SOU 1997:132
Executive summary
During the accession negotiations with the European Union, Sweden was granted a derogation from community legislation to maintain national legislation within the area of feed additives of the groups antibiotics, chemotherapeutics, coccidiostats and growth promoters. In Sweden, the use of such substances is restricted to the purpose of curing or preventing diseases, i.e. used as veterinary medicines according to the Feedingstuffs Act of 1985. The Swedish government has appointed a commission to evaluate the hazards and risks associated with use of antimicrobial feed additives in animal production.
Our conclusions can be summarised as follows:
·Antibacterial feed additives have favourable economic effects on livestock production, but from a long term perspective these are questionable, especially regarding animal welfare and animal health. Antibacterial feed additives can, at levels permitted in feedingstuffs, be used for treatment or prevention of animal diseases, which is in violation of directive 70/524/EEC.
·The quinoxalines and the nitroimidazoles are potentially genotoxic and may be regarded as an occupational hazard.
·Halofuginone and the quinoxalines are toxic for target species. This is deleterious for animal well being.
·The risk of increased resistance associated with the general use of antibacterials as feed additives are far from negligible and the potential consequences are serious for both animal and human health. Antibacterials that are presently not used as therapeuticals in human or veterinary medicine are valuable templates for future drugs. As emergence of resistance is considered to be a threat to animal and human health, all AFA should be restricted to medical and veterinary purposes.
It is the conclusion of this commission that the benefits of antibacterial feed additives do not outweigh the risks.
With regard to coccidiostats and other medicinal substances, they are specifically used to prevent disease and should therefore be treated as pharmaceutical specialities, i.e. as medicated feed.
2 | SOU 1997:132 |
SOU 1997:132 | Contents | 3 |
%XECUTIVE SUMMARY )NTRODUCTION
1.1 The Swedish derogation.......................................................................... | 9 |
"ACKGROUND
2.1 | Introduction........................................................................................... | 11 |
2.2 | Role of antibacterials in animal husbandry........................................... | 12 |
2.2.1 Therapeutic and prophylactic use of antibacterials......................... | 12 | |
2.2.2 Chemoprophylaxis of protozoal diseases........................................ | 13 | |
2.2.3 Antibacterials as performance enhancers ....................................... | 13 | |
2.3 | Community legislation.......................................................................... | 15 |
2.3.1 Antibiotics and growth promoters .................................................. | 15 | |
2.3.2 Coccidiostats and other medicinal feed additives........................... | 17 | |
2.4 | Current Swedish legislation .................................................................. | 20 |
2.4.1 Antibiotics and growth promoters .................................................. | 20 | |
2.4.2 Coccidiostats and other antiprotozoals ........................................... | 20 | |
2.4.3 Antibacterials for use in therapy or prophylaxis............................. | 21 | |
2.4.4 Distribution of medicinal products ................................................. | 21 | |
2.4.5 Control ............................................................................................ | 22 | |
2.5. The Swedish ban .................................................................................. | 22 | |
2.5.1 The preambles................................................................................. | 22 | |
2.5.2 Effects on animal health ................................................................. | 23 | |
2.6 | Sales of antibacterials for veterinary use in Sweden............................. | 27 |
2.6.1 Materials and methods .................................................................... | 27 | |
2.6.2 Total consumption .......................................................................... | 28 | |
2.6.3 Flock treatment ............................................................................... | 31 | |
2.6.4 Coccidiostats ................................................................................... | 32 | |
2.6.5 Some comments on the Swedish consumption statistics ................ | 33 | |
2.7 | Prevalence of bacterial resistance ......................................................... | 36 |
2.7.1 Zoonotic pathogens......................................................................... | 36 | |
2.7.2 Animal pathogens ........................................................................... | 38 | |
2.7.3 Animal commensals........................................................................ | 40 | |
2.7.4 Some comments on the resistance figures ...................................... | 43 | |
2.8 Summary comments.............................................................................. | 43 |
3.1 Mode of action ...................................................................................... | 49 |
3.1.1 Effects ............................................................................................. | 49 |
3.1.2 Suggested main mode of action ...................................................... | 50 |
3.2 Prophylactic and therapeutic effects of AFA........................................ | 55 |
3.2.1 Introduction..................................................................................... | 55 |
3.2.2 Necrotic enteritis in poultry ............................................................ | 57 |
3.2.3 Swine dysentery .............................................................................. | 57 |
3.2.4 Porcine proliferative enteritis (PPE) ............................................... | 59 |
3.2.5 Other bacterial enteritis in swine .................................................... | 59 |
3.3 Growth and feed efficiency responses to AFA in pigs and poultry ...... | 60 |
4 | Contents | SOU 1997:132 |
3.3.1 Growth and feed efficiency responses to AFA in pigs ................... | 60 |
3.3.2 Growth and feed efficiency responses to AFA in poultry .............. | 62 |
3.4 Alternatives to AFA.............................................................................. | 63 |
3.4.1 Enzymes.......................................................................................... | 63 |
3.4.2 Probiotics ........................................................................................ | 64 |
3.5 Addendum: A benefit cost analysis of reintroduction of AFA in | |
Sweden........................................................................................................ | 65 |
3.5.1 Executive Summary........................................................................ | 65 |
3.5.2 Introductory comments................................................................... | 66 |
3.5.3 Gains if AFA were to be used in Sweden....................................... | 67 |
3.5.4 The pig industry.............................................................................. | 68 |
3.5.5 Egg production ............................................................................... | 71 |
3.5.6 Production of poultry meat (broilers) ............................................. | 72 |
3.5.7 A brief comment on an earlier report ............................................. | 73 |
4.1 | Introduction........................................................................................... | 83 |
4.2 | Antibacterial activity of AFA ............................................................... | 83 |
4.3 | AFA and development of resistance..................................................... | 85 |
4.3.1 Prospective studies ......................................................................... | 87 | |
4.3.2 Retrospective studies ...................................................................... | 89 | |
4.3.3 |
90 | |
4.3.4 Some comments on study design.................................................... | 92 | |
4.4 | Acquisition of resistance in bacteria..................................................... | 93 |
4.4.1 Transfer of resistance genes ........................................................... | 93 | |
4.4.2 Bacterial interspecies transfer of resistance genes ......................... | 97 | |
4.4.3 |
97 | |
4.4.4 Resistance genes and animal hosts ................................................. | 98 | |
4.4.5 The encumbrance of resistance for bacteria ................................. | 100 | |
4.4.6 Some remarks on horizontal transmission of genes ..................... | 100 | |
4.5 | Transfer of resistance between various host species .......................... | 101 |
4.5.1 Transmission of bacteria............................................................... | 102 | |
4.5.2 Transfer of genes .......................................................................... | 103 | |
4.5.3 Routes of transmission - food as a vehicle ................................... | 107 | |
4.5.4 Likelihood of resistance being transferred from animals to man . 108 | ||
4.6 | Epidemiology of antibacterial resistance............................................ | 109 |
4.6.1 Reservoirs - the gene pool ............................................................ | 109 | |
4.6.2 Risk factors for spread of resistance............................................. | 110 | |
4.6.3 Persistence of resistance ............................................................... | 111 | |
4.6.4 Some comments on epidemiology................................................ | 112 | |
4.7 | Effects of an increase in resistance ..................................................... | 113 |
4.8 | Other effects on the microflora........................................................... | 115 |
4.8.1 Salmonella .................................................................................... | 115 | |
4.8.2 Other pathogens ............................................................................ | 122 | |
4.8.3 Other alterations of the microflora ............................................... | 122 |
SOU 1997:132 | Contents | 5 |
4.9 Summary comments............................................................................ | 123 | |
4OXICOLOGICAL AND RELATED EFFECTS OF ANTIBACTERIAL FEED ADDITIVES | ||
5.1 | Introduction......................................................................................... | 141 |
5.2 | Toxicity for target species................................................................... | 141 |
5.3 | Toxicity for |
142 |
5.4 | Adverse effects in humans .................................................................. | 143 |
5.4.1 Exposure to residues ..................................................................... | 143 | |
5.4.2 Allergy .......................................................................................... | 147 | |
5.5 | Interactions.......................................................................................... | 148 |
5.6 | Summary comments........................................................................... | 148 |
%NVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS ON ANTIBACTERIAL FEED ADDITIVES | ||
6.1 | Introduction......................................................................................... | 153 |
6.2 | Exposure of the environment to AFA ................................................. | 154 |
6.3 | Effects of AFA on the environment.................................................... | 155 |
6.3.1 Disruption of microecology .......................................................... | 155 | |
6.3.2 Decreased nutrient losses.............................................................. | 156 | |
6.4 | Antimicrobial resistance genes in the environment ............................ | 157 |
6.4.1 Persistence of resistant bacteria in the environment ..................... | 157 | |
6.4.2 Gene transfer in the environment.................................................. | 158 | |
6.4.3 Persistence of resistance genes in environmental bacteria ........... | 159 | |
6.4.4 Possible implications for the environment................................... | 159 | |
6.5 Summary comments............................................................................ | 159 |
#OCCIDIOSTATS
7.1 | Introduction......................................................................................... | 165 |
7.1.1 The parasite and the disease.......................................................... | 165 | |
7.1.2 Prevention and chemoprophylaxis................................................ | 166 | |
7.2 | Microbiological aspects ...................................................................... | 169 |
7.2.1 Parasitological aspects .................................................................. | 169 | |
7.2.2 Bacteriological aspects ................................................................. | 170 | |
7.3 | Toxicological aspects.......................................................................... | 171 |
7.3.1 Toxicity of ionophores.................................................................. | 171 | |
7.3.2 Toxicity of other coccidiostats...................................................... | 174 | |
7.3.3 Residues ........................................................................................ | 175 | |
7.3.4 Allergy .......................................................................................... | 176 | |
7.4 | Environmental aspects ........................................................................ | 177 |
7.4.1 Environmental aspects on ionophores .......................................... | 177 | |
7.4.2 Environmental aspects on other coccidiostats .............................. | 178 | |
7.5 | Alternatives to coccidiostats ............................................................... | 178 |
7.5.1 Improved hygiene ......................................................................... | 179 | |
7.5.2 Genetic resistance to coccidiosis .................................................. | 179 | |
7.5.3 Immunoprophylaxis ...................................................................... | 180 | |
7.6 | Summary comments on coccidiostats ................................................. | 181 |
7.7 | Addendum: dimetridazole, ipronidazole and ronidazole .................... | 181 |
7.7.1 Introduction................................................................................... | 181 |
6 | Contents | SOU 1997:132 |
7.7.2 Histomoniasis - the parasite and the disease ................................ | 182 |
7.7.3 Toxicological aspects on |
182 |
7.7.4 Summary comments on nitroimidazoles....................................... | 184 |
!SSESSMENT OF THE USAGE OF ANTIMICROBIAL FEED ADDITIVES
8.1 | Introduction......................................................................................... | 195 |
8.2 | Some comments on risk analysis ........................................................ | 196 |
8.3 | Safety for animals and humans........................................................... | 198 |
8.3.1 Increased resistance ...................................................................... | 199 | |
8.3.2 Suppression of pathogens ............................................................. | 208 | |
8.3.3 Favouring of enteric pathogens .................................................... | 208 | |
8.3.4 Toxicological aspects ................................................................... | 211 | |
8.4 | Safety for the environment ................................................................. | 213 |
8.5 | Prophylactic effects of AFA ............................................................... | 214 |
8.6 | The risks and the benefits ................................................................... | 215 |
8.6.1 The benefits .................................................................................. | 215 | |
8.6.2 Indirect |
216 | |
8.6.3 The risks ....................................................................................... | 217 | |
8.6.4 Conclusions .................................................................................. | 219 | |
8.6.5 Considerations for risk management decisions ............................ | 219 |
!NNEX ! !VILAMYCIN
A.1 | Introduction........................................................................................ | 225 |
A.2 | Mode of action and resistance mechanisms...................................... | 225 |
A.3 | Development of resistance................................................................. | 227 |
A.4 | Acquisition of resistance.................................................................... | 228 |
A.5 | Impact of resistance on animal and human health ............................. | 228 |
A.6 | Other effects on the microflora .......................................................... | 228 |
A.6.1 Salmonella ................................................................................... | 228 | |
A.6.2 Other enteric pathogens ............................................................... | 229 | |
A.7 | Effects on specific animal diseases.................................................... | 229 |
A.8 | Toxicological aspects......................................................................... | 229 |
A.9 | Environmental effects ........................................................................ | 230 |
A.10 Summary comments......................................................................... | 230 |
!NNEX " "ACITRACIN
B.1 | Introduction ........................................................................................ | 233 |
B.2 | Mode of action and resistance mechanisms ...................................... | 234 |
B.3 | Development of resistance ................................................................. | 235 |
B.3.1 Prospective studies....................................................................... | 235 | |
B.3.2 |
236 | |
B.4 | Acquisition of resistance .................................................................... | 238 |
B.5 | Effects on specific animal diseases .................................................... | 239 |
B.6 | Impact of resistance on animal and human health ............................. | 240 |
B.7 | Other effects on the microflora .......................................................... | 240 |
B.7.1 Effects on salmonella colonisation .............................................. | 240 | |
B.7.2 Other enteric pathogens ............................................................... | 242 |
SOU 1997:132 | Contents | 7 |
B.8 | Toxicological aspects ......................................................................... | 242 |
B.8.1 Adverse effects in ruminants........................................................ | 242 | |
B.8.2 Allergy.......................................................................................... | 243 | |
