, Göteborg.

/DENSVIK + , 1997. Sammanställning över foderläkemedel 1995 och 1996. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING 386-389.

0OHL 0 6ERLINDEN - ,INTERMANS 0 6AN 2OBAEYS ' AND 3TOCKMANS ' , 1991.

Antibiogrammes des enterobacteries pathogenes pour les animaux delevage et les pigeons, isolees en Belgique de 1986 a 1990. !NNALES DE MEDICINE VETERINAIRE 101-108.

0OULSEN ( $ , 1995. Zinc oxide for weaning piglets. !CTA !GRICULTUAE 3CANDINAVICA 3ECTION !!NIMAL HEALTH 3CINECE 159-167.

2OBERTSSON * … AND &RANKLIN ! , 1987. Antibiotikaresistens hos bakterier från akuta mastiter på kor. 3VENSK VETERIN¤RTIDNING 115-120.

2OBERTSSON * … AND ,UNDEHEIM . , 1994. Prohibited use of antibiotics as a feed additive for growth promotion - effect on piglet health and production parameters. )N PROCEEDINGS OFTH )063 #ONGRESS June 26-30, Bangkok. p. 282.

2OBINSON 0 , 1952. Controlled trial of aureomycin in premature twins and triplets. 4HE ,ANCET I 52.

2UTQVIST , # , 1970. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING 307-308.

3MITH ( 7 AND 4UCKER * & , 1978. The effect of antimicrobial feed additives on the colonization of the alimentary tract of chickens by 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM. *OURNAL OF (YGIENE 217-

231.

3MITH 7 ( AND 4UCKER * & , 1980. Further observations on the effect of feeding diets containing

avoparcin, bacitracin and sodium arsenilate on the colonization of the alimentary tract of poultry by salmonella organisms. *OURNAL OF (YGIENE 137-150.

3NELLING # % , 1952. The value of aureomycin in prevention of cross infection in the hospital for sick children. #ANADIAN -EDICAL !SSOCOATION *OURNAL 6-7.

3TOKESTAD % , 2 AND *UKES 4 ( , 1949. Further observations on the animal protein factor.

0ROCEEDINGS OF THE 3OCIETY OF "IOLOGICAL AND %XPERIMENTAL -EDICINE 523-528.

3TOKESTAD % , 2 AND *UKES 4 ( , 1950. The multiple nature of the animal protein factor. *OURNAL OF "IOLOGICAL #HEMISTRY 647-654.

363, 1990. Riktlinjer för antibiotikainblandning i foder till svin. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING 407- 413.

48 2. Background SOU 1997:132

4AYLOR # % , 1967. Synergism between infections and malnutrition (editorial). !RCHIVES OF %NVIRONMENTAL (EALTH 650.

7IERUP - , 1989. Antibiotikaförbrukning hos djur i Sverige under perioden 1980-1987. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING 299-311.

7IERUP - , 1996. Sverige förbjöd antibiotika i tillväxtbefrämjande syfte 1986 - vad hände med djurhälsan och hur löstes problemen? +UNGLIGA 3KOGS OCH ,ANTBRUKSAKADEMIENS 4IDSKRIFT

69-78.

7IERUP - # , 7OLD 4ROELL - AND !GEN¤S ) , 1987. Animal consumption of antibiotic and chemotherapeutic drugs in Sweden during 1980, 1982 and 1984. 6ETERINARY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 397-405.

7IERUP - ,ARSSON + (OLTENIUS 0 *ACOBSSON 3 / AND -ANSSON ) , 1975. Effekten av

foderantibiotika på antibiotikaresistens, överförbar antibiotikaresistens, morbiditet och tillväxt hos mellankalv. .ORDISK 6ETERIN¤RMEDICIN 253-265.

SOU 1997:132 49

3Mode of action and effects of antibacterial feed additives

3.1Mode of action

The mode of action of antibacterial feed additives (AFA) has been the subject of numerous scientific reports. However, most of these deal with effects, rather than modes of action. The exact mechanisms regulating the growth promoting effect of AFA is not precisely known (for a review see Thomke and Elwinger, 1997c).

3.1.1Effects

Rosen (1995) has compiled responses in poultry and pigs associated with dietary supplements of AFA (table 3.I). This table illustrates the diversity of the responses to AFA.

AFA will alter the intestinal bacterial flora and reduce the number of sensitive microorganisms. Most AFA in use within the EU have effects on gram-positive bacteria. An early and fundamental finding was that young germ-free chickens, that grew approximately 20% faster than conventionallyreared chickens, did not respond to dietary inclusion of AFA (Forbes and

Park, 1959; Eyssen and De Somer, 1967). Inoculation of germ-free chickens with %NTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS - a common inhabitant of the intestinal tract -

lowered growth performance significantly. Dietary inclusion of AFA, however, restored growth performance of inoculated birds (Lev and Forbes,

1959; Eyssen and De Somer, 1967). Some other micro-organisms that have been associated with growth suppression are: %NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM (Coates, 1980; Fuller, 1994) and #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS (Lev and Forbes, 1959;

Stutz ET AL , 1983a; Stutz ET AL , 1983b). The mechanism for the proposed growth suppressing effect has not been clarified.

In animals given AFA, reduced weight of the intestine, thinning of the intestinal wall and shortening of the gut has been recorded (Jukes ET AL , 1956; Stutz ET AL , 1983b). These results suggest a lowered number of mucosal cells which, in turn, possibly also reflect the mucosal cell turn-over rate. Research has shown a similar lowered mucosal cell turn-over rate as well as a thinner intestinal wall in germ-free chickens, as compared to conventionally reared chickens (Coates, 1980). This indicates that the dietary inclusion of AFA will alter these intestinal characteristics towards the properties seen in germ free animals.

50 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

Table 3.I. Some physiological, nutritional and metabolic effects ascribed to AFA (modified from Rosen, 1995)

4ABELL ) .¥GRA FYSIOLOGISKA NUTRITIONELLA OCH METABOLISKA EFFEKTER SOM TILLSKRIVITS !&4 MODIFIERAT FR¥N 2OSEN

0HYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTSa

Gut food
transit time  
Gut wall
diameter  
Gut wall
length  
Gut wall
weight  
Gut absorptive
capacity  
Faecal
moisture  
Mucosal cell
turnover  
Stress
Feed intake ,,

.UTRITIONAL EFFECTS

Energy
retention  
Gut energy
loss  
Nitrogen
retention  
Limiting amino
acid supply  
Vitamin
absorption  
Vitamin
synthesis  
Trace element
absorption  
Fatty acid
absorption  
Glucose
absorption  
Calcium
absorption  
Plasma
nutrients  

-ETABOLIC EFFECTS

Ammonia
production  
Toxic amine
production  
Alpha-toxin
production  
Fatty acid
oxidation  
Faecal fat
excretion  
Liver protein
synthesis  
Gut alkaline
phosphatase  
Gut urease

adenotes a reduction; denotes an increase; denotes no change

It seems likely that the change of the intestinal flora and the subsequent changes in the intestine, including a slower intestinal passage rate, associated with AFA usage are linked to the many reported effects on nutrient breakdown, nutrient losses and nutrient absorption. Examples are the lowered breakdown of easily fermentable nutrients and the restriction in breakdown of essential amino acids, leading to a general nutrient saving effect.

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 51

3.1.2Suggested main mode of action

As AFA are antibacterial substances, it is likely that their growth promoting effect is associated with their inhibitory effect on intestinal microbes. As discussed above, at dosages permitted for growth promotion, AFA will alter the intestinal microbial flora. Increased understanding of the complex relationships between the immune system and other functions of the body offer possibilities to better understand the mode of action of AFA.

Infections and growth rate

It is well established that growth rate and feed efficiency are reduced as a sequel to infection. This is why for example specific pathogen free (SPF) animals grow faster than animals in a conventional environment. Similarly animals reared in carefully cleaned and disinfected units grow faster than animals reared under a lower level of sanitary conditions. It has been shown that absence of disease increases the capacity of pigs to grow (Young ET AL , 1959; Caldwell ET AL , 1961). In Danish SPF systems, feed conversion is 3.9% lower and growth rate 6.4% higher than for conventionally reared pigs (Jorgensen, 1987). Similar observations have been reported in Swedish studies by Wallgren (1993a) (Figure 3.I). Chickens housed in clean, disinfected quarters also grow faster and more efficiently than chickens housed in less sanitary conditions, even in the absence of any clinical signs of infectious diseases (Roura ET AL , 1992).

Immune responses and growth rate

An infectious challenge is a common form of stress encountered by growing animals. Infectious challenges may, or may not, result in clinical diseases, depending on the pathogenicity of the challenging microorganism and the immunocompetence of the animal. A stress response is indicated by decreased growth rates and quantitative changes in nutritional requirements (cit. from Klasing ET AL , 1987). In humans, reduced food intake is considered to play a major role in infection-induced weight loss (Grunfeld ET AL , 1996). This has also been shown in animals. Studying chickens, Klasing and coworkers (1987), found a growth depressive effect associated with an immune response. This effect was correlated to the immunogenic strength of the agent tested, the duration and the intensity of the immune response. The response to combinations of immunogens was additive. The dominating factor in the reduction of the animals’ weight gain was shown to be a decrease in feed intake, while the remainder was the effect of less efficient routes in the intermediary metabolism (Klasing ET AL , 1987). Roura and co-workers (Roura ET AL , 1992) showed the influence of the animal environment on weight gain and feed efficiency in chickens (see table 3. IIb.). Studies in pigs

52 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

with a low or high level of chronic immune system activation revealed lower feed intake, reduced body weight gain, lower daily protein accretion and more feed required per kg weight gain in pigs with a high level of chronic immune system activation (see table 3.IIa.)(Stahly, 1996).

Table 3.IIa. Responses of pigs with a low or high level of antigen exposure to dietary antibacterial agents (carbadox). Adopted from Stahly (1996)

4ABELL ))A %FFEKT AV DEN ANTIBAKTERIELLA FODERTILLSATSEN CARBADOX P¥ TILLV¤XT OCH FODERUTNYTTJANDE HOS GRISAR MED H¶G ELLER L¥G GRAD AV ANTIGEN EXPONERING !NPASSAD FR¥N 3TAHLY

         
'ROWTH AND FEED UTILISATION !NTIGEN #ARBADOX   #HANGE
  EXPOSURE A B  
Daily gain, g Low 845 858 +1.5
  High 686 735 +7.1
Kg feed/ kg gain Low 2.75 2.67 -2.9
  High 3.12 2.90 -7.1

aNon-medicated control group.

bPigs fed 55 ppm carbadox from 5 to 34 kg body weight and then placed on the control

diet without carbadox from 34 to 115 kg body weight. a /MEDICINERAD KONTROLLGRUPP

b 'RISAR SOM F¥TT PPM CARBADOX FR¥N TILL KG KROPPSVIKT OCH D¤REFTER FODER UTAN CARBADOX FR¥N TILL KG KROPPSVIKT

Table 3.IIb. Responses of chickens with a low or high level of antigen exposure to dietary antibacterial agents (streptomycin and penicillin) Adopted from Rour (1992)

4ABELL ))B %FFEKT AV DE ANTIBAKTERIELLA SUBSTANSERNA PENICILLIN OCH STREPTOMYCIN P¥ TILLV¤XT OCH FODERUTNYTTJANDE HOS SLAKTKYCKLING MED H¶G ELLER L¥G GRAD AV ANTIGENEXPONERING !NPASSAD FR¥N 2OUR

4REATMENT   7EIGHT GAIN G DAY &EED EFFICIENCY
        G GAIN G FEED
Clean   12.65a   0.66a
Unsanitary   12.10b 0.54b
Clean+Antibacterial   12.72a 0.67a
Unsanitary+Antibacterial   12.57a 0.63a

1Sixty-four chickens were raised 14 days in each of the 2 different environments (clean or unsanitary) and fed diets either without antibiotic or with streptomycin (100 ppm) and penicillin (100 ppm); 2Means in a column with different superscript letters differ

significantly (p<0.05).

3EXTIOFYRA KYCKLINGAR VISTADES DAGAR I OLIKA MILJ¶ER L¥G ELLER H¶G ANTIGENEXPONERING OCH GAVS FODER ANTINGEN UTAN ANTIBIOTIKA ELLER INNEH¥LLANDE STREPTOMYCIN PPM OCH PENICILLIN PPM -EDELV¤RDEN I EN KOLUMN MED OLIKA BOKSTAVSMARKERINGAR SKILJER SIG SIGNIFIKANT P

The relationship between cytokines, immunologic stress and growth is complex. Responses in the brain and immune system are expressed as effector

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 53

signals in the form of regulatory hormones from the hypothalamus and pituitary and as cytokines from the immune system. Several hormones including corticotrophin releasing hormone, prostaglandins, glucagon, insulin and corticosteroids are induced by cytokines (for ref. see Grunfeld ET AL , 1996). In this respect the release of corticotrophin releasing hormone and corticosteroids is of special interest since corticosteroids have a catabolic effect, thereby reducing muscle tissue. An activated immune system releases cytokines, that mediate the host response to infection and/or inflammation. Cytokines may also have direct effects on the brain, resulting in, for example, a decreased appetite.

In summary, cytokines released as a consequence of a stimulated immune system mediate profound host responses including decreased appetite and a general catabolic effect. Many extrinsic stimuli such as bacterial toxins, yeast cell walls, silica particles, bacterial (gram-positive and gram-negative) or viral antigens have the capacity to elicit these responses (Mahé and Oppenheim, 1992; Degré, 1996).

Immune responses and AFA

Two recently published studies report on the effects of AFA on the immune system in relation to performance in clinically healthy animals. In one, avoparcin (having a gram-positive spectrum) was used and in the other carbadox (having a gram negative spectrum).

In the study on avoparcin, Krinke and Jamroz (1996) compared some immunological parameters in avoparcin-fed chickens with a control group. In birds from the medicated group, most chickens had a suppressed reactive lymphoid tissue of the bursa of Fabricius. This result indicates that there may be a lack of stimulation of the immune system in the antibiotic-treated birds.

The effects of carbadox in a model using pigs with low or high level of chronic immune system activation was studied by Stahly (1996 see table 3.IIa). The magnitude of the performance enhancement induced by carbadox was greater in the pigs with high level of chronic immune system activation than in pigs with low level of immune system. Similar results were obtained for pigs fed tylosin at 110 ppm (Stahly ET AL , 1995). In chickens fed therapeutic levels of antibiotics (Table 3.IIb Roura ET AL , 1992), the effects of antibiotics on immune stressed animals was further confirmed.

54 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132
  120          
(kg) 100          
80          
weight          
60          
           
Body 40          
20          
        Age (days)  
           
  0          
  0 50 100 150 200 250

Figure 3.I. Growth rate of pigs in farrow to finish herds with different pathogen loads. denotes specific pathogen free pigs representing the lowest pathogen load, denotes conventional pigs reared from farrow to finish but applying an age segregated system representing an intermediate pathogen load; denotes conventional pigs reared from farrow to finish employing a continuos rearing system representing the highest pathogen load (Wallgren, 1993b).

&IGUR ) 4ILLV¤XT HOS GRISAR UPPF¶DDA I INTEGRERADE BES¤TTNINGAR MED OLIKA SMITT¤MNESTRYCK VISAR 30& GRISAR 3PECIFIC 0ATHOGEN &REE REPRESENTERANDE DET L¤GSTA SMITTRYCKET VISAR KONVENTIONELLA GRISAR INOM EN BES¤TTNING SOM TILL¤MPAR ¥LDERSSEKTIONERING REPRESENTERANDE ETT INTERMEDI¤RT SMITTRYCK VISAR KONVENTIONELLA GRISAR SOM TILL¤MPAR ETT KONTINUERLIGT UPPF¶DNINGSSYSTEM REPRESENTERANDE DET H¶GSTA SMITTRYCKET 7ALLGREN B

AFA improve growth rate and feed efficiency.

The effects of AFA are inversely related to animal health status. The poorer the health status the better the effect.

Challenge of the immune system will reduce growth rate and feed efficiency. This response is mediated by cytokines. Cytokines have direct effects on the brain, inducing a decrease in appetite, and stimulate the release of catabolic hormones, reducing the mass of muscle tissue.

AFA, through their antimicrobial effects, will alleviate immune system challenges from the intestinal tract on the immune system. This appears to be the major effect of AFA.

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 55

3.2Prophylactic and therapeutic effects of AFA

3.2.1Introduction

Most substances used as AFA are also used, or have been used, for therapeutic purposes. For some AFA the maximum dosage permitted for growth promotion is the same or nearly the same as what is recommended for prophylaxis and treatment of disease (table 3.III.). It has been pointed out that one expected consequence of abstaining from use of AFA is increased animal health problems due to infectious diseases (McOrist, 1997; Viaene, 1997) Indeed, the Swedish experience from banning AFA in 1986 was the emergence of clinical problems and disturbances of the health status of piglets and broilers which initially created a demand for antibiotic medicated feed at therapeutic dosages. The response to withdrawal of AFA in 1986 on piglet health and performance in 220 Swedish piglet producing herds was statistically evaluated by Robertson and Lundeheim (1994 see chapter 2). Removal of AFA was followed by a doubling of incidence of diarrhoea and number of medical treatments of post-weaning diarrhoea as well as by an increased mortality by about 1.5%. The age at 25 kg increased by 5-6 days. Since then, efforts have been made to improve the rearing and production systems e.g. sectioning between age groups and planned production. Production data of the pig herds from 1986 (Robertsson and Lundeheim, 1994) have now been re-analysed comparing 1986 to 1995 (Wierup, 1996). The comparison revealed a drop in post-weaning mortality from 1.5% in 1986 to 0.9% in 1995 and a reduction of the age at 25 kg by 1-2 days in 1995, as compared to 1986.

This poses questions as to what degree AFA, at their permitted dosages for growth promotion, also have therapeutic and/or prophylactic effects against certain economically important intestinal diseases in pigs and poultry.

56 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

Table 3.III. Recommended dosages of AFA for treatment, prophylaxis and growth promotion in swine and poultry. ( Från Allen ET AL , 1992; Prescott and Baggot, 1993; FASS VET., 1997 and 70/524/EEC). Dosages have been converted to mg/kg and rounded off

4ABELL ))) 2EKOMMENDERADE DOSER AV !&4 F¶R BEHANDLING PROFYLAX OCH SOM TILLV¤XTBEFR¤MJARE HOS SVIN OCH FJ¤DERF¤ &R¥N !LLEN ET AL 0RESCOTT AND "AGGOT &!33 6%4 OCH %%# $OSERINGAR HAR R¤KNATS OM TILL MG KG OCH AVRUNDATS

3UBSTANCE )NDICATION !NIMAL $OSAGE FOR 0ERMITTED
    SPECIES TREATMENT DOSAGE AS !&!
      AND MG KG FEED
      PROPHYLAXIS  
      MG KG FEED  
!VILAMYCIN GROWTH PROMOTION POULTRY    
    SWINE    
"ACITRACIN bacterial enteritis poultry 55-220  
    swine 280  
  GROWTH PROMOTION POULTRY    
    SWINE    
#ARBADOX SD1, PPE2, bacterial swine 50-55  
  enteritis      
  GROWTH PROMOTION SWINE    
&LAVOMYCIN GROWTH PROMOTION POULTRY    
    SWINE    
/LAQUINDOX SD, bacterial enteritis swine 100-160  
  GROWTH PROMOTION SWINE    
3PIRAMYCIN mycoplasmosis poultry 400  
  GROWTH PROMOTION POULTRY    
    SWINE    
4YLOSIN mycoplasmosis poultry 900-1100  
  erysipelas, myco- swine 40-110  
  plasmosis, SD, PPE      
  GROWTH PROMOTION SWINE    
6IRGINIAMYCIN necrotic enteritis, poultry 20-40  
  respiratory infections,      
  SD, other bacterial swine 28-150  
  enteritis      
  GROWTH PROMOTION POULTRY    
    SWINE    

1SD= swine dysentery

2PPE= porcine proliferative enteropathy

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 57

Below, some studies on therapeutic and/or prophylactic effects of AFA on certain diseases have been reviewed. Studies on this subject where several antimicrobial treatments are administered simultaneously to the same animals have not been included, as they are impossible to evaluate.

3.2.2Necrotic enteritis in poultry

Necrotic enteritis (NE) is an intestinal disease affecting poultry. It is associated with #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS

Wicker and co-workers (1977) demonstrated a reduced mortality (p<0.01) due to NE in broiler chicks fed bacitracin at 11 ppm. In chickens with experimentally induced disease, a prophylactic effect of bacitracin administered in water at 100 mg/gallon and a therapeutic effect at 200 mg/gallon was demonstrated (Prescott ET AL , 1978).

In a larger study, Jansson and co-workers (1992) induced NE by feeding chickens a diet high in barley. Virginiamycin given in feed at 20 ppm effectively prevented the disease. Another study by Elwinger and Teglöf (1991) showed similar results; virginiamycin at 20 ppm in feed notably reduced mortality due to necrotic enteritis in chickens (p<0.001) compared to non-medicated groups.

Stutz and co-workers (1983a) showed that bacitracin, carbadox and

virginiamycin, all at the level of 55 ppm in feed, reduced the amount of # PERFRINGENS in the intestines of chickens compared to non-medicated controls

(p<0.05). The numbers of clostridia were inversely correlated with performance data. A similar reduction in numbers of clostridia and correlation with performance data was observed by Elwinger and co-workers in several studies using avilamycin at 10 ppm or avoparcin at 15 ppm (Elwinger ET AL , 1993; Elwinger ET AL , 1995; Elwinger ET AL , 1996).

From the above, it is clear that some AFA are effective against clostridia, both IN VITRO and IN VIVO at the levels used for growth promotion, resulting in

effective disease prevention. Prevention of subclinical NE is associated with performance enhancement.

3.2.3Swine dysentery

Swine dysentery (SD) is a contagious diarrhoeic disease in swine, caused by the spirochete 3ERPULINA HYODYSENTERIAE. Other forms of spirochetal diarrhoea in pigs are associated with other 3ERPULINA spp.

Various studies have shown effects on SD by quinoxalines at growth promoting levels. Hunneman (1980) reported a notable decrease in outbreaks of SD in a region when carbadox was introduced as a feed additive for swine. These observations are supported by the results obtained in two clinical trials

58 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

(Anonymous, 1980). Molnar and Magyar (1987) reported an attempt to eradicate SD from swine herds by the aid of carbadox. Complete eradication of clinically apparent SD failed but the course and the severity of the disease was altered. The author also noted that the performance of the trial herds had improved markedly. Successful eradication of SD using carbadox in feed has been reported by other authors (Olson, 1986; Wood, 1987).

A swine dysentery model for evaluation of drug prophylaxis has been developed by Raynaud and co-workers (1980a; 1980b). Using this model, carbadox, and to some extent olaquindox, was found to prevent the outbreak of SD. This was substantiated in a large scale trial in commercial pig herds in France, where 50 ppm carbadox was found to be sufficient for both prophylaxis and treatment of swine dysentery (Raynaud and Bretheau, 1973) Prevention of experimentally induced SD with carbadox or olaquindox at levels used for growth promotion has been reported by several other authors (Davis and Libke, 1976; Williams and Babcock, 1978; Williams and Shively, 1978; Rainier ET AL , 1980a; Rainier ET AL , 1980b; Taylor and Davey, 1980; Biehl ET AL , 1984; Jenkins and Froe, 1985; Jacks ET AL , 1986). In one of these studies, olaquindox-resistant strains were also used as challenge (Williams and Shively, 1978). In those trials, the disease was not prevented, but morbidity was lower than in the non-medicated control group.

There seems to be a good correlation between MIC values of 3 HYODYSENTERIAE for tylosin and therapeutic effect of this substance. Williams

and Shively (1978) found that tylosin at 100-110 ppm completely prevented SD induced by a tylosin-susceptible isolate of 3 HYODYSENTERIAE, while it was

only partly effective against the disease induced by isolates with higher MIC values for tylosin. Jacks and co-workers (Jacks ET AL , 1986) also prevented swine dysentery in pigs experimentally infected with a tylosin-susceptible strain, by feeding tylosin at 110 ppm. When a tylosin-resistant strain was used the disease was not prevented, although mortality was lower in the tylosin-medicated group than in the non medicated group. A new tylosin compound, 3-acetyl-4"-isovaleryl tylosin was also tested and found to be effective at 50 ppm.

Miller and co-workers (1972) studied the effect of different levels of

virginiamycin and tylosin on pigs experimentally infected with 3 HYODYSENTERIAE. They found a good prophylactic effect of virginiamycin at

about 25 ppm but only a moderate effect of tylosin even at about 100 ppm. The antimicrobial resistance pattern of the infecting strain was not presented, but presumably it was resistant to tylosin. Williams and Shively (Williams and Shively, 1978) fed virginiamycin at 50 to 100 ppm to experimentally infected pigs. Virginiamycin could not control the disease, although clinical signs were a little less common in medicated pigs than in non-medicated animals. This was supported by the observations of Rønne and co-workers (1992) who investigated the effect of 20 ppm of virginiamycin.

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 59

3.2.4Porcine proliferative enteritis (PPE)

Porcine proliferative enteritis (proliferative adenomatosis) is an intestinal

disease of pigs characterised by thickening of the intestinal mucosa.

,AWSONIA INTRACELLULARIS (formerly )LEAL SYMBIONT INTRACELLULARIS) is the causative agent. For a long time, the cause of the disease was elusive and various causative agents have earlier been pointed out. Therefore, most of the research bearing to prophylaxis or therapy is recent.

McOrist and co-workers (McOrist ET AL , 1997) evaluated the efficacy of orally administered tylosin for the prevention and treatment of experimentally induced PPE. They found that tylosin at therapeutic levels could prevent PPE in challenge exposed pigs and could also be used for the treatment of previously induced PPE. Even at growth promoting levels, tylosin was effective in preventing the development of PPE. Moore and Zimmermann (1996) reported successful prevention of PPE by tylosin at about 100 ppm. Fleck and Jones (1994) compared 0, 40 and 100 ppm of tylosin for the treatment and prevention of PPE. The higher level of tylosin was effective as treatment of PPE, while 40 ppm did not quite prevent the emergence of clinical signs.

Kyriakis and co-workers (1996a; 1996b) found that in-feed bacitracin had a prophylactic effect against PPE in swine. The dosages used in this study were mostly substantially higher than what is used for growth promotion, and doses were changed over time. Even in the group receiving the lowest levels of bacitracin (50-200 ppm), a notable prophylactic effect could be seen.

3.2.5Other bacterial enteritis in swine

Among bacterial enteric diseases in swine, weaning diarrhoea is one of the most important, both clinically and economically. %SCHERICHIA COLI has been

implicated in the pathogenesis. Bertschinger (Bertschinger, 1976) found that olaquindox at low growth promoting dosages was effective for both prevention and treatment of experimentally induced % COLI-diarrhoea in piglets. Kyriakis (1989) studied the effect of avilamycin and olaquindox on stress-induced post-weaning diarrhoea. At 40 ppm avilamycin or 50 ppm olaquindox, mortality was reduced (p<0.05). The diarrhoea score was considerably lower compared to the control, but the difference was not significant. At 80 ppm avilamycin, both diarrhoea and mortality were reduced (p<0.05).

Holmgren (1994) found that prophylactic treatment with 122 ppm or 173 ppm olaquindox in commercial swine herds reduced (p<0.01) the incidence of post-weaning diarrhoea in all but one of the herds investigated. From the herd where olaquindox had no prophylactic effect, olaquindox-resistant % COLI were isolated.

60 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

Troutt and co-workers (1974) found that carbadox at maximum AFA

dosage reduced clinical signs and intestinal lesions in pigs experimentally infected with 3ALMONELLA Cholerasuis

Most AFA are, or have been, used for therapeutic purposes and for some AFA the maximum dosage permitted for growth promotion is the same or nearly the same as recommended for prophylaxis and treatment of disease.

Most AFA have prophylactic and/or therapeutic effects on enteric diseases, at permitted dosages.

3.3Growth and feed efficiency responses to AFA in pigs and poultry

AFA were introduced in the early 1950s and have played a major role in the development of intensive and industrialised livestock production.

There is a great variation in responses of animals to AFA (CEC, 1993 , see table 3.IV). When judging these promoting or enhancing effects one has to consider the age and type of animals, the duration of AFA administration and the performance level of the control group. The major part of the research in this area with different animal species has been performed by the manufacturing and feed industries, whereas a relatively limited part has been performed by independent research bodies (Brenninkmeiyer, 1996).

3.3.1Growth and feed efficiency responses to AFA in pigs

The response of younger animals, piglets as well as broiler chickens and calves, to AFA is superior compared to responses in older animals. In piglets the growth responses to AFA varies between 9 and 30% and the feed efficiency responses between 6 and 12%, whereas for growing-finishing pigs the level of response is inferior (Thomke and Elwinger, 1997b).

There has been a tendency to increase the level of AFA with time (Rosen, 1995). Some studies indicate a decreasing effect of AFA on daily weight gain and feed efficiency over time (Gruber, 1986). However, Schneider (1992) was unable to find differences in growth rate and feed efficiency for tylosin in growing-finishing pigs comparing the period of 1969/79 versus 1980/90.

A general opinion is that growth and feed efficiency responses of pigs and broiler chickens to AFA is lower under improved environmental conditions than in poorer environments. Rosen (1995) estimated the ratio in response between a very good and a poor environment to 1:2.

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 61

Table 3.IV. Percentage responses in growth performance and feed efficiency as a result of AFA usage in livestock production, compared with unsupplemented control diets, as reported by different authors (sources cit. by De Craene and Viaene, 1992; CEC, 1993)

4ABELL )6 3AMMANST¤LLNING AV PROCENTUELL EFFEKT AV !&4 P¥ TILLV¤XT OCH FODERUTNYTTJANDE HOS OLIKA HUSDJUR J¤MF¶RT MED OBEHANDLAD KONTROLL ENLIGT VAD SOM RAPPORTERATS AV OLIKA F¶RFATTARE K¤LLOR CIT AV $E #RAENE AND 6IAENE

#%#

!NIMAL SPECIES 'ROWTH DAILY WEIGHT GAIN &EED EFFICIENCY
3OURCE    
0IGLETS    
CEC (1993) 16 9
'ROWING PIGS KG    
CEC (1993) 9 5.5
&INISHING PIGS KG SLAUGHTER    
CEC (1993) 0 0
'ROWING FINISHING PIGS    
Bickel (1983) 5-10 5-7
Hudd (1983) 4-5 4-5
Mordenti et al. (1979) 6.5 4.1
Weiss (1989) 1.9-8.6 0.7-5.1
Robinson (1969) 10-20 5-10
CEC (1993) 3.5 3
"ROILER CHICKENS    
Birzer and Gropp (1991) 4 4
Hudd (1983) 3-4 3-4
Mordenti et al. (1979) 5.0 3.5
Robinson (1969) 5-10 5
CEC (1993) 4 4
,AYING HENS    
CEC (1993) 2 1
6EAL CALVES    
Birzer and Gropp (1991) 10 5
CEC (1993) 7 4
     

Some discrepancy exists between different reports on the effect of AFA on sow performance. Speer (1974) concluded that the farrowing rate was improved by the use of AFA. However, others state AFA had no effects on oestrus, mating behaviour or breeding efficiency (Myers and Speer, 1973). Soma and Speer (1975) reported improved litter weights at birth and at

62 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

weaning This could not be corroborated by Frölich and co-workers (1974) under Swedish conditions.

Based on the available literature data, Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) estimated the average response in growth rate to 17% and in feed efficiency to 9%, when piglet diets were supplemented with AFA. Corresponding responses for growing-finishing pigs were inferior, and averaged 3.6% for growth rate and 3.1% for feed efficiency.

Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) also tried to predict the responses on performance in the Swedish pig industry to a re-introduction of APE. They assumed a lower response level on performance as a result of changes in the animal welfare rules, the current rearing and production models and performance levels in Sweden. For the piglet sector they calculated a response to AFA of 4-5% for growth performance and feed efficiency. For growing-finishing pigs a lower level of responses to AFA, of 1.5-2% was estimated.

3.3.2Growth and feed efficiency responses to AFA in poultry

In broiler production the administration of AFA can yield an effect in comparison with the unsupplemented control of between -1 and 6% (Brenninkmeiyer, 1996).

Swedish and Danish experiments, performed during the period 1967-76 with broiler chickens fed bacitracin have been reviewed by Elwinger (1976). This antibacterial improved growth rate on average by 2.0% and feed efficiency by 1.3%. There were no differences in mortality. Similar to the result for pigs, responses in broiler chickens to AFA are superior in the first growth phase, as compared with the second.

In a comprehensive review, Rosen (1996), arrived at responses in growth rate and feed efficiency of 2 and 3%, respectively. It was also observed that AFA were more effective with respect to live weight gains when used in diseased than in apparently healthy birds. When including anticoccidials, the growth-promoting effect of the AFA themselves was clearly limited, due to the fact that some anticoccidials have antibacterial effects as well.

Based on available literature data, Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) estimated the overall responses of broiler chickens to AFA as regards growth rate and feed efficiency and found it to be on average 3.9 and 2.9%, respectively.

A re-introduction of AFA into today's Swedish broiler chicken industry would induce responses in performance and feed efficiency at a lower level than those reported above. An explanation for this is that the Swedish broiler industry has introduced production models without AFA, with a very high standard of hygiene and by the use of feeding programmes including a mixture of enzyme preparations. A tentative response level for performance and feed efficiency of 1-1.5% may be assumed.

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 63

In pigs the responses to AFA in terms of growth performance and feed efficiency are higher in piglets than in growing pigs and for finishing pigs the effects seem to be minute.

A re-introduction of AFA into Swedish pig and broiler meat production would most likely lead to lower levels of responses for growth performance and feed efficiency than what is reported in the literature. This is because these production systems have adjusted to production without AFA usage.

3.4Alternatives to AFA

Livestock performance and feed efficiency are closely interrelated with the qualitative and quantitative microbial load of the host animal, including the alimentary tract and the animal environment. Appropriate nutrient supply and choice of ingredients and their proper preparation with respect to the animal’s digestive capacity will minimise nutrient losses, overloading, disturbances and intestinal overcrowding by harmful microbial flora. Hence, improvements in feed composition and feeding strategies is an alternative to usage of AFA.

Despite a vast body of information, details on the mode of action of both enzymes and probiotics are still lacking. Obviously, more research is needed to develop more efficient enzymes and to find out efficient combinations of enzyme preparations suitable for individual and compounded feedstuffs

3.4.1Enzymes

Supplementing feed with enzymatic preparations may improve the digestive capacity, particularly in young animals. Thereby, nutrient utilisation in the anterior part of the gastrointestinal tract may be improved, possibly limiting the incidence of intestinal perturbation.

Some experiments demonstrate that the beneficial effects achieved by AFA can at least partly be obtained by the inclusion of dietary enzymes affecting

the physical properties of the ingested non-starch polysaccharides (Elwinger and Teglöf, 1991; Kronseder, 1993; Miles ET AL, 1996; Vranjes and Wenk,

1996).

Thomke and Elwinger (1997a) assessed the effects of various enzyme preparations on the nutrient digestibility and performance in pigs, based on available literature data, and arrived at a value for the average feed efficiency response of approximately 4% in piglets and about 2% in growing-finishing

64 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

pigs. For broiler chickens the average improvement of feed efficiency was about 4% (Thomke and Elwinger, 1997a) which is similar to the figure arrived at in the extensive compilation undertaken by Kronseder (1993).

In terms of improved digestibility and feed efficiency a fair estimate of the improvement by enzyme supplementation for young pigs and poultry according to the literature reviewed above would be approximately 3-4%. Calculating with an average digestibility of organic matter in cereal-based diets for these animal species of 80%, one arrives at a decrease in animal nutrient voidings by 15-20%.

3.4.2Probiotics

Fuller (1992) recently redefined ”probiotic” as a live microbial feed supplement that beneficially affects the host animal by improving its intestinal microbial balance.

The probiotic concept is generally based on a viable micro-organism culture with capacity to adhere to structures in the intestine. In selecting microbial strains with probiotic potentials, their genetic stability and intestinal colonising capacity as well as their stabilising properties are of main concern.

The efficacy of administrating probiotics seems to be dependent on a number of conditions, e.g. the physiological or health status of the animal, environmental factors such as feed regimen and microbial load. Beneficial effects are more often observed in neonatal animals and in weaners than in older animals.

In evaluating the great number of reports on the efficacy of probiotic organisms and substances in poultry, Barrow (1992) points out a number of factors hampering a critical appraisal. The vast majority of results on the efficacy of probiotics in poultry is reported as abstracts with essential information lacking, e.g. on the identity of strains used and on experimental design. The implantation in the gastrointestinal tract of the strains used is rarely assessed. The microbiological results in nutrition-oriented papers are often poorly interpreted. A further comment is that in a number of reports in which performance and health could be improved by probiotics, the general conditions seem to have been poor and non-representative with respect to production level and morbidity. Moreover, Barrow (1992) in his review considers that some of the interpretations of the results are obviously overoptimistic and arise mainly from a naive and uncritical acceptance of the data or speculations by previous workers.

According to the review by Mead (1995), there are a number of

commercial preparations available that have been successfully used in the prophylaxis of #LOSTRIDIUM and 3ALMONELLA infections in poultry. Recently,

Abu-Ruwaida and co-workers (1995) confirmed the potential of this method

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 65

against salmonellosis. The prophylactic treatment of salmonellosis is based on the principle of early establishment of an adult intestinal microflora in the young bird by supplying a suspension of anaerobic cultures of intestinal material, thereby competitively excluding pathogenic organisms. However, criteria on which to select micro-organisms for protective purposes are lacking at present and will remain so until more is known about factors influencing salmonella colonisation at the cellular level and the protective mechanism(s) involved (Mead, 1995).

Swedish experimental results when using the probiotic Broilact® have been

promising, with a significantly lowered mortality and lowered caecal counts of # PERFRINGENS (Elwinger ET AL , 1992).

Supplementing feed with enzymatic preparations may improve the digestive capacity, particularly in young animals.

Enzyme additives affect the physical properties of ingested polysaccharides.

Some probiotics have been demonstrated to improve piglet performance and health. The efficacy of probiotics is difficult to evaluate in many instances, since experimental details are poorly presented.

More research is needed both on enzymes and probiotics and their mode of action.

3.5Addendum: A benefit cost analysis of reintroduction of AFA in Sweden.

3.5.1Executive Summary

If antibacterial feed additives (AFA) were to be used in the Swedish production of pork, egg and broilers (poultry meat) the expected direct savings in the production costs would be between 0.5-1%. However, these estimates do not regard externalities such as the impact on demand for these animal products, nor the costs of increased antibiotic resistance both in veterinary and human medicine.

The economic impact of AFA on the Community level should be scrutinised, having regard to all relevant factors and externalities including

(a) the results of the GATT and CAP reform, (b) the costs of increased antibiotic resistance, (c) the dynamic effects for the industry within the Community, and (d) the smaller distortions of the world market due to subsidised exports from the EU. Previous studies have not accounted for the increased opening of the EU internal market to the world market due to the

66 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

GATT/WTO agreement and the increased fickleness of the consumers with regard to the perceived safety of the food of animal origin. The gains from lower export restitutions and increased import levies could be used to compensate farmers if AFA were not to be used as feed additives.

In the final analysis one should, moreover, also consider the danger of losing the consumer confidence in the safety of meat and eggs for which the continued use of AFA could be a risk factor.

3.5.2Introductory comments

This benefit cost analysis will examine the monetary impact for Swedish farmers, if AFA were to be used in the pork and poultry sector.

The estimates presented were derived from the budget sheets from the Swedish University of Agricultural Science’s extension service (SLU- Kontakt, 1996) and the budget sheets were adopted to capture the variation of estimates concerning the effects of AFA under Swedish conditions. The results were presented as estimated savings in production costs in SEK per kg produced meat or eggs, and also as the estimated monetary gain for the whole segment of the industry.

Since Sweden is a member of the EU, the market prices could be assumed to be constant with regard to the putative use of AFA. In consequence, decreased production costs would benefit the Swedish agricultural industry as such. The distribution of benefits between the primary producers, and the industry was not possible to estimate, and was not within the purview of this report.

Another uncertainty was the consumer response if AFA were to be used in pig and poultry production. The assumption both in the CEC report (1993) and the De Crane and Viane report (1992), that the consumer will only respond to price changes, seems to be contradicted by the BSE experience within the EU and also by the scrapie experience in Norway. In both cases considerable drops in the consumption of meat occurred. There is a risk of damaging the Swedish consumer confidence if AFA were to be used in Swedish animal production. This should not be ignored.

This report presents the models based on the budget sheets for the pig industry, for the egg production and finally for the poultry meat production. Moreover, the De Crane and Viane (1992) report is elaborated on to show an alternative analysis of the impact of AFA on the Community level with the egg market as an example. This is because the GATT agreement resulted in a downward slope of prices within the EU and this exogenous downward pressure on prices was ignored by the same report.

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 67

3.5.3Gains if AFA were to be used in Sweden

Jonasson and Andersson (1996) indicated that the costs for AFA were approximately 0.02 SEK per kg feed for the pig sector, and the same estimate was also used in the poultry sector. The same authors noted that by using AFA, one should be able to use cheaper feed ingredients, thus lowering the net costs of AFA. However, they provided no estimate of this cost reduction.

Simulation of outcomes

All budget sheets were simulated 1000 times using @ Risk (Palisade Corp.) to capture the uncertainties with regard to the effect on growth and feed conversions if AFA were to be used in Swedish pig and poultry production.

Results

The results of the study appear in table 3.V, while the more detailed results for each kind of production appear in tables 3.VI - 3.IX. The detailed budget sheets used for the estimation of the putative benefits appear in Annex F, tables 1-4.

The savings on the supply side is around 1% of the production costs. However, this benefit must in the final analysis be weighed against the possibility of disturbances on the demand side due to adverse consumer reactions and externalities such as the costs of the increased antibiotic resistance both for animals and humans. Based on the experience from the last 10 years of not using AFA, the Swedish pig and poultry meat market could be foreseen to experience disturbances on the demand side if AFA were to be used.

Table 3.V. Possible gains at the supply side if AFA were to be used in the Swedish pork and poultry industry

4ABELL 6 -¶JLIGA VINSTER P¥ LEVERANT¶RSSIDAN OM !&4 ¥TER B¶RJADE ATT ANV¤NDAS I SVENSK FL¤SK OCH SLAKTKYCKLINGPRODUKTION

  2EDUCED #OST OF !&! "ENEFIT )NDUSTRY NET
  PRODUCTION COSTS MILLION 3%+ COST RATIO GAIN
  MILLION 3%+     MILLION 3%+
Piglet 47 4 11 43
Slaughter pig 47 16 3 31
Egg 11 5 2.3 6
Broiler 9 3 3 6

If consumers’ confidence in the safety of e.g. pig and poultry meat diminishes, then the consequences tend to result in decreased demand. Recent experiences suggest that a drop in demand of 10-25% should be

68 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

foreseen. Given a price elasticity of -0.5, this could indicate a decrease in the market price of 20 to 50%. Recent similar experiences include the drop in beef prices and increased market management expenses due to BSE and its impact on the demand for beef within the EU during the 90s, and also the diminished demand for mutton due to the fear of scrapie transmission to humans in Norway during 1996.

3.5.4The pig industry

Piglet production assumptions

The following assumptions concerning the effects of AFA in piglets were made: the number of sows in Sweden amounts to 237 355 in 1995 according to the official yearbook of agricultural statistics (SCB, 1997). However, not all piglets from these sows should be foreseen to receive AFA. Exemptions include e.g. elite breeding herds and organic farming. It was assumed that the offsprings of around 230 000 sows were candidates to receive AFA.

Earlier estimates of an increase in piglet mortality of 1.5% after the prohibition of AFA in 1986 (Robertsson and Lundeheim, 1994) had to be adjusted to the present Swedish situation (see chapter 2). It was assumed that AFA would lead to a decrease in piglet mortality by 0.6%, based on the calculations by Wierup (1996).

To incorporate all relevant information on feed efficacy and piglet growth weighted approaches were used in which 0% was set as the minimum.

Feed efficacy was assumed to improve on average by 4.6%. The estimated effect on feed efficiency (FEFAC according to CEC, 1993) for Danish piglets was 2%, while the average effect on feed efficiency within the EU was 7.3% according CEC. Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an effect of feed efficiency of 4.5% if AFA were to be used under current Swedish conditions, and the upper estimate given in the same report was 9%. The average of these estimates was used.

Piglet growth was assumed to improve on average by 6.8%. The estimated growth (FEFAC according to CEC, 1993) for Danish piglets was 2% and the average effect within the EU was 8.5%. Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an effect on growth of around 4.5% if AFA were to be used under the current Swedish conditions, and the upper estimate given in the same report was 16%. The average of these estimates was used.

Veterinary and therapeutic costs was assumed to be reduced by 2 SEK per piglet, if AFA was introduced (Jonasson and Andersson, 1996).

Table 3.VI: The results of 1000 simulations if AFA were to be used in Swedish piglet production, mean value, with the 5th-95th percentile range in parentheses

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 69

4ABELL 6) 2ESULTATET AV SIMULERINGAR AV EFFEKTEN OM !&4 ¥TER B¶RJADE ANV¤NDAS I SVENSK SVINPRODUKTION MEDELV¤RDE MED E E PERCENTILEN INOM PARENTES

  3AVED #OST OF !&! .ET BENEFIT
  PRODUCTION COSTS    
SEK per piglet 10.19 0.93 9.23
produced (6.76-13.62) (0.86-1.01) (5.81-12.67)
SEK per sow 205.01 18.75 186.26
  (134-274) (18-20) (116-255)
Savings in 1.18 0.108 1.07
production costs (%) (0.78-1.58) (0.10-0.11) (0.67-1.47)
Industry benefits 47.2 4.3 42.8
(million SEK) (31-63) (4.1-4.5) (27-59)

The expected benefit cost ratio was 11 (mean value of simulations) while the minimum benefit/cost ratio was 5.6, the maximum was 15.9 and the 5th to 95th percentile range was 7.2-14.7. In other words, under these assumptions the use of AFA in piglet production should produce a benefit for the piglet producing part of the pork industry of around 43 million SEK. The distribution of the benefits within the industry was not possible to predict.

Slaughter pig assumptions

It was assumed that around 3.5 million slaughter pigs would receive AFA. According to the official year book of agricultural statistics (SCB, 1997) the number of pigs slaughtered in Sweden was 3.7 million in 1995. However, not all herds would use AFA in their pig production. Moreover, it was assumed that if AFA were to be used in piglet production (production of pigs of 25 kg live weight), this would not interfere with the market for piglets and the piglet price which the pig farmers faced. No effect was foreseen on mortality by using AFA in the slaughter pig production stage.

To incorporate all relevant information on feed efficiency and growth, weighted approaches were used in which 0% was set as the minimum.

Feed efficacy was assumed to improve by, on average, 1.9%. The estimated effect for Danish slaughter pigs was 1.5% and the average effect within the EU was 2.1% according to CEC (1993). Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an effect of feed efficiency of 1.75%, and an upper estimate of 3.1%. The average of these estimates was used.

Table 3.VII. The results of 1000 simulations of the effect of AFA in the slaughter pig production, the values are represented as mean values (5th-95th percentile)

70 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

4ABELL 6)) 2ESULTATET AV SIMULERINGAR AV EFFEKTEN OM !&4 ¥TER B¶RJADE ANV¤NDAS I SVENSK SLAKTSVINPRODUKTION MEDELV¤RDE E E PERCENTILEN

  3AVED PRODUCTION #OSTS OF .ET BENEFIT
  COSTS ANTIBIOTICS  
SEK per slaughter 13.5 4.5 9.0
pig (7.4-19.7) (4.3-4.7) (2.3-15.3)
SEK per kg pig meat 0.173 0.058 0.115
  (0.094-0.253) (0.056-0.060) (0.03-0.195)
Savings in 0.99 0.33 0.65
production costs (%) (0.54-1.4) (0.32-0.35) (0.16-1.1)
Industry benefits 47.2 15.8 31.4
(million SEK) (26-69) (15-16) (8-53)

Growth was assumed to improve by on average 1.6%. The estimate on growth for Danish slaughter pigs was 1.5% and the average effect within EU was 2.4% (CEC, 1993). Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an effect on growth of 1.75%, with an upper estimate of the effect of 3.6%. The average of these estimates was used.

The expected benefit/cost ratio was 3 (mean value of simulations) while the minimum benefit/cost ratio was 0.58 with a maximum of 5.6 and a 5th to 95th percentile range of 1.5-4.4. In other words if examining only the production stage, the use of AFA would have a net benefit in most cases. However, in a few scenarios (1%) one would expect a negative benefit in the production stage. The impact on the demand side and possible externalities such as the costs for increased resistance to antibiotics were not assessed.

A brief comment on the results

Gains of such magnitude, around 74 million SEK, for piglet and slaughter pig production could be questioned based on the variations in piglet prices in Sweden and Denmark. If the only difference were the usage of AFA, then the Swedish piglet could be foreseen to be 10 SEK more expensive than its Danish counterpart. However, the market prices have varied significantly and according to the agricultural paper Land, April 11, 1997, the Swedish piglets were 37 SEK more expensive than their Danish counterparts, while last November according to Land, November 29, 1996, the Swedish piglets were 53 SEK less expensive than their Danish counterparts.

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 71

3.5.5Egg production

Assumptions

No effect on the mortality of laying hens due to the use of AFA was foreseen, and the improvements in feed efficiency and laying performance were assumed to be in addition to the use of digestive enzymes and coccidiostats in the feed.

To incorporate all relevant information on feed efficiency and laying performance weighted approaches were used in which 0% was set as the minimum.

Feed efficacy was assumed to improve by on average 1.1%. The estimate by the food industry for Danish layers was 2.2% and the average effect within EU was 1.2% (CEC, 1993). Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an effect on feed efficiency of 1% using Zn-bacitracin. The average of these estimates was used.

Laying performance was assumed to improve by on average 1.4%. The estimate by the food industry for Danish laying hens was 3% and the average effect within EU was 1.3% (CEC, 1993). Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an effect on laying performance of 1%, using Zn-bacitracin. The average of these estimates was used.

Table 3.VIII: The results of 1000 simulations of the effect of AFA in the consumer egg production, the values are represented as mean values (5th- 95th percentile)

4ABELL 6))) 2ESULTATET AV SIMULERINGAR AV EFFEKTEN OM !&4 ¥TER B¶RJADE ANV¤NDAS I SVENSK ¤GGPRODUKTION MEDELV¤RDE E E PERCENTILEN

  3AVING OF #OSTS OF ANTIBIOTICS .ET BENEFIT
  PRODUCTION COSTS    
SEK/kg egg 0.104 0.0455 0.0587
  (0.052-0.158) (0.0450-0.0460) (0.006-0.113)
SEK/100 hens 165 72 93
  (83-255) (70-75) (10-183)
Savings of production 1.20 0.52 0.68
costs (%) (0.87-1.85) (0.51-0.54) (0.07-1.32)
Industry benefits 10.9 4.75 6.1
(million SEK) (5.5-17) (4.7-4.8) (0.7-12)
72 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

Results

The expected benefit/cost ratio was 2.3 (mean value of simulations) while the minimum benefit/cost ratio was 0.37. The maximum was 4.4 and the 5th to 95th percentile range was 1.1-3.5. In other words, if examining only the production stage the use of AFA would have a net benefit in most cases. However, in some scenarios, 4 out of 100 egg producing farms, one would expect a negative benefit in the production stage. The impact on the demand side and possible externalities such as the costs for increased resistance to antibiotics were not assessed in this analysis.

3.5.6Production of poultry meat (broilers)

Assumptions

No effect of AFA on the mortality of broilers was foreseen. The effect of AFA on feed efficacy was assumed to be in addition to the use of digestive enzymes and coccidiostats.