B.9 | Environmental effects ........................................................................ | 243 |
B.10 Summary comments ......................................................................... | 244 |
!NNEX # &LAVOMYCIN
C.1 | Introduction ........................................................................................ | 250 |
C.2 | Mode of action and resistance mechanisms ...................................... | 250 |
C.3 | Development of resistance ................................................................. | 251 |
C.3.1 Prospective studies ....................................................................... | 251 | |
C.3.2 |
253 | |
C.4 | Acquisition of resistance .................................................................... | 253 |
C.4.1 Influence on resistance against other antimicrobials ................... | 253 | |
C.5 | Effects on specific animal diseases .................................................... | 254 |
C.6 | Impact of resistance on animal and human health ............................. | 254 |
C.7 | Other effects on the microflora .......................................................... | 255 |
C.7.1 Salmonella.................................................................................... | 255 | |
C.7.2 Other enteric pathogens................................................................ | 256 | |
C.8 | Toxicological aspects ......................................................................... | 256 |
C.8.1 Allergy.......................................................................................... | 256 | |
C.9 | Environmental effects ........................................................................ | 256 |
C.10 Summary comments ......................................................................... | 257 |
!NNEX$!RDACIN AND AVOPARCIN
D.1 | Introduction ........................................................................................ | 261 |
D.2 | Mode of action and resistance mechanisms ...................................... | 261 |
D.3 | Development of resistance ................................................................. | 264 |
D.4 | Resistance genes and gene transfer .................................................... | 266 |
D.5 | Effects on specific animal diseases .................................................... | 272 |
D.6 | Impact of resistance on animal and human health ............................. | 272 |
D.7 | Other effects on the microflora .......................................................... | 273 |
D.7.1 Salmonella.................................................................................... | 273 | |
D.7.2 Other enteric pathogens ............................................................... | 276 | |
D.8 | Toxicological aspects ......................................................................... | 276 |
D.9 | Environmental effects ........................................................................ | 277 |
D.10 Summary comments......................................................................... | 277 |
!NNEX % 3PIRAMYCIN TYLOSIN AND VIRGINIAMYCIN
E.1 | Introduction ........................................................................................ | 285 |
E.1.1 Macrolides (tylosin and spiramycin) ............................................ | 285 | |
E.1.2 Streptogramins (virginiamycin).................................................... | 288 | |
E.2 | Mode of action and resistance mechanisms ...................................... | 288 |
E.3 | Development of resistance ................................................................. | 289 |
E.3.1 Prospective studies ....................................................................... | 290 | |
E.3.2 Retrospective studies .................................................................... | 292 | |
E.3.3 |
292 |
8 | Contents | SOU 1997:132 |
E.4 | Resistance genes and acquisition of resistance .................................. | 295 |
E.4.1 Target modification ...................................................................... | 297 | |
E.4.2 Enzymatic inactivation................................................................. | 302 | |
E.4.3 Active efflux ................................................................................ | 302 | |
E.4.4 |
303 | |
E.4.5 Exposure to AFA and resistance .................................................. | 303 | |
E.5 | Effects on specific animal diseases .................................................... | 304 |
E.6 | Impact of resistance on animal and human health ............................. | 306 |
E.6.1 Consequences of MLS resistance................................................. | 306 | |
E.6.2 Influence of AFA usage ............................................................... | 306 | |
E.7 | Other effects on the microflora .......................................................... | 309 |
E.7.1 Salmonella.................................................................................... | 309 | |
E.7.2 Other enteric pathogens................................................................ | 311 | |
E.7.3 Other effects ................................................................................. | 312 | |
E.8 | Toxicological aspects ......................................................................... | 312 |
E.8.1 Residues ....................................................................................... | 312 | |
E.8.2 Allergy.......................................................................................... | 313 | |
E.8.3 Other immunological effects........................................................ | 314 | |
E.9 | Environmental effects ........................................................................ | 314 |
E.10 Summary comments ......................................................................... | 315 |
!NNEX & #ARBADOX AND OLAQUINDOX
F.1 | Introduction ........................................................................................ | 327 |
F.2 | Mode of action and resistance mechanisms ...................................... | 327 |
F.3 | Development of resistance ................................................................. | 329 |
F.4 | Acquisition of resistance .................................................................... | 332 |
F.5 | Effects on specific animal diseases .................................................... | 333 |
F.6 | Impact of resistance on animal and human health.............................. | 335 |
F.7 | Other effects on the microflora .......................................................... | 336 |
F.8 | Toxicological aspects ......................................................................... | 336 |
F.8.1 Target species ............................................................................... | 336 | |
F.8.2 Adverse effects in humans ........................................................... | 337 | |
F.9 | Environmental effects......................................................................... | 340 |
F.10 Summary comments ......................................................................... | 340 |
!NNEX ' "UGET SHEETS TO
G.1 | Budget sheets for piglet production ................................................... | 349 |
G.2 | Budget sheets for pig meat production .............................................. | 351 |
G.3 | Budget sheets for egg production ...................................................... | 353 |
G.4 | Budget sheets for poultry meat production........................................ | 355 |
SOU 1997:132 | 9 |
1 Introduction
1.1The Swedish derogation
In 1986, the Swedish Parliament imposed a ban on antibacterial growth promoters. During the accession negotiations with the European Union Sweden was granted a derrogation from Community legislation concerning the use of antibiotics, chemotherapeutics, coccidiostats and growth promoters as feed additives. Before December 31, 1998 the Commission shall decide on the applications for adjustment to be submitted by Sweden. These applications are to be accompanied by a detailed scientific report on motives for the applications. The decision shall be taken in accordance with the procedures laid down in article 7 of the directive 70/524/EEC concerning additives in feedingstuffs.
In 1995 the Ministry of Agriculture appointed a Commission (Commission on Antimicrobial Feed Additives) to collect and review scientific data which are relevant for a decision on the above mentioned feed additives. Professor
The appointed Commission has gathered the scientific data which it has found appropriate in two reports, one in English (SOU 1997:132) and one in Swedish (SOU 1997:133). The Swedish report is an abstract the English report.
Among the feed additives dealt with, the coccidiostats hold a specific position since they are used to prevent specific diseases and not as growth promoters. They are according to 705/524/EEC classified as medicinal substances. As the indications for use of these substances are specifically to prevent disease, they are treated separately.
Chapters
10 | 1. Introduction | SOU 1997:132 |
SOU 1997:132 | 11 |
2 Background
2.1Introduction
Antimicrobials are probably the single most important discovery in the history of medicine. The antimicrobial era began in the 1930s when the first sulphonamides made their way into clinical use in human medicine. Penicillin, the first antibiotic, was discovered in 1929 but was not introduced for therapy until 1940. Shortly after its introduction into human medicine penicillin was used in animals for the treatment of different bacterial diseases. Since these early discoveries, a large number of antimicrobial substances have been discovered or developed. Although some of these drugs have been developed specifically for animal use, the substantial costs for development are often not covered by profits from the veterinary market alone.
Table 2.I. Some terms used and corresponding definitions
4ABELL ) .¥GRA ANV¤NDA TERMER OCH DESSAS DEFINITION
4ERM | !BBREVIATION | $EFINITION |
Antibiotic | Substance produced by a microorganism, with an | |
inhibitory effect on other microorganisms | ||
Chemotherapeutical | Chemically synthesised substance with an | |
inhibitory effect on microorganisms | ||
Antibacterial | Antibiotic or chemically synthesised substance | |
with an inhibitory or lethal effect on bacteria | ||
Antiprotozoal | Antibiotic or chemically synthesised substance | |
with an inhibitory or lethal effect on protozoa | ||
Antimicrobial | Substance with an antibacterial and/or | |
antiprotozoal effect | ||
Anticoccidial | Antiprotozoal with inhibitory or lethal effect on | |
coccidia | ||
Coccidiostat | Anticoccidial used specifically for prevention of | |
coccidiosis | ||
Antihistomonal | Antiprotozoal with inhibitory or lethal effect on | |
histomonads | ||
Antibacterial feed | AFA | Antibacterials used as feed additives for the |
additives | purpose of performance enhancement | |
(corresponds to antibiotics and growth promoters | ||
in Directive 70/524/EEC) | ||
Medicinal feed | MFA | Antimicrobials used as feed additive for the |
additives | purpose of preventing a specific disease | |
(corresponding to medicinal feed additives | ||
according to Directive 70/524/EEC) |
12 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
An antibiotic is defined as a substance produced by living
2.2Role of antibacterials in animal husbandry
A better understanding of many aspects of animal husbandry have resulted in a development towards improved productivity. Such factors include the combat of epizootic diseases, control of parasitism, improvements in animal nutrition, genetic improvements and the use of antimicrobials.
Antimicrobial agents are used for three major purposes in domestic animals:
1Therapy, to treat an identified illness
2Prophylaxis, to prevent illness in advance
3Performance enhancement, to increase feed conversion, growth rate or yield
2.2.1Therapeutic and prophylactic use of antibacterials
Therapy usually involves an individual animal or a defined group of diseased animals while prophylactic treatment involves the treatment of a herd or group of animals. The aim of the latter is to prevent diseases that might otherwise occur. A special form of prevention, also called metaphylaxis, is when all animals in a herd or group of animals are medicated, in situations when the proportion of animals diseased during a defined time period reaches a threshold value. In such situations, the probability of most, or all, of the animals getting infected is high. In both therapy and prophylaxis, the drug is administered over a defined, preferably short, period of time and in both instances the drug is used upon prescription by a veterinarian. The dosages used must be high enough so that concentrations that are inhibitory for the infectious agent are reached at the site of infection (e.g. the lung).
The animal diseases currently requiring the most extensive use of therapeutic or prophylactic drugs are respiratory and enteric diseases of pigs
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 13 |
and calves, and mastitis in dairy cattle. Prophylactic treatment is particularly common during periods when stress is imposed on the animal, e.g.. changes in diet and loss of maternal interaction at weaning, after transport and commingling. Although in recent years much emphasis has been placed on disease prevention through improved management and environmental conditions, intensive animal production systems still depend on antimicrobials, as shown by the continuously growing market for antibacterials.
2.2.2Chemoprophylaxis of protozoal diseases
In the case of certain protozoal diseases, the probability of clinical outbreaks or production losses due to subclinical disease is so high that chemoprevention has become standard practice. The main diseases in question are coccidiosis of poultry and rabbits and histomoniasis of turkeys and pheasants. The appropriate drugs for prophylaxis are referred to as anticoccidials (coccidiostats) and antihistomonals.
Anticoccidials and antihistomonals are medicinal substances preventing specific diseases with a high probability of occurrence. In that respect, they are by definition veterinary medicines. On the other hand, in most parts of the world they are used as standard feed additives and are, from a regulatory point of view, treated as such.
2.2.3 Antibacterials as performance enhancers
The
Growth enhancement in children
The findings of improved growth as an effect of administration of subtherapeutic doses of antibiotics led to investigations on possible similar effects in humans. In 1952, Snelling and Johnson reported lowered morbidity, increased growth rate and shortened hospital stay of premature infants following daily administrations of 50 mg chlortetracycline. Similar results, from a controlled trial in twins and triplets, were also reported by
14 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
Robinson (1952). MacDougall (1957) found that low doses of chlortetracycline given to hospitalised malnourished children resulted in, among other effects, improved weight gain. Positive effects on the weight gain of undernourished school children have also been reported (Mackay ET AL , 1956; Guzman ET AL , 1958). MacDougall (1957) concluded that chlortetracyclines could prove a valuable adjunct to dietary therapy in clinical practice under the conditions described. In contrast, both Mackay and
absolute necessity of maintaining adequate nutrition during weaning (Taylor, 1967; Behar ET AL , 1968).
Growth enhancers in animal husbandry
In animal husbandry, the early findings initiated an intensive area of research. The practice of feeding subtherapeutic doses of antibiotics was readily adopted and AFA soon became an integrated part of the systems developed in the animal industry. Apart from increased growth rate and/or increased feed conversion, examples of other observed effects of antimicrobials at low doses are improved egg production in laying hens, increased litter size in sows and increased milk yield of dairy cows. When antimicrobials are used for the latter purposes the term yield promoters has been used. Alternative terms proposed for growth promoters such as ”growth permitters” or ”digestive enhancers” appear misleading. ”Growth permitters” would imply that growth of animals is not permitted without these additives. The term ”digestive enhancers” indicates that the effect of AFA is primarily on the digestion of feed. This is not in line with the, admittedly scarce, knowledge on the mode of action of AFA (see chapter 3).
The various claimed benefits of antibacterial performance enhancers have been listed by the European Animal Health Federation (FEDESA) as:
·To improve feed utilisation
·To improve growth rate
·To improve carcass quality
·To improve rate of throughput of livestock
·To improve farm economics
·To improve building utilisation
·To reduce labour
·To permit economical redeployment of resources
·To help indebtedness of farmers
·To permit controlled production from fewer stock to achieve quotas
·To reduce energy consumption
·To conserve natural fuels
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 15 |
·To reduce waste
·To reduce environmental contamination
·To reduce livestock numbers and slurry disposal problems
·To improve the environment
(Source: FEDESA 1994 cit. by Colegrave and Wesley, 1995)
The exhaustive nature of this list is due partly to the fact that some effects have been duplicated using different phrasings, and partly to the listing of various secondary and tertiary effects. If feed utilisation and/or growth rate of the animals is improved, the throughput of animals on a specific premise will increase. The latter is equal to improved building utilisation. From this follows an economic benefit, which, for indebted farmers certainly will mean an improvement. Improved use of buildings and feed would, in certain situations, reduce energy consumption which normally is the same as conservation of natural fuels. Reduced waste, reduced slurry disposal problems, reduced environmental contamination and improvement of the environment also appear synonymous and are sequels to improved feed
utilisation. The statement ”improved carcass quality” is doubtful. In some cases, a higher fat content of the carcass has been noted (FiemsET AL, 1995).
A list encompassing only the primary effects attributed to of AFA would read:
·Prevention of disease
·Improved feed utilisation
·Improved growth rate
2.3Community legislation
2.3.1 Antibiotics and growth promoters
In the EU, feed additives (AFA and MFA) are regulated separately from veterinary medicines (including medicated feed).
Approval of feed additives is
Certain provisions of the latest amendment will be in force on April 1 1998 and the remaining provisions by October 1 1999.
When the ”5th amendment” (Council Directive 96/51/EC) takes force, some important changes will follow. Approvals of high technology additives will be
16 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
In article 3 of this Directive (formerly Article 7 of Directive 84/587/EEC) important conditions that must be fulfilled are listed.
It should be noted that, although the phrasing of some of the conditions has been altered (cf. Article 7, 2A of 84/587/EEC), the spirit is essentially the same as in the directive presently in force.
$IRECTIVE %%# AS AMENDED IN %# !RTICLE A
#OMMUNITY AUTHORISATION OF AN ADDITIVE SHALL BE GIVEN ONLY IF
A WHEN USED IN ANIMAL NUTRITION IT HAS ONE OF THE EFFECTS REFERRED TO IN !RTICLE A
B TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE CONDITIONS OF USE IT DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT HUMAN OR ANIMAL HEALTH OR THE ENVIRONMENT NOR HARM THE CONSUMER BY ALTERING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS
C ITS PRESENCE CAN BE MONITORED
AS AN ADDITIVE PER SEIN PREMIXTURES
IN FEEDINGSTUFFS OR WHERE APPROPRIATE IN FEED MATERIALS
D AT THE LEVEL PERMITTED TREATMENT OR PREVENTION OF ANIMAL DISEASE IS EXCLUDED THIS CONDITION DOES NOT APPLY TO ADDITIVES BELONGING TO THE GROUP OF COCCIDIOSTATS AND OTHER MEDICINAL SUBSTANCES
E FOR SERIOUS REASONS CONCERNING HUMAN OR ANIMAL HEALTH ITS USE MUST NOT BE RESTRICTED TO MEDICAL OR VETERINARY PURPOSES
)N ARTICLE OF THIS DIRECTIVE FAVOURABLE EFFECTS OF ADDITIVES ARE SPECIFIED
According to Council Directive 95/69/EC, establishments where AFA are produced or mixed need specific approval.
Council Directive 94/40/EEC (amending 87/153/EEC), presently under revision, fixes standard data requirements for dossiers used to support approval of additives, so called guidelines. Specified data with relevance for the conditions cited above are to be provided.
After consulting the Member States in the Standing Committee, and evaluation by the Scientific Committee of Animal Nutrition (SCAN) the Commission may, if the substance if found to meet the requirements of the directives, be authorised for use.
If, as the result of new information or a reassessment of existing information, a Member State has specific grounds for establishing that the use of one of the authorised additives (or its use in specified conditions) constitutes a danger to animal or human health or the environment, the Member State may temporarily suspend or restrict the application (so called ”safe guard clause”, Article 11 of Council Directive 70/524/EEC). The other Member States and the Commission shall immediately be notified and informed of the reasons for the decision. The Commission shall examine the grounds cited by the member state and consult the Member States. The
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 17 |
Commission shall then deliver its opinion and take appropriate measures. If any of the conditions laid down in the article cited above are no longer met, a regulation shall be adopted to withdraw the additive.
Presently authorised AFA (annex I or II of 70/524/EEC) are bacitracin, flavomycin, avoparcin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin, carbadox, olaquindox, monensin, salinomycin and avilamycin (table 2.II). Ardacin has been approved under Annex II but the authorisation is not expected to be prolonged.
A number of additives have, since the original list in 1970, been withdrawn from the list of authorised additives because of a decision to restrict certain antibiotics to therapeutic use (e.g. penicillin, streptomycin and tetracyclines) .
2.3.2Coccidiostats and other medicinal feed additives
The anticoccidial agents authorised for use in poultry within the EU (Council Directive 70/524/EC) are listed in Table 2.III. Apart from being used as anticoccidials in poultry some coccidiostats are also approved for the prevention of coccidiosis in rabbits. Some ionophores are also approved for growth promotion (see table 2.II). The other medicinal substances include the antihistomonals which are mainly used in turkeys.
18 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
Table 2.II. Antibacterial feed additives authorised for growth promotion, including most of the applications (Council Directive 70/524/EEC)
4ABELL )) !NTIBAKTERIELLA FODERTILLSATSER GODK¤NDA SOM TILLV¤XTBEFR¤MJANDE MEDEL SAMT FLERTALET GODK¤NDA APPLIKATIONER R¥DSDIREKTIV %%'
3UBSTANCE | !NIMAL SPECIES | %XAMPLES OF OTHER | ||
OR CATEGORY | AGE | CONTENT | PROVISIONS | |
MG KG | ||||
!.4)")/4)#3 | ||||
!VILAMYCIN | piglets | 4 months | ||
slaughter pigs | ||||
chickens | ||||
"ACITRACIN | layers | |||
ZINC | turkeys | 4 weeks | ||
BACITRACIN | turkeys | 26 weeks | ||
other poultry | 16 weeks | certain species excepted | ||
piglets | 4 months | |||
calves | 16 weeks | |||
calves | 6 months | |||
&LAVO | layers | |||
PHOSPHOLIPOL | turkeys | 26 weeks | ||
FLAVOMYCIN | other poultry | 16 weeks | certain species excepted | |
BAMBERMYCINS | piglets | 3 months | milkreplacements only | |
slaughter pigs | 6 months | |||
calves | 6 months | |||
beef | ||||
3PIRAMYCIN | turkeys | 26 weeks | ||
other poultry | 16 weeks | certain species excepted | ||
calves | 16 weeks | |||
6 months | milkreplacements only | |||
piglets | 4 months | |||
slaughter pigs | 6 months | |||
4YLOSIN | piglets | 4 months | ||
TYLOSIN | 6 months | |||
PHOSPHATE | ||||
6IRGINIAMYCIN | layers | 20 | ||
turkeys | 26 weeks | |||
other poultry | 16 weeks | certain species excepted | ||
piglets | 4 months | |||
slaughter pigs | 6 months | |||
calves | 16 weeks | |||
beef | ||||
beef | ||||
3ALINOMYCIN | piglets | 4 months | ||
slaughter pigs | 6 months | |||
'2/74( |
||||
#ARBADOX | piglets | 4 months | withdrawal time 28 days | |
/LAQUINDOX | piglets | 4 months | withdrawal time 28 days | |
piglets | 4 months | milkreplacements only |
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 19 |
Table 2.III. Coccidiostats and other medicinal substances authorised as feedadditives within the European Union (Council directive 70/524/EEC)
4ABELL ))) +OCCIDIOSTATIKA OCH ANDRA MEDICINSKA SUBSTANSER GODK¤NDA SOM FODERTILLSATSER INOM DEN %UROPEISKA 5NIONEN R¥DSDIREKTIV
'ENERIC NAME | 3PECIES CATEGORY | #ONTENT IN | 7ITH | |
AGE | FEED | DRAWAL | ||
MG KG | DAYS | |||
!MPROLIUM | poultry | from laying | 3 | |
onwards | ||||
!MPROLIUM | chickens for laying, | from laying | 3 | |
ETHOPABATE | turkeys, guinea fowls | onwards | ||
!RPRINOCID | chickens | 60 | 5 | |
chickens for laying | 16 weeks | 60 | 5 | |
$ECOQUINATE | chickens for fattening | 3 | ||
$ICLAZURIL | chickens for fattening | 1 | 5 | |
$INITOLMIDE | poultry | from laying | 3 | |
$/4 | onwards | |||
(ALOFUGINONE | chickens for fattening | 5 | ||
turkeys | 12 weeks | 5 | ||
,ASALOCID | chickens for fattening | 5 | ||
chickens for laying | 16 weeks | |||
turkeys | 12 weeks | 5 | ||
chickens for fattening | 5 | 5 | ||
chickens for fattening | laying and | 125 | 5 | |
guinea fowl | onwards | 125 | 5 | |
rabbits | 5 | |||
chickens for fattening | 110 | 5 | ||
METHYLBENZOQUAT | chickens for laying | 16 weeks | 110 | - |
turkeys | 12 weeks | 110 | 5 | |
chickens for fattening | 3 | |||
chickens for laying | 16 weeks | |||
turkeys | 16 weeks | 3 | ||
.ARASIN | chickens for fattening | 5 | ||
.ARASIN | chickens for fattening | 7 | ||
NICARBAZIN | ||||
.ICARBAZIN | chickens for fattening | 4 weeks | 9 | |
2OBENIDINE | chickens for fattening | 5 | ||
turkeys | 5 | |||
rabbits | 5 | |||
3ALINOMYCIN | chickens for fattening | 5 | ||
3EMDURAMICIN | chickens for fattening | 25 | 5 | |
/4(%2 |
||||
$IMETRIDAZOL | turkeys | from laying on | 6 | |
guinea fowl | from laying on | 6 | ||
)PRONIDAZOL | turkeys | from laying on | 6 | |
2ONIDAZOL | turkeys | from laying on | 6 | |
.IFURSOL | turkeys | 5 |
20 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
2.4Current Swedish legislation
2.4.1Antibiotics and growth promoters
The basic Swedish legislation with relevance for AFA and medicinal feed additives is the Feedingstuffs Act (SFS 1985:295), that came into force in 1986. According to this act, antibiotics and chemotherapeuticals may only be incorporated in animal feed for the purpose of preventing, alleviating or curing disease, i.e. not for growth or yield promoting purposes.
2.4.2Coccidiostats and other antiprotozoals
In Sweden, as in other countries, the coccidiosis control in broilers relies primarily on coccidiostats. The drugs approved in Sweden for this purpose are listed in table 2.IV.
In accordance with the Feedingstuffs Act, coccidiostats are available as pharmaceutical specialities (veterinary medicinal products), on veterinary prescription only. As a result of the legislative changes in 1986, some coccidiostats earlier approved as feed additives are today instead authorised for use as medicated feed.
Table 2.IV. Coccidiostats approved as pharmaceutical specialities in Sweden
4ABELL )6 +OCCIDIOSTATIKA GODK¤NDA SOM L¤KEMEDEL I 3VERIGE
'ENERIC NAME | 3PECIES | #ONTENT IN FEED | 7ITH | |
(ATCvet code) | CATEGORY | AGE | MG KG | DRAWAL |
TIME | ||||
DAYS | ||||
!MPROLIUM | chickens for | 14 weeks | 125+8 in starter feed, | 3 |
ETHOPABATE | laying | 75+4.8 in grower feed | ||
(QP51A X59) | ||||
(ALOFUGINONE | poultry | 3 | 3 | |
(QP51A X08) | ||||
,ASALOCID | chickens for | 3 | ||
(QP51 A H02) | fattening | |||
chickens for | 5 | 3 | ||
(QP51A X10) | fattening | |||
chickens for | 3 | |||
(QP51A H03) | fattening | |||
.ARASIN | chickens for | 70 | 3 | |
(QP51A H04) | fattening |
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 21 |
Ronidazole (Ridzola® vet.) and dimetridazole (Emtryl® vet.) were approved as pharmaceutical specialities for use against swine dysentery and, for dimetridazole, also against histomoniasis in poultry, until 1995. Ronidazole and dimetridazole were then withdrawn from the market in accordance with the provisions of the Committee of Veterinary Medicinal Products (CVMP). Ipronidazole has never been approved in Sweden.
2.4.3Antibacterials for use in therapy or prophylaxis
Antibacterials for use in animals are authorised by the Medical Products Agency. Withdrawal times, based on the maximum residue limits (MRL) fixed by the CVMP, are assigned by the National Food Administration. All antibacterials, including dermatological and other formulations, for use in animals are available on prescription only.
Veterinary prescriptions are subject to the regulations of the Medical Products Agency. All veterinarians are under the supervision of the Swedish Board of Agriculture, that also issue regulations pertinent to antibacterials. The general veterinary regulations of the Board of Agriculture (LSFS 1982:43) state that ”the usage of medicinal products shall be well motivated. When choosing type and dosage of a medicinal product the risk of residues in food of animal origin shall be taken into account”. Further, in the regulations for veterinarians with special reference to prescriptions of medicinal products (LSFS 1979:8), it is stated that ”prescribing and handing out medicinal products shall be done with great restrictivity and only when the need is apparent...”. According to the same regulations, medicinal products may, on each occasion, be prescribed or handed out only after careful examination of the diseased animal or herd, on the premises, except in the case of general prophylactic measures other than antibiotics and chemotherapeuticals, or if other special circumstances are at hand.
Regarding medicated feed, the provisions of Directive 90/167/EEC are implemented.
Of the antibacterials authorised as feed additives in the EU, tylosin and virginiamycin are presently available in Sweden for use in medicated feed. Olaquindox was withdrawn from the market in 1997. Spiramycin is authorised for use in food animals for injections only.
2.4.4Distribution of medicinal products
All prescriptions and deliveries of drugs are administered by the pharmacies which all belong to Apoteksbolaget (The National Corporation of Swedish Pharmacies). This means that all prescriptions of drugs for therapeutic use,
22 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
including those mixed by the feed mills, are handled by the Swedish pharmacies. From the above follows that veterinarians are not allowed to sell or dispense medicinal products but may, for practical reasons, hand out the products to the
2.4.5Control
The manufacturing of animal feed is supervised by the Board of Agriculture. As part of the supervision, annual statistics on quantities of feed delivered and on specifics such as medicated feed are gathered.
All veterinarians are, as mentioned, subject to supervision by the Board of Agriculture. On a regional level, the County veterinarian (an official employee) is in charge of supervision of the work of the veterinarians, animal welfare and disease control. Traditionally, most of the veterinarians in food animal practice are employed by the Board of Agriculture. However, private practice in food animals is becoming more common.
Sales statistics of antibacterials for use in animals is an indirect way of control. As mentioned above, the Board of Agriculture gathers annual statistics on sales of medicated feed. The National Veterinary Institute has, based on data provided by Apoteksbolaget, calculated the total sales of antibacterials for veterinary use in Sweden (see 2.6). Recently, Apoteksbolaget has initiated yearly surveys of all veterinary prescriptions of medicated feed. By combining these three sources of statistics, the surveillance is maximised. Discrepancies or undesired trends may be detected and their causes found and corrected (see 2.6.5).