To incorporate all relevant information on feed efficiency and growth promotion, weighted approaches were used in which 0% were set as the minimum.

Feed efficacy was assumed to improve by on average 1.4%. The estimate by the food industry for Danish layers was 1.85% and the average effect within the EU was 2.0% CEC (1993). Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an improved feed efficiency of between 1-1.5%, while the upper estimate according to same authors was 2.9%.

Growth performance was assumed to improve by on average 2.1%. The estimate by the food industry for Danish broilers was 2.5% and the average effect within EU was 2.5% (CEC, 1993). Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an effect on growth performance of 2%, using Zn-bacitracin in 1976, while the usage of AFA in general would indicate an effect of 1-1.5% while the upper estimate for the effect on growth was 3.9% according to the same authors.

Results

The expected benefit/cost ratio was 3.2 (mean value of simulations) while the minimum benefit/cost ratio was negative and the maximum was 9.4, and the 5th to 95th percentile range was 0.4-7.0. In other words, if examining only the production stage the use of AFA would have a net benefit in most cases. However, in some scenarios, 18 out of 100 farms, one would expect a negative result. The impact on the demand side and possible externalities

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 73

such as the costs of increased resistance to antibiotics were not assessed in this analysis.

Table 3.IX. The results of 1000 simulations of the effect of AFA in the poultry meat production, the values are represented as mean values (5th-95th percentile)

4ABELL )8 2ESULTATET AV SIMULERINGAR AV EFFEKTEN OM !&4 ¥TER B¶RJADE ANV¤NDAS I SVENSK SLAKKYCKLINGPRODUKTION MEDELV¤RDE E E PERCENTILEN

  3AVINGS OF #OSTS OF ANTIBIOTICS .ET BENEFIT
  PRODUCTION COSTS    
SEK/ kg meat 0.107 0.034 0.73
  (0.0-0.22) (0.031-0.038) (-0.02-0.19)
SEK/ batch of 98000 31000 66700
80000 chicken (0-202000) (28200-33700) (-28000-173000)
Savings of 1.5 0.47 1.0
production costs (%) (0.0-3.1) (0.44-0.50) (-0.4-2.7)
Industry benefits 8.5 2.7 5.8
(million SEK) (0-18) (2.5-3.0) (-2.5-15)

3.5.7A brief comment on an earlier report

In the following, a brief comment on the report by De Crane and Viaene (1992) dealing with the economic effects of performance enhancers in food animal production will be given.

Two issues are elaborated here i. the impact on the market of the withdrawal of performance enhancers and ii. the impact of the GATT-WTO regime and reform of the common agricultural policy (CAP).

An alternative point of view is presented, in which the adaptation will fully be on the supply side, since prices are presumed to be constant and unchanged regardless of whether AFA are permitted or not within the EU. This assumption is based on the GATT agreement for agriculture and the CAP reform, where the previous variable import levies and export restitutions are fixed and thereafter shall be reduced annually. Moreover, the market shall be opened for a small, but increasing share of imported animal products including meat and eggs. Hence, there will be a downward pressure on the prices during the next years. The De Crane and Viaene report (1992) mentions these effects in an appendix, but does not account for them in the substantive analysis.

74 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

The removal of AFA will result in an upward shift in the supply curve, initially it is here assumed as a parallel shift of the curve. This means that for the same price a smaller quantity will be supplied, or that a higher price is required for the same quantity to be supplied. In the long run, dynamic effects will dominate, and possibly change the slope of the supply curve.

Notice that the producer surplus change is estimated as the increase in production cost times the decrease of the amount supplied, in the case of AFA being prohibited.

The impact on the market of the withdrawal of AFA

The report has examined the impact for each country and we will elaborate this for the egg market within the EU. The price elasticity of demand is assumed to be -0.5 and the price elasticity of supply is assumed to be 0.5.

&OR EGGS the impact would be an increase in production costs of 1.2%, which would result in an increase of market price of 0.6%, which would result in a decrease in supply of 5300 tonnes (0.1% of 4.466 million tonnes) while demand would also decrease 5200 tonnes (0.1% of 4.439 million tonnes). This would increase the need for export by 100 tonnes to 27700 tonnes, and a drop in economic surplus of 28.7 million ECU, i.e., the market

seems to be broadly in balance.

#OMMENTS: In other words, the impact of the use of AFA in addition to the use of coccidiostats and digestive enzymes would be hard to detect at the market level. Moreover, due to the CAP and GATT reform, an increase in prices is unlikely. The effect of increased production costs would thus be a decrease of supply, i.e., a shift of the supply curve, meaning less surplus export and less subsidies paid (Gardner, 1988). If the market price was kept unchanged, how much would the supply drop due to the cost increase?

If one could use the supply elasticity 0.5, i.e. % change in quantity/ % change in price, which is derived from the aggregate cost function as an estimate for the response to an increase in production costs, the supply would drop by roughly 1.2% * 0.5 which is 0.6%, or approximately 53000 tonnes, i.e., the surplus situation would change to an import situation, with 25300 tonnes of eggs in net import. If one assumed an import levy/export restitution of 10% or 90 ECU/tonne, this would lead to a savings at the community level of 53000 tonnes times 90 ECU/ tonne or 4.8 million ECU. In this case the consumer surplus would be unchanged, while the producer surplus would decrease by 4.4 million tonnes times 10 ECU/tonne or 44 million ECU. A net loss of 39 million ECU could be foreseen, if the prices were assumed unchanged or 0.9% for the producers.

In other words using De Crane and Vianes (1992) assumptions, not using AFA in egg production would have insignificant impact on the economics of egg production within the EU. This does not account for the possible costs of

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 75

a loss of consumer confidence, for which the continued use of AFA is a risk factor.

Economic studies of the use of AFA has often arrived at positive conclusions for the use of AFA. Nevertheless the assumptions underlying the studies, in particular about the ignorant consumer, are probably too restrictive and at variance with the experience in the beef market regarding BSE. Hence one could question whether the results are of any significant relevance for future decisions concerning AFA.

76 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

References

!BU 2UWAIDA ! 3 (USSEINI - AND "ANAT ) - , 1995. Salmonella exclusion in broiler chicks by the competitive action of adult gut microflora. -ICROBIOS 59-

69.

!LLEN $ , 3TRAW " % -ENGELING 7 , $ !LLAIRE 3 AND 4AYLOR $ * EDS , 1992. $ISEASES OF 3WINE 7th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames , Iowa..

!NONYMOUS, 1980. Carbadox vs lincomycin in swine dysentery control. -ODERN 6ETERINARY 0RACTICE 152-153.

"ARROW 0 ! 1992. 0ROBIOTICS FOR CHICKENS In: Probiotics - the scientific basis. Chapman & Hall, London. pp. 225-257.

"ERTSCHINGER ( 5 , 1976. Chemotherapeutic efficacy of olaquindox in experimental coli diarrhoea and enterotoxaemia in piglets. 3CHWEIZER !RCHIV FUR 4IERHEILKUNDE

397-407.

"IEHL , -ANSFIELD - -EYER 2 7OODS ' AND 3TURM 2 , 1984. Comparison of

lincomycin and carbadox in the control of swine dysentery in commingled feeder pigs. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS Gent. p. 190.

"RENNINKMEIYER # , 1996. The use of antimicrobials as growth promoters in poultry. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 88 7ORLDtS 0OULTRY #ONGRESS September 2-5, New Delhi. pp. 119-

124.

#ALDWELL * $ 5NDERDAHL . 2 AND 9OUNG ' ! , 1961. Swine repopulation. III. Performance of primary SPF pigs on farms. *OURNAL OF !MERICAN 6ETERINARY !SSOCIATION 141-145.

#%#, 1993. The impact of animal husbandry in the European Community of the use of growth promoters in animal feed. Volume 1 and 2.pp. 319+142. Office for Official publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, Brussels.

#OATES - % 1980. 4HE GUT MICROFLORA AND GROWTH In: Growth in animals. Butterworths, Boston. pp. 175-188.

$AVIS * 7 AND ,IBKE + ' , 1976. Bay VA 9391 for prevention of swine dysentery.

6ETERINARY -EDICINE AND 3MALL !NIMAL #LINICIAN 1257-1259.

$E #RAENE ! AND 6IAENE * , 1992. Economic effects of technology in agriculture. Do performance enhancers for animals benefit consumers?pp. 162. University of Ghent, Ghent.

$EGR© - , 1996. Interferons and other cytokines in bacterial infections. *OURNAL OF )NTERFERON 2ESEARCH 417-426.

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 77

%LWINGER + , 1976. Sammanställning över danska och svenska försök med tillväxtstimulerande ämnen (främst zinkbacitracin och payzone i foder till fjäderfä (report). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

%LWINGER + %NGSTR¶M " "ERNDTSON % &OSSUM / AND 4EGL¶F " , 1993. Effect of Avotan (avoparcin) and Maxus (avilamycin) on the caecal growth of #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS and the occurrence of necrotic enteritis in broilers (report). Swedish

University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

%LWINGER + %NGSTR¶M " "ERNDTSON % &OSSUM / AND 7ALDENSTEDT , , 1995.

Effect of Maxus (avilamycin), Avotan (avoparcin), Monteban (narasin) and Elancoban (monensin-Na) on the caecal growth of #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS in

broilers (report). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

%LWINGER + %NGSTR¶M " "ERNDTSON % &OSSUM / AND 7ALDENSTEDT , , 1996.

Effect of growth promoters and coccidiostats on performance and growth of

#LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS in the caeca of broilers. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 88 7ORLD S 0OULTRY #ONGRESS 2-5 September, New Delhi. p. 219.

%LWINGER + 3CHNEITZ # "ERNDTSON % &OSSUM / 4EGL¶F " AND %NGSR¶M " ,

1992. Factors affecting the incidence of necrotic enteritis, caecal carriage of

#LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS and bird performance in broiler chickens. !CTA 6ETERINARIA 3CANDINAVICA 361-370.

%LWINGER + AND 4EGL¶F " , 1991. Performance of broiler chickens as influenced by a

dietary enzyme complex with and without antibiotic supplementation. !RCHIV FUR 'EFLUGELKUNDE 69-73.

%YSSEN ( AND $E 3OMER 0 , 1967. Effects of 3TREPTOCOCCUS FAECALIS and a filterable agent in growth and nutrient absorption in gnotobiotic chicks. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE

323-333.

&LECK - + *ONES ' & 0OOMVISES 0 AND )NGKANINUN 0 , 1994. Porcine proliferative enteropathy outbreak and treatment using tylosin. )N PROCEEDINGS OFTH )063 #ONGRESS June 26-30, Bangkok. p. 345.

&ORBES - AND 0ARK * 9 , 1959. Growth of germ-free and conventional chicks. Effect of diet, dietary penicillin, and bacterial environment. *OURNAL OF .UTRITION 69-78.

&R¶HLICH ! +VARNFORS % -¥NSSON ) AND 3IMONSSON ! , 1974. Antibiotic additives in sows´ diet - effects on production and intestinal flora. !CTA !GRICULTURAE 3CANDINAVICA 273-285.

&ULLER 2 , 1992. History and development of probiotics. )N R. Fuller (ed.), 0ROBIOTICS 4HE SCIENTIFIC BASIS Chapman & Hall, London. pp. 1-8.

&ULLER 2 , 1994. Microbial activity in the alimentary tract of birds (domestic chicken,

'ALLUS DOMESTICUS). 0ROCEEDINGS OF THE .UTRITION 3OCIETY 55-61.

'ARDNER " , 1988. 4HE ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURAL POLICIES Macmillan Publishing

Company, New York. pp. 387.

78 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

'RUBER & , 1986. Einfluss der Di-N-Oxide auf die Futteraufnahme beim Schwein. (Thesis). Ludwig Maximilian Universität, München.

'RUNFELD # :HAO # &ULLER * 0OLLOCK ! -OSER ! &RIEDMAN * AND &EINGOLD

+ 2 , 1996. Endotoxin and cytokines induce expression of leptin, the OB gene product in hamsters. #LINICAL )NVESTIGATION 2152-2156.

(OLMGREN . , 1994. Profylaktiska effekter av zinkoxid eller olaquindox mot avvänjningsdiarré hos svin. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING 217-222.

(UNNEMAN 7 ! , 1980. Swine dysentery. From acute outbreaks to an almost subclinical situation. "ULLETIN DE L /FFICE )NTERNATIONAL DES %PIZOOTIES 915-923.

*ACKS 4 - *UDITH & 2 &EIGHNER 3 $ AND ,IKOFF 2 / , 1986. 3-acetyl-4"-isovaleryl tylosin for prevention of swine dysentery. !MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH 2325-2328.

*ANSSON , %LWINGER + %NGSTR¶M " &OSSUM / AND 4EGL¶F " , 1992. Clinical test of the efficacy of virginiamycin and dietary enzyme supplementation against necrotic enteritis (NE) infection in broilers.638. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

*ENKINS % - AND &ROE $ , ))), 1985. Comparing carbadox and bacitracin in the prevention of clinical signs of swine dysentery. 6ETERINARY -EDICINE 90, 92-94.

*ONASSON , AND !NDERSSON ( , 1996. Kartläggning av den svenska modellen - hävstång eller ok för svensk svinproduktion. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

*ORGENSEN " , 1987. Epidemiologiska analyser af sygdomsdata fra svinavelns forsøgsstationer. $ANSK 6ETERINAERTIDSKRIFT 209-219.

*UKES 4 ( (ILL $ # AND "RANION ( $ , 1956. Effect of feeding antibiotics on the intestinal wall of the chick. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE 716-723.

+LASING + # ,AURIN $ % 0ENG 2 + AND &REY $ - , 1987. Immunologically

mediated growth depression in chicks: Influence in feed intake, corticosterone and interleukine-1. *OURNAL OF .UTRITION 1629-1637.

+RINKE ! , AND *AMROZ $ , 1996. Effect of feeding antibiotic avoparcin on organ morphology in broiler chickens. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE 705-710.

+RONSEDER ' , 1993. Wirkung und Verträglichkeit einer kohlenhydratspaltenden Enzympräparation (Roxazyme R G) in Broilerrationen. (Thesis). Ludwig Maximilian University, München.

+YRIAKIS 3 # , 1989. The effects of avilamycin in the control of stress-induced postweaning diarrhoea in piglets. *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 0HARMACOLOGY AND 4HERAPEUTICS 296-301.

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 79

+YRIAKIS 3 # 4SINAS ! ,EKKAS 3 3ARRIS + AND "OURTZIHATZOPOULOU % , 1996a.

Clinical evaluation of in feed zinc bacitracin for the control of porcine intestinal adenomatosis in growing/fattening pigs. 6ETERINARY 2ECORD 489-492.

+YRIAKIS 3 # 4SINAS ! # ,EKKAS 3 3ARRIS + "OURTZI (ATZOPOULOU % "ERGE ' AND *ANSEGERS , , 1996b. Clinical evaluation of in feed zinc bacitracin for the control of porcine intestinal adenomatosis in growing/fattening pigs. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 CONGRESS 7-10 July, Bologna, Italy. p. 331.

,EV - AND &ORBES - , 1959. Growth response to dietary penicillin of germ-free chicks and of chicks with a defined intestinal flora. "RITISH *OURNAL OF .UTRITION 78-84.

-AH© 9 AND /PPENHEIM * * 1992. )NTERLEUKIN In: Encyclopaedia of Immunology. Academic Press, New York. pp. 897-901.

-C/RIST 3 , 1997. Use of oral antibiotics in farm livestock: facts and ethics. *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 0HARMACOLOGY AND 4HERAPEUTICS 3UPPL 175.

-C/RIST 3 -ORGAN * &LECK 6EENHUIZEN - ,AWRENCE + AND +ROGER ( 7 ,

1997. Oral administration of tylosin phosphate for treatment and prevention of proliferative enteropathy in pigs. !MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH 136-

139.

-EAD ' # , 1995. Role of probiotics in controlling foodborne pathogens in poultry. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH %UROPEAN 3YMPOSIUM OF THE 7ORLDtS 0OULTRY 3CIENCE !SSOCIATION pp. 226-232.

-ILES 2 $ "ROWN 2 $ #OMER # 7 AND /ELFKE % , 1996. Influence of an enzyme and an antibiotic on broiler performance. !PPLIED !NIMAL 2ESEARCH 105-117.

-ILLER # 2 0HILIP * 2 &REE 3 - *R AND ,ANDIS , - , 1972. Virginiamycin for prevention of swine dysentery. 6ETERINARY -EDICINE AND 3MALL !NIMAL #LINICIAN

1246-1248.

-OLNAR , AND -AGYAR + , 1987. Studies on the efficacy of Getroxel against 4REPONEMA HYODYSENTERIAE and its role in the control of swine dysentery. !CTA 6ETERINARIA (UNGARICA 405-413.

-OORE ' - AND :IMMERMAN ! ' , 1996. Efficacy of tylosin phosphate administered

in feed for the prevention and control of porcine proliferative enteropathies in commercial swine herds. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 CONGRESS July 7-10,

Bologna. p. 263.

-YERS $ * AND 3PEER 6 # , 1973. Effects of antibiotic and flushing on the performance of sows with short farrowing intervals. !NIMAL 3CIENCE 1125-1128.

/LSON , $ , 1986. Probable elimination of swine dysentery after feeding ronidazole, carbadox or lincomycin and verification by feeding sodium arsanilate. #ANADIAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH 365-368.

0RESCOTT * & AND "AGGOT * $ EDS , 1993. !NTIMICROBIAL THERAPY IN VETERINARY MEDICINE 2nd ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames. pp. 612.

80 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

0RESCOTT * & 3IVENDRA 2 AND "ARNUM $ ! , 1978. The use of bacitracin in the

prevention and treatment of experimentally-induced necrotic enteritis in the chicken. #ANADIAN 6ETERINARY *OURNAL 181-183.

2AINIER 2 ( (ARRIS $ , #LOCK 2 $ +INYON * - AND "RAUER - ! , 1980a.

Carbadox and lincomycin in the treatment and carrier state control of swine dysentery 4REPONEMA HYODYSENTERIAE. !MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH

1349-1356.

2AINIER 2 ( (ARRIS $ , 'LOCK 2 $ +INYON * - AND "RAUER - ! , 1980b.

Prevalence of asymptomatic carriers of swine dysentery following withdrawal of carbadox or lincomycin treatments. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS June 30-

July 3, Copenhagen.

2AYNAUD * 0 AND "RETHEAU ( , 1973. Essais a large echelle du carbadox dans les elevages porcins en France. Bilan en 1972. 2EVUE DE MEDICINE 6ETERINAIRE

375-392.

2AYNAUD * 0 "RUNAULT ' AND 0ATTERSON % " , 1980a. A new swine dysentery

model for evaluation of drug prophylaxis: I. Model development - oral infection plus pen contamination. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS 30 June-3 July,

Copenhagen. p. 248.

2AYNAUD * 0 "RUNAULT ' AND 0ATTERSON % " , 1980b. A new swine dysentery

model for evaluation of drug prophylaxis: II. Efficacy of various drugs in the control of swine dysentery. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS 30 June-3 July,

Copenhagen. p. 249.

2OBERTSSON * … AND ,UNDEHEIM . , 1994. Prohibited use of antibiotics as a feed

additive for growth promotion - effect on piglet health and production parameters.

)N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS June 26-30, Bangkok. p. 282.

2ONNE ( AND *ENSEN * # % , 1992. Virginiamycin susceptibility of 3ERPULINA HYODYSENTERIAE, IN VITRO and IN VIVO. 6ETERINARY 2ECORD 239-240.

2OSEN ' $ 1995. !NTIBACTERIALS IN POULTRY AND PIG NUTRITION In: Biotechnology in Animal Feeds and Feeding. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Weinheim. pp. 143- 172.

2OSEN ' $ , 1996. The nutritional effects of tetracyclines in broiler feeds. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 88 7ORLDtS 0OULTRY #ONGRESS New Delhi. pp. 141-146.

2OURA % (OMEDES * AND +LASING + # , 1992. Prevention of immunologic stress

contributes to the growth-permitting ability of dietary antibiotics in chicks. *OURNAL OF .UTRITION 2383-2390.

3#", 1997. Jordbruksstatistisk årsbok 1996. pp. 244. Statistiska centralbyrån, Örebro, Sweden.

3CHNEIDER 7 , 1992. Wirkung des Futterzusatztsoffes Tylan G in der Schweinemast. 2. Mitt. Leistungsfördernde Effekte. 3CHWEINESUCHT UND 3CHWEINEMAST 118-121.

SOU 1997:132 3. Mode of action and effects 81

3,5 +ONTAKT, 1996. Områdeskalkyler för slaktsvin, smågrisproduktion, värphöns och slaktkyckling. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

3OMA * ! AND 3PEER 6 # , 1975. Effects of PMS and chlortetracycline on the reproductive efficiency of sows. !NIMAL 3CIENCE 100-105.

3PEER 6 # , 1974. Reducing farrowing intervals in sows. &EEDSTUFFS 20-31.

3TAHLY 4 , 1996. Impact of immune system activation on growth and optimal dietary regimens of pigs. )N Gansworthy. (ed.), 2ECENT ADVANCES IN ANIMAL NUTRITION

Butterworths, London. pp. 197-206.

3TAHLY 4 3 7ILLIAMS . ( AND 3WENSON 3 ' , 1996. Impact of carbadox on rate,

efficiency and composition of growth in pigs with a high or low genetic capacity for lean growth. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS 7-10 July, Bologna. p. 413.

3TAHLY 4 3 7ILLIAMS . ( AND :IMMERMANN $ 2 , 1995. Impact of tylosin on rate,

efficiency and composition of growth in pigs with a low or high level of immune system activation. *OURNAL OF !NIMAL 3CIENCE SUPPLEMENT 84.

3TUTZ - 7 *OHNSON 3 , AND *UDITH & 2 , 1983a. Effects of diet and bacitracin on growth, feed efficiency, and populations of #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS in the intestine of broiler chicks. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE 1619-1625.

3TUTZ - 7 *OHNSON 3 , *UDITH & 2 AND -UIR , ! , 1983b. Effect of the antibiotic thiopeptin on #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS and growth and feed efficiency of broiler chicks. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE 1633-1638.

4AYLOR $ * AND $AVEY , ! , 1980. Elimination of 4REPONEMA HYODYSENTERIAE infection from pigs by medication with carbadox. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS June

30- July 3, Copenhagen. p. 251.

4HOMKE 3 AND %LWINGER + , 1997a. Alternatives to antibiotic growth promotants. Report to to Commission on Antimicrobial Feed Additives. pp. 32. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

4HOMKE 3 AND %LWINGER + , 1997b. Growth and feed efficiency responses to antibiotic growth promotants in pigs and poultry. Report to the Commission on Antimicrobial Feed Additives. pp. 17. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

4HOMKE 3 AND %LWINGER + , 1997c. Mode of action of antibiotic growth promotants. Report to the Commission on Antimicrobial Feed Additives. pp. 18. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

4ROUTT ( & (OOPER " % AND (ARRINGTON 2 , 1974. Effect of carbadox in experimentally induced salmonellosis of swine. *OURNAL OF THE !MERICAN 6ETERINARY -EDICAL !SSOCIATION 402-404.

7ALLGREN 0 , 1993a. Infections and immune functions of swine in fattening herds. (Thesis). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

82 3. Mode of action and effects SOU 1997:132

7ALLGREN 0 , 1993b. Infektioners inflytande på tillväxthastigheten hos svin. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING 727-732.

6%4 & 1997. &!33 6%4 3WEDISH LIST OF PERMITTED VETERINARY DRUGS Läkemedelinformation AB (Drug information service of pharmaceutical companies in Sweden), Stockholm.

6IAENE * , 1997. The Swedish animal production system. Could it be applied across the European Union. University of Gent, Gent.

7ICKER $ , )SGRIGG 7 . AND 4RAMMEL * ( , 1977. The control and prevention of necrotic enteritis in broilers with zinc bacitracin. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE 1229-1231.

7IERUP - , 1996. Sverige förbjöd antibiotika i tillväxtbefrämjande syfte 1986 - vad hände med djurhälsan och hur löstes problemen? +UNGLIGA 3KOGS OCH ,ANTBRUKSAKADEMIENS 4IDSKRIFT 69-78.

7ILLIAMS " * AND "ABCOCK 7 % , 1978. )N 6IVO and )N 6ITRO susceptibility of

4REPONEMA HYODYSENTERIAE to carbadox before and after repeated in vitro passage in sublethal concentrations of drug. 6ETERINARY -EDICINE AND 3MALL !NIMAL #LINICIAN

432-433, 436.

7ILLIAMS " * AND 3HIVELY * % , 1978. )N 6ITRO antitreponemal activities of carbadox,

virginiamycin, olaquindox, and tylosin as indices of their effectiveness for preventing swine dysentery. 6ETERINARY -EDICINE AND 3MALL !NIMAL #LINICIAN

349-351.

7OOD % . , 1987. Financial aspects of swine dysentery eradication without depopulation. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS Copenhagen. pp. 112-115.

6RANJES - 6 AND 7ENK # , 1996. Influence of 4RICHODERMA VIRIDAE enzyme complex

on nutrient utilization and performance of laying hens in diets with and without antibiotic supplementation. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE 551-555.

9OUNG ' ! 5NDERDAHL , * 3UMPTON , * 0EO , 3 /LSEN ' 7 +ELLY $ " (UDMAN $ " #ALDWELL * $ AND !DAMS # ( , 1959. Swine repopulation. I. Performance within a "disease-free" experiment station herd. *OURNAL OF !MERICAN 6ETERINARY !SSOCIATION 491-496.

SOU 1997:132 83

4Microbiological aspects on antibacterial feed additives

4.1Introduction

Antibacterial substances (antibiotics and synthetic substances) exert their activity by inhibiting or disturbing vital bacterial processes. The effect is concentration dependent. At levels above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), bacterial growth will cease or the bacteria will be killed. The only way for sensitive bacteria to avoid elimination is to develop resistance. This can be achieved by mutation or by acquisition of genes from other bacteria. Transfer of genes occurs by several mechanisms, namely transduction, transformation, and conjugation mediated by plasmids and/or transposons. The latter mechanism is the most studied and possibly the most important. Horizontal gene transfer between bacteria is a common event and an important factor in microbial evolution.

Antimicrobial resistance, leading to loss of effectiveness of antibacterial drugs, has been targeted by the WHO as one of the major emerging human health problems (WHO, 1994). The consequences of antimicrobial resistance are seen as an increase in morbidity and mortality due to bacterial diseases. Antimicrobial resistance also has a considerable economic impact and is estimated to cost at least US$ 4 billion annually in the United States alone.

The possible influence of antibacterial feed additives (AFA) on resistance in animal and human pathogens has been debated for almost four decades. The development of new techniques, particularly in the field of molecular biology, has provided new insights into these problems.

The antibacterial effect of AFA is also manifested in alterations of the intestinal microflora. The intact microflora is an important barrier against colonisation by enteric pathogens. Disruptions may lead to increased prevalence of zoonotic bacteria in food.

At the end of this chapter, a short glossary of terms used has been provided.

4.2Antibacterial activity of AFA

The concentrations of AFA used in feed for performance enhancement exceed the susceptibility ranges of naturally susceptible intestinal bacteria (table 4.I). Concentrations reached in various parts of the intestine using the approved dosages will depend on a number of factors. Most AFA are poorly,

84 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

if at all, absorbed from the gut. They are therefore likely to be present in concentrations well above the MIC of normally susceptible bacterial species at least in part of the intestine.

The fact that AFA exert an inhibitory effect on the intestinal microflora is evident from various types of experiments. Early studies showed that the growth promoting effect could be associated with changes in the microflora, especially the enterococci and the clostridia, of the animals (see chapter 3.1). This is further substantiated by the preventive effect of AFA against certain intestinal diseases (see chapter 3.2). For therapy, higher doses are generally needed. By definition, therapy will be instituted once the disease is overt. When the infectious agent to be combated is already established in tissues, higher doses will be needed in order to have a satisfactory effect. If the infectious process is located in an internal organ other than the intestine, the administered substance must reach this organ at concentrations well above MIC. As the amount of substance given will then have to be absorbed in adequate amounts and be distributed in a larger volume (the whole body as opposed to only the intestine), higher doses are needed.

Table 4.I. Normal susceptibility ranges of clostridia and enterococci for some AFA compared to permitted levels in feed for performance enhancement (modified from Dutta and Devriese, 1984; Devriese ET AL , 1993)

4ABELL ) +¤NSLIGHET HOS KLOSTRIDIER OCH ENTEROKOCKER F¶R N¥GRA !&4 J¤MF¶RT MED TILL¥TNA HALTER I FODER F¶R AVKASTNINGS¶KNING MODIFIERAT FR¥N $UTTA AND $EVRIESE $EVRIESE ET AL

!NTIBACTERIAL 2ANGE OF MINIMUM INHIBITORY $OSAGES USED FOR
SUBSTANCE CONCENTRATION PPM FOR PERFORMANCE
      ENHANCEMENT
      PPM
  #LOSTRIDIA %NTEROCOCCI  
Avilamycin <0.25-0.5 NA1 2.5-40
Avoparcin 0.5-2 1-2 5-40
Bacitracin <1-42 <0.5-162 5-100
Flavomycin <1-8 0.25-4 1-25
Monensin 0.5-4 1-2 10-40
Spiramycin 0.25-8 0.5-4 5-80
Tylosin <1 1-4 4-40
Virginiamycin 0.25-1 0.25-8 5-80

1 NA = no information available; 2Given in IU/ml

.! INFORMATION SAKNAS 5TTRYCKT I )% ML

The mechanisms of action of the different types of substances used as AFA have been studied in detail, with the exception of the quinoxalines. Currently approved AFA exert their effect on bacteria by one of four mechanisms (table 4.II):

SOU 1997:132 4.Microbiological aspects 85

·inhibition of protein synthesis

·inhibition of cell wall synthesis

·inhibition of DNA synthesis

·alterations of the cytoplasmic membrane

Concerning information on resistance mechanisms and their genetic background, practically all published studies on resistance mechanisms have focused on substances, or classes, also used in human therapy and mostly on resistance in human pathogens. The characterised resistance genes and mechanisms are probably only ”the tip of the iceberg”.

It is often stated that the AFA used in animal production are not used as therapeuticals in humans. This is true only for avilamycin, flavomycin and the quinoxalines. Spiramycin is used in human therapy. So is bacitracin, although mainly for local application. Small chemical differences between substances within the same class of antibacterials may have profound effects on their pharmacokinetics but their mode of action on the bacterium will usually be the same. Therefore, the bacterial defence in the form of resistance will often confer cross-resistance to all or most substances of the same class. Tylosin, avoparcin, ardacin and virginiamycin all belong to classes of antibacterials that include valuable therapeuticals.

Old, presently not used substances may become valuable therapeuticals in the future. Such is the case with everninomycins, a substance of the orthosomycin class. This substance is presently undergoing trials as a new drug candidate. Another member of the orthosomycin class is avilamycin.

Most AFA are similar to, or identical with, antibacterials used for therapy.

AFA are, in concentrations given for performance enhancement, inhibitory to inherently susceptible intestinal bacteria.

4.3AFA and development of resistance

It has been argued that the concentrations of antibacterials used for performance enhancement are too low for any development of resistance to occur. As noted in 4.2, they are high enough to inhibit the growth of susceptible microorganisms. The usage of AFA would therefore be expected to favour the occurrence of resistant strains in exposed populations.

Table 4.II. Mode of action of substances used as AFA and known mechanisms of resistance (modified from Witte, 1996)

4ABELL )) 6ERKNINGSMEKANISMER HOS SUBSTANSER SOM ANV¤NDS SOM !&4 OCH K¤NDA RESISTENSMEKANISMER MODIFIERAD FR¥N 7ITTE

#LASS 3UBSTANCE %XAMPLES OF -ODE OF ACTION +NOWN RESISTANCE +NOWN GENETIC #ROSS RESISTANCE
    OTHER SUBSTANCES   MECHANISMS BACKGROUND OF TO SUBSTANCES OF
    IN THE CLASS     RESISTANCE OTHER CLASSES
Glycopeptides avoparcin VANCOMYCIN inhibition of cell wall modification of binding site VAN genes  
  ardacin TEICOPLANIN synthesis by preventing (peptidoglycan precursor)    
    DAPTOMYCIN transglycosylation      
Ionophores monensin other ionophores disaggregation of      
  salinomycin   cytoplasmic membrane      
Macrolides TYLOSIN ERYTHROMYCIN inhibition of protein modification of binding site ERM genes, point LINCOSAMIDES
  SPIRAMYCIN AZITHROMYCIN synthesis by stalling the (methylation of 23S rRNA) mutation STREPTOGRAMINS
    CLARITHROMYCIN ribosome drug inactivation, efflux    
Orthosomycins avilamycin everninomycins inhibition of protein      
      synthesis by preventing      
      elongation      
Phospho- flavomycin   inhibition of cell wall     no information
glycolipids     synthesis by preventing     available
      transglycosylation      
Polypeptides BACITRACIN   inhibition of cell wall active efflux, alteration of BCR gene, BACA gene no information
      synthesis by preventing binding site (IPP), reduced   available
      transpeptidation membrane permeability    
Quinoxalines OLAQUINDOX cyadox inhibition of DNA     no information
  CARBADOX   synthesis     available
Streptogramins VIRGINIA PRISTINAMYCIN inhibition of protein modification of binding site ERM, SAT VAT, VGA SBH MACROLIDES
  MYCIN QUINUPRISTIN synthesis by stalling the (methylation of 23S rRNA), genes LINCOSAMIDES
    DALFOPRISTIN ribosome drug inactivation, active    
        efflux    

Substances with well known therapeutic use in human and/or veterinary medicine are in bold characters.

3UBSTANSER MED V¤LK¤NDA TERAPEUTISKA APPLIKATIONER INOM HUMAN OCH ELLER VETERIN¤RMEDICINEN ¤R SKRIVNA MED FETSTIL

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 87

4.3.1Prospective studies

Experimental studies

Several studies by the research group of Linton (Hinton ET AL , 1986b; Kaukas ET AL , 1987; Kaukas ET AL , 1988) illustrate the influence of AFA on development of resistance in enterococci.

In two of these studies (Hinton ET AL , 1986b; Kaukas ET AL , 1987), the control groups were given a diet containing growth promoters (bacitracin or virginiamycin) and/or a coccidiostat with antibacterial activity. The confounding effect of growth promoters and anticoccidials in the control groups of these latter studies cannot be ignored. Consequently, only comparisons between the groups in the study from 1988 are deemed to be valid and will, in the following, be discussed in detail.

In this study (Kaukas ET AL , 1988), small groups of chickens were given feed containing either avoparcin, nitrovin, virginiamycin or bacitracin or a diet without AFA during the first three weeks of life. The resistance to virginiamycin, bacitracin or nitrovin in % FAECIUM increased in the groups receiving the respective substance. Moreover, the incidence of resistance to therapeutic antibiotics, expressed as Antibiotic Resistance Index (ARI), was

higher (p=0.003) in all groups receiving antibacterials. This increase could be associated with an increase in the proportion of % FAECIUM in the

enterococcal population of the treated birds.

An experimental study on germ-free mice fed carbadox, olaquindox, flavomycin and chlortetracycline was reported by Corpet (1984). The mice were inoculated with intestinal microflora from 4 piglets, and the drugs were given at dosages corresponding to those used for growth promotion in livestock. Little effect on coliform resistance against olaquindox and carbadox was observed, while resistance against tetracycline increased in the flora of mice fed this drug. In the group given flavomycin, resistance to tetracycline was lower than in the control group. Resistance against flavomycin was not tested.

Dealy and Moeller (1977a) investigated the effect of in-feed flavomycin on the antibacterial susceptibility patterns of faecal % COLI from calves. They found an increase in resistance to flavomycin, but a decrease in resistance against streptomycin and tetracycline in the medicated group.

Observations on an apparent suppression of coliforms carrying resistance plasmids has been suggested in reports for both flavomycin, carbadox and bacitracin (Pohl ET AL , 1975; Walton, 1978; Sepulchre, 1979; Gedek, 1981; Walton, 1984; Walton and Wheeler, 1987; Brophy, 1988). Some of these reports, however, merely studied the synergistic effects of the AFA and other

88 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

antibacterials and in others, the information provided is not enough to fully evaluate the issue.

Only for flavomycin have the possible mechanisms for a direct effect on numbers of plasmid carrying strains been addressed. George and co-workers (1984) investigated several possible mechanisms for the effects of flavomycin in concentrations from 1-4 ppm on % COLI strains harbouring different types of plasmids. The growth of some, but not all, of the plasmid carrying strains was inhibited in the presence of flavomycin. The plasmid transfer rates were mostly reduced, but also in some cases increased, depending on the type of plasmid. The authors suggest, among other explanations, that the differences observed could be due to flavomycin interacting with transfer-related cell wall structures, such as pili, coded for by certain plasmids. Publications concerning possible effects on gram-positive plasmid-carrying bacteria have not been found. The transfer proteins implicated in the mechanism have not been demonstrated in gram-positives and therefore, such effects would not be expected.

Field studies

Linton and co-workers (1985b) studied antibiotic resistance in the enterococci of commercial broiler flocks fed virginiamycin, bacitracin and avoparcin, and of pigs from commercial farms using in-feed tylosin and virginiamycin. In short, feeding of virginiamycin and/or tylosin resulted in increased resistance to tylosin and variable effects on virginiamycin resistance in both pigs and poultry. Feeding of bacitracin led to an increased resistance to bacitracin. Resistance to avoparcin or other glycopeptides was not tested. Unfortunately, only the pig study included a non-medicated farm as control group, outcome was somewhat variable, and the enterococci were not identified to the species level.

The influence of virginiamycin on the prevalence of resistant enterococci within flocks of turkeys has recently been reported by Thal and co-workers

(1996). Different turkeys from the same flock were found to share the same type of streptogramin-resistant % FAECIUM, and the prevalence of resistance

to both streptogramins and ampicillin increased over time. All flocks received in-feed virginiamycin, plus other AFA and coccidiostats.

A study to monitor the development of olaquindox resistance in coliforms following the introduction of olaquindox as a feed additive was conducted in commercial farms in Suffolk by Linton and co-workers (1988). The results concerning olaquindox resistance in coliforms in farms with and without use of the antibacterial are shown in table 4.III. As is often the case in field studies, there were problems with sampling variability and difficulties to control the management on the farms. In spite of this, the overall results were consistent and showed an increasing level of resistance to olaquindox in

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 89

coliforms from farms using olaquindox. Incidence and level of resistance increased on neighbouring farms not using olaquindox as well, but to a lesser extent. The latter finding is not surprising as the herds were not isolated from the environment.

Table 4.III. The average percentage of coliforms resistant to olaquindox in each year of the survey (from Linton ET AL , 1988)

4ABELL ))) 'ENOMSNITTLIG PROCENTANDEL AV KOLIFORMER RESISTENTA MOT OLAQUINDOX UNDER RESPEKTIVE STUDIE¥R FR¥N ,INTON ET AL

9EAR 2ESISTANCE  
  #ONTROL FARMS 4EST FARMS
19811 0.00 -
1982 0.03 0.04
1983 0.12 5.63
1984 0.68 6.14

1 Sampled before olaquindox was used in the UK

0ROVTAGNA INNAN OLAQUINDOX ANV¤NDES I 3TORBRITANNIEN

4.3.2Retrospective studies

Devriese and co-workers (1993) studied the antibacterial resistance patterns for some AFA in # PERFRINGENS isolated from various animal sources and

found no notable increase in resistance between 1979 and 1992.

Ohmae and co-workers (1981; 1983) reported the incidence of carbadox resistance in % COLI from cattle, pigs and chickens, collected during 1976- 1980. Carbadox resistance was only found in isolates from pigs. All carbadox-resistant isolates originated from 6 farms, where carbadox was used for preventing swine dysentery or promoting piglet growth. All isolates from one farm harboured a conjugative plasmid, carrying carbadox, spectinomycin, streptomycin and ampicillin resistance.

An increase in carbadox resistance in salmonellae over time was noted in a study by Mills and Kelly (1986). The study included clinical isolates from necropsied swine in Kansas during 1980-1983. A steady increase in carbadox resistance, from 37% 1980 to 61 % 1983 was noticed. The authors note that in-feed carbadox in Kansas is labelled for prevention of swine dysentery and for treatment of salmonella infections.

A strong association between the use of avoparcin and prevalence of vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) in animals has been reported. Bager and co-workers (1997) investigated poultry and pig farms in a retrospective

cohort study. The relative risk for occurrence of vancomycin resistant %NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM was 3.3 (0.9-12.3) for pig herds exposed to avoparcin.

The corresponding figure for poultry flocks was 2.9 (1.4-5.9). These findings are supported by observations from countries where avoparcin is not used, no

90 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

VRE have yet been isolated from animals (Coque ET AL , 1996; Greko and Lindblad, 1996).

4.3.3Point-prevalence studies

Shortly after the introduction of avoparcin, no glycopeptide resistance was found among 15 strains of % FAECIUM isolated on vancomycin-free media

(Dutta and Devriese, 1982), nor was resistance found in other enterococcal species. In table 4.IV, recent results concerning glycopeptide resistance from the Danish surveillance system are presented. As in the above mentioned study, the isolates investigated were obtained without the use of antibiotic containing media in the course of a monitoring programme.

Studies using media favouring resistant isolates indicate that enterococci with high level resistance to glycopeptides (VRE) are widespread among animals including pets and horses (Bates ET AL , 1994; Klare ET AL , 1995b; Devriese ET AL , 1996). The lack of earlier data on VRE in animals precludes conclusions on whether the resistance trait was present in animal populations at the time of introduction of avoparcin in animal husbandry.

As mentioned in 4.3.2, in studies from USA where avoparcin has never been used and from Sweden where avoparcin has not been used for 10 years no VRE were found in samples from animals using selective techniques (Coque ET AL , 1996; Greko, 1996). Thus, in the absence of avoparcin, the prevalence of VRE in animals is, at most, very low.

Table 4.IV. Frequency of resistance to glycopeptides (vancomycin) in % FAECIUM from different sources1

4ABELL )6 &REKVENS AV RESISTENS MOT GLYKOPEPTIDER VANCOMYCIN HOS Enterococcus faecium FR¥N OLIKA PROVTYPER

!NIMAL SOURCE .O OF ISOLATES 2ESISTANCE IN
Cattle 13 0
Beef 40 0
Swine 58 20
Pork 23 0
Poultry 54 59
Poultry meat 71 18

1 Data from DANMAP (1997). In samples from food, only high-level resistance was reported whereas in animals samples, all resistant isolates are included

$ATA FR¥N $!.-!0 &¶R PROVER FR¥N LIVSMEDEL HAR ENDAST H¶GGRADIG RESISTENS RAPPORTERATS FR¥N DJURPROVER INKLUDERADES D¤REMOT ALLA RESISTENTA ISOLAT

It has often been assumed that resistance observed in animal bacteria is entirely a result of the use of therapeuticals. A comparison between the situation in countries where macrolides are used both for therapy and as

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 91

AFA, and where they are only used for therapy is therefore of interest. In table 4.V, results from investigations in Denmark, Finland and Sweden are presented. Spiramycin, being a 16-membered macrolide was chosen in the example as indicator of constitutively expressed ERM-genes, encoding for MLSB type resistance (see annex E). A lower prevalence of resistance is reported from Finland and Sweden, using only therapeutical macrolides compared to Denmark where they are also used as AFA.

The tables above illustrate phenotypic expression of resistance. However, information on phenotype at best only permits inferential conclusions about the genes conferring these resistance traits. All the resistant isolates from Sweden and Finland were cross-resistant to erythromycin (a 14-membered macrolide). The enterococci are inherently resistant to moderate concentrations of lincosamides (e.g. clindamycin) but high level resistance can be acquired (Murray, 1990). For all the Swedish isolates that were resistant to 16-membered macrolides, MIC values higher than for the remaining group of isolates were noted. This leads to the assumption that the resistance shown is mediated by constitutively expressed ERM-genes. MICs for clindamycin were not given for the Finnish isolates.

Table 4.V. Resistance to MLSB antibacterials (indicated by spiramycin resistance) in enterococci from various species and countries (From Greko, 1996; DANMAP, 1997; Greko, 1997; MAF, 1997)

4ABELL 6 2ESISTENS MOT -,3" ANTIBIOTIKA INDIKERAT AV SPIRAMYCINRESISTENS HOS OLIKA DJURSLAG &R¥N 'REKO $!.-!0 'REKO -!&

"ACTERIAL SPECIES !NIMAL .O OF 9EAR 2ESISTANCE #OUNTRY
  SOURCE ISOLATES   IN  
% FAECIUM poultry 54 1995-96   Denmark
% FAECIUM poultry 234 1996   Finland
% FAECALIS poultry 299 1996   Finland
%NTEROCOCCUS spp. poultry 207 1996   Sweden
% FAECALIS swine 123 1995-96   Denmark
% FAECIUM swine 58 1995-96   Denmark
% FAECIUM swine 89 1996   Finland
% FAECALIS swine 85 1996   Finland
%NTEROCOCCUS spp. swine 92 1996   Sweden

Further information on frequency of resistance to AFA can be found in annexes A-F.

92 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

4.3.4Some comments on study design

Studies performed to date are extremely difficult to compare. Selection criteria, methods used and definition of resistance vary. Further, a serious limitation of most studies on antibacterial resistance is the restricted range of microbes surveyed (Salyers, 1995). This is particularly true if the question asked is how the use of a substance affects the evolution and spread of resistance genes in a certain environment. Inclusion of numerically predominant organisms, such as certain anaerobic genera, would give a more complete picture. For practical reasons, most studies focus on easily cultured bacteria. Until further knowledge about the role of the predominant part of the flora is obtained, we have to accept that much information concerning gene transfer in natural settings is missing (Salyers, 1995).

Some species are inherently (naturally) resistant to certain antibacterial substances. For example, # PERFRINGENS and % FAECIUM have been reported

to be inherently resistant to flavomycin and enterococci, apart from % FAECIUM are inherently resistant to streptogramin A. Such species will be favoured if a selective pressure is applied. Other species, that are inherently susceptible to the substance in question, may become resistant either by mutation or by the acquisition of already existing resistance genes. When the aim is to assess the influence of antibacterial usage on the prevalence of antibacterial resistance, bacterial populations with a potential for acquiring resistance should be targeted. Enterococci are inherently susceptible to most AFA and are known to easily acquire resistance genes. In view of this, and bearing the above mentioned limitations in mind, the choice of enterococci as one of the indicators of the development of resistance seems acceptable for most AFA.

The study time in both experimental and field exposure studies is generally short. Dissemination of antibacterial resistance will be governed by two main factors; presence of the antibacterial in concentrations high enough to inhibit susceptible bacteria and presence of resistance traits (intrinsic or acquired) in bacteria. If either is continually absent, a resistance problem will not emerge (Levy, 1996). Acquisition of the relevant gene and its subsequent adaptation to a new host bacterium may take time (years). As closed experimental herds are often used, resistance may in fact never appear, even if it would with time in a field situation where herds are expected to have numerous direct and indirect contacts with potential gene reservoirs.

Given the presence of both a selective pressure and resistance, the resistance trait will be selected for and propagated. The spread of resistant bacteria themselves, as well as cell to cell spread of genes conveying resistance, further adds to the equation. Longer study periods (years) would be expected to give more applicable results, but may be impractical for other reasons.

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 93

In view of the long standing debate on usage of AFA and resistance, there are surprisingly few studies including data on prevalence of resistance against the substances in question. Even less data is available on development over time. Well-planned screening studies, conducted in several countries and combined with data on consumption of antibacterial feed additives in these countries (amount given to different animal species), as well as therapeutic usage might provide at least some of the information on exposure necessary for an accurate analysis of potential hazards and associated risks. Programmes, such as the Danish monitoring (DANMAP, 1997), as well as the one lately initiated by the European Commission, are therefore to be commended.

Various types of studies show that exposure of bacterial populations to AFA in approved dosages favours resistant clones or subpopulations.

4.4Acquisition of resistance in bacteria

Acquired resistance can arise in a bacterium through mutation(s) in existing genes or through the uptake of a pre-existent gene. In the first case, the resistance trait will be confined to the mutant clone. Spread of resistance will depend on the ability of that clone to multiply (vertical transmission) and infect new hosts. In the second case, the resistance trait can also spread to other bacterial clones, to other bacterial species and genera (horizontal transmission).

Following uptake, acquired resistance genes may be modified, or optimised, by means of mutation. Once the optimal configuration has been accomplished, little change would be expected within the gene, although transfer to a new host species or genus may require some adaptation for maximum expression. ”Silent” resistance genes, i.e. non-expressed genes, may be ”activated” by mutations.

4.4.1Transfer of resistance genes

Pre-existent resistance genes are mostly associated with transfer elements such as plasmids or transposons, residing in plasmids or on the chromosome. Detailed studies concerning transfer elements associated with relevant genes have only been published for antibacterials in clinical use. As acquired resistance has been reported for other AFA as well, there is no reason to believe that resistance against these substances would be any different in this respect. In table 4.VI, described genes conveying resistance to macrolides and/or streptogramins and examples of their localisation have been compiled.

94 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

The plasmids and transposons mentioned are often of a conjugative type, meaning that in addition to the resistance genes, they carry the information necessary to initiate and complete their own transfer to new hosts.

Transfer of resistance determinants with relevance for AFA has been shown IN VITRO and, for some, IN VIVO.

Resistance to the A component of streptogramins is mediated by various genes carried on plasmids. The VATB gene has been shown to transfer between coagulase-negative staphylococci and 3 AUREUS (Allignet ET AL , 1996).

Resistance to streptogramin B and 16-membered macrolides (spiramycin, tylosin) is mostly mediated by constitutively expressed ERM-genes of different classes (Leclercq and Courvalin, 1991b). The product of the gene, a ribosomal methylase, alters the ribosome slightly with the result that macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramin B cannot bind (MLSB resistance). The ERM-genes in staphylococci are often inducible only by 14- membered macrolides (erythromycin), meaning that the methylase will only be produced in presence of erythomycin. The gene can convert to constitutive expression by a single or two point mutation rendering the bacterium phenotypically resistant to all macrolides, to lincosamides and to streptogramin B (see annex E).

Poyart-Salmeron and co-workers (1990) showed by way of IN VITRO mating experiments that a self-transferable plasmid designated pIP811 carrying an

ERMB gene (also carrying resistance determinants for chloramphenicol, tetracycline and streptomycin) could transfer from ,ISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES to, among others, % FAECALIS and vice versa. The donor efficiency3 depended

on the combination of donor-recipient tested and varied from 10-3-10-9 with

enterococci and streptococci being the most and staphylococci the least efficient. The plasmid, originally identified in ,ISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES, was

suggested to have originated from streptococci or enterococci as it is similar to pAMb1, the prototype for broad-host range plasmids in those genera.

Acquisition of macrolide resistance through transfer of the chromosomally carried transposon Tn harbouring MLSB (ERMB), kanamycin (APH!3’) and tetracycline (TETM) resistance determinants from % FAECALIS to , MONOCYTOGENES has been demonstrated both in VITRO by mating experiments and IN VIVO in gnotobiotic mice (Doucet-Populaire ET AL , 1991). The IN VITRO

and IN VIVO transfer frequencies were around 10-7 and 10-8, respectively. In both cases, subinhibitory concentrations of tetracycline increased the transfer frequency around 10 times.