2.5.The Swedish ban
2.5.1The preambles
Similar to the situation in other countries, some Swedish scientists viewed the practice of routine addition of antibacterials to animal feeds with scepticism. The knowledge of the transmissibility of resistance between bacteria through plasmids led to exhortations for a restrictive use of antibacterials in animals (Rutqvist, 1970). Following the recommendations of the Swann Committee in the UK, a broader debate was initiated, which eventually led to a reassessment of the use of antibacterials as feed additives (LBS, 1977).
A working group of the Board of Agriculture concluded, among other things, that ”the use of AFA entails a risk of increased resistance in bacteria but as the substances in use are mainly active against
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 23 |
from which resistance is not transferred, the impact of such development is negligible”. On the other hand, a negative attitude to all kinds of additives among consumers was noted by the group. The benefits, in terms of increased production and prevention of certain diseases, were also acknowledged (LBS, 1977). Legislative changes, especially in the requirements for approval, were proposed in order to mitigate possible risks.
At the same time, the farmers were growing increasingly sceptical towards feed antibiotics. They were concerned that the continued use of antibiotics might harm consumer confidence. The Federation of Swedish Farmers (LRF) made a policy statement, declaring that Swedish agriculture aimed towards a more restricted and controlled use of antibiotics. In a letter to the Ministry of Agriculture in 1984, the LRF requested a ban on the use of antibacterials as feed additives.
In response to the above, the Ministry of Agriculture drafted a new Feedingstuffs Act (Government Bill 1984/85:146, Swedish Government). Among other things, the draft proposed that the use of antibacterials in feed should be restricted to treatment, prevention or cure of diseases, i.e. their use for growth promotion should not be allowed. The grounds cited for this amendment was the risk for increased resistance, especially the risk for
The Feedingstuffs Act was accepted by the parliament in November 1985 and came into force in January 1986 (SFS 1985:295).
2.5.2Effects on animal health
The effects of the ban on AFA on animal health has recently been reviewed by Wierup (1996). In essence, the following is based on his review.
Calves
In the 60s and 70s different AFA (bacitracin, flavomycin, oleandomycin, spiramycin) were used in concentrate and milk replacers for calves. However, the effect was considered doubtful and documented improvements
in animal growth was not always seen in repeated experiments (e.g. Jonson and Jacobsson, 1973; WierupET AL, 1975). Due to this scepticism, the use of
AFA in calf rearing had more or less come to an end before the ban in 1986. Negative clinical or other effects as a consequence of the ban have not been reported.
24 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
Chickens
The antibacterial feed additive nitrovin came into use in the 70s and through this, existing problems with necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens were almost completely eliminated. Later, nitrovin was gradually replaced by avoparcin. Reports on an effect of avoparcin on salmonella colonisation and excretion (e.g. Smith and Tucker, 1978; Smith and Tucker, 1980) gave rise to concern, as the broiler production put considerable efforts into the salmonellosis control programme. This prompted a change from avoparcin to virginiamycin in the early 80s. In the autumn of 1985 (before the ban), outbreaks of necrotic enteritis were reported with increasing frequency. This was dealt with by increasing the dosage of virginiamycin from 10 to 20 ppm.
At the time of the ban, the chicken producers identified the occurrence of clinical or subclinical necrotic enteritis as the main problem to tackle. A committee with representatives of the producers, the feed industry and veterinarians from animal health areas as well as from the meat inspection services was put together. The aim of the committee was to initiate studies and to suggest appropriate solutions to the problem. It was agreed that a transition period would be necessary and that virginiamycin would be prescribed during this period, in the dose of 20 ppm.
Field trials where no medicated feed was used indicated that a number of factors needed correction. It was concluded that the construction and climate of stables, hygiene, management and feed composition all contribute to the occurrence of necrotic enteritis in broiler production. Further, it was found that coccidiostats of the ionophore type also prevent necrotic enteritis. Strong emphasis was placed on improving animal environment because many diseases, including necrotic enteritis, have a multifactorial background. A special bonus was given for good animal management and care which also led to improvements in the total level of quality of the production.
In 1988, all prophylactic medications were abandoned and, in case of outbreaks, a two day treatment with phenoxymethyl penicillin in the drinking water was applied. The amount of active substance of antibiotics which was used for treatment decreased from about 2 000 kg of virginiamycin in 1987 to 100 kg of phenoxymethyl penicillin in 1988 (expressed as active substance, Wierup, 1989). Today the need for such treatment of necrotic enteritis is more or less completely eliminated.
More formal, scientific studies were also initiated to find alternative ways to control necrotic enteritis. Studies on animal feed included effects of enzymes and certain probiotics, the structure of the feed, different levels of protein and different sources of proteins and coccidiostats (Elwinger and Teglöf, 1991; Elwinger ET AL , 1992; Elwinger ET AL , 1994; Elwinger ET AL , 1996).
The results indicated that additions of enzymes acting on carbohydrates and the addition of certain probiotics to develop an adequate intestinal
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 25 |
bacterial flora reduced the incidence of necrotic enteritis. Dietary levels of protein were reduced and amino acids were added which also resulted in an improved hygiene and health.
In retrospect the most important changes were related to feed, involving a reduction of protein content, a higher fibre content and supplementation with enzymes together with the utilisation of ionophores for prevention of coccidiosis. The feeding strategies employed were developed through close collaboration between the feed industry and the farmers.
As mentioned, the coccidiostats of the ionophore type that are now used do have antibacterial effects and act prophylactically against necrotic enteritis. However, the sanitary situation of broiler chicken rearing in Sweden today would not have been reached without the above mentioned enforcements.
After the ban, coccidiostats were prescribed as medicated feed. Close monitoring of the efficiency of coccidiostats was introduced in Sweden in 1986. Since 1991, the efficiency of the drugs is studied by lesion scoring (according to methods described by Johnson and Reid, 1970) in approximately 5% of the Swedish broiler flocks, representative of all individual feed mills. The results are used for surveillance of the coccidiosis situation and to adapt the coccidiostatic regimen accordingly. In addition, all broiler flocks are under direct veterinary supervision as part of the salmonella control programme.
Egg production
AFA have never been authorised for use in laying hens in Sweden. Consequently, the ban in 1986 had no impact on the egg production. Following the ban, coccidiostats were prescribed as medicated feed to replacement birds. This practice is now being gradually replaced by the use of vaccines.
Turkeys
The situation for turkey producing units was similar to that for production of broiler chickens. Before 1986, AFA were used for prevention of necrotic enteritis. The ban did not result in noticeable clinical problems or reduced growth rate.
Weaner pigs
Before 1986, practically all piglets were given AFA (olaquindox or carbadox), from weaning until delivery to the finishing units at the age of 10- 12 weeks. Slaughter pigs were, to a lesser extent, given AFA (avoparcin or virginiamycin) until slaughter.
26 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
Production averages from 220 piglet producing herds from the years 1985 and 1986 have been assessed statistically (Robertsson and Lundeheim, 1994). For piglet production, problems emerged as a consequence of the removal of olaquindox which was used for weaning piglets. However, the
In connection with the ban of AFA it became obvious that clear guidelines for veterinarians on how to prescribe antibiotics as medicated feed were lacking. Such guidelines were adopted by the Swedish Veterinary Association in 1990 (SVS). The guidelines emphasise that the prescription of feed antibiotics should always be based on a diagnosis together with a thorough evaluation of contributory factors and accompanied by recommendations on hygienic and other prophylactic measures.
In a study from 1994, Holmgren and Lundeheim analysed the results from 55 piglet producing units in the western part of Sweden. They concluded that the medicated feed prescribed to weaning pigs was clinically motivated and in accordance with the guidelines formulated by the SVS. The need for medicated feed differed markedly between herds and this could be ascribed to weaning and management systems. The production results were highly correlated to the rearing systems and to the level of hygiene. In herds rearing post weaning pigs on deep litter bedding the use of medicated feeds was three to four times lower than in herds with pigs in traditional post weaning pens. The study also underlines the problem with preventing weaning diarrhoea in units with limited facilities to arrange satisfactory sectioning and hygiene.
Efforts have also been undertaken to make adjustments in the composition of pig feed. The most prominent changes have been a lowering of the protein content, use of water soluble fibres and supplementation with amino acids (Göransson ET AL , 1995). An antisecretory factor, preventing liquid penetration to the gut induced by enterotoxin, has also been explored as a preventive measure (Göransson ET AL , 1993).
A notable effect on weaning diarrhoea through addition of high levels of zinc oxide has been reported (Holm, 1989; Poulsen, 1995). Zinc oxide has a preventive effect on weaning diarrhoea equal to the effect which is reached
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 27 |
when using olaquindox (Holmgren, 1994b). Since 1992, zinc oxide is approved for incorporation into piglet feed, at 2000 ppm of zinc. Not all piglet feed contains high levels of zinc, as many producers do not experience problems with weaning diarrhoea. The intention was that the use of zinc oxide would only be temporary, until other measures to prevent weaning diarrhoea had been developed. Presently, the long term impact of the use of zinc oxide is under debate, and the Board of Agriculture is currently considering a
After the ban of AFA numerous measures have been, and are continuously, undertaken to optimise rearing and production systems and to employ available techniques (e.g. sectioning of buildings, age segregation, planned production). The ban also stimulated a development towards new rearing systems. The weaning of piglets on deep litter in large groups is one example and the so called
The experiences from the clinical problems which emerged after the ban indicate that single environmental or rearing measures are seldom enough to correct the situation. A combination of efforts aiming towards a healthorientated production system is often necessary. Many problems have been solved while others await solution.
Slaughter pigs
The ban of AFA did not create obvious clinical problems for growing or finishing pigs. The production results from this sector are comparable to those from, for example, the Danish production (source: Advisory Service Optima).
2.6Sales of antibacterials for veterinary use in Sweden
2.6.1Materials and methods
Data for
All data on pharmaceutical specialities are based on the sales statistics in the Central Statistics System of Apoteksbolaget (National Corporation of Swedish Pharmacies). This system contains registers of all sales from the
28 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
wholesalers to the local pharmacies (all belonging to Apoteksbolaget), and to the feed companies. As all pharmaceutical specialities are distributed from these wholesalers to local pharmacies or to authorised feed companies, these figures represent the total consumption in Sweden.
The local pharmacies normally have short storage periods for these products, so it can be assumed that the products sold were also consumed during the respective periods.
With regard to antibacterials used as feed additives before 1986, data has been gathered from the Board of Agriculture. Additionally, for
The antibacterials included are pharmaceutical specialities approved for general or local use in veterinary medicine (ATCvet1 code QJ01, QJ51, QA07A, QG01A, QP51AA and QP51AG). For
All data are expressed as kilogram of active substance. In formerly published data, the weight of the procaine part of procaine penicillin was included in the presentations. As the procaine part of the molecule is not active in an antibiotic sense, procaine penicillin has been calculated to benzyl penicillin as 0.6 times the weight of procaine penicillin. Further, some corrections have been made of erroneous macrolide figures.
2.6.2Total consumption
The total usage of antibacterials is presented in table 2.Va. For clarity, table 2.Vb lists examples of pharmaceutical specialities included in the different groups in table 2.Va.
Since 1986, the total usage has decreased from a mean on 45 tonnes/year during
1 ATC = Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 29 |
form of formulations for treatment of individual animals (e.g. parenteral drugs, intramammaries or tablets).
As the different substances in question are not equal in their biological activity per weight unit, total figures might be misleading (i.e. if a substance requiring high dosages for full efficacy is replaced by a more active substance, a false impression of a reduction could be given). Therefore, each substance group should be assessed separately for trends.
Of the pharmaceutical specialities that were authorised at the time of the ban, the sales of G- and
Similarly, the
Although the amount of macrolides sold as formulations for injection increased in the beginning of the 90s (Nilsson and Greko, 1997), the major part of this increase derives from macrolides for oral use (mixed in feed or water). This increase, and that of the pleuromutilins, is believed to reflect an increase in the incidence of swine dysentery (the major indication for those drugs). The increase during 1995 and 1996 is likely to be explained by the fact that the nitroimidazoles, the third category of drugs (formerly) available for this indication, were withdrawn from the market in 1995.
The usage of tetracyclines and aminoglycosides has decreased. The changes in the latter group is partly explained by a decrease in usage of the combination of penicillin and dihydrostreptomycin. The usage of tetracyclines will be further commented on below.
The consumption of substances formerly approved as feed additives and subsequent to the ban approved as therapeuticals (quinoxalines and streptogramins) has decreased substantially in spite of higher doses being given for therapy than for growth promotion.