1The donor efficiency expresses the number of successful transmissions from donors to recipients per total number of recipients. The donor:recipient ratio in experiments is often 1:1

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 95

Table 4.VI. Examples of resistance to macrolides and streptogramins by different mechanisms and genes1

Tabell 4.VI. Exempel på resistens mot makrolider och streptograminer, via olika mekanismer och gener1

Phenotype2 Mechanism Gene Described Examples of bacterial hosts
      localisation  
MLSB target modi- ermA Tn554 S. aureus, coagulase negative
  fication     staphylococci
    ermB, Tn551, pAMb1, S. aureus, S. intermedius, S.
    ermAM Tn917, Tn1545, hyicus, Streptococcus spp, S.
      plus various other pneumoniae, E. faecalis,
      plasmids and Lactobacillus spp.
      transposons  
    ermC pE194, plM13, S. aureus, coagulase negative
      pE5, pNE131 staphylococci, S. hyicus,
        Bacillus subtilis
    emrCX Tn5432 Corynebacterium xerosis
    ermD chromosome B. licheniformis
    ermBC pIP1527 E. coli
    ermF pBF4 Bacteroides spp.
    ermE chromosome Streptomyces erythreus
    ermP,   Cl. perfringens
    ermQ    
    ermZ Tn5398 Cl. difficile
    ermJ   Bacillus anthracis
    ermM   S. epidermidis
SB drug sbh pIP524 S. aureus
  inactivation vgb pIP680 S. aureus
SA   satA pAT424 E. faecium
    vat pIP680, IS257 S. aureus
    vatB pIP1156 S. aureus
SA active efflux vga plasmids S. aureus, S. epidermidis

1Data compiled from Leclercq and Courvalin, 1991a; 1991b; Brisson Noel et al, 1988; Arthur et al, 1987; Eady et al, 1993; Weisblum, 1995; Mullany et al, 1995; Allignet et al, 1996; Tauch et al, 1995

2 Resistance phenotype; MLSB = macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B; S B = streptogramin B; SA = streptogramin A

1Data sammanställda från Leclercq and Courvalin, 1991a;1991b; Brisson Noel et al, 1988; Arthur et al, 1987; Eady et al, 1993; Weisblum, 1995; Mullany et al, 1995; Allignet et al, 1996; Tauch et al, 1995

2Resistensfenotyp; MLSB = makrolid-linkosamid-streptogramin B; SB= streptogramin B, SA = streptogramin A

96 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

In the above cited experiment, germ-free mice were used. McConnell and co-workers (1991) used mice with a complex microflora functionally equivalent to that of conventional mice. They investigated transfer of the plasmid pAMb1, carrying ERMB. Transfer of the plasmid from ,ACTOBACILLUS REUTERI to % FAECALIS was detected within days after birth in the offspring of the mice inoculated with the donor strain. The parent animals were given lincomycin at subtherapeutic concentrations. No transfer was detected in offspring of mice not given lincomycin.

The fact that conjugal transfer was easily detectable within a relatively short time period in both IN VIVO experiments cited above confirms that the intestinal environment is highly conductive to conjugal transfer, even when the donor and recipient are of different genera. Further, they show that IN VITRO results on transfer and transfer rates can be predictive of IN VIVO results.

Transferable glycopeptide resistance is usually mediated by the gene clusters VANA or VANB. These are generally located on plasmids and/or transposons (Arthur and Courvalin, 1993). High level resistance to

glycopeptides mediated by the VANA-gene cluster has been detected in % FAECIUM, other enterococcal species (Arthur and Courvalin, 1993), /ERSKOVIA TURBATA and !RCHANOBACTERIUM HAEMOLYTICUM (Power ET AL , 1995). The gene

cluster is mostly associated with the conjugative transposon Tn and/or

self-transferable plasmids (Arthur ET AL , 1996). Transfer of the VANA-gene cluster has been shown IN VITRO from % FAECIUM to ,ISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES,

3TAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS, and various streptococci (Leclercq ET AL , 1989). Transfer frequencies were 10-4 for % FAECIUM to % FAECIUM and 10-6 - 10-9 for

transfer to other species. When resistance to MLS antibiotics was also present, the two traits were transferred EN BLOC (Leclercq ET AL , 1989).

Conjugal co-transfer of resistance to high levels of glycopeptides, erythromycin and chloramphenicol, from % FAECALIS to 3 AUREUS on the skin

of hairless obese mice was demonstrated in an experiment by Noble and coworkers (1992). The mice used cannot be regarded as ”normal” mice. Nonetheless, they are a better model for the IN VIVO situation than a petri dish.

Resistance to glycopeptides mediated by the VANB gene cluster has, in relation to AFA, attracted less attention. The VANB-gene cluster is transferable either directly from the chromosome by a transposon (Tn ) or through plasmids (Quintiliani and Courvalin, 1994; Woodford ET AL , 1995;

Quintiliani and Courvalin, 1996) at a low frequency. The VANB-gene cluster has been found in % FAECALIS, % FAECIUM and, recently, in 3 BOVIS (Arthur

and Courvalin, 1993; Poyart ET AL , 1997). The gene usually confers inducible resistance to glycopeptides by a mechanism similar to that of the VANA genecluster. The VANB-gene cluster is induced by vancomycin but not by teicoplanin, meaning that when strains carrying the gene cluster are exposed to teicoplanin, the gene will not be activated and the strain phenotype will remain susceptible (Arthur and Courvalin, 1993). According to available

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 97

information, the VANB gene cluster does not seem to be inducible by

avoparcin. No information is available on the capacity of ardacin to induce

VANB.

)N VITRO as well as during therapy, mutants expressing the VANB gene constitutively have been reported (Hayden ET AL , 1993; Green ET AL , 1995). Recently, transfer experiments with a strain expressing VANB constitutively were reported (Hayden ET AL , 1997). The resulting transconjugants were either of constitutive or of inducible type. The use of a non-inducing antibacterial such as avoparcin, and possibly ardacin, could favour strains harbouring VANB-gene clusters with the mutation required for the gene to be constitutively expressed should the gene be present in animal populations or their environments. Further information is needed on this topic.

4.4.2Bacterial interspecies transfer of resistance genes

As evident from 4.4.1, similar or identical resistance genes can be found in various bacterial species, indicating that transfer of resistance genes between different bacterial species is not uncommon in nature. Conjugal transfer systems are able to cross genus, phylogenetic, and even kingdom lines (Amabile-Cuevas and Chicurel, 1992). There are broad host range genes that can be expressed in a variety of species as well as broad host range gene transfer elements.

As an example, high level resistance to MLSB antibacterials in a clinical isolate of % COLI was characterised by Brisson-Noël and co-workers (1988).

The resistance trait was found to be due to the presence of an ERM-gene highly homologous to ERMB, previously described in % FAECALIS and 3 SANGUIS The occurrence of ERMB-like genes in enterobacteria was confirmed in other % COLI strains and in +LEBSIELLA. The findings indicate that the gene

pool of gram-positive cocci has extended to gram-negative bacteria, that such transfer can occur in nature and that the extension is recent. Further inferential evidence of such trans-gram promiscuity exists for other resistance genes (for a review see Courvalin, 1994).

4.4.3Co-transfer of genes and multiresistance

A plasmid or transposon may gradually acquire one gene after another. Integrons and transposons appear to be largely responsible for this phenomenon. When they are located on the same transferable element, the transmission of different genes is linked and transfer leads to co-resistance. This means that a bacterium concurrently becomes resistant to two or more different antibacterials, mediated by different resistance mechanisms,

98 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

governed by different genes. Co-transfer, linked transfer or transfer EN BLOC are different expressions for this phenomenon.

The transmission of resistance genes with relevance for AFA can be linked to the transfer of other genes. The % COLI plasmid pNV13 conveys resistance to carbadox, streptomycin, spectinomycin and ampicillin (Ohmae ET AL , 1981; Ohmae ET AL , 1983). Conjugal transfer of resistance to streptogramin A, between 3 AUREUS strains, linked to lincosamide, trimethoprim and penicillin resistance has been reported (Allignet and El Solh, 1995; Allignet ET AL , 1996). Enterococcal plasmids from several host species have been shown to harbour and transfer MLSB, kanamycin, streptomycin and, sometimes, tetracycline resistance (Rollins ET AL , 1985; LeBlanc ET AL , 1986; Christie ET AL , 1987). The transposon Tn has been shown to carry and transfer resistance genes to kanamycin, macrolides and tetracycline (Doucet- Populaire ET AL , 1991). Genes conveying resistance to glycopeptides and macrolides have been found to co-reside on plasmid pIP819 (Leclercq ET AL , 1989). Other examples of co-transfer, have been given in 4.4.1.

A similar linkage between different genes has been shown between some resistance and virulence genes, such as haemolysinor toxin-encoding genes. Co-transfer of virulence and resistance genes has been well studied in enteric pathogens (among others Franklin and Möllby, 1983). Less information is available concerning gram-positive bacteria. Christie and co-workers (1987) demonstrated IN VITRO co-transfer of genes encoding for macrolide and

tetracycline resistance and haemolysin production from % FAECALIS to "ACILLUS SUBTILIS. )N VIVO transfer of pheromone-responsive plasmids carrying

genes conferring cytolytic properties and macrolide resistance (ERMB) between strains of % FAECALIS has been studied in a model using Syrian

hamsters (Huycke ET AL , 1992). Transfer occurred in high frequencies (10-1 - 10-2 per donor). Even more worrying is the transfer IN VITRO of macrolide

resistance (ERMBZ) and toxin A, apparently carried on a transposon (Tn ) from # DIFFICILE to non-toxigenic # DIFFICILE strains and to " SUBTILIS

reported by Mullaney (1995).

Consequently, a selection for antibacterial resistance may, in some cases, also select for virulence. The danger of transfer elements carrying multiple genes is evident; a single transfer event conveys not only resistance to the selector but also other properties to the recipient bacterium. The recipient may acquire multiresistance and/or increase its virulence. Any advantage given by one of the transferred genes helps to maintain all of the transferred genes in the new host.

4.4.4Resistance genes and animal hosts

Highly homologous resistance genes and their associated transfer elements have been found in natural isolates not only of different bacterial species but also in bacteria from a variety of host species. The macrolide resistance gene

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 99

ERMB has been demonstrated in bacteria of different species originating from pigs, chickens, cattle, dogs and humans (Rollins ET AL , 1985; Arthur ET AL , 1987; Stuart ET AL , 1992; Eady ET AL , 1993; Roberts and Brown, 1994; Wasteson ET AL , 1994).

As an example, the results of Eady and co-workers (1993) who screened

for resistance determinants in macrolide resistant isolates of staphylococci (excluding 3 AUREUS) from humans, pigs and dogs are shown in table 4.VII.

Table 4.VII. Distribution of macrolide resistance genes in staphylococci from various hosts given as percent of total number of genes identified in isolates from respective animal host1 (modified from Eady ET AL , 1993)

4ABELL 6)) &¶RDELNINGEN AV MAKROLIDRESISTENSGENER HOS STAFYLOKOCKER FR¥N OLIKA V¤RDDJUR UTTRYCKT SOM PROCENT AV TOTALANTALET IDENTIFIERADE GENERMODIFIERAT FR¥N %ADY ET AL

'ENE1 3WINE $OGS (UMANS    
      group 12   group 22
ERMA 0 6 12 6
ERMB 20 65 0 0
ERMC 63 6 41 54
MSRA 6 6 38 39
ERM untypable 11 18 9 2

1No. of genes identified and No. of investigated isolates: swine 35 and 33, dogs 17 and 16, humans group 1 58 and 55, humans group 2 121 and 117, respectively.

2Group 1 includes isolates from patients undergoing ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (n=27)

and from blood cultures (n=28); group 2 includes patients with acne (n=117).

1 !NTAL IDENTIFIERADE GENER RESPEKTIVE ANTAL UNDERS¶KTA ISOLAT SVIN OCH HUNDAR

OCH M¤NNISKOR GRUPP OCH M¤NNISKOR GRUPP OCH

'RUPP INKLUDERAR ISOLAT FR¥N PATIENTER I AMBULATORISK PERITONEALDIALYS N SAMT BLODODLINGAR N GRUPP INKLUDERAR PATIENTER MED AKNE N

The suggested spread of vancomycin resistance between enterococci of various origin is another example of the spread of resistance among grampositive bacteria. VRE harbouring the VANA gene cluster have been isolated from humans, both in hospitals and community, from pig, rabbit, dog, cat,

horse chicken, turkey, pheasant, duck, food of animal origin and sewage (Bates ET AL , 1994; Torres ET AL , 1994; Klare ET AL , 1995b; Chadwick ET AL ,

1996; Devriese ET AL , 1996; DANMAP, 1997). A polyclonal nature of the VRE strains has been demonstrated (Klare ET AL , 1995b). The VANA gene cluster consists of 7 gene components and two transposition gene sequences. It is extremely unlikely that such a complicated gene should have developed separately in so many different host populations. Its occurrence therefore strongly suggests a spread between bacteria of different host species.

100 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

4.4.5The encumbrance of resistance for bacteria

In an environment that contains antibacterials, possession of a corresponding resistance gene is clearly beneficial for the bacterium. The resistance traits have, however, been considered to impose a burden on their bacterial hosts. Synthesis of plasmids require energy and metabolites. The products encoded for by resistance genes may interfere with the bacterium’s physiology; alterations of the cell wall may lead to loss of adhesive properties and alternative metabolic pathways may be less efficient. Constitutive expression of resistance genes encoding for such traits would be a handicap in the absence of antibacterials. For such reasons, resistant clones have been thought to suffer a competitive disadvantage in the absence of a selective pressure. Even so, this might not always be the case. Much evidence of the cost for the bacterium of harbouring the resistance trait has been obtained in laboratory experiments with bacteria that have recently acquired the resistance gene.

Other experiments show that, given time, bacteria can eliminate the cost of resistance by adapting their system in order to counteract the harmful sideeffects of the resistance genes. This will result in increased fitness of resistant strains with consequent persistence of the resistance trait in the microbial population even after the selective pressure is removed. Such adaptation has been shown for resistance acquired through mutations as well as through plasmids (for reviews see Lenski, 1996; Gillespie and McHugh, 1997). As an example, McConnell and co-workers (1991) demonstrated the need of a selective pressure for the establishment of a resistance plasmid in the microflora of mice. However, once established, the strain originally carrying the plasmid adapted and competed well with susceptible strains in the absence of a selective pressure.

4.4.6Some remarks on horizontal transmission of genes

Transmission of genes between bacteria occurs readily IN VITRO. Experimental transfer of a conjugative element may require little manipulation besides the mixing of two cultures. The rates, or frequencies, of such transmissions will depend on the transfer element involved and the donor-recipient combination as well as on the conditions of the transfer experiments. In this respect it should be noted that failure to demonstrate transfer does not mean it cannot take place, simply that it did not occur under the conditions of the experiment. On the other hand, demonstration of transfer indicates that the event can take place.

Bacteria are equipped with very efficient gene transfer systems. Similar, or identical, resistance genes and associated transfer elements are present in field isolates from different host species as well as in different bacterial

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 101

species. A multitude of transfer elements are found in bacteria isolated from natural settings. Resistance traits arise within species that were formerly considered uniformly susceptible.

The experiments demonstrating IN VIVO transfer in laboratory animals have been conducted to test a hypothesis based on firm observations from ”real

life” of emerging resistance. An example of this is the studies on macrolide and tetracycline resistance in ,ISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES cited in 4.4.1. The

settings are, albeit artificial, certainly closer to the real situation than the test tube.

The opinion that the transfer rate in nature would be significantly lower than what is obtained IN VITRO is based on the assumption that laboratory

settings provide optimal conditions, and that such conditions are rare in real life. This is not necessarily true. The laboratory conditions normally used to test DNA transfer employ rapid growth, aerobic conditions and nutrient excess. Such conditions might enhance transfer rates, but it might also repress gene transfer in some bacteria (Salyers, 1995). Further, the event does not have to be frequent in order to have an effect. Once the resistance gene is present in a recipient, given a selective pressure the resistant clone will multiply.

Taken together, it is evident that transfer of genes does occur in nature (in/on living hosts or in their environments). The question that remains is how often it occurs.

Resistance mechanisms and resistance genes have only been investigated for AFA belonging to classes containing therapeuticals.

Described resistance genes are generally associated with transfer elements.

Transfer of resistance has been shown experimentally both IN VITRO and IN VIVO

Transfer of resistance has been shown between bacteria of different genera.

The same resistance genes are found in bacteria from different host species.

Co-transfer of multiple genes is common.

Resistant bacteria are not necessarily less competitive in the absence of a selective pressure.

4.5Transfer of resistance between various host species

There are two theoretically possible ways for transmission of antibiotic resistance from bacteria of one host species to those of another; firstly, direct

102 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

transmission of resistant bacteria, and secondly, transmission of resistance genes between bacteria colonising different host species. The debate has mostly been concerned with transmission of resistant bacteria from animals (taken as a group) to man. It has been questioned whether such transmission can occur. Logically, if transfer did not occur between bacteria from a specific animal species to man, then transfer between different animal species would not be expected to occur either. After all, humans are the only species in constant contact with all the other species.

4.5.1Transmission of bacteria

Studies concerning transmission of resistant bacteria from animal to man have mainly focused on gram-negative enteric pathogens such as 3ALMONELLA spp. and #AMPYLOBACTER spp. For antibiotic resistant salmonellae, the

pathways from animals to man and subsequent infections have been clearly demonstrated (Bezanson ET AL , 1983; Holmberg ET AL , 1984; Spika ET AL , 1987; Mishu ET AL , 1991). Several reports suggest the transfer of other

antibiotic-resistant enteropathogens such as quinolone-resistant campylobacter (Endtz ET AL , 1991) and chloramphenicol-resistant 9ERSINIA ENTEROCOLITICA (Perez Trallero ET AL , 1988).

Transfer of % COLI between various animals and humans has been demonstrated in various studies. The spread of a labelled multiresistant % COLI from cow to pig, mouse, fowl, fly, water and human, and from pig to fly, mouse, fowl, water and human was reported by Marshall and co-workers (1990). Levy (Levy ET AL , 1976) reported the transfer of a labelled multiresistant % COLI from chicken to a farm worker. Linton and co-workers (1977) demonstrated the transfer of sulphonamide-resistant % COLI from a chicken carcass to the faecal flora of five human volunteers handling the chicken.

Although the above cited studies concern resistance to antibacterials not used as AFA in the EU, they demonstrate that bacteria can be transmitted from animals to man directly, via food, or by other routes and in the case the bacterium carries resistance this trait will not disappear along the line.

Transfer of gram-positive bacteria has been less studied. Hummel and Witte (1981) found macrolide-resistant 3 AUREUS of human biovariant in farm

workers and in occasional pigs on farms using in-feed tylosin and tetracycline. This seems to indicate a human to animal transmission. As staphylococci are known to be relatively host specific, it is likely that the finding was merely the result of a transient colonisation. Interestingly, no macrolide-resistant strains were found among the family members of the farm workers, indicating the need for a selective pressure for transferred bacteria to persist in the new host. In the case of the farm-workers, they were likely to be exposed to tylosin through dust.

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 103

Direct transmission from chicken to man has been implicated in a recent report on a case of wound infection with a vancomycin resistant % FAECIUM

in a worker at a chicken packaging plant (Das ET AL , 1997). Available information strongly suggests that the infection was occupationally derived

(contracted from chicken carcasses).

Human % FAECIUM strains have been widely used as probiotics and do, at least transiently, colonise animal intestines. Further, human VRE have successfully been used to colonise mice experimentally (Whitman ET AL , 1996). This indicates that at least certain enterococcal strains can colonise, or transiently inhabit, a variety of hosts. Another report on occupational exposure provides further evidence (van den Bogaard ET AL , 1997). The prevalence of VRE in turkeys, turkey farmers, turkey slaughterers and urban residents was found to be 50%, 39%, 20% and 14%, respectively. Further investigations showed that VRE isolated from one of the farmers and his turkeys could not be differentiated by phenotypic or genotypic (pulsed-field gel electrophoresis) methods. Investigations of the VANA-gene cluster by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and hybridisation showed the two strains to be identical in the tested areas, having an insertion in a previously nondescribed position, between the VANX and VANY gene, and a deletion in the right end of the cluster.

4.5.2Transfer of genes

The majority of the bacteria in the animal intestinal microflora are relatively host specific and would not be expected to colonise other animal species or man. Similar restrictions do not apply to the bacterial host range of resistance genes. Therefore, transfer of genes between animal and human bacteria is more likely to have an impact on interspecies exchange of resistance. Transfer of resistance genes between animal and human microflora has been shown in several studies. Again, many of those deal with resistance genes related to therapeutical antibacterials.

However, in the light of the close relatedness between resistance genes in human and animal bacteria and the current knowledge of gene transfer mechanisms and genetic drift, it would be naïve to presume that there is no exchange of resistance genes between animal and human microflora. On the contrary, this is the most, if not the only, plausible explanation for the spread of antibacterial resistance against both therapeuticals and AFA in various populations. The majority of the studies addressing this topic concern resistance in gram-negative bacteria against therapeutic antibacterials. Nonetheless, they illustrate the fact that transmission of genes occurs between animal and human bacteria.

104 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

Resistance genes identified in both animal and human bacteria

Levy and co-workers (Levy ET AL , 1976) reported spread of an % COLI multiresistance plasmid between chickens and from chicken to man.

The spread of streptothricin resistance from animal to human bacteria has been documented in former Eastern Germany. A streptothricin antibiotic, nourseothricin, was commonly used in pig feed from the beginning of the 80s. A novel transposon-encoded resistance mechanism was identified in % COLI from pigs in 1983. Subsequently, this transposon, Tn , has been found in the normal microflora of pig farmers and their families and of healthy unrelated adults in the community, and in urinary tract infections in humans. Finally, the resistance determinant has been detected in salmonella and shigella from human cases of diarrhoea (Hummel 1986, Tschäpe 1994). Streptothricin antibiotics are not used in humans. In areas where the antibiotic was not used in animals, the resistance determinant was not found.

Another example is the spread of aminoglycoside-acetyl-transferase IV (apramycin resistance) and hygromycin B phosphotransferase (hygromycin B resistance). The corresponding genes, AACC4 and HPHB, form part of one resistance gene operon associated with an insertion sequence IS probably part of a transposon, that is found on plasmids. The organisation of AACC4 and HPHB is such that they are always co-transferred. Apramycin and

hygromycin B are used exclusively in animals. The gene AACC4, conferring cross-resistance to gentamicin, was first identified in % COLI and 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM from animals in France and the United Kingdom (Chaslus-

Dancla ET AL , 1986; Wray ET AL , 1986). It has since been demonstrated in various enterobacteria, including salmonella, from human as well as

environmental sources in different countries (Threlfall ET AL , 1986; Chaslus- Dancla ET AL , 1989; Hunter ET AL , 1993; Hunter ET AL , 1994). A high degree

of genetic homology between plasmids harbouring AACC4 and HPHB of human and animal origin has been demonstrated (Salauze ET AL , 1990; Chaslus-Dancla ET AL , 1991). In a prospective study on a pig farm, Hunter

(1994) demonstrated a widespread dissemination of plasmids harbouring AACC4 in % COLI from pigs, calves, the stockman and a variety of

environmental sources including rainwater puddles and water from a stream nearby. +LEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE with a slightly smaller conjugative plasmid

and similar resistance pattern was isolated from the stockman's wife.

As mentioned in 4.3.4, investigations concerning antimicrobial resistance tend to focus on a limited range of microbes. Few investigations concerning transfer of genes between the predominant, anaerobic, part of the microflora of man and animals are available. Nikolich and co-workers (1994) examined the possible gene transfer between microflora of ruminants and man, by

using the TETQ gene, conveying tetracycline resistance, as indicator. By DNA sequencing of the gene from "ACTEROIDES spp. and 0REVOTELLA INTERMEDIA of human origin and 0REVOTELLA RUMINICOLA of bovine origin, they showed

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 105

identical, or nearly identical, gene sequences in bacteria of the two hosts from different geographic origin. The findings indicate that extensive transmission of the TETQ gene has occurred in nature between bacteria normally colonising different hosts and that the transfer is recent.

No similar investigations with direct relevance for AFA used in Europe have been found, nor studies concerning dominant microflora of other animal

species. )N VITRO co-transfer of macrolide and tetracycline resistance between

"ACTEROIDES spp. and 0REVOTELLA RUMINICOLA has been shown (Shoemaker ET AL , 1992), indicating a strong possibility of similar IN VIVO transfer events

related to macrolides and streptogramins. Further, successful transfer of

ERMF genes from 4REPONEMA DENTICOLA to %NTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS has been demonstrated (Roberts ET AL , 1996a)

The question of ”identity” of genes has been a matter of debate in relation to the discussion on the use of avoparcin in animal husbandry. It is important to point out that the bacterial genome is subject to changes over time. Mobile gene-sequences may insert into or close to non-essential parts of a gene, and deletions or point-mutations may take place. Consequently, the sequence of a specific gene may differ from one point in time to another.

The VANA gene cluster contains 9 genes (7 VAN and two transposition genes). Between those genes are intergenic, non-coding regions. The coding regions would be expected to be highly conserved once their sequences are optimal for function. As the intergenic regions are not essential for the function of the gene cluster, they are more likely to vary. Several recent studies have addressed the matter by amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing of the genes and/or their intergenic regions (Jensen, 1996; Haaheim ET AL , 1997; Kirk ET AL , 1997).

In a study from Norway (Haaheim ET AL , 1997), PCR for the VANA and VANB genes combined with restriction fragment analysis of a long PCR covering the entire gene cluster and sequencing of the intergenic VANS-VANH region were used to analyse the vanA gene cluster from VRE of Norwegian poultry and humans of various nationality (Swedish, Norwegian and American). In 9/12 human isolates and 7/10 poultry the results were identical, indicating horizontal transfer of the gene cluster.

Kirk and co-workers (1997), investigated 37 VRE isolates from one UK hospital and 36 VRE isolates from poultry meat bought in national

supermarkets. By PCR, three intergenic regions and three genes of the VANA- cluster were investigated (VANS-VANH, VANX-VANY, VANY-VANZ, VANX, VANY

and VANZ) In the chicken isolates, all three investigated genes were amplified as well as the three intergenic regions. Evidence of a not previously described insertion sequence in various locations of the intergenic region between VANX and VANY was found in some of the chicken isolates. The gene sequences of the strains from humans in this study were clearly atypical.

106 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

The focus of a Danish study, reported by Jensen (1996), was slightly different. In order to investigate the degree of variation within the VANA gene cluster, isolates from different animals and humans from a wider geographic range were investigated. Similar to Kirk and co-workers (1997), Jensen found evidence of an insertion sequence in the VANX-VANY region in 7 of 12 British human isolates. Based on sequencing of coding and non-coding regions, the remaining isolates could be divided into 3 groups, each containing isolates both from man and animals from different countries. The

designation of one of the groups was based on the presence of a point mutation in VANX and an insertion sequence (IS 6) in a specific position

in the transposon (Tn ). The group contained isolates from humans (Denmark and USA) and pigs (Denmark and UK). Mutations within the coding regions appear to be rare. Insertion sequences are highly mobile, and frequently vary in their location. The occurrence of an insertion sequence in the same location in strains of different origin could either be interpreted as evidence of an epidemiological relationship, or as the site being a ”hot spot” for insertion of the specific sequence. However, the likelihood of both a point mutation and an insertion in a specific location occurring independently in different strains is extremely low. Therefore, the genes present in those isolates must be very closely related and their presence the result of horizontal transfer.

Experimental transfer studies

Lacey (1980) examined the possibility of transfer of macrolide resistance between animal and human isolates of 3TAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS. Transfer by

phage conjugation from human to animal isolates was shown at low frequencies (10-8-10-9) for some of the isolates (see comments on transfer rates under 4.4.6 and 4.5.4). No transfer from animal to human isolates could be demonstrated. The genetic nature of the resistance traits for which transfer

was attempted is not known. The same author also investigated transfer of resistance between animal and human streptococci, including 3TREPTOCOCCUS group D (now %NTEROCOCCUS) (Lacey, 1984). In about 10% of the animal

strains investigated, transfer to human recipients was demonstrated. Transfer of resistance occurred more readily from the enterococci. No transfer to group A or group C streptococci was demonstrated. The most common transfer frequencies were between 10-6 and 10-8. However, the experiments were conducted in broth, filter matings being used only for isolates that had failed to transfer initially. Under optimal conditions, the transfer rates would be expected to be considerably higher (by up to 3 logarithms). Further, the experiments also failed to demonstrate conjugative transfer from human enterococci to human group A or group C streptococci. Such transfer has, contrary to the statement of Lacey, been demonstrated by other authors

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 107

(Malke, 1979; Horodniceanu ET AL , 1981; Ravdonikas, 1983; Horaud ET AL , 1985). This indicates that the conditions of the experiment may not have allowed optimal transfer rates.

4.5.3Routes of transmission - food as a vehicle

Direct contact with animals carrying resistance genes provides excellent opportunity for uptake of these genes. Examples of farmers carrying the same resistance genes in their microflora as do their animals have been given in 4.5.1 and 4.5.2. Logically, this transfer works both ways, resistance genes may also spread from humans to animals. However, as animals are in many ways part of the human food chain, transfer from animals to humans would be expected to occur more easily.

Enteric pathogens are readily transmitted through foods as are antibiotic resistant pathogens and commensals. It has been suggested that, in the normal human population, most resistant enterobacteria in faeces come from contaminated food (Corpet, 1988). In an experiment (Corpet, 1988), 7 healthy volunteers were given a control diet for 3 weeks followed by a sterile

diet for 2.5 weeks. During both periods, total and antibiotic resistant %NTEROBACTERIACEAE in stools were counted. A drastic drop in faecal

concentrations of antibiotic resistant enterobacteria was observed during the sterile diet period (p<0.05).

Antibiotic resistant gram-negative bacteria are present in animal products as well as on vegetables and fruits (Levy, 1983). Antibiotic-resistant grampositive bacteria have also been isolated from various foods (Roosen ET AL , 1989; Franco Abuin ET AL , 1994; Perreten and Teuber, 1995; DANMAP, 1997; Perreten ET AL , 1997; Wegener ET AL , 1997). Moreover, various

transferable resistance genes, including VANA-genes in enterococci and ERM- genes in ,ISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES, have been found in gram-positive bacteria

isolated from food (Bates ET AL , 1994; Aarestrup, 1995; Klare ET AL , 1995a; Perreten and Teuber, 1995; Roberts ET AL , 1996b; Perreten ET AL , 1997).

Most foods are heat treated before consumption and hence, no viable resistant bacteria would be expected to be present in the final product. However, food-borne infections with infectious doses as high as 106-109 (as for salmonellosis) are relatively common. This proves that recontamination is

common and viable bacteria can be present in relatively large numbers in food when consumed. Certain bacteria, such as % FAECIUM may also have an

increased heat tolerance (Panagea and Chadwick, 1996).

The origin of these resistant bacteria is difficult to determine but there can be no doubt that they at least partly originate from contamination of meat and vegetables with animal bacteria. Exchange of resistance genes between bacterial species has been demonstrated in water, soil, on kitchen towels, on cutting boards, and on the surface of food (Kruse and Sørum, 1994).

108 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

Epidemiological studies comparing the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria in vegetarians and meat-eaters are of limited value for quantifying the spread of bacteria from animals to man via the food chain. Vegetables are likely to become contaminated by animal microbes through manure. The higher prevalence of resistance in vegetarians found in some studies is therefore not surprising as vegetables are less often heat treated, as compared to meat.

4.5.4Likelihood of resistance being transferred from animals to man

It has been proposed that both types of transfer discussed above are extremely rare events (Knothe, 1977; Lacey, 1980; Lacey, 1984; Lacey, 1988; Shah ET AL , 1993). The basis for this opinion is the rarity of isolation of the same bacteria from animals and man (Lacey, 1988; Shah ET AL , 1993), the rarity of gene transfer IN VITRO between human and animal isolates of some bacterial species (Lacey, 1980; Lacey, 1984) and lack of association between drug consumption in veterinary medicine and resistance patterns in human pathogens (Knothe, 1977). Acknowledging the logic of these arguments, they are mainly based on observations on staphylococci and to a lesser extent streptococci and enterococci. Staphylococci and streptococci are indeed rather host specific, and transfer frequencies between staphylococci are, compared to other genera, rather low irrespective of host origin. Nevertheless, it is doubtful whether the finding of a low number of animal isolates capable of transferring resistance to human isolates, and vice versa, in the laboratory at a frequency in the order of 10-6-10-8 (Lacey, 1980; Lacey, 1984) under suboptimal conditions should be regarded as proof of a rare event. Considering the vast amount of bacterial subpopulations present in the intestinal flora, even a comparatively low transfer frequency may result in a

large number of successful transfer events. The rarity of macrolide resistance in #AMPYLOBACTER spp. isolated from humans has also been pointed out

(Lacey, 1988). The species distribution of the bacterial isolates investigated was not given, but as the vast majority of human isolates are # JEJUNI this

species can be assumed to be the predominant in the material. It was stated that in animal husbandry, macrolides are mainly used as AFA in pigs. As the main animal host of # JEJUNI is poultry, prevalence of macrolide resistance in this bacterial species provides little information about the effects of macrolide use in pigs. In # COLI, which is mainly found in pigs, a high prevalence of macrolide resistance has been reported (Wang ET AL , 1984; Burridge ET AL , 1986; Jacobs-Reitma ET AL , 1994; DANMAP, 1997). This has also been shown in # COLI isolated from humans (Reina ET AL , 1992).

As stated by Lacey (1988), it is known that animal bacteria can colonise man, at least transiently, and that resistance genes can be transferred between animal and human bacteria, but the frequency of these events in nature is unknown.

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 109

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria and transferable resistance genes in food are ingested by humans.

Transmission of resistant bacteria between host species occurs, although depending on bacterial species the resulting colonisation may be transient.

Transmission of resistance genes can and does occur in a variety of surroundings.

The question that remains is how often successful transfers cause clinical problems.

4.6Epidemiology of antibacterial resistance

The causal relationship between use of antibacterials and resistance has been shown both for human and animal bacteria (among others Richmond, 1972; Levy ET AL , 1976; Seppälä ET AL , 1997). In evolutionary terms, exposure to antibacterials exert a selective pressure on bacterial populations, giving bacteria with advantageous traits a competitive advantage (survival of the fit).

All factors influencing the usage of antibacterials and/or the spread of infectious agents will also affect the emergence of resistance. In human medicine, such factors are; changes in human demographics and behaviour, changes in technology and industry, economic development and land use, international travel and commerce, microbial adaptation and change and breakdown of public health measures (Cohen, 1996). Corresponding factors are known to influence epidemiology of contagious diseases in animals. Apart from the two latter, these factors all influence the degree of contact between individuals, either by affecting the population density or by providing new contact routes. This emphasises the similarity between spread of resistance and spread of infectious diseases.

4.6.1Reservoirs - the gene pool

As noted in 4.3.4, dissemination of resistance requires both presence of the antibacterial in concentrations high enough to inhibit growth of normally susceptible bacteria and presence of resistance genes (Levy, 1996). This spread involves a variety of commensals and environmental bacteria (see 4.3, 4.4 and 6.4) which act as reservoirs.

In order to create a problem, or even to be noticed, the resistance genes have to pass from the reservoirs into clinically relevant bacterial hosts. The size and accessibility of the reservoir available will determine the likelihood of such events. The prevalence of resistance genes (i.e. the size of the

110 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

reservoir) will primarily depend on the selective pressure applied in different microbial habitats. In most surveys on antibacterial resistance, only potential pathogens are included and thus, the bulk of the resistance gene pool will go unnoticed.

4.6.2Risk factors for spread of resistance

The kinetics of resistance spread in bacterial populations will be dependent on the total time and degree of exposure to risk factors, and on the sizes and numbers of populations exposed (Levy, 1996).

The selective pressure

The main risk factor for increased resistance is, as mentioned, exposure of bacteria to the specific antimicrobial under study. The selective pressure can be defined as the product of exposure dose and exposure time. The importance of time is illustrated by the investigations by Garber (1989) on the association between antibacterial use and the nosocomial spread of infections with resistant gram-negative bacteria. By using a mathematical model, he found that the risk of an individual acquiring an infection with a resistant strain was directly proportional to the length of time the patient was treated with the drug in question. Further, for some antibacterials, the risk for such infections also increased for non-treated individuals in the same ward.

The number of bacteria exposed is important, but even more so the number of separate bacterial subpopulations. Orally administered antibacterials will exert a larger selective pressure than for instance if locally applied on the skin, as the intestine contains a larger number of various bacterial species (Salyers, 1995).

The proportion of individuals exposed in a subpopulation, as well as the number of subpopulations exposed, is of importance for the spread of resistance between the microflora of individuals.

When antibacterials are used as AFA, they are administered for a long period of time, and usually to all individuals in a group or even herd. As discussed in 4.2, the doses given are certainly inhibitory enough to disrupt the initial balance between resistant and susceptible strains in the normal flora. With time, resistance will and does evolve (see 4.3).

Population factors

The spread of resistance genes between the microflora of different individuals depends on the number of direct or indirect contacts between the bacteria of the individuals. As for infectious diseases, the incidence of resistance genes will depend on size, and structure of the host population.

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 111

The degree of contact between individuals and subpopulations, population density, is also crucial (Schwabe ET AL , 1977). As an example, studies on human skin flora show that sequential therapy for acne promotes the carriage of resistant staphylococci on the skin of close contacts (Miller ET AL , 1996).

In animal husbandry, high stocking densities, frequent indirect contacts with other herds, frequent trading of animals, and a low level of hygiene will favour the spread and maintenance of resistance traits. Other factors such as feeding practices, management, temperature, humidity and light intensity may influence the composition of the bacterial population and thus, to some extent, influence the incidence of resistance.

Individual factors

Transfer of resistance and/ or colonisation with resistant strains appears to occur more readily in the intestine of young animals as compared to adults (Langlois, 1988). McConnell and co-workers (1991) found, in previously cited experiments (see 4.4.1), that transfer of a resistance plasmid could only be detected in the offspring of the mice originally inoculated. The authors suggested that this might be correlated to the differences in the composition of the intestinal flora between suckling and adult mice. This was thought to affect the donor-recipient ratio. Other explanations might be that colonisation by resistant bacteria is favoured in young animals. This may be ascribed to factors favouring adhesion, including less competition from established microflora (Corpet, 1986).

Individual features of the combination of bacterial species and specific

antibacterial involved also play a role. For example, penicillin resistance developed rapidly in human 3TAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS following the

introduction of penicillin, whilst in group A streptococci, such resistance has not yet been demonstrated in spite of 4 decades of use of the drug. On the other hand, group A streptococci seem to readily acquire resistance to macrolides (Hamilton-Miller, 1990; Seppälä ET AL , 1997). Certain genera, such as enterococci, seem to have a high capacity for both acquisition and transfer of resistance (Murray, 1990).

4.6.3Persistence of resistance

Field observations indicate that the relation between antibacterial use and resistance is not as clear-cut as it may seem (Leak ET AL , 1986; Langlois, 1988). Whether resistance would regress in the absence of antibacterials depends, among other things, on the availability of susceptible strains to replace the resistant ones. The importance of the environmental reservoir is illustrated by some experiments by Levy (1976) in which chickens excreting multiply resistant % COLI were studied. Despite repeated cleaning of the

112 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

cages, over several months, the resistance level did not decline. However, when the cages were relocated to different sites, the flora slowly returned to more susceptible levels. This was interpreted as the first environment lacking susceptible strains to replace the resistant ones.

The concept that susceptible strains will replace the resistant ones once the selective event has passed relies on the idea that resistant strains will be at a disadvantage once the antibacterial is withdrawn. This might not always be the case, as a long-term selective pressure can lead to bacterial adaptation (see 4.4.5).

Another factor to be considered is co-selection (see 4.4.3). Due to this phenomenon, exposure to factors other than the substance in question might help sustain antibacterial resistance within a bacterial population.

4.6.4 Some comments on epidemiology

While each single use of an antibiotic has only a small effect on the probability of a resistant strain developing, the consequences add up across all other users in the community. Logically, the selective pressure within a dense population, such as patients in a hospital or animals in a herd, is the major factor contributing to amplification of resistance genes within that particular population. However, very few populations of either animals and humans are isolated from others and transmission of resistance genes can easily occur between groups. This is illustrated in the findings of Linton (1988 see 4.3.1). A resistance gene originating in an animal population may spread to a population of humans and persist there, under the selective pressure from antimicrobials used for human therapy (for example apramycin resistance, see 4.5.2), and vice versa.

Disproportions in the usage of antibacterials between different populations of humans or animals may cause "spill-over" of resistance genes to other populations Hypothetically, if a gene from animal bacteria, conferring resistance to virginiamycin, were to enter a hospital where regular streptogramin therapy had recently been introduced, the gene would be likely to spread within the hospital and soon become a problem. In this case, the animal population would have served as a reservoir for the resistance gene

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 113

subsequently maintained within the hospital population. This illustrates the fact that although the antimicrobial usage within a certain population contributes to most of the antimicrobial resistance within that population, other populations serve as reservoirs for resistance genes.

Commensals and environmental bacteria act as reservoirs for resistance genes.

In the presence of antimicrobials, resistant bacteria will have a competitive advantage.

The effects of the selective pressure on bacterial populations will depend on the exposure dose and exposure time, and on the sizes and numbers of populations exposed.

If susceptible strains are available in the environment, these may replace the resistant ones when the selective pressure is removed.

Bacterial adaptation may result in increased fitness of resistant strains.

Factors influencing the usage of antibacterials and/or the spread of infectious agents will also affect the emergence of resistance.

Microbiota of animals serve as resistance gene reservoirs for human bacteria and vice versa.

4.7Effects of an increase in resistance

Presence of resistance genes in the human or animal microflora is not in itself a problem. The problem arises when bacteria causing a disease withstand antibiotic therapy.

For substances that are used both as AFA and for therapy or prevention (tylosin, spiramycin, virginiamycin, olaquindox, carbadox) the consequences

for animals of resistance in animal pathogens are obvious. As an example, for important swine pathogens such as 3ERPULINA HYODYSENTERIAE and ,AWSONIA INTRACELLULARIS tylosin or tiamulin are the drugs of choice

(Fellström, 1996; McOrist ET AL , 1996; McOrist ET AL , 1997). Tylosin resistance in 3 HYODYSENTERIAE is already widespread, leaving tiamulin as the

only available alternative (Gunnarsson ET AL , 1991; Buller and Hampson, 1994; Molnar, 1996). In table 3.III (chapter 3) some indications for treatment and prophylaxis with substances also used as AFA are listed.

In human medicine, macrolides, streptogramins and glycopeptides all have important indications such as respiratory infections, mycoplasmas, chlamydiae (macrolides only) and other infections with staphylococci, streptococci enterococci and clostridia, (see annexes D and E ). For some of

114 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

these indications, other drugs might be the first choice but substances in the groups listed constitute valuable secondor even last-resort choices. For example, in infections such as streptococcal infections (common in children), penicillins are generally considered first choice. When this is not an option, for instance due to penicillin allergy, macrolides are often used (Huovinen ET AL , 1996). Macrolide resistance in streptococci is currently regarded as an emerging problem (Coranaglia ET AL , 1996).

An increase in resistance against these drugs may lead to therapeutic failures and will substantially diminish the available therapeutic arsenal. As long as there are alternative drugs available, the situation can still be managed, although possibly at a higher cost.

The relative importance of the different therapeutical substances is subject to change over time. Vancomycin became a last resort antibiotic as a consequence of the spread of multiresistant staphylococci in hospitals. Emergence of resistance is one explanation, but also that new pathogens emerge due to a combination of technological and societal changes (Cohen, 1992).

Some potential alternatives have not yet been introduced into human medicine. Old, underexploited antibiotic classes such as orthosomycins, phosphoglycolipids and elfamycins as well as antimicrobial peptides all have modes of action that make them interesting as templates for therapeutic substances (van den Bogaard and Stobberingh, 1996; Chopra ET AL , 1997). Cross-resistance between old and new substances of the same class is to be expected. The most recent examples of this are quinpristin-dalfopristin and everninomycins. Quinpristin-dalfopristin is a streptogramin now launched in human medicine for the treatment of infections with vancomycin resistant bacteria, and everninomycins, an orthosomycin compound, is a promising candidate for the same area (Nicas ET AL , 1997). Unfortunately, as these agents are widely used as AFA, their lifespan as therapeuticals may be shortened by rapidly emerging resistance problems.

Although safe and effective new antibacterial substances may still be found, the efficacy of the older drugs is imperative in keeping fatal infections at bay.

Resistance becomes a problem when bacteria causing a disease withstand antibiotic therapy.

Some substances used as AFA are also used for therapy in animals and humans. Increased resistance to AFA may therefore cause clinical problems

Other substances used as AFA may serve as templates for future drugs. An increase in resistance may shorten the life-span of the drugs.

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 115

4.8Other effects on the microflora

The normal intestinal flora of healthy animals and humans does not cause the host any harm. On the contrary, it protects against colonisation with enteric pathogens. Intensive livestock production systems can, however, induce imbalance in this normal flora, thereby making way for enteric disease (McOrist, 1997). All exposure of the normal flora to antibacterials, for growth promotion or for therapy, will disturb its balance (Corpet, 1996). Depending on the antibacterial spectrum, different microbes will be suppressed. This may lead to a loss of the protective role of the normal flora, impairing resistance to colonisation. As many of the enteric pathogens are of zoonotic character and are known to cause foodborne infections, this might present a hazard for human health.

If the antibacterial feed additive is effective against certain pathogenic bacteria, it would be expected to prevent intestinal colonisation by these organisms and perhaps even remove already established infections. In this case, however, feeding the antibacterial substance must be regarded as prophylaxis or therapy and cannot be categorised as growth promotion.

4.8.1Salmonella

Concern over potential salmonella contamination of human food has led to the instigation of various measures for its control. Reports in the medical literature that antibiotics may prolong the course of salmonella colonisation has led to the scrutiny of the effects of AFA on salmonella in animals.

The protective effect of the normal microflora against salmonella infection was demonstrated by Nurmi and Rantala in the early 70s (Nurmi and Rantala, 1973). As most AFA, apart from quinoxalines and perhaps flavomycin, are not active against salmonella, their presence in the intestine would be expected to favour rather than disfavour salmonella colonisation.

The main concern regarding human health is contamination of the animal products. There are numerous ways by which salmonellae can contaminate animal products. Stress during transportation may lead to translocation of enteric bacteria with subsequent contamination of internal organs at slaughter. Faecal material on skin or from the intestine can spread to the meat of several carcasses along the processing line (Lillard, 1990). This problem is particularly important when chickens are slaughtered. Rigorous measures following Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) may reduce the problem.

The important factor when assessing the overall risk of contamination of food is the total amount of salmonella organisms brought into the processing plant by animals (Jordon, 1990). Thus, the epidemiological unit of concern is the flock or herd.

116 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

Theoretical effects of AFA on salmonella colonisation could be a lowering of the infectious dose necessary to achieve colonisation, an increase in the amount of organisms shed by colonised animals or a prolonged duration of shedding by colonised animals.

A lowered infectious dose will increase the probability of the flock becoming infected by exposure to low doses of salmonella. Moreover, a lowered infectious dose will facilitate the subsequent spread within the flock.

Likewise, an increased amount of organisms shed will contribute to the spread of the infection within the flock. More importantly, animals shedding a large amount of salmonella organisms can have a substantial impact on the cross-contamination of carcasses at slaughter and on the spread to subsequent flocks through contamination of the environment.

A prolonged duration of shedding also contributes to the spread within the flock, as well as the proportion of animals shedding salmonella at slaughter.

A substantial amount of studies have been performed on the effects of AFA on salmonella colonisation. Most of these studies are, however, inconclusive and while some are excellent, many have considerable shortcomings regarding study design and conclusions drawn. As the study designs used are very different, it is almost impossible to compare the results of one study to those of another. Further comments on the different studies can be found in annexes A-F. In table 4.VIII an attempt has been made to summarise the results of some studies in this area. One must remember, though, that do not allow for comparisons.

Table 4.VIII. Results from various studies on the effects of AFA on No. of animals shedding salmonella.

Tabell 4.VIII. Resultat från olika studies avseende effekten av antibakteriella fodertillsatser på antal djur som utsöndrar sal monella

Study Animal Serovar AFA Conclusions drawn1 Comment
  species          
Abou-Youssef et al, swine S. Typhimurium virginiamycin No statistical difference between  
1979         medicated and controls  
Abou Youssef et al, chickens S. Typhimurium virginiamycin No statistical difference between  
1983         medicated and controls  
Barrow, 1989 chickens S. Typhimurium, avoparcin Increased No. of birds shedding Dose-response relationship
    S. Pullorum,     salmonella in medicated group established for avoparcin
    S. Choleraesuis,        
    S. Dublin,        
    S. Arizonae        
Dealy and Moeller, swine S. Typhimurium flavomycin Reduced duration and prevalence of Infecting organism susceptible to
1976         salmonella shedding by medicated flavomycin
          animals  
Dealy and Moeller, calves S. Typhimurium flavomycin Reduced duration and prevalence of Infecting organism susceptible to
1977         salmonella shedding by medicated flavomycin
          animals  
George et al, 1982 chickens S. Typhimurium flavomycin No statistical difference between  
          medicated and controls  
Gustafson et al, 1981 chickens S. Typhimurium avoparcin, No statistical difference between All birds also received monensin
      virginiamycin medicated and controls  
Gustafson et al, 1983 chickens S. Typhimurium avoparcin No statistical difference between
      medicated and controls

Also tested effect of clean versus used litter

Table VIII. Continued

4ABELL 6))) &ORTS¤TTNING

Study Animal Serovar AFA Conclusions drawn1 Comment
  species          
Hinton et al, 1986 chickens S. Bredeney, avoparcin, ? Results inconclusive All birds also received monensin
    S. Cubana, virginiamycin      
    natural infection        
    via feed        
Hinton, 1988 chickens S. Kedougo avilamycin No statistical difference between  
          medicated and controls  
Humbert et al, 1991 chickens S. Typhimurium avoparcin, No significant effect of AFA alone,
    bacitracin, interaction with CE treatment
    flavomycin,
    virginiamycin

All birds shed salmonellae, comparisons based on amount of organisms in faeces

Jacks et al, 1988 swine S. Typhimurium efrotomycin No statistical difference between Both quantity, duration and
          medicated and controls prevalence of shedding evaluated
Latour and Barnum, ducks S. Typhimurium bacitracin Increased prevalence in medicated  
1981       group in 2 experiments, no statis-  
          tical difference in 2 experiments  
Leuchtenberger, 1981 chickens S. Typhimurium avoparcin, Increased prevalence and duration  
      tylosin, of shedding in medicated groups  
      virginiamycin    
Linton et al, 1985 chickens Various, natural avoparcin No statistical difference between
  infection via   medicated and controls
  contaminated feed    

All groups except one of the controls also received monensin

Manning et al, 1994 chickens S. Enteritidis bacitracin Increased prevalence of salmonella All birds kept on used litter
      shedding in medicated group

Table 4.VIII. Continued

4ABELL 6))) &ORTS¤TTNING

Study Animal Serovar AFA Conclusions drawn1 Comment
  species      
Matthes et al, 1981 chickens not given avoparcin, Prolonged salmonella shedding in
      tylosin, medicated groups
      virginiamycin  
Nurmi and Rantala, chickens S. Infantis bacitracin Reduced prevalence and amount of
1974         salmonella shedding in medicated
          group
Smith and Tucker, chickens S. Typhimurium bacitracin, Small or no increase in prevalence
1975     flavomycin, of shedding in groups fed
      tylosin, virginiamycin or bacitracin. Larger
      virginiamycin increase in most groups fed
          flavomycin and tylosin

Possibly identical to one of the experiments reported by Leuchtenberger

Smith and Tucker, chickens S. Typhimurium avoparcin, Increased prevalence of salmonella
1978     tylosin shedding in medicated groups
Smith and Tucker, chickens S. Typhimurium, avoparcin, Increased prevalence and duration
1980   S. Heidelberg, bacitracin of shedding in groups fed
    S. Oranienburg,     avoparcin. Little or no increase in
    S. Infantis,     groups fed bacitracin
    S. Senftenberg      

Effect of infectious dose, poultry breed and feed type also investigated

Troutt et al, 1974 swine S. Choleraesuis carbadox Diminished clinical signs in
        medicated group

1 Arrows indicate conclusions as drawn by the authors regarding effect of AFA on colonisation; denotes no difference,denotes a decrease, indicate an increase in shedding time and/or prevalence when medicated groups were compared to control groups

120 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

The interest in these studies has mainly been focused on prevalence and duration of salmonella shedding in experimentally infected animals. Most studies have been conducted for 40-50 days and evaluated at the end of the study period. Roughly, 18 experiments show non-significant results, 14 experiments indicate an increase in prevalence/duration of salmonella shedding among medicated animals, and 4 trials indicate a decrease in shedding by medicated animals (see table 4.VIII). Only one study (Barrow, 1989) established a dose-dependent response, to in-feed avoparcin.