Table 2.Va. Total animal usage of antibacterials in animals Sweden during
4ABELL 6A 4OTAL F¶RBRUKNING AV ANTIBIOTIKA F¶R ANV¤NDNING TILL DJUR UTTRYCKT SOM KG AKTIV SUBSTANS $ATA FR¥N
FR¥N 7IERUP ET AL "J¶RNEROT ET AL OCH FR¥N 'R EKO OPUBLICERAT
!CTIVE SUBSTANCE | 9EAR(kg active substance) | |||||||||||||||
G and V penicillins1 | 3232 | 4153 | 4788 | 5934 | 7144 | 7007 | 7414 | 7423 | 7446 | 8301 | 10374 | 9082 | 8555 | |||
Aminopenicillins | 60 | 248 | 714 | 540 | 655 | 681 | 738 | 769 | 837 | 859 | 941 | 928 | 829 | |||
Aminoglycosides | 5274 | 4776 | 5608 | 2885 | 3194 | 2823 | 2539 | 2255 | 2139 | 1938 | 1696 | 1342 | 1066 | |||
Tetracyclines | 9819 | 10765 | 12955 | 6585 | 4691 | 4624 | 4572 | 5414 | 8023 | 8815 | 7730 | 4968 | 2733 | |||
Macrolides | 603 | 616 | 887 | 1144 | 1205 | 1156 | 1399 | 1478 | 1701 | 1562 | 1701 | 1803 | 1486 | |||
Fluoroquinolones | 1 | 84 | 123 | 147 | 173 | 246 | 200 | 173 | ||||||||
Sulphonamides | 6600 | 4931 | 4325 | 3093 | 3072 | 2988 | 2510 | 2372 | 2362 | 2045 | 2323 | 2135 | 2198 | |||
Trimethoprim incl. derivatives | 134 | 142 | 186 | 197 | 250 | 282 | 272 | 257 | 284 | 303 | 352 | 331 | 339 | |||
Pleuromutilins | 124 | 140 | 229 | 236 | 268 | 384 | 465 | 889 | 1142 | |||||||
Quinoxalines2 | 6250 | 7700 | 9900 | 1300 | 7164 | 7202 | 5778 | 5128 | 4917 | 3523 | 1904 | 1191 | 1098 | |||
Streptogramins2 | 0 | 0 | 8800 | 1610 | 1088 | 2388 | 2413 | 1350 | 1275 | 550 | 600 | 575 | 525 | |||
Feed additives3 | 8380 | 9370 | 700 | 870 | ||||||||||||
Other substances4 | 918 | 869 | 1688 | 1616 | 1603 | 1871 | 2326 | 2666 | 1644 | 1627 | 1915 | 1125 | 163 | |||
TOTAL | 41270 | 43570 | 50551 | 25774 | 30190 | 31164 | 30274 | 29274 | 31043 | 30080 | 30247 | 24569 | 20307 |
1Procaine penicillin has been calculated to and expressed as bensylpenicinllin as 0.6 times total weight of procaine penicillin
2For
3Including avoparcin, bacitracin, nitrovin, oleandomycin and spiramycin
4For
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 31 |
Table 2.Vb. Explanations of groups in main table (table 2.Va)
4ABELL 6B &¶RKLARINGAR TILL DE GRUPPER SOM ING¥R I TABELL 6A
!CTIVE SUBSTANCE %XAMPLES OF SUBSTANCES INCLUDED
G and V penicillins | procaine penicillin, benzyl penicillin, phenoxymethyl |
penicillin | |
Aminopenicillins | ampicillin, amoxicillin |
Aminoglycosides | dihydrostreptomycin, gentamicin, neomycin |
Tetracyclines | oxitetracycline, chlortetracycline |
Macrolides | spiramycin, tylosin |
Fluoroquinolones | enrofloxacin |
Sulphonamides | sulphadiazine, sulphadoxine, formolsulphatiazole |
Trimethoprim incl. derivatives | trimethoprim, baquiloprim |
Pleuromutilins | tiamulin |
Quinoxalines | olaquindox, carbadox |
Streptogramins | virginiamycin |
Feed additives | avoparcin, bacitracin, nitrovin, oleandomycin and |
spiramycin as feed additive for growth promotion | |
Other substances | nitroimidazoles, clindamycin, cephalosporins |
2.6.3Flock treatment
Of special interest is the consumption of antibacterials intended for group or flock medication. When considering the risk for development of resistance, it is unimportant whether these medications take place by feed or water.
Sales data on formulations of antibacterials intended for such use have therefore been extracted from the data on total consumption shown in table 2.Va for the years
Olaquindox
Olaquindox is exclusively used in pigs. The only indication is diarrhoea around weaning but some off label use against swine dysentery is likely to occur. The usage of olaquindox was reduced by 82% (total quantity of active substance per number of pigs produced) from 1985 to 1987. Thereafter, however, more antibiotics were prescribed and the total amount used during the subsequent years 1988 and 1989 was 5 and 6%, respectively, higher than
32 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
in 1985 (Björnerot ET AL , 1996). Considering that the dosage prescribed in from 1986 and onwards was about three times higher than the AFA dosage employed before, a smaller fraction of the weaning pigs was treated with olaquindox. Calculated this way, the proportion of pigs that were treated was 12% in 1986 and 76% in 1989 and 12% in 1995 (Wierup, 1996). As mentioned, olaquindox is no longer available in Sweden.
Table 2.VI. Sales of formulations of antibacterials intended for treatment of animals through feed or water (flock or group medications) during 1993- 1996 expressed as kg active substance
4ABELL 6) &¶RS¤LJNING AV BEREDNINGSFORMER AV ANTIBAKTERIELLA MEDEL AVSEDDA F¶R BEHANDLING VIA FODER ELLER VATTEN FLOCK ELLER GRUPPMEDICINERING UNDER UTTRYCKT SOM KG AKTIV SUBSTANS
!4#VET CODE !CTIVE SUBSTANCE | 9EAR | ||||
QJ01AA | Tetracyclines | 8106 | 7036 | 4243 | 2088 |
QJ01FA | Macrolides | 959 | 791 | 1029 | 975 |
QJ01XX91 | Streptogramins | 550 | 600 | 575 | 525 |
QJ01XX92 | Pleuromutilins | 344 | 422 | 815 | 1069 |
QJ01MA | Fluoroquinolones | 13 | 30 | 31 | 27 |
QJ01MB | Quinoxalines | 3523 | 1904 | 1191 | 1098 |
QP51AA | Nitroimidazoles | 1490 | 1764 | 953 | 0 |
2.6.4Coccidiostats
The combination of amprolium and ethopabate has been the drug of choice for prevention of coccidiosis in chickens intended for laying in Sweden. During the last few years, this product has been largely replaced by vaccination of replacement breeders.
For broilers, a limited number of ionophores have been available to the during the past ten years. Narasin is, by far, the most widely applied product.
The total usage of anticoccidials in feed has been calculated from the same sources as the antibacterials (see 2.6.1). Presently, approximately 13 500 kg active substance of coccidiostats is used annually in Sweden. The quantities in kg active substance sold from
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 33 |
2.6.5Some comments on the Swedish consumption statistics
The consumption statistics from Sweden show that the usage of antibacterials in animals can, and has been, reduced substantially. Little data are available on consumption statistics other than from the Nordic countries. Comparisons between countries are difficult, as no generally accepted method of correcting for differing numbers of animals of different species is available. The total numbers of animals in Sweden during
As mentioned, figures on the total usage of antibacterial drugs should be interpreted with caution. Each substance group should be assessed separately, and knowledge on common indications is necessary in order to interpret the figures. In attempts to control resistance to antibacterials and to minimise the environmental impact of these drugs, monitoring systems for both usage of antibacterial drugs per animal species and for resistance to antibacterials in animal microbiota are crucial. Whenever undesirable trends are observed, activities to disclose underlying causes and, if possible, corrected.
During the years
The comparison of statistics from different sources can also be a valuable asset. Results from the recently introduced system for statistics on prescriptions of medicated feed (Odensvik, 1997), were compared to data on sales from wholesalers and to data on sales of medicated feed reported by feed mills to the Board of Agriculture. An excellent agreement between the different systems for statistics was found in question of antibacterial substances. However, for coccidiostats a major discrepancy was noted. The quantity covered by prescriptions in 1995 was about 65% of the quantities registered in the two other systems. The amounts used, according to the latter, match well the number of chickens produced in that year (figure 2.I). Therefore, it can be assumed that one or more
200 | 60 | |||||||||
180 | millions | |||||||||
160 | 50 | |||||||||
Feed, 1000 tonnes | 140 | 40 | chickens slaughtered, | |||||||
120 | ||||||||||
100 | 30 | |||||||||
80 | ||||||||||
60 | 20 | |||||||||
40 | 10 | of | ||||||||
No. | ||||||||||
20 | ||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||
1980 | 1982 | 1984 | 1986 | 1988 | 1990 | 1992 | 1994 | 1996 | ||
Year |
Ionophores | Chickens slaughtered | |||||||
Figure 2.I. Usage of coccidiostats in Sweden expressed as quantity of medicated feed expressed as 1000 tonnes (left axis), and number of broiler chickens
slaughtered in millions (right axis)
&IGUR ) !NV¤NDNING AV KOCCIDIOSTATIKA I 3VERIGE UTTRYCKT SOM M¤NGD FODER UTTRYCKT SOM TAL TON MED TILLSATT L¤KEMEDEL V¤NSTER AXEL OCH ANTALET SLAKTADE SLAKTKYCKLINGAR I MILLIONER H¶GER AXEL
Table 2.VII. The number of foodand
4ABELL 6)) !NTAL LIVSMEDELSPRODUCERANDE DJUR P¤LSDJUR OCH H¤STAR I 3VERIGE UNDER FR¥N "J¶RNEROT
9EAR | ||||||||
Dairy cows1 | 564 550 | 568 857 | 576 409 | 528 212 | 525 948 | 524 520 | 509 431 | 482 118 |
Beef cows1 | 56 412 | 64 199 | 74 544 | 97 653 | 135 791 | 153 555 | 164 578 | 157 128 |
Heifers, bulls, bullocks1 | 527 522 | 533 296 | 543 458 | 543 418 | 565 463 | 548 620 | 560 911 | 595 521 |
Calves1 | 513 044 | 521 298 | 524 032 | 537 495 | 548 100 | 580 671 | 591 569 | 542 328 |
Ewes and rams1 | 159 107 | 160 647 | 161 974 | 168 178 | 180 067 | 188 944 | 195 736 | 195 439 |
Lambs1 | 235 606 | 239 859 | 243 621 | 250 605 | 267 394 | 281 743 | 287 692 | 266 410 |
Sows and boars1 | 242 872 | 239 482 | 229 683 | 226 839 | 233 133 | 249 314 | 249 171 | 244 950 |
Pigs slaughtered2 (fattening) | 3 551 360 | 3 642 213 | 3 471 482 | 3 224 570 | 3 297 326 | 3 483 439 | 3 657 067 | 3 634 837 |
Layers1 | 6 411 821 | 6 366 499 | 6 391 943 | 6 145 174 | 6 063 357 | 5 764 401 | 5 918 015 | 6 100 270 |
Pullets1 | 2 274 343 | 2 267 732 | 2 175 676 | 2 579 920 | 2 166 105 | 1 908 371 | 2 175 337 | 1 811 509 |
Broilers slaughtered3 | 32.8 x 106 | 36.4 x 106 | 38.7 x 106 | 43.0 x 106 | 44.1 x 106 | 49.3 x 106 | 55.8 x 106 | 60.3 x 106 |
Turkeys slaughtered4 | 790 387 | 673 011 | 660 396 | 590 733 | 610 700 | 719 950 | 685 727 | 458 516 |
Domestic geese slaughtered4 | 22 290 | 18 512 | 22 186 | 20 813 | 15 771 | 20 823 | 22 140 | 29 962 |
Ducks slaughtered4 | 97 142 | 83 516 | 49 003 | 30 207 | 61 508 | 52 410 | 32 796 | 78 839 |
Horses2 (estimated figures) | ~180 000 | ~180 000 | ~180 000 | ~180 000 | ~180 000 | ~180 000 | ~180 000 | ~180 000 |
Minks5 (breeding females) | 490 324 | 439 271 | 285 589 | 255 037 | 260 919 | 184 741 | ~212 450 | ~244 320 |
Foxes5 (breeding females) | 19 463 | 13 028 | 9 052 | 4 554 | 5 239 | 3 627 | ~ 3 600 | ~3 600 |
Sources: 1Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics,
36 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
2.7Prevalence of bacterial resistance
Acquired resistance in bacteria to antibacterials is the results of reflects the exposure to the substances in question. Therefore statistics on prevalence of resistance in various bacterial species is an indirect way of assessing the consumption of antibacterials. Trends over time in prevalence of resistance among bacterial populations are likely to reflect quantities and patterns of usage.
2.7.1Zoonotic pathogens
Salmonella
In accordance with the recommendations of WHO, antibiotic resistance in 3ALMONELLA spp. isolated from animals in Sweden has been monitored since
1976. Salmonellosis in animals is a notifiable disease in Sweden. All strains from animals isolated at or sent to the National Veterinary Institute are included. This surveillance is mainly motivated by the implications of resistant zoonotic bacteria for human health .
Table 2.VIII. Antibacterial resistance in 3ALMONELLA Typhimurium from animals in Sweden (Data from Franklin, 1997 unpublished and Franklin and Wierup, 1987; Franklin ET AL , 1994; Franklin, 1995)
4ABELL 6))) 2ESISTENS MOT ANTIBAKTERIELLA MEDEL HOS Salmonella 4YPHIMURIUM ISOLERADE FR¥N DJUR I 3VERIGE $ATA FROM &RANKLIN
UNPUBLISHED AND &RANKLIN AND 7IERUP &RANKLIN ET AL &RANKLIN
3UBSTANCE | "REAKPOINT | 2ESISTANCE | ||
uG ML | 9EAR | |||
.O OF ISOLATES INVESTIGATED | ||||
(n=117) | (n=62) | (n=108) | ||
Ampicillin | >8 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Streptomycin | >32 | 78 | 32 | 25 |
Tetracycline | >8 | 14 | 6 | 8 |
>0.5 | 0 | 0 | 23 | |
Enrofloxacin | >0.5 | ND2 | 0 | 14 |
1Breakpoint = value above which the isolate has been classified as resistant; 2 ND = not
determined; 3 Isolated from a pigeon; 4 Isolated from a horse
"RYTPUNKT V¤RDE ¶VER VILKEN ISOLATET BETECKNATS SOM RESISTENT .$ EJ UNDERS¶KT )SOLAERAD FR¥N EN DUVA )SOLERAD FR¥N EN H¤ST
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 37 |
The antibiotic resistance in 3 Typhimurium in different time periods is shown in table 2.VIII. In the period
Campylobacter
The frequency of resistance in #AMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI isolated from chicken was investigated by Berndtsson (1996). Data on obtained minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) values are given in table 2.IX. Antibacterials are rarely used in broiler production in Sweden and the low proportion of resistant isolates seems to confirm the absence of a selective pressure. From other countries, quinolone resistance has been reported following the introduction of this drug (Endtz ET AL , 1991).
Table 2.IX. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antibacterials against 200 strains of #AMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI isolated from chickens in
Sweden
4ABELL )8
3UBSTANCE | ||||||||||||||
Ampicillin | 9 | 28 | 82 | 60 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 0 | ||||||
Cephalotin | 5 | 11 | 59 | 111 | 14 | |||||||||
Doxycycline | 15 | 18 | 99 | 40 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Enrofloxacin | 4 | 71 | 91 | 18 | 7 | 9 | ||||||||
Erythromycin | 7 | 39 | 92 | 39 | 21 | 2 | ||||||||
38 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
2.7.2Animal pathogens
Escherichia coli
%SCHERICHIA COLI strains with ability to cause piglet diarrhoea and edema disease are among the most important intestinal pathogens in piglets. Weaning diarrhoea in pigs has also been associated with % COLI but the role of % COLI in that disease is not clear. In order to assess the development of resistance over time, three different investigations regarding antibiotic resistance in porcine % COLI were compared. The majority of the included strains originated from pig herds with diarrhoea problems.
From table 2.X, it is apparent that the frequency of antibiotic resistant strains has not changed dramatically over the last ten years. The number of strains resistant to trimethoprim was unexpectedly high in 1981 to 1982 (9%), taking into account the fact that trimethoprim had only been used for 6 to 7 years in Sweden at that time. A further increase was expected but, as shown, did not take place. This might be explained by the improved health situation in piglets which presumably has been accompanied by a similar decrease in the usage of this particular combination of drugs.
Resistance to streptomycin and tetracycline is still high, but compared to results from other countries (e.g. Pohl ET AL , 1991; Morvan and Moisan, 1994) the overall figures indicate a favourable situation.
Table 2.X. Antibiotic resistance in porcine % COLI strains isolated in Sweden during different time periods (%). (From Franklin unpublished data and Franklin, 1984; Melin ET AL , 1996)
4ABELL 8 !NTIBIOTIKARESISTENS HOS E. coli FR¥N SVIN ISOLERADE I 3VERIGE UNDER OLIKA TIDSPERIODER &R¥N &RANKLIN OPUBLICERADE DATA OCH &RANKLIN
3UBSTANCE | "REAK | 2ESISTANCE | ||
POINT | 9EAR | |||
uG ML | .O OF ISOLATES INVESTIGATED | |||
N | N | N | ||
Ampicillin | >16 | 8 | 6 | 8 |
Streptomycin | >32 | 56 | 44 | 41 |
Tetracycline | >8 | 40 | 28 | 38 |
>82 | 9 | 15 | 10 | |
Enrofloxacin | >0.5 | ND4 | <1 | <1 |
1Breakpoint = value above which the isolate has been classified as resistant; 2 Denotes the trimethoprim concentration; 3 Denotes number of investigated isolates; 4 ND= not
determined
"RYTPUNKT V¤RDE ¶VER VILKEN ISOLATET BETECKNATS SOM RESISTENT !VSER KONCENTRATION TROMETOPRIM N ANTAL UNDERS¶KTA ISOLAT .$ EJ UNDERS¶KT
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 39 |
Staphylococcus aureus
Table 2.XI. Proportion of 3TAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS (isolated from clinical mastitis in dairy cows in Sweden during different years) with resistance to different antibacterials (Data from Franklin and Horn af Rantztien, 1983; Robertsson and Franklin, 1987; Nilsson, 1996)
4ABELL 8) !NDEL AV S.aureus ISOLERADE FR¥N KLINISK MASTIT HOS N¶T I 3VERIGE UNDER OLIKA ¥R VILKA UPPVISAR RESISTENS MOT VISSA ANTIBAKTERIELLA MEDEL $ATA FR¥N &RANKLIN AND (ORN AF 2ANTZTIEN 2OBERTSSON AND &RANKLIN
.ILSSON
3UBSTANCE | "REAK | 2ESISTANCE | |||
POINT | 9EAR .O OF ISOLATES INVESTIGATED | ||||
uG ML | |||||
N | N | N | |||
Penicillin | - 2 | 10 | 10 | 6 | |
Oxacillin | >2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
Erythromycin | >4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
Spiramycin | >16 | ND3 | ND | 1 | |
Tetracycline | >8 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
1Breakpoint = value above which the isolate has been classified as resistant; 2 Resistant
isolates determined on the basis of
"RYTPUNKT V¤RDE ¶VER VILKET ISOLATEN BED¶MTS SOM RESISTENTA 2ESITENS BEST¤MD SOM PRODUKTION AV b LAKTAMAS .$ EJ UNDERS¶KT
Among the udder pathogens causing bovine mastitis, 3 AUREUS is the most important causative agent. It gives rise not only to severe acute inflammation
but also to chronic subclinical conditions. In Sweden, about 25% of clinical mastitic cases are caused by this species. Besides 3 AUREUS, a number of
other staphylococcal species are associated with bovine mastitis. About 5 to 10% of the 3 AUREUS isolates from clinical cases of mastitis are resistant to
penicillin due to penicillinase production (Table 2.XI). Penicillin resistance is more common in
Serpulina hyodysenteriae
3ERPULINA HYODYSENTERIAE is the causative agent of swine dysentery. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for 67 Swedish strains were determined for seven antibiotics. The strains were isolated from herds with and without dysentery problems in the period 1988 to 1990 (Gunnarsson ET AL , 1991). The distribution of MIC values are shown in Table 2.XII. The MIC values of tylosin and virginiamycin indicate that these drugs would no longer be effective for treatment of swine dysentery.
2 Lolita Nilsson, Laboratory Veterinary Officer, Department of Mastitis, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Sweden
40 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
Table 2.XII. Antibacterial sensitivity of 67 isolates of 3ERPULINA HYODYSENTERIAE from Swedish pigs (Data from Gunnarsson ET AL , 1991)
4ABELL 8)) +¤NSLIGHET F¶R ANTIBAKTERIELLA MEDEL HOS ISOLAT AV Serpulina hyodysenteriae FR¥N SVENSKA GRISAR $ATA FR¥N 'UNNARSSON ET AL
!NTIBACTERIAL | |||||||
SUBSTANCE | .O OF ISOLATES | ||||||
Carbadox | |||||||
36 | 2 | 15 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
Olaquindox | |||||||
14 | 2 | 19 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
Tylosin | |||||||
5 | 1 | 7 | 15 | 11 | 14 | 14 | |
Virginiamycin | |||||||
4 | 1 | 19 | 25 | 11 | 3 | 4 | |
Tiamulin | |||||||
4 | 4 | 32 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 4 | |
Tetracycline | |||||||
27 | 4 | 19 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 0 | |
Ronidazol | |||||||
35 | 1 | 19 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
Dimetridazol | |||||||
0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 49 | |
2.7.3Animal commensals
Surveys for antimicrobial resistance in commensals, i.e.
In a study on poultry bacteria, enterococci and % COLI were isolated on selective media from neck skin and hindgut samples representing 52 poultry
flocks slaughtered in 9 different slaughterhouses (Greko, 1996). A total of 207 isolates of %NTEROCOCCUS spp. and 194 isolates of % COLI were
investigated for MIC values for a range of antibacterials. Results from this study are shown in table 2.XIII and 2.XIV.
The figures show an overall low level of resistance for both enterococci and % COLI. The one exception is the prevalence of resistance against
tetracyclines in enterococci. Tetracyclines are not frequently used in Swedish
poultry production, and corresponding figures for other bacteria isolated from chickens (#AMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI, % COLI) do not indicate a high exposure
to this drug.
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 41 |
Table 2.XIII Resistance in %NTEROCOCCUS spp. isolated from chicken (neckskin and faecal samples). No. of isolates = 194
4ABELL 8))) 2ESISTENS HOS Enterococcus SPP ISOLERADE FR¥N KYCKLING HALS SKINN OCH FECES PROV !NTAL ISOLAT
3UBSTANCE | "REAKPOINT | 0ROPORTION OF ISOLATES RESISTANT |
uG ML | ||
Vancomycin | >4 | 0 |
Erythromycin | >2 | 17 |
Spiramycin | >16 | 15 |
Spiramycin | >8 | 15 |
Ampicillin | >8 | 0 |
Neomycin | >128 | 0 |
Streptomycin | >128 | 2 |
Chloramphenicol | >8 | 0 |
Tetracycline | >4 | 64 |
>0.5 | 0 |
1Breakpoint = value above which the isolate has been classified as resistant
"RYTPUNKT V¤RDE ¶VER VILKET ISOLATEN BED¶MTS SOM RESISTENTA
Table 2.XIV. Resistance in % COLI isolated from chicken
4ABELL 8)6 2ESISTENS HOS E.coli ISOLERADE FR¥N KYCKLING HALS SKINN OCH FECES PROV !NTAL ISOLAT
3UBSTANCE | "REAKPOINT | 0ROPORTION OF ISOLATES RESISTANT |
uG ML | ||
Ampicillin | >8 | 5 |
Neomycin | >64 | 0 |
Streptomycin | >64 | 7 |
Gentamicin | >8 | 0 |
Tetracycline | >4 | 17 |
>0.5 | 4 | |
Chloramphenicol | >16 | 1 |
Enrofloxacin | >0.25 | 4 |
Nalidixic acid | >32 | 6 |
Olaquindox | >32 | <12 |
1Breakpoint = value above which the isolate has been classified as resistant; 2One isolate,
also resistant to enrofloxacin (MIC=1µg/ml)
"RYTPUNKT V¤RDE ¶VER VILKET ISOLATEN BED¶MTS SOM RESISTENTA %TT ISOLAT ¤VEN RESISTENT MOT ENROFLOXACIN
The antibacterial resistance of enterococci and % COLI isolated from piglets has recently been investigated in a cohort study (Greko, 1997; Melin ET AL , 1997). Briefly, in a study aiming to investigate the possible occurrence of resistance to zinc oxide among commensal % COLI of piglets in Sweden, a
42 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
total of 300 faecal samples were examined. The samples were collected
From
shows the results of determinations of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of different antibiotics for %NTEROCOCCUS spp. and table 2.XVI the
corresponding results for % COLI.
Taken together, the figures are comparatively favourable. The number of isolates investigated from each group is too small to validate any conclusions with regard to differences between groups. Some conflicting observations on differences between groups can be made. For enterococci, the figures on resistance to neomycin and streptomycin in the
Table 2.XV. Resistance to different antibacterials in %NTEROCOCCUS spp. isolated from weaned pigs in herds using different regimes
4ABELL 86 2ESISTENS MOT OLIKA ANTIBACTERIELLA MEDEL HOS Enterococcus SPP ISOLERADE FR¥N AVVANDA GRISAR I BES¤TTNINGAR MED OLIKA REGIM
3UBSTANCE | "REAK | 2ESISTANCE IN ISOLATES | ||||
POINT | FROM SAMPLING GROUP | |||||
uG ML | /LAQUIN | :INC | .O MEDI 4OTAL | |||
DOX | OXIDE | CATION | ||||
n=69)2 | n=57) | n=92) | n=218) | |||
Erythromycin | >2 | 29 | 33 | 36 | 33 | |
Spiramycin | >16 | 6 | 12 | 22 | 14 | |
Spiramycin | >8 | 14 | 26 | 38 | 27 | |
Ampicillin | >8 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
Neomycin | >128 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 6 | |
Streptomycin | >128 | 9 | 5 | 18 | 12 | |
Chloramphenicol | >8 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
Tetracycline | >4 | 42 | 54 | 33 | 41 | |
>0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1Breakpoint = value above which the isolate has been classified as resistant; 2 n= number
of isolates
"RYTPUNKT V¤RDE ¶VER VILKET ISOLATEN BED¶MTS SOM RESISTENTA N ANTAL UNDERS¶KTA ISOLAT
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 43 |
Table 2.XVI Resistance to different antibacterials in % COLI isolated from weaned pigs in herds using different regimes
4ABELL 86) 2ESISTENS MOT OLIKA ANTIBAKTERIELLA MEDEL HOS E. coli ISOLERADE FR¥N AVVANDA GRISAR I BES¤TTNINGAR MED OLIKA REGIM
3UBSTANCE | "REAK | 2ESISTANCE IN ISOLATES | ||||
POINT | FROM SAMPLING GROUP | |||||
uG ML | /LAQUIN | :INC | .O MEDI 4OTAL | |||
DOX | OXIDE | CATION | ||||
n=60)2 | n=73) | n=85) | n=218) | |||
Ampicillin | >8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | |
Neomycin | >64 | 10 | 12 | 8 | 10 | |
Streptomycin | >64 | 13 | 26 | 13 | 17 | |
Gentamicin | >8 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | |
Tetracycline | >4 | 12 | 4 | 26 | 10 | |
>0.5 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 3 | ||
Chloramphenicol | >16 | 15 | 26 | 7 | 16 | |
Enrofloxacin | >0.25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Enrofloxacin | >0.12 | 15 | 11 | 1 | 8 | |
Nalidixic acid | >32 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Olaquindox | >32 | 35 | 19 | 32 | 28 |
1Breakpoint = value above which the isolate has been classified as resistant; 2 n= number
of isolates
"RYTPUNKT V¤RDE ¶VER VILKET ISOLATEN BED¶MTS SOM RESISTENTA N ANTAL UNDERS¶KTA ISOLAT
2.7.4Some comments on the resistance figures
As shown above, available data indicate that antibacterial resistance is comparatively low in most bacteria from Swedish food producing animals. For most substances this reflects the consumption figures. However, other factors than antimicrobial usage may also contribute to keeping resistance to certain substances at a high level (see chapter 4). Continuous monitoring for antimicrobial resistance is necessary for detecting trends in resistance development. It is important to remeber, though, that resistance data only shows the phenotypic expression of resistance traits. Thus, further research on the genes behind the resistance is also necessary.
2.8Summary comments
Antibacterial substances are valuable therapeutic tools in both veterinary and human medicine. Their use both as therapeuticals and as feed additives have contributed to the development of the contemporary animal industry.