Three studies (Nurmi and Rantala, 1974; Barrow, 1989; Humbert ET AL , 1991) evaluate the amount of organisms shed. Two indicate a possible decrease in numbers shed by bacitracin-fed animals and two an increase in the amount shed by animals receiving avoparcin. However, none of these studies investigate the amount of organisms shed over time.

Regarding changes in the infectious dose, or increased susceptibility of infected animals, the prevalence of salmonella in the different experimental groups shortly after infection may give a hint. One study, by Smith and Tucker (1980) clearly showed, by dose-titration, a decrease (from 104 to 103) in the infectious dose necessary for colonising avoparcin-fed birds as compared to non-medicated birds.

Some substances do appear to affect the course of salmonella infection within an animal herd. Gustafson and co-workers (1981) used an inoculation dose optimised to achieve colonisation of about 50 % of the animals, which resulted in a faster spread of the infection, with an earlier peak of the epidemic curve, in birds receiving either avoparcin or virginiamycin, compared to the control group. At day 47, the prevalence of salmonella in samples from live birds was larger in the control group than in the medicated groups, but the prevalence of salmonellae in caecal contents after slaughter was larger in the medicated groups. This illustrates that there is sometimes a difference between the epidemic curves of the control group and the medicated group.

Comments on study design

One problem with many of the studies in the table above is that the groups of animals are too small. Population size and density are important factors influencing the spread and persistence of an infection within a herd (Schwabe ET AL , 1977). Studies performed on small groups of chickens are not necessarily applicable to real poultry flocks with tens of thousands of birds.

The need for a study design as realistic as possible must be balanced against the need for a controlled environment. Practices vary in animal husbandry and what is a realistic study design in one part of the world may

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 121

be unrealistic in another area. For example, Gustafson (1983) conducted a series of studies on the effect on salmonella shedding if chickens were raised on clean or used litter and found a higher prevalence of shedding among birds raised on clean litter.

As evident from table 4.VIII, most investigators use 3.Typhimurium for the experimental inoculation, and most strains are laboratory mutants resistant to nalidixic acid. It is unclear whether the results obtained with such strains are applicable to all salmonella serovars. Further, the properties of an old laboratory strain are not necessarily comparable to wild strains. 3. Enteritidis is currently the main cause of poultry-derived salmonellosis in humans. As this serovar has a distinctly different behaviour compared to 3 Typhimurium in the host animals in natural infections (Barrow and Lovell, 1991), separate studies should be conducted. Similarly, for swine, other serovars may be of interest.

Titration of infectious dose and establishment of dose-response relationships is an essential part of risk assessment (see chapter 8). This type of investigation is crucial when determining causal relationships and also for explaining the seemingly conflicting results obtained in different studies. If the doses used are close to the threshold value of response/no response, different studies are bound to show equivocal results. In all dose-response experiments, Barrow (1989) found significant increases in salmonella shedding by chickens in all groups receiving concentrations of avoparcin from 15 ppm. For lower concentrations, variable results were obtained. This explains the contradictory results obtained in studies where 10 ppm has been used.

Doses used for inoculation are often large enough to cause colonisation of almost every animal in the control groups. While this allows for a maximum number of animals to monitor the shedding time, differences in susceptibility or epidemic curves are impossible to detect.

From a statistical point of view, these studies were designed to demonstrate differences between experimental groups, not to prove the absence of differences. In the former type of experiments, the null hypothesis is that there is no difference. In such cases, most statistical analyses use figures for significance and power that accept a 5% risk of falsely rejecting the null hypothesis (type I error) and a 20% risk of falsely maintaining the null hypothesis (type II error). Consequently, results calculated under these assumptions cannot simply be reversed to argue that the null hypothesis is true. When trying to prove safety, the allowances for type I and type II errors should be reversed. Alternatively, other statistical methods can be used, such as the detection level (a parameter indicating the minimum effect that could have been detected) suggested by Hansson (1995).

122 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

4.8.2Other pathogens

In addition to various 3ALMONELLA spp., colonisation of the animals with other

zoonotic and animal pathogens could also be affected. Little is known of such effects in relation to pathogens such as #AMPYLOBACTER spp., 9ERSINIA spp., verotoxin-producing %SCHERICHIA COLI, #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS, 3ERPULINA HYODYSENTERIAE and ,AWSONIA INTRACELLULARIS Increased presence

in the animal intestine of these bacteria could have serious consequences for either human or animal health. No studies specifically addressing this topic have been found.

4.8.3Other alterations of the microflora

Resistant bacteria may carry other traits that are disadvantageous for the host, such as other resistance genes, or virulence genes. An increase of the population of naturally resistant bacteria following exposure to antibacterial substances can be expected. Moreover, the prevalence of species with a high capacity for acquisition of resistance genes can be expected to increase. Although this may indirectly lead to an overall increase in resistance, this issue has not attracted much attention.

In an earlier cited study by Kaukas and co-workers (1988 , see 4.3.1), the feeding of AFA increased the proportion of % FAECIUM. As this species was

generally more resistant than the other enterococcal species, the ARI

increased in groups fed AFA. Resistance to the antibiotics studied is mainly conferred by acquired resistance genes in % FAECIUM

AFA cause disruption of the intestinal microflora which may increase the susceptibility to colonisation by enteric pathogens.

Avoparcin enhances intestinal colonisation with salmonella.

Some other AFA also affect salmonella colonisation.

Information on enteric pathogens other than salmonella is scarce.

Published studies do not directly address the influence of AFA on contamination of food of animal origin with zoonotic pathogens.

Well-designed studies, and use of appropriate statistical methods, are needed in this area.

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 123

4.9Summary comments

Use of AFA results in dissemination of resistance to AFA and related substances. Resistance against AFA can and does transfer between different bacteria and between different human and animal hosts. The use of AFA will thereby contribute to the increase of the environmental pool of resistance genes. The relative importance of this contribution for the increased resistance in animal and human pathogens cannot be determined. In a situation where the substance in question is not used for therapy, the bulk of the resistance genes will be directly attributable to AFA usage. At least two of the classes formerly primarily used as AFA are today options for new therapeutical drugs.

The possible effects of AFA on prevalence of food-borne pathogens in animal products have not been fully addressed. For salmonella, the effects would be expected to be more important in areas where the prevalence is

low, or where control programs are in force. Regarding other pathogens, such as #AMPYLOBACTER spp. and 9ERSINIA spp., no information has been found.

124 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

Glossary

ACTIVE EFFLUX - active transportation of a substance out of the bacterial cell, mostly by a membrane "pump"

CHROMOSOME - circular DNA structure, the major part of the bacterial genome

CO RESISTANCE - simultaneous resistance to several different antibacterials by different mechanisms, encoded by different genes

CO TRANSFER - simultaneous transfer of different resistance genes, located on the same mobile element

CONJUGATION OR CONJUGAL TRANSFER - direct transfer of plasmids or transposons between different bacteria via cell-cell contact

CONJUGATIVE PLASMIDS AND TRANSPOSONS - mobile DNA elements that carry genes encoding the mechanisms for their own conjugal transfer

CONSTITUTIVE EXPRESSION - the gene product is synthesised regardless of the presence of an inducer

CROSS RESISTANCE - resistance to different antimicrobials by the same resistance mechanism

DELETION - disappearance of DNA within or between genes

GENE DNA sequence that encodes a single protein; promoter plus open reading frame

GENE CASSETTE - gene lacking promoter, that encodes a specific mechanism, and can be inserted into integrons

GENE CLUSTER - several genes located together, forming a functional gene with products acting together to exert an effect

INDUCIBLE RESISTANCE - the product of the resistance gene is only synthesised in the presence of the inducing substance, usually the antimicrobial that the resistance mechanism counteracts

INSERTION - addition of DNA within or between genes

INTEGRON - small mobile element carrying gene cassettes and genes encoding its own transfer and insertion into the bacterial genome, as well as genes encoding rearrangement, expression and uptake of gene cassettes

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 125

INTERGENIC SEQUENCE - DNA sequence separating functional genes

MULTIRESISTANCE - resistance to a large number of different antimicrobials by various resistance mechanisms encoded by different genes

MUTATION random change in DNA sequence, can change the amino acid of an encoded protein

OPEN READING FRAME (ORF) - DNA sequence that encodes a single protein

OPERON - gene plus the operator controlling its expression

PHAGE - virus that infects bacteria and inserts its own DNA into the bacterial genome

PLASMID - extrachromosomal small, covalently closed, usually circular DNA element that can replicate autonomously and be transferred between bacteria

RIBOSOME - cytoplasmic structure where protein synthesis takes place through translation of mRNA

TRANSDUCTION - phage mediated gene transfer

TRANSFORMATION - gene transfer via bacterial uptake of free, extracellular DNA

TRANSPOSON - small, mobile DNA element that carry one or several genes, plus genes encoding for its on transposition between various locations in the bacterial genome

126 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

References

!ARESTRUP & - , 1995. Occurence of glycopeptide resistance among %NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM isolates from conventional and ecological poultry farms. -ICROBIAL $RUG 2ESISATANCE 255-257.

!BOU 9OUSSEF - ( #UOLLO # * D &REE 3 - 3COTT ' # AND $I #UOLLO # * , 1983.

The influence of a feed additive level of virginiamycin on the course of an experimentally induced 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM infection in broilers. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE 30-37.

!BOU 9OUSSEF - ( $I#UOLLO # * -ILLER # 2 AND 3COTT ' # , 1979. Influence of a

sub-therapeutic level of virginiamycin in feed on the incidence and persistence of

3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM in experimentally infected swine. *OURNAL OF !NIMAL 3CIENCE 128-133.

!LLIGNET * !UBERT 3 -ORVAN ! AND %L 3OLH . , 1996. Distribution of genes

encoding resistance to streptogramin A and related compounds among staphylococci resistant to these antibiotics. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 2523-2528.

!LLIGNET * AND %L 3OLH . , 1995. Diversity among the gram-positive acetyltransferases

inactivating streptogramin A and structurally related compounds and characterization of a new staphylococcal determinant, VATB. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 2027-2036.

!MABILE #UEVAS # & AND #HICUREL - % , 1992. Bacterial plasmids and gene flux. #ELL

189-199.

!RTHUR - "RISSON .OEL ! AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1987. Origin and evolution of genes

specifying resistance to macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin antibiotics: data and hypothesis. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY 783-802.

!RTHUR - AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1993. Genetics and mechanisms of glycopeptide resistance in enterococci. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 1563-1571.

!RTHUR - 2EYNOLDS 0 AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1996. Glycopeptide resistance in enterococci. 4RENDS IN -ICROBIOLOGY 401-407.

"AGER & -ADSEN - #HRISTENSEN * AND !ARESTRUP & - , 1997. Avoparcin used as

a growth promoter is associated with the occurrence of vancomycin-resistant

%NTEROCOCCUS FACECIUM on Danish poultry and pig farms. 0REVENTIVE 6ETERINARY -EDICINE 95-112.

"ARROW 0 ! , 1989. Further observations on the effect of feeding diets containing

avoparcin on the excretion of salmonellas by experimentally infected chickens.

%PIDEMIOLOGY AND )NFECTION 239-252.

"ARROW 0 ! AND ,OVELL - ! , 1991. Experimental infection of egg-laying hens with

3ALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS phage type 4. !VIAN 0ATHOLOGY 335-348.

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 127

"ATES * *ORDENS * : AND 'RIFFITHS $ 4 , 1994. Farm animals as a putative reservoir for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infection in man. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #EMOTHERAPY 507-516.

"EZANSON ' 3 +HAKHRIA 2 AND "OLLEGRAAF % , 1983. Nosocomial outbreak caused by antibiotic-resistant strain of 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM acquired from dairy cattle.

#ANADIAN -EDICAL !SSOCIATION *OURNAL 426-427.

"RISSON .OEL ! !RTHUR - AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1988. Evidence for natural gene transfer from gram-positive cocci to %SCHERICHIA COLI. *OURNAL OF "ACTERIOLOGY

1739-1745.

"ROPHY 0 / , 1988. Antibiotics on the farm: the UCD Lyons experience. )RISH 6ETERINARY *OURNAL 6-7.

"ULLER . " AND (AMPSON $ * , 1994. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 3ERPULINA HYODYSENTERIAE. !USTRALIAN 6ETERINARY *OURNAL 211-214.

"URRIDGE 2 7ARREN # AND 0HILLIPS ) , 1986. Macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin resistance in #AMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI COLI. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY 315-321.

#HADWICK 0 2 7OODFORD . +ACZMARSKI % " 'RAY 3 "ARRELL 2 ! AND /PPENHEIM " ! , 1996. Glycopeptide-resistant enterococci isolated from uncooked meat. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY 908-909.

#HASLUS $ANCLA % -ARTEL * #ARLIER # ,AFONT * AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1986. Emergence of aminoglycoside 3-N-acetyl transferase IV in %SCHERICHIA COLI and

3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM isolated from animals in France. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 239-243.

#HASLUS $ANCLA % 0OHLA 0 -EURISSE - -ARIN - AND ,AFONT * 0 , 1991. High

genetic homology between plasmids of human and animal origins conferring resistance to the aminoglycosides, gentamicin and apramycin. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 590-591.

#HASLUS $ANCLA % 9 'LUPCZYNSKI ' 'ERBAUD ' ,AGORCE - ,AFONT * 0 AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1989. Detection of apramycin resistant %NTEROBACTERIACEAE in hospital isolates. &%-3 -ICROBIOLOGY ,ETTERS 261-266.

#HOPRA ) (ODGSON * -ETCALF " AND 0OSTE ' , 1997. The search for antimicrobial agents effective against bacteria resistant to multiple antibiotics. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 497-503.

#HRISTIE 0 * +ORMAN 2 : :AHLER 3 ! !DSIT * # AND $UNNY ' - , 1987. Two conjugation systems associated with 3TREPTOCOCCUS FAECALIS plasmid pCF10:

identification of a conjugative transposon that transfers between 3 FAECALIS and

"ACILLUS SUBTILIS. *OURNAL OF "ACTERIOLOGY 2529-2536.

#OHEN - , , 1992. Epidemiology of drug resistance: implications for a postantimicrobial era. 3CIENCE 1050-1055.

128 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

#OHEN - , , 1996. Epidemiological factors influencing the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. )N PROCEEDINGS OF !NTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE ORIGINS EVOLUTION SELECTION AND SPREAD Whiley, Chichester (Ciba Foundation Symposium 207), July 16-18, London.

pp. 223-237.

#OQUE 4 - 4OMAYKO * & 2ICKE 3 # /KHYUSEN 0 # AND -URRAY " % , 1996.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci from nosocomial, community, and animal sources in the United States. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 2605-2609.

#ORANAGLIA ' ,IGOZZI - -AZZARIOL ! 6ALENTINI - /REFICI ' AND &ONTANA

2 , 1996. Rapid increase of resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin in

3TREPTOCOCCUS PYOGENES in Italy, 1993-1995. %MERGING )NFECTIOUS $ISEASES ???- 341.

#ORPET $ % , 1984. The effect of bambermycin, carbadox, chlortetracycline and

olaquindox on antibiotic resistance in intestinal coliforms: a new animal model.

!NNALES DE -ICROBIOLOGIE ! 329-339.

#ORPET $ % , 1986. Ecological factors influencing the transfer of plasmids IN VITRO and IN VIVO. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY 3UPPL # 127-132.

#ORPET $ % , 1988. Antibiotic resistance from food. .EW %NGLAND *OURNAL OF -EDICINE

1206-1207.

#ORPET $ % , 1996. Microbiological hazards for humans of antimicrobial growth promoter use in animal production. 2EVUE -EDICINE 6ETERINAIRE 851-862.

#OURVALIN 0 , 1994. Transfer of antibiotic resistance genes between gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 1447-1451.

$!.-!0, 1997. Consumption of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, food and humans in Denmark.No. 1. DANMAP, Copenhagen.

$AS ) &RAISE ! AND 7ISE 2 , 1997. Are glycopeptide-resistant enterococci in animals a threat to human beings? ,ANCET 997-998.

$EALY * AND -OELLER - 7 , 1976. Influence of bambermycins on 3ALMONELLA infection and antibiotic resistance in swine. *OURNAL OF !NIMAL 3CIENCE 1331-1336.

$EALY * AND -OELLER - 7 , 1977a. Effect of bambermycins on %SCHERICHIA COLI and antibiotic resistance in calves. *OURNAL OF !NIMAL 3CIENCE 1239-1242.

$EALY * AND -OELLER - 7 , 1977b. Influence of bambermycins on 3ALMONELLA infection and antibiotic resistance in calves. *OURNAL OF !NIMAL 3CIENCE 734-738.

$EVRIESE , ! $AUBE ' (OMMEZ * AND (AESEBROUCK & , 1993. In vitro susceptibility of #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS isolated from farm animals to growthenhancing antibiotics. *OURNAL OF !PPLIED "ACTERIOLOGY 55-7.

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 129

$EVRIESE , ! )EVEN - 'OOSSENS ( 6ANDAMME 0 0OT " (OMMEZ * AND (AESEBROUCK & , 1996. Presence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in farm and pet animals. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 2285-2287.

$OUCET 0OPULAIRE & 4RIEU #OUT 0 $OSBAA ) !NDREMONT ! AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1991. Inducible transfer of conjugative transposon Tn from %NTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS to ,ISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES in the digestive tract of gnotobiotic mice.

!NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 185-187.

$UTTA ' . AND $EVRIESE , ! , 1982. Susceptibility of fecal streptococci of poultry origin to nine growth-promoting agents. !PPLIED AND %NVIRONMENTAL -ICROBIOLOGY

832-837.

$UTTA ' . AND $EVRIESE , ! , 1984. Observations on the in vitro sensitivity and

resistance of Gram positive intestinal bacteria of farm animals to growth promoting antimicrobial agents. *OURNAL OF !PPLIED "ACTERIOLOGY 117-123.

%ADY % ! 2OSS * ) 4IPPER * , 7ALTERS # % #OVE * ( AND .OBLE 7 # , 1993. Distribution of genes encoding erythromycin ribosomal methylases and an

erythromycin efflux pump in epidemiologically distinct groups of staphylococci.

*OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY 211-217.

%NDTZ ( 0 2UIIS ' * VAN +LINGEREN " *ANSEN 7 ( VAN DER 2EYDEN 4 AND -OUTON 2 0 , 1991. Quinolone resistance in campylobacter isolated from man and

poultry following the introduction of fluoroquinolones in veterinary medicine.

*OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY 199-208.

&ELLSTR¶M # , 1996. Phenotypic classification, detection and phylogeny of 3ERPULINA species in swine. (Thesis). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

&RANCO !BUIN # - 1UINTO &ERNANDEZ % * &ENTE 3AMPAYO # 2ODRIGUEZ /TERO * , $OMINGUEZ 2ODRIGUEZ , AND #EPEDA 3AEZ ! , 1994. Susceptibilities of

,ISTERIA species isolated from food to nine antimicrobial agents. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 1655-1657.

&RANKLIN ! AND -¶LLBY 2 , 1983. Concurrent transfer and recombination between

plasmids encoding for heat-stable enterotoxin and drug resistance in porcine enterotoxigenic %SCHERICHIA COLI. -EDICAL -ICROBIOLOGY AND )MMUNOLOGY 137-

147.

'ARBER ! - , 1989. A discrete-time model of the acquisition of antibiotic-resistant infections in hospitalized patients. "IOMETRICS 797-816.

'EDEK " , 1981. Factors influencing multiple resistance in enteric bacteria in animals. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 4EN YEARS ON FROM 3WANN 5th-6th October, London. pp. 111-126.

'EORGE " ! AND &AGERBERG $ * , 1984. Effect of bambermycins, in vitro, on plasmidmediated antimicrobial resistance. !MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH

2336-2341.

'EORGE " ! &AGERBERG $ * 1UARLES # , &ENTON * - AND -C+INLEY ' ! , 1982. Effect of bambermycins on quantity, prevalence, duration, and antimicrobial

130 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

resistance of 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM in experimentally infected broiler chickens.

!MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH 299-303.

'ILLESPIE 3 AND -C(UGH 4 $ , 1997. The biological cost of antimicrobial resistance.

4RENDS IN -ICROBIOLOGY 337-339.

'REEN - 3HLAES * ( "ARBADORA + AND 3HLAES $ - , 1995. Bacteriemia due to vancomycin-dependent %NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM. #LINICAL )NFECTIOUS $ISEASES 712-

714.

'REKO # , 1996. Inventering av resistens mot antibakteriella medel hos enterokocker från kyckling (rapport). National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala.

'REKO # , 1997. Sensitivity to antibacterials in % COLI and enterococci isolated from piglets in Sweden (in manuscript). .

'REKO # AND ,INDBLAD * , 1996. Vancomycin sensitivity of enterococci from Swedish poultry and pigs. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 3YMPOSIUM &OOD !SSOCIATED 0ATHOGENS Dept.

of Food Hygiene, SLU, Uppsala, May 6-8, Uppsala.

'UNNARSSON ! &RANKLIN ! (ORN AF 2ANTZIEN - ,ANDEN ! AND 2ANTZIEN

- ( A , 1991. Resistensundersökning av svenska isolat av Treponema hyodysenteriae. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING 349-352.

'USTAFSON 2 ( , 1983. Salmonella shedding and feed additives. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )NTERNATIONAL 3YMPOSIUM ON !NTIBIOTICS IN !GRICULTURE "ENEFITS AND -ALEFITS Butterworths,Nottingham. pp. 369-384.

'USTAFSON 2 ( "ECK * 2 AND +OBLAND * $ , 1981. The influence of Avoparcin on the establishment of Salmonella in chickens. :ENTRALBLATT FUR 6ETERIN¤RMEDIZIN REIHE " 119-128.

(AAHEIM ( 3IMONSEN ' 3 $AHL + ( ,OVESETH ! /LSVIK / +RUSE ( AND 3UNDSFJORD ! , 1997. 6ANA glycopeptide resistant enterococci: Identical VANA

gene cluster in glycopeptide resistant enterococi from man and avoparcin-exposed poultry. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )NTERNATIONAL -EETING ON "ACTERIAL %PIDEMIOLOGICAL -ARKERS September 10-13, Elsinore, Denmark. p. 154.

(AMILTON -ILLER * - 4 , 1990. The emergence of antibiotic resistance: myths and facts in clinical practice. )NTENSIVE #ARE -EDICINE SUPPL S206-S211.

(ANSSON 3 / , 1995. The detection level. 2EGULATORY 4OXICOLOGY AND 0HARMACOLOGY

103-109.

(AYDEN - + 0ICKEN 2 . AND 3AHM $ & , 1997. Heterogeneous expression of

glycopeptide resistance in enterococci associated with transfer of VANB.

!NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 872-874.

(AYDEN - + 4REHOLME * % 3CHULTZ * % AND 3AHM $ & , 1993. )N VIVO development of teicoplanin resistance in a VANB %NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM isolate.

*OURNAL OF )NFECTIOUS $ISEASES 1224-1227.

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 131

(INTON - , 1988. Salmonella colonization in young chickens given feed supplemented with the growth promoting antibiotic avilamycin. *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 0HARMACOLOGY AND 4HERAPEUTICS 269-275.

(INTON - !L #HALABY : ! - AND ,INTON ! ( , 1986a. The influence of dietary

protein and antimicrobial feed additives on salmonella carriage by broiler chickens.

6ETERINARY 2ECORD 495-500.

(INTON - +AUKAS ! ,IM 3 + AND ,INTON ! ( , 1986b. Preliminary observations on the influence of antibiotics on the ecology of %SCHERICHIA COLI and the enterococci in the faecal flora of healthy young chickens. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY 165-73.

(OLMBERG 3 $ /STERHOLM - 4 3ENGER + ! AND #OHEN - , , 1984. Drug-resistant Salmonella from animals fed antimicrobials. .EW %NGLAND *OURNAL OF -EDICINE

617-622.

(ORAUD 4 ,E "OUGENEC # AND 0EPPER + , 1985. Molecular genetics of resistance to

macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramin B (MLS) in streptococci. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY SUPPL ! 111-135.

(ORODNICEANU 4 "OUGUELERET , AND "IETH ' , 1981. Conjugative transfer of multiple antibiotic resistance markers in beta-hemolytic group A, B, F and G streptococci in the absence of extrachromosomal deoxyribonucleic acid. 0LASMID 127-137.

(UMBERT & ,ALANDE & L (OSPITALIER 2 3ALVAT ' AND "ENNEJEAN ' , 1991. Effect

of four antibiotic additives on the Salmonella contamination of chicks protected by an adult caecal flora. !VIAN 0ATHOLOGY 577-584.

(UMMEL 2 AND 7ITTE 7 , 1981. Zum Problem der Resistenzentwicklung bei Staphylococcus aureus des Menschen infolge der Anwendung von Oxytetrazyklin

und Tylosin in den industriemä bigen Schweineproduktionsanlagen. !RCHIV F¼R %XPERIMENTELLE 6ETERIN¤RMEDIZIN 419-432.