44 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
In Sweden, all antimicrobial substances used in animals are classified as pharmaceutical specialities and are only available on veterinary prescription. The ban on antimicrobial feed additives in 1986 was associated with animal health problems in certain production systems. These health problems have to a large extent been overcome, and today’s total consumption of antibacterials in veterinary medicine is considerably lower (50%) than what was used before the ban. The lower consumption is reflected in a comparatively favourable resistance situation in most animal bacteria. The Swedish experience shows that changes in production systems are necessary in order to adjust to animal production without antimicrobial feed additives, but also that such adjustments are possible and might pay off in a better situation regarding antibacterial resistance among zoonotic and animal bacteria.
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 45 |
References
"EHAR - 3CRIMSHAW . 3 'UZMAN - ! AND 'ORDON * % , 1968. Nutrition and infection
field study in Guatemalan villages,
"ERDTSSON % , 1996. Campylobacter in broiler chickens- The mode of spread in chicken flocks with special reference to food hygiene. (Thesis). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
"J¶RNEROT , , 1996. Sverige förbjöd antibiotika i tillväxtstimulerande syfte 1986 - vad hände med förbrukningen? +UNGLIGA 3KOGS OCH ,ANTBRUKSAKADEMIENS 4IDSKRIFT
"J¶RNEROT , &RANKLIN ! AND 4YSEN % , 1996. Usage of antibacterial and antiparasitic drugs in animals in Sweden between 1988 and 1993. 6ETERINARY RECORD
#OLEGRAVE 4 AND 7ESLEY 4 1995. 4HE FEED ADDITIVES MARKET PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT AND
DISEASE CONTROL 32 Animal Pharm Reports. PJB Publications Ltd.
%LWINGER + %NGSTR¶M " "ERNDTSON % &OSSUM / AND 7ALDENSTEDT , , 1996. Effect of growth promoters and coccidiostats on performance and growth of #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS in the caeca of broilers. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 88 7ORLD S 0OULTRY #ONGRESS
New Delhi. p. 219.
%LWINGER + %NGSTR¶M " &OSSUM / (ASSAN 3 AND 4EGL¶F " , 1994. Effect of coccidiostats on necrotic enteritis and performance in broiler chickens. 3WEDISH *OURNAL OF !GRIULTURAL 2ESEARCH
%LWINGER + 3CHNEITZ # "ERNDTSON % &OSSUM / 4EGL¶F " AND %NGSR¶M " , 1992. Factors affecting the incidence of necrotic enteritis, caecal carriage of #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS and bird performance in broiler chickens. !CTA 6ETERINARIA 3CANDINAVICA
%LWINGER + AND 4EGL¶F " , 1991. Performance of broiler chickens as influenced by a dietary enzyme complex with and without antibiotic supplementation. !RCHIV FUR 'EFLUGELKUNDE
%NDTZ ( 0 2UIIS ' * VAN +LINGEREN " *ANSEN 7 ( VAN DER 2EYDEN 4 AND
2 0 , 1991. Quinolone resistance in campylobacter isolated from man and poultry following the introduction of fluoroquinolones in veterinary medicine. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY
&IEMS , / "OUCQUE # 6 AND #OTTYN " ' , 1995. Effect of feed antibiotics on animal
performances, meat quality and health in ruminants, and on aspects of environmental pollution. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 3CIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON GROWTH PROMOTION IN MEAT PRODUCTION REPORT AND CONCLUSIONS November 29
&RANKLIN ! , 1984. Antimicrobial drug resistance in porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli of O- group 149 and
&RANKLIN ! , 1995. Antibiotikaresistens hos salmonellastammar isolerade på SVA
46 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
&RANKLIN ! 'UNNARSSON ! AND 2EHBINDER 6 , 1994. Antibiotic resistance i Salmonella isolated from animal sources in Sweden. )N PROCEEDINGS OF !NTIMICROBIALS IN ANIMAL INTENSIVE PRODUCTION October
&RANKLIN ! AND (ORN AF 2ANTZTIEN
&RANKLIN ! AND 7IERUP
'REKO # , 1996. Inventering av resistens mot antibakteriella medel hos enterokocker från kyckling (rapport). Statens Veterinärmedicinska Anstalt, Uppsala.
'REKO # , 1997. Sensitivity to antibacterials in % COLI and enterococci isolated from piglets in Sweden (in manuscript). .
'UNNARSSON ! &RANKLIN ! (ORN AF 2ANTZIEN
Resistensundersökning av svenska isolat av Treponema hyodysenteriae. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING
'UZMAN - ! 3CRIMSHAW . 3 AND
Americam children. I. Growth responses of rural Guatemalan school children to daily administration of penicillin and aureomycin. !MERICAN *OURNAL OF #LINICAL .UTRITION 430-
438.
'¶RANSSON , ,ANGE 3 AND ,ONNROTH ) , 1995. Post weaning diarrhoea: focus on diet. 0IG .EWS AND )NFORMATION
'¶RANSSON ,
*OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY
(OLM ! , 1989. Zinkoxid tilsat foderet til forebyggelse af %
(YOLOGISK 4IDSKRIFT
(OLMGREN . , 1994a. Djurhälsomässiga behobet av fodermedelsantibiotika i smågrisproducerande besättningar. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING
(OLMGREN . , 1994b. Profylaktiska effekter av zinkoxid eller olaquindox mot avvänjningsdiarré hos svin. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING
*OHNSON * AND 2EID 7
*ONSON ' AND *ACOBSSON 3 % , 1973. Foderantibiotikas inverkan på kalvdödlighet. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING
,"3, 1977. Utredning avseende utnyttjandet av specialämnen såsom antibiotika/kemoterapeutika, vilka i tillväxtbefrämjande syfte inblandas i foder. Lantbruksstyrelsen, Jönköping.
SOU 1997:132 | 2. Background | 47 |
July
Zoopole, October
.ILSSON , , 1996. Mastiter - infektionspanorama och antibiotikaresistens (att publiceras).
.ILSSON , AND 'REKO # , 1997. Survey of the use of antimicrobial drugs in veterinary medicine with special emphasis on mastitis treatment. )N PROCEEDINGS OF .ORDIC 3EMINAR 2EGARDING THE &UTURE 5SE OF !NTIBIOTICS IN
/DENSVIK + , 1997. Sammanställning över foderläkemedel 1995 och 1996. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING
0OHL 0 6ERLINDEN
Antibiogrammes des enterobacteries pathogenes pour les animaux delevage et les pigeons, isolees en Belgique de 1986 a 1990. !NNALES DE MEDICINE VETERINAIRE
0OULSEN ( $ , 1995. Zinc oxide for weaning piglets. !CTA !GRICULTUAE 3CANDINAVICA 3ECTION !!NIMAL HEALTH 3CINECE
2OBERTSSON * … AND &RANKLIN ! , 1987. Antibiotikaresistens hos bakterier från akuta mastiter på kor. 3VENSK VETERIN¤RTIDNING
2OBERTSSON * … AND ,UNDEHEIM . , 1994. Prohibited use of antibiotics as a feed additive for growth promotion - effect on piglet health and production parameters. )N PROCEEDINGS OFTH )063 #ONGRESS June
2OBINSON 0 , 1952. Controlled trial of aureomycin in premature twins and triplets. 4HE ,ANCET I 52.
2UTQVIST , # , 1970. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING
3MITH ( 7 AND 4UCKER * & , 1978. The effect of antimicrobial feed additives on the colonization of the alimentary tract of chickens by 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM. *OURNAL OF (YGIENE 217-
231.
3MITH 7 ( AND 4UCKER * & , 1980. Further observations on the effect of feeding diets containing
avoparcin, bacitracin and sodium arsenilate on the colonization of the alimentary tract of poultry by salmonella organisms. *OURNAL OF (YGIENE
3NELLING # % , 1952. The value of aureomycin in prevention of cross infection in the hospital for sick children. #ANADIAN
3TOKESTAD % , 2 AND *UKES 4 ( , 1949. Further observations on the animal protein factor.
0ROCEEDINGS OF THE 3OCIETY OF "IOLOGICAL AND %XPERIMENTAL
3TOKESTAD % , 2 AND *UKES 4 ( , 1950. The multiple nature of the animal protein factor. *OURNAL OF "IOLOGICAL #HEMISTRY
363, 1990. Riktlinjer för antibiotikainblandning i foder till svin. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING 407- 413.
48 | 2. Background | SOU 1997:132 |
4AYLOR # % , 1967. Synergism between infections and malnutrition (editorial). !RCHIVES OF %NVIRONMENTAL (EALTH 650.
7IERUP
7IERUP
7IERUP - # , 7OLD 4ROELL - AND !GEN¤S ) , 1987. Animal consumption of antibiotic and chemotherapeutic drugs in Sweden during 1980, 1982 and 1984. 6ETERINARY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
7IERUP
foderantibiotika på antibiotikaresistens, överförbar antibiotikaresistens, morbiditet och tillväxt hos mellankalv. .ORDISK 6ETERIN¤RMEDICIN
SOU 1997:132 | 49 |
3Mode of action and effects of antibacterial feed additives
3.1Mode of action
The mode of action of antibacterial feed additives (AFA) has been the subject of numerous scientific reports. However, most of these deal with effects, rather than modes of action. The exact mechanisms regulating the growth promoting effect of AFA is not precisely known (for a review see Thomke and Elwinger, 1997c).
3.1.1Effects
Rosen (1995) has compiled responses in poultry and pigs associated with dietary supplements of AFA (table 3.I). This table illustrates the diversity of the responses to AFA.
AFA will alter the intestinal bacterial flora and reduce the number of sensitive microorganisms. Most AFA in use within the EU have effects on
Park, 1959; Eyssen and De Somer, 1967). Inoculation of
lowered growth performance significantly. Dietary inclusion of AFA, however, restored growth performance of inoculated birds (Lev and Forbes,
1959; Eyssen and De Somer, 1967). Some other
Stutz ET AL , 1983a; Stutz ET AL , 1983b). The mechanism for the proposed growth suppressing effect has not been clarified.
In animals given AFA, reduced weight of the intestine, thinning of the intestinal wall and shortening of the gut has been recorded (Jukes ET AL , 1956; Stutz ET AL , 1983b). These results suggest a lowered number of mucosal cells which, in turn, possibly also reflect the mucosal cell
50 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
Table 3.I. Some physiological, nutritional and metabolic effects ascribed to AFA (modified from Rosen, 1995)
4ABELL ) .¥GRA FYSIOLOGISKA NUTRITIONELLA OCH METABOLISKA EFFEKTER SOM TILLSKRIVITS !&4 MODIFIERAT FR¥N 2OSEN
0HYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTSa
Gut food | ➘ |
transit time | |
Gut wall | ➘ |
diameter | |
Gut wall | ➘ |
length | |
Gut wall | ➘ |
weight | |
Gut absorptive | ➚ |
capacity | |
Faecal | ➘ |
moisture | |
Mucosal cell | ➘ |
turnover | |
Stress | ➘ |
Feed intake | ➚,➘,➙ |
.UTRITIONAL EFFECTS
Energy | ➚ |
retention | |
Gut energy | ➘ |
loss | |
Nitrogen | ➚ |
retention | |
Limiting amino | ➚ |
acid supply | |
Vitamin | ➚ |
absorption | |
Vitamin | ➘ |
synthesis | |
Trace element | ➚ |
absorption | |
Fatty acid | ➚ |
absorption | |
Glucose | ➚ |
absorption | |
Calcium | ➚ |
absorption | |
Plasma | ➚ |
nutrients |
Ammonia | ➘ |
production | |
Toxic amine | ➘ |
production | |
➘ | |
production | |
Fatty acid | ➘ |
oxidation | |
Faecal fat | ➘ |
excretion | |
Liver protein | ➚ |
synthesis | |
Gut alkaline | ➚ |
phosphatase | |
Gut urease | ➘ |
a➘ denotes a reduction; ➚ denotes an increase; ➙denotes no change
It seems likely that the change of the intestinal flora and the subsequent changes in the intestine, including a slower intestinal passage rate, associated with AFA usage are linked to the many reported effects on nutrient breakdown, nutrient losses and nutrient absorption. Examples are the lowered breakdown of easily fermentable nutrients and the restriction in breakdown of essential amino acids, leading to a general nutrient saving effect.
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 51 |
3.1.2Suggested main mode of action
As AFA are antibacterial substances, it is likely that their growth promoting effect is associated with their inhibitory effect on intestinal microbes. As discussed above, at dosages permitted for growth promotion, AFA will alter the intestinal microbial flora. Increased understanding of the complex relationships between the immune system and other functions of the body offer possibilities to better understand the mode of action of AFA.
Infections and growth rate
It is well established that growth rate and feed efficiency are reduced as a sequel to infection. This is why for example specific pathogen free (SPF) animals grow faster than animals in a conventional environment. Similarly animals reared in carefully cleaned and disinfected units grow faster than animals reared under a lower level of sanitary conditions. It has been shown that absence of disease increases the capacity of pigs to grow (Young ET AL , 1959; Caldwell ET AL , 1961). In Danish SPF systems, feed conversion is 3.9% lower and growth rate 6.4% higher than for conventionally reared pigs (Jorgensen, 1987). Similar observations have been reported in Swedish studies by Wallgren (1993a) (Figure 3.I). Chickens housed in clean, disinfected quarters also grow faster and more efficiently than chickens housed in less sanitary conditions, even in the absence of any clinical signs of infectious diseases (Roura ET AL , 1992).
Immune responses and growth rate
An infectious challenge is a common form of stress encountered by growing animals. Infectious challenges may, or may not, result in clinical diseases, depending on the pathogenicity of the challenging microorganism and the immunocompetence of the animal. A stress response is indicated by decreased growth rates and quantitative changes in nutritional requirements (cit. from Klasing ET AL , 1987). In humans, reduced food intake is considered to play a major role in
52 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
with a low or high level of chronic immune system activation revealed lower feed intake, reduced body weight gain, lower daily protein accretion and more feed required per kg weight gain in pigs with a high level of chronic immune system activation (see table 3.IIa.)(Stahly, 1996).