(UNTER * % " "ENNETT - (ART # ! 3HELLEY * # AND 7ALTON * 2 , 1994. Apramycin-resistant %SCHERICHIA COLI isolated from pigs and a stockman.

%PIDEMIOLOLGY AND )NFECTION 473-480.

(UNTER * % " (ART # ! 3HELLEY * # 7ALTON * 2 AND "ENNETT - , 1993. Human isolates of apramycin-resistant %SCHERICHIA COLI which contain the genes for the AAC(3)IV enzyme. %PIDEMIOLOGY AND )NFECTION 253-259.

(UOVINEN 0 3EPP¤L¤ ( +ATAJA * AND +LAUKA 4 , 1996. The relationship between erythromycin consumption and resistance in Finland. )N PROCEEDINGS OF !NTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE ORIGINS EVOLUTION SELECTION AND SPREAD Whiley, Chichester (Ciba

Foundation Symposium 207), July 16-18, London. pp. 36-46.

(UYCKE - - 'ILMORE - 3 *ETT " $ AND "OOTH * , , 1992. Transfer of pheromone-inducible plasmids between %NTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS in the Syrian hamster gastrointestinal tract. *OURNAL OF )NFECTIOUS $ISEASES 1188-1191.

132 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

*ACKS 4 - &RAZIER % *UDITH & 2 AND /LSON ' , 1988. Effect of efrotomycin in

feed on the quantity, duration, and prevalance of shedding and antibacterial susceptibility of 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM in experimentally infected swine.

!MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH 1832-1835.

*ACOBS 2EITMA 7 & +OENRAAD 0 - & * "OLDER . - AND -ULDER 2 7 ! 7 , 1994. )N VITRO susceptibility of Campylobacter and Salmonella isolates from broilers to quinolones, ampicillin, tetracycline and erythromycin. 6ETERINARY 1UARTERLY

206-208.

*ENSEN , " , 1996. Characterization of the VANA gene cluster in vancomycin resistant %NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM (preliminary report 06-11-96). 6. Statens Veteriaere

Serumlaboratorium, Copenhagen.

*ORDON & 4 7 ED 1990. 0OULTRY $ISEASES. Cambridge University Press, Great Britain.

+AUKAS ! (INTON - AND ,INTON ! ( , 1987. The effect of ampicillin and tylosin on the faecal enterococci of healthy young chickens. *OURNAL OF !PPLIED "ACTERIOLOGY

441-447.

+AUKAS ! (INTON - AND ,INTON ! ( , 1988. The effect of growth-promoting antibiotics on the faecal enterococci of healthy young chickens. *OURNAL OF !PPLIED "ACTERIOLOGY 57-64.

+IRK - #HEN ( 9 (ILL 2 #ASEWELL - 7 AND "EIGHTON $ , 1997. Novel instertion sequences from vancomycin-resistant%NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM isolated from poultry. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )#!!# Toronto, Ontario. pp. C-134.

+LARE ) (EIER ( #LAUS ( "¶HME ' -ARIN 3 3ELTMANN ' (AKENBECK 2 !NTANASSOVA 6 AND 7ITTE 7 , 1995a. %NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM strains with VANA-

mediated high level glycopeptide resistance isolated from animal food-stuffs and faecal samples of humans in the community. -ICROBIAL $RUG 2ESISATANCE 265-

272.

+LARE ) (EIER ( #LAUS ( 2EISSBRODT 2 AND 7ITTE 7 , 1995b. VANA-mediated high-level glycopeptide resistance in %NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM from animal husbandry.

&%-3 -ICROBIOLOGY LETTERS 165-172.

+NOTHE ( , 1977. A review of the medical considerations of the use of tylosin and other macrolide antibiotics as additives in animal feeds. )NFECTION 183-7.

+RUSE ( AND 3¸RUM ( , 1994. Transfer of multiple drug resistance plasmids between bacteria of diverse origins in natural microenvironments. !PPLIED %NVIRONMENTAL -ICROBIOLOGY 4015-4021.

,ACEY 2 7 , 1980. Rarity of gene transfer between animal and human isolates of

3TAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS IN VITRO. *OURNAL OF 'ENERAL -ICROBIOLOGY 437-442.

,ACEY 2 7 , 1984. Are resistant gram-positive bacteria in animals a threat to man? )N PROCEEDINGS OF !NTIMICROBIALS IN !GRICULTURE TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTIBIOTICS IN AGRICULTURE BENEFITS AND MALEFITS Butterwoths, London,Nottingham.

pp. 221-235.

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 133

,ACEY 2 7 , 1988. Rarity of tylosin resistance in human pathogenic bacteria. 6ETERINARY 2ECORD 438-439.

,ANGLOIS " % , 1988. Effect of age and housing location on antibiotic resistance of fecal coliforms from pigs in a non-antibiotic-exposed herd. !PPLIED AND %NVIRONMENTAL -ICROBIOLOGY 1341-1344.

,ATOUR 0 " AND "ARNUM $ ! , 1981. Use of ducks as a model to study the effect of antibiotics in feed on the fecal shedding of 3ALMONELLA. !MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH 2105-2108.

,EAK " % ,ANGLOIS " % AND $AWSON + ! , 1986. Antibiotic resistance of fecal

coliforms from various age pigs under different housing conditions in a swine herd not fed antimicrobials for over 12 years. *OURNAL OF !NIMAL 3CIENCE SUPPL

239.

,E"LANC $ * )NAMINE * - AND ,EE , . , 1986. Broad geographical distribution of

homologous erythromycin, kanamycin and streptomycin resistance determinants among group D streptococci of human and animal origin. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 549-555.

,ECLERCQ 2 AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1991a. Bacterial resistance to macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin antibiotics by target modification. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 1267-1272.

,ECLERCQ 2 AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1991b. Intrinsic and unusual resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin antibiotics in bacteria. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 1273-1276.

,ECLERCQ 2 $ERLOT % 7EBER - $UVAL * AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1989. Transferable vancomycin and teicoplanin resistance in %NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 10-15.

,ENSKI 2 % , 1996. The cost of antibiotic resistance - from the perspective of the bacterium. )N PROCEEDINGS OF !NTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE ORIGINS EVOLUTION SELECTION AND SPREAD Chichester (Ciba Foundation Symposium 207), July 16-18, London. pp. 131-

151.

,EUCHTENBERGER 7 ' , 1981. Einfluss antibiotischer Futterzusatze auf die Darmflora von Huhnerkuken und auf die Persistenz von 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM Infektionen.

(Thesis). Tierarztliche Hochschule, Hannover.

,EVY 3 , 1996. Antibiotic resistance: an ecological imbalance. )N PROCEEDINGS OF !NTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE ORIGINS EVOLUTION SELECTION AND SPREAD Whiley, Chichester

(Ciba Foundation Symposium 207), July 16-18, London. pp. 1-9.

,EVY 3 " , 1983. Antibiotic resistant bacteria in food of man and animals. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )NTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTIBIOTICS IN AGRICULTURE BENEFITS AND

MALEFITS Butterworths, London,Nottingham. pp. 525-531.

134 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

,EVY 3 " &ITZ'ERALD ' " AND -ACONE ! " , 1976. Spread of antibiotic-resistant plasmids from chicken to chicken and from chicken to man. .ATURE 40-42.

,ILLARD ( 3 , 1990. The impact of commercial processing procedures on the bacterial

contamination and cross-contamination of broiler carcasses. *OURNAL OF &OOD 0ROTECTION 202-204.

,INTON ! ( !L #HALABY : ! - AND (INTON - ( , 1985a. Natural subclinical

salmonella infection in chickens: a potential model for testing the effects of various procedures on salmonella shedding. 6ETERINARY 2ECORD 361-364.

,INTON ! ( (EDGES ! * AND "ENNETT 0 - , 1988. Monitoring for the development of

antimicrobial resistance during the use of olaquindox as a feed additive on commercial pig farms. *OURNAL OF !PPLIED "ACTERIOLOGY 311-327.

,INTON ! ( (INTON - ( AND !L #HALABY : ! - , 1985b. Monitoring for antibiotic

resistance in enterococci consequent upon feeding growth promoters active against gram-positive bacteria. *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 0HARMACOLOGY AND 4HERAPEUTICS

62-70.

,INTON ! ( (OWE + "ENNETT 0 - AND 2ICHMOND - ( , 1977. The colonization of the human gut by antibiotic resistant %SCHERICHIA COLI from chickens. *OURNAL OF !PPLIED "ACTERIOLOGY 465-469.

-!&, 1997. Tylosin and spiramycin as feed additives. Influence on the efficacy of therapeutical macrolides.Nr. 5. pp. 29. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Helsinki.

-ALKE ( , 1979. Conjugal transfer of plasmids determining resistance to macrolides,

licosamides and streptogramin B type antibiotics among group A, B, D and H streptococci. &%-3 -ICROBIOLOGY ,ETTERS 335-338.

-ANNING * ' (ARGIS " - (INTON ! *R #ORRIER $ % $E,OACH * 2 AND #REGER # 2 , 1994. Effect of selected antibiotics and anticoccidials on 3ALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS cecal colonization and organ invasion in Leghorn chicks. !VIAN $ISEASES

256-261.

-ARSHALL " 0ETROWSKI $ AND ,EVY 3 " , 1990. Interand intraspecies spread of

%SCHERICHIA COLI in a farm environment in the absence of antibiotic usage.

0ROCEEDINGS OF THE .ATIONAL !CADEMY OF 3CIENCE 53! 6609-6613.

-ATTHES 3 ,EUCHTENBERGER ' AND ,OLIGER ( # , 1981. The effect of antimicrobial

feed additives on the gut flora and the persistence of Salmonellae in experimentally infected chickens. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 6))TH )NTERNATIONAL #ONGRESS OF THE 760! 1-

3 July, Oslo. p. 74.

-C#ONNELL, 1991. Tranfer of plasmid pAMb1 between members of the normal microflora

inhabiting the murine digestive tract and modification of the plasmid in a

,ACTOBACILLUS REUTERI host. -ICROBIAL %COLOGY IN (EALTH AND $ISEASE 343-356.

-C/RIST 3 , 1997. Use of oral antibiotics in farm livestock: facts and ethics. *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 0HARMACOLOGY AND 4HERAPEUTICS 3UPPL 175.

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 135

-C/RIST 3 -ORGAN * &LECK 6EENHUIZEN - ,AWRENCE + AND +ROGER ( 7 ,

1997. Oral administration of tylosin phosphate for treatment and prevention of proliferative enteropathy in pigs. !MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH 136-

139.

-C/RIST 3 3MITH 3 ( 3HEARN - & ( #ARR - - AND -ILLER $ * 3 , 1996.

Treatment and prevention of porcine proliferative entheropathy with oral tiamulin.

6ETERINARY 2ECORD 615-618.

-ILLER 9 7 %ADY % ! ,ACEY 2 7 #OVE * ( *OANES $ . AND #UNLIFFE 7 * ,

1996. Sequential antibiotic therapy for acne promotes the carriage of resistant staphylococci on the skin of contacts. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY

829-837.

-ILLS + 7 AND +ELLY " , , 1986. Antibiotic susceptibilities of swine 3ALMONELLA isolants from 1979 to 1983. !MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH 2349-

2350.

-ISHU " 'RIFFIN 0 - 4AUXE 2 6 #AMERON $ . (UTCHESON 2 ( AND 3CHAFFNER 7 , 1991. 3ALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS gastroenteritis transmitted by intact chicken eggs. !NNALS OF )NTERNAL -EDICINE 190-194.

-OLNAR , , 1996. Sensitivity of strains of 3ERPULINA HYODYSENTERIAE isolated in Hungary to chemotheraputic drugs. 6ETERINARY 2ECORD 158-160.

-ULLANY 0 7ILKS - AND 4ABAQCHALI 3 , 1995. Transfer of macrolide-lincosamide- streptogramin B (MLS) resistance in #LOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE is linked to a gene

homologous with toxin A and is mediated by a conjugative transposon, Tn5398.

*OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY 305-315.

-URRAY " % , 1990. The life and times of the Enterococcus. #LINICAL -ICROBIOLOGY 2EVIEWS 46-65.

.ICAS 4 ) :ECKEL - , AND "RAUN $ + , 1997. Beyond vancomycin: new therapies to meet the challenge of glycopeptide resistance. 4RENDS IN -ICROBIOLOGY 240-249.

.IKOLICH - 0 (ONG ' 3HOEMAKER . " AND 3ALYERS ! ! , 1994. Evidence for

natural horiosontal transfer of TETQ between bacteria that normally colonize humans and bacteria that normally colonize livestock. !PPLIED AND %NVIRONMENTAL -ICROBIOLOGY 3255-3260.

.OBLE 7 # 6IRANI : AND #REE 2 ' , 1992. Co-transfer of vancomycin and other resistance genes from %NTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS NCTC 12201 to 3TAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS. &%-3 -ICROBIOLY ,ETTERS 195-198.

.URMI % AND 2ANTALA - , 1973. New aspects of 3ALMONELLA infection in broiler production. .ATURE 210-211.

.URMI % AND 2ANTALA - , 1974. The influence of zinc bacitracin on the colonization of

3ALMONELLA INFANTIS in the intestine of broiler chickens. 2ESEARCH IN 6ETERINARY 3CIENCE 24-27.

136 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

/HMAE + 9ONEZAWA 3 AND 4ERAKADO . , 1981. R plasmid with carbadox resistance from %SCHERICHIA COLI of porcine origin. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY

86-90.

/HMAE + 9ONEZAWA 3 AND 4ERAKADO . , 1983. Epizootiological studies on R plasmid with carbadox resistance. *APANESE *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 3CIENCE 165-

170.

0ANAGEA 3 AND #HADWICK 0 2 , 1996. Heat tolerance of vancomycin resistant

%NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM. *OURNAL OF #LINICAL 0ATHOLOGY 687-689.

0EREZ 4RALLERO % :IGORRAGA # #ILLA ' )DIGORAS 0 ,OPEZ ,OPATEGUI # AND 3OLAUN , , 1988. Animal origin of the antibiotic resistance of human pathogenic

9ERSINIA ENTEROCOLITICA. 3CANDINAVIAN *OURNAL OF )NFECTIOUS $ISEASES 573.

0ERRETEN 6 +OLL¶FFEL " AND 4EUBER - , 1997. Conjugal transfer of the Tn -like transposon TnFO1 from %NTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS isolated from cheese to other grampositive bacteria. 3YSTEMATIC !PPLIED -ICROBIOLOGY 27-38.

0ERRETEN 6 AND 4EUBER - , 1995. Antibiotic resistant bacteria in fermented dairy products - a new challenge for raw milk cheese? )N PROCEEDINGS OF 2ESIDUES OF ANTIMICROBIAL DRUGS AND OTHER INHIBITORS IN MILK International Dairy Federation,

Brussels,Kiel. pp. 144-148.

0OHL 0 ,AUB +UPERSZTEJN 2 4HOMAS * AND VAN 2OBAEYS ' , 1975. Effets de la

flavomycine et de quelques agents antiparasitaires sur une souche colibacillaire hébergeant divers facteurs-R.!NNALES DE -©DECINE 6©T©RINAIRE 51-57.

0OWER % ' - !BDULLA 9 ( 4ALSANIA ( ' 3PICE 7 !ATHITHAN 3 AND &RENCH ' , , 1995. VANA genes in vancomycin-resistant clinical isolates of /ERSKOVIA TURBATA and !RCHANOBACTERIUM #ORYNEBACTERIUM HAEMOLYTICUM. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY 595-606.

0OYART # 0IERRE # 1UESNE ' 0RON " "ERCHE 0 AND 4RIEU #UOT 0 , 1997. Emergence of vancomycin resistance in the genus 3TREPTOCOCCUS: characterisation of a VANB transferable determinant in 3TREPTOCOCCUS BOVIS. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 24-29.

0OYART 3ALMERON # #ARLIER # 4RIEU #UOT 0 #OURTIEU ! , AND #OURVALIN 0 ,

1990. Transferable plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance in ,ISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES. ,ANCET 1422-1426.

1UINTILIANI 2 * AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1994. Conjugal transfer of the vancomycin

resistance determinant VANB between enterococci is associated with the movement of large elements from chromosome to chromosome. &%-3 -ICROBIOLOGY ,ETTERS

359-363.

1UINTILIANI 2 * AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1996. Charachterization of Tn , a composite

transposon flanked by the IS and IS -like elements, that confers vancomycin resistance in %NTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS BM4281. 'ENE 1-8.

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 137

2AVDONIKAS , % , 1983. The genetic control of virulence in group A streptococci I.

Conjugal transfer of plasmids and their effect on expression of some host cell properties. !CTA 0ATHOLOGICA -ICROBIOLOGICA ET )MMUNOLOGICA 3CANDINAVICA SECT " 55-60.

2EINA * "ORRELL . AND 3ERRA ! , 1992. Emergence of resistance to erythromycin and

fluoroquinolones in thermotolerant Campylobacter strains isolated from faeces 1987-1991. %UROPEAN *OURNAL OF #LINICAL -ICROBIOLOGY AND )NFECTIOUS $ISEASES

1163-1166.

2ICHMOND - ( , 1972. Some environmental consequences of the use of antibiotics: or "what goes up must come down". *OURNAL OF !PPLIED "ACTERIOLOGY 155-176.

2OBERTS - # AND "ROWN - " , 1994. Macrolide-lincosamide resistance determinants in streptococcal species isolated from the bovine mammary gland. 6ETERINARY -ICROBIOLOGY 253-261.

2OBERTS - # #HUNG 7 / AND 2OE $ % , 1996a. Charachterization of tetracycline and erythromycin resistance determinants in 4REPONEMA DENTICOLA. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 1690-1694.

2OBERTS - # &ACINELLI " 'IOVANETTI % AND 6ARALDO 0 % , 1996b. Transferable erythromycin resistance in ,ISTERIA spp. isolated from food. !PPLIED AND %NVIRONMENTAL -ICROBIOLOGY 269-270.

2OLLINS , $ ,EE , . AND ,E"LANC $ * , 1985. Evidence for a disseminated

erythromycin resistance determinant mediated by Tn -like sequences among group D streptococci isolated from pigs, chickens and humans. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 439-444.

2OOSEN & "LAZY -AUGEN & AND -ICHEL ' , 1989. Etude de la sensibilité aux antibiotiques de Staphylocoques isolés d'aliments préparés-. ©DECINE ET .UTRITION

113-117.

3ALAUZE $ /TAL ) 'OMEZ ,US 2 AND $AVIES * , 1990. Aminoglycoside

acetyltransferase 3-IV (AACC4) and hygromycin M 4-1 phosphotransferase (HPHB) in bacteria isolated from human and animal sources. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 1915-1920.

3ALYERS ! ! 1995. !NTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE TRANSFER IN THE MAMMALIAN INTESTINAL TRACT IMPLICATIONS FOR HUMAN HEALTH FOOD SAFETY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Molecular Biology

Intelligence Unit. R. G. Landes Company, Austin. pp. 191.

3CHWABE # 7 2EIMANN ( 0 AND &RANTI # % 1977. %PIDEMIOLOGY IN 6ETERINARY

0RACTICE Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia.

3EPP¤L¤ ( +LAUKKA 4 6UOPIO 6ARKILA * -OUTIALA ! (ELENIUS ( ,AGER + AND (UOVINEN 0 , 1997. The effect of changes in the consumption of macrolide

antibiotics on erythromycin resistance in group A streptococci in Finland. .EW %NGLAND *OURNAL OF -EDICINE 441-446.

138 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

3EPULCHRE - , 1979. Flavomycine: inhibition de l’antibioresistance chez les enterobacteries. "ULLETIN -ENSUEL DE LA 3OCIET© 6©T©RINAIRE 0RATIQUE DE &RANCE

199-225.

3HAH 0 - 3CHAFER 6 AND +NOTHE ( , 1993. Medical and veterinary use of

antimocrobial agents: implications for public health. A clinician’s view on antimicrobial resistance. 6ETERINARY -ICROBIOLOGY 269-274.

3HOEMAKER . " 7ANG ' AND 3ALYERS ! ! , 1992. Evidence for natural transfer of a

tetracycline resistance gene between bacteria from the human colon and bacteria from the bovine rumen. !PPLIED %NVIRONMENTAL -ICROBIOLOGY 1313-1320.

3MITH ( 7 AND 4UCKER * & , 1978. The effect of antimicrobial feed additives on the colonization of the alimentary tract of chickens by 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM.

*OURNAL OF (YGIENE 217-231.

3MITH 7 ( AND 4UCKER * & , 1975. The effect of feeding diets containing permitted antibiotics on the faecal excretion of 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM by experimentally infected chickens. *OURNAL OF (YGIENE 293-301.

3MITH 7 ( AND 4UCKER * & , 1980. Further observations on the effect of feeding diets

containing avoparcin, bacitracin and sodium arsenilate on the colonization of the alimentary tract of poultry by salmonella organisms. *OURNAL OF (YGIENE 137-

150.

3PIKA * 3 7ATERMAN 3 ( 3OO (OO ' 7 3T ,OUIS - % 0AGER 2 % *AMES 3 - "ISSETT - , -AYER , 7 #HIU * 9 (ALL " 'REENE + 0OTTER - % #OHEN - , AND "LAKE 0 ! , 1987. Chloramphenicol-resistant 3ALMONELLA Newport traced through hamburger to dairy farms. .EW %NGLAND *OURNAL OF -EDICINE 565-569.

3TUART * ' :IMMERER % * AND -ADDUX 2 , , 1992. Conjugation of antibiotic resistance in 3TREPTOCOCCUS SUIS. 6ETERINARY -ICROBIOLOGY 213-222.

4AUCH ! +ASSING & +ALINOWSKI * AND 0UHLER ! , 1995. The #ORYNEBACTERIUM XEROSIS composite transposon Tn consists of two identical insertion sequences, designated IS1249, flanking the erythromycin resistance gene ERMCX. 0LASMID

119-131.

4HAL , ! 7ELTON , ! 0ERRI - " $ONABEDIAN 3 -C-AHON * #HOW * 7 AND

:ERVOS - * , 1996. Antimicrobial resistance in enterococci isolated from turkeys fed virginiamycin. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )#!!# New Orleans.

4HRELFALL % * 2OWE " &ERGUSSON * , AND 7ARD , 2 , 1986. Characterization of plasmids conferring resistance to gentamicin and apramycin in strains of 3ALMONELLA THYPHIMURIUM phage type 204c isolated in Britain. *OURNAL OF (YGIENE 419-426.

4ORRES # 2EGUERA * ! 3ANMARTIN M * 0EREZ $IAZ * # AND "AQUERO & , 1994.

VAN-A mediated vancomycin-resistant %NTEROCOCCUS spp in sewage. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY 553-561.

SOU 1997:132 4. Microbiological aspects 139

4ROUTT ( & (OOPER " % AND (ARRINGTON 2 , 1974. Effect of carbadox in experimentally induced salmonellosis of swine. *OURNAL OF THE !MERICAN 6ETERINARY -EDICAL !SSOCIATION 402-404.

7ALTON * 2 , 1978. The effect of zinc bacitracin on the susceptibility of selected gram negative and gram positive bacteria to therapeutic antibiotics. :ENTRALBLATT F¼R 6ETERIN¤RMEDIZINE 2EIHE " 329-331.

7ALTON * 2 , 1984. The effect of dietary zinc bacitracin on the resistance status of intestinal %SCHERICHIA COLI and enterococci from broiler chickens. :ENTRALBLATT F¼R 6ETERIN¤RMEDIZINE 2EIHE " 1-8.

7ALTON * 2 AND 7HEELER * % , 1987. Loss of resistance to the tetracyclines from porcine %SCHERICHIA COLI in contact with dietary bacitracin methylene disalicylate.

:ENTRALBLATT F¼R 6ETERIN¤RMEDIZINE 2EIHE " 161-164.

VAN DEN "OGAARD ! % AND 3TOBBERINGH % % , 1996. Time to ban all antibiotics as animal growth-promoting agents? ,ANCET 619.

VAN DEN "OGAARD ! * *ENSEN , " AND 3TOBBERING % % , 1997. An identical VRE isolated from a turkey and a farmer (letter). SUBMITTED.

7ANG 7 , 2ELLER , " AND "LASER - * , 1984. Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of #AMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI and #AMPYLOBACTER COLI. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 351-353.

7ASTESON 9 (OIE 3 AND 2OBERTS - # , 1994. Characterization of antibiotic resistance in 3TREPTOCOCCUS SUIS. 6ETERINARY -ICROBIOLOGY 41-49.

7EGENER ( # -ADSEN - .IELSEN . AND !ARESTRUP & - , 1997. Isolation of vancomycin resistant %NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM from food. )NTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF &OOD -ICROBIOLOGY 57-66.

7EISBLUM " , 1995. Erythromycin resistance by ribosome modification. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 577-585.

7HITMAN - # 0ITSAKIS 0 ' $E*ESUS % /SBORNE ! * ,EVINSON - % AND

*OHNSON # # , 1996. Gastrointestinal tract colonisation with vancomycin-resistant

%NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM in an animal model. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY 1526-1530.

7(/, 1994. WHO calls for action on spread of drug -resistant diseases. 0RESS RELEASE

$ECEMBER http://www. who.ch/press/1994/pr94-95.html.

7ITTE 7 , 1996. Impact of antibiotic use in animal feeding on resistance of bacterial pathogens in humans. )N PROCEEDINGS OF !NTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE ORIGINS EVOLUTION SELECTION AND SPREAD Whiley, Chichester (Ciba Foundation Symposium 207), July

16-18, London. pp. 61-70.

140 4. Microbiological aspects SOU 1997:132

7OODFORD . *ONES " "ACCUS : ,UDLAM ( AND "ROWN $ , 1995. Linkage of

vancomycin and high level gentamicin resistance genes on the same plasmid in a clinical isolate of %NTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY

179-184.

7RAY # (EDGES 2 7 3HANNON + 0 AND "RADLEY $ % , 1986. Apramycin and gentamicin resistance in %SCHERICHIA COLI and salmonellas isolated from farm animals. *OURNAL OF (YGIENE 445-446.