Table 3.IIa. Responses of pigs with a low or high level of antigen exposure to dietary antibacterial agents (carbadox). Adopted from Stahly (1996)
4ABELL ))A %FFEKT AV DEN ANTIBAKTERIELLA FODERTILLSATSEN CARBADOX P¥ TILLV¤XT OCH FODERUTNYTTJANDE HOS GRISAR MED H¶G ELLER L¥G GRAD AV ANTIGEN EXPONERING !NPASSAD FR¥N 3TAHLY
'ROWTH AND FEED UTILISATION !NTIGEN | #ARBADOX | #HANGE | ||
EXPOSURE | A | B | ||
Daily gain, g | Low | 845 | 858 | +1.5 |
High | 686 | 735 | +7.1 | |
Kg feed/ kg gain | Low | 2.75 | 2.67 | |
High | 3.12 | 2.90 |
a
bPigs fed 55 ppm carbadox from 5 to 34 kg body weight and then placed on the control
diet without carbadox from 34 to 115 kg body weight. a /MEDICINERAD KONTROLLGRUPP
b 'RISAR SOM F¥TT PPM CARBADOX FR¥N TILL KG KROPPSVIKT OCH D¤REFTER FODER UTAN CARBADOX FR¥N TILL KG KROPPSVIKT
Table 3.IIb. Responses of chickens with a low or high level of antigen exposure to dietary antibacterial agents (streptomycin and penicillin) Adopted from Rour (1992)
4ABELL ))B %FFEKT AV DE ANTIBAKTERIELLA SUBSTANSERNA PENICILLIN OCH STREPTOMYCIN P¥ TILLV¤XT OCH FODERUTNYTTJANDE HOS SLAKTKYCKLING MED H¶G ELLER L¥G GRAD AV ANTIGENEXPONERING !NPASSAD FR¥N 2OUR
4REATMENT | 7EIGHT GAIN G DAY | &EED EFFICIENCY | ||
G GAIN G FEED | ||||
Clean | 12.65a | 0.66a | ||
Unsanitary | 12.10b | 0.54b | ||
Clean+Antibacterial | 12.72a | 0.67a | ||
Unsanitary+Antibacterial | 12.57a | 0.63a |
significantly (p<0.05).
3EXTIOFYRA KYCKLINGAR VISTADES DAGAR I OLIKA MILJ¶ER L¥G ELLER H¶G ANTIGENEXPONERING OCH GAVS FODER ANTINGEN UTAN ANTIBIOTIKA ELLER INNEH¥LLANDE STREPTOMYCIN PPM OCH PENICILLIN PPM
The relationship between cytokines, immunologic stress and growth is complex. Responses in the brain and immune system are expressed as effector
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 53 |
signals in the form of regulatory hormones from the hypothalamus and pituitary and as cytokines from the immune system. Several hormones including corticotrophin releasing hormone, prostaglandins, glucagon, insulin and corticosteroids are induced by cytokines (for ref. see Grunfeld ET AL , 1996). In this respect the release of corticotrophin releasing hormone and corticosteroids is of special interest since corticosteroids have a catabolic effect, thereby reducing muscle tissue. An activated immune system releases cytokines, that mediate the host response to infection and/or inflammation. Cytokines may also have direct effects on the brain, resulting in, for example, a decreased appetite.
In summary, cytokines released as a consequence of a stimulated immune system mediate profound host responses including decreased appetite and a general catabolic effect. Many extrinsic stimuli such as bacterial toxins, yeast cell walls, silica particles, bacterial
Immune responses and AFA
Two recently published studies report on the effects of AFA on the immune system in relation to performance in clinically healthy animals. In one, avoparcin (having a
In the study on avoparcin, Krinke and Jamroz (1996) compared some immunological parameters in
The effects of carbadox in a model using pigs with low or high level of chronic immune system activation was studied by Stahly (1996 see table 3.IIa). The magnitude of the performance enhancement induced by carbadox was greater in the pigs with high level of chronic immune system activation than in pigs with low level of immune system. Similar results were obtained for pigs fed tylosin at 110 ppm (Stahly ET AL , 1995). In chickens fed therapeutic levels of antibiotics (Table 3.IIb Roura ET AL , 1992), the effects of antibiotics on immune stressed animals was further confirmed.
54 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
120 | ||||||
(kg) | 100 | |||||
80 | ||||||
weight | ||||||
60 | ||||||
Body | 40 | |||||
20 | ||||||
Age (days) | ||||||
0 | ||||||
0 | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 250 |
Figure 3.I. Growth rate of pigs in farrow to finish herds with different pathogen loads. ❍ denotes specific pathogen free pigs representing the lowest pathogen load, ● denotes conventional pigs reared from farrow to finish but applying an age segregated system representing an intermediate pathogen load; ■ denotes conventional pigs reared from farrow to finish employing a continuos rearing system representing the highest pathogen load (Wallgren, 1993b).
&IGUR ) 4ILLV¤XT HOS GRISAR UPPF¶DDA I INTEGRERADE BES¤TTNINGAR MED OLIKA SMITT¤MNESTRYCK ❍ VISAR 30& GRISAR 3PECIFIC 0ATHOGEN &REE REPRESENTERANDE DET L¤GSTA SMITTRYCKET ● VISAR KONVENTIONELLA GRISAR INOM EN BES¤TTNING SOM TILL¤MPAR ¥LDERSSEKTIONERING REPRESENTERANDE ETT INTERMEDI¤RT SMITTRYCK ■ VISAR KONVENTIONELLA GRISAR SOM TILL¤MPAR ETT KONTINUERLIGT UPPF¶DNINGSSYSTEM REPRESENTERANDE DET H¶GSTA SMITTRYCKET 7ALLGREN B
AFA improve growth rate and feed efficiency.
The effects of AFA are inversely related to animal health status. The poorer the health status the better the effect.
Challenge of the immune system will reduce growth rate and feed efficiency. This response is mediated by cytokines. Cytokines have direct effects on the brain, inducing a decrease in appetite, and stimulate the release of catabolic hormones, reducing the mass of muscle tissue.
AFA, through their antimicrobial effects, will alleviate immune system challenges from the intestinal tract on the immune system. This appears to be the major effect of AFA.
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 55 |
3.2Prophylactic and therapeutic effects of AFA
3.2.1Introduction
Most substances used as AFA are also used, or have been used, for therapeutic purposes. For some AFA the maximum dosage permitted for growth promotion is the same or nearly the same as what is recommended for prophylaxis and treatment of disease (table 3.III.). It has been pointed out that one expected consequence of abstaining from use of AFA is increased animal health problems due to infectious diseases (McOrist, 1997; Viaene, 1997) Indeed, the Swedish experience from banning AFA in 1986 was the emergence of clinical problems and disturbances of the health status of piglets and broilers which initially created a demand for antibiotic medicated feed at therapeutic dosages. The response to withdrawal of AFA in 1986 on piglet health and performance in 220 Swedish piglet producing herds was statistically evaluated by Robertson and Lundeheim (1994 see chapter 2). Removal of AFA was followed by a doubling of incidence of diarrhoea and number of medical treatments of
This poses questions as to what degree AFA, at their permitted dosages for growth promotion, also have therapeutic and/or prophylactic effects against certain economically important intestinal diseases in pigs and poultry.
56 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
Table 3.III. Recommended dosages of AFA for treatment, prophylaxis and growth promotion in swine and poultry. ( Från Allen ET AL , 1992; Prescott and Baggot, 1993; FASS VET., 1997 and 70/524/EEC). Dosages have been converted to mg/kg and rounded off
4ABELL ))) 2EKOMMENDERADE DOSER AV !&4 F¶R BEHANDLING PROFYLAX OCH SOM TILLV¤XTBEFR¤MJARE HOS SVIN OCH FJ¤DERF¤ &R¥N !LLEN ET AL 0RESCOTT AND "AGGOT &!33 6%4 OCH %%# $OSERINGAR HAR R¤KNATS OM TILL MG KG OCH AVRUNDATS
3UBSTANCE | )NDICATION | !NIMAL | $OSAGE FOR | 0ERMITTED |
SPECIES | TREATMENT | DOSAGE AS !&! | ||
AND | MG KG FEED | |||
PROPHYLAXIS | ||||
MG KG FEED | ||||
!VILAMYCIN | GROWTH PROMOTION | POULTRY | ||
SWINE | ||||
"ACITRACIN | bacterial enteritis | poultry | ||
swine | 280 | |||
GROWTH PROMOTION | POULTRY | |||
SWINE | ||||
#ARBADOX | SD1, PPE2, bacterial | swine | ||
enteritis | ||||
GROWTH PROMOTION | SWINE | |||
&LAVOMYCIN | GROWTH PROMOTION | POULTRY | ||
SWINE | ||||
/LAQUINDOX | SD, bacterial enteritis | swine | ||
GROWTH PROMOTION | SWINE | |||
3PIRAMYCIN | mycoplasmosis | poultry | 400 | |
GROWTH PROMOTION | POULTRY | |||
SWINE | ||||
4YLOSIN | mycoplasmosis | poultry | ||
erysipelas, myco- | swine | |||
plasmosis, SD, PPE | ||||
GROWTH PROMOTION | SWINE | |||
6IRGINIAMYCIN | necrotic enteritis, | poultry | ||
respiratory infections, | ||||
SD, other bacterial | swine | |||
enteritis | ||||
GROWTH PROMOTION | POULTRY | |||
SWINE |
1SD= swine dysentery
2PPE= porcine proliferative enteropathy
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 57 |
Below, some studies on therapeutic and/or prophylactic effects of AFA on certain diseases have been reviewed. Studies on this subject where several antimicrobial treatments are administered simultaneously to the same animals have not been included, as they are impossible to evaluate.
3.2.2Necrotic enteritis in poultry
Necrotic enteritis (NE) is an intestinal disease affecting poultry. It is associated with #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS
Wicker and
In a larger study, Jansson and
Stutz and
virginiamycin, all at the level of 55 ppm in feed, reduced the amount of # PERFRINGENS in the intestines of chickens compared to
(p<0.05). The numbers of clostridia were inversely correlated with performance data. A similar reduction in numbers of clostridia and correlation with performance data was observed by Elwinger and
From the above, it is clear that some AFA are effective against clostridia, both IN VITRO and IN VIVO at the levels used for growth promotion, resulting in
effective disease prevention. Prevention of subclinical NE is associated with performance enhancement.
3.2.3Swine dysentery
Swine dysentery (SD) is a contagious diarrhoeic disease in swine, caused by the spirochete 3ERPULINA HYODYSENTERIAE. Other forms of spirochetal diarrhoea in pigs are associated with other 3ERPULINA spp.
Various studies have shown effects on SD by quinoxalines at growth promoting levels. Hunneman (1980) reported a notable decrease in outbreaks of SD in a region when carbadox was introduced as a feed additive for swine. These observations are supported by the results obtained in two clinical trials
58 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
(Anonymous, 1980). Molnar and Magyar (1987) reported an attempt to eradicate SD from swine herds by the aid of carbadox. Complete eradication of clinically apparent SD failed but the course and the severity of the disease was altered. The author also noted that the performance of the trial herds had improved markedly. Successful eradication of SD using carbadox in feed has been reported by other authors (Olson, 1986; Wood, 1987).
A swine dysentery model for evaluation of drug prophylaxis has been developed by Raynaud and
There seems to be a good correlation between MIC values of 3 HYODYSENTERIAE for tylosin and therapeutic effect of this substance. Williams
and Shively (1978) found that tylosin at
only partly effective against the disease induced by isolates with higher MIC values for tylosin. Jacks and
Miller and
virginiamycin and tylosin on pigs experimentally infected with 3 HYODYSENTERIAE. They found a good prophylactic effect of virginiamycin at
about 25 ppm but only a moderate effect of tylosin even at about 100 ppm. The antimicrobial resistance pattern of the infecting strain was not presented, but presumably it was resistant to tylosin. Williams and Shively (Williams and Shively, 1978) fed virginiamycin at 50 to 100 ppm to experimentally infected pigs. Virginiamycin could not control the disease, although clinical signs were a little less common in medicated pigs than in
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 59 |
3.2.4Porcine proliferative enteritis (PPE)
Porcine proliferative enteritis (proliferative adenomatosis) is an intestinal
disease of pigs characterised by thickening of the intestinal mucosa.
,AWSONIA INTRACELLULARIS (formerly )LEAL SYMBIONT INTRACELLULARIS) is the causative agent. For a long time, the cause of the disease was elusive and various causative agents have earlier been pointed out. Therefore, most of the research bearing to prophylaxis or therapy is recent.
McOrist and
Kyriakis and
3.2.5Other bacterial enteritis in swine
Among bacterial enteric diseases in swine, weaning diarrhoea is one of the most important, both clinically and economically. %SCHERICHIA COLI has been
implicated in the pathogenesis. Bertschinger (Bertschinger, 1976) found that olaquindox at low growth promoting dosages was effective for both prevention and treatment of experimentally induced %
Holmgren (1994) found that prophylactic treatment with 122 ppm or 173 ppm olaquindox in commercial swine herds reduced (p<0.01) the incidence of
60 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
Troutt and
dosage reduced clinical signs and intestinal lesions in pigs experimentally infected with 3ALMONELLA Cholerasuis
Most AFA are, or have been, used for therapeutic purposes and for some AFA the maximum dosage permitted for growth promotion is the same or nearly the same as recommended for prophylaxis and treatment of disease.
Most AFA have prophylactic and/or therapeutic effects on enteric diseases, at permitted dosages.
3.3Growth and feed efficiency responses to AFA in pigs and poultry
AFA were introduced in the early 1950s and have played a major role in the development of intensive and industrialised livestock production.
There is a great variation in responses of animals to AFA (CEC, 1993 , see table 3.IV). When judging these promoting or enhancing effects one has to consider the age and type of animals, the duration of AFA administration and the performance level of the control group. The major part of the research in this area with different animal species has been performed by the manufacturing and feed industries, whereas a relatively limited part has been performed by independent research bodies (Brenninkmeiyer, 1996).
3.3.1Growth and feed efficiency responses to AFA in pigs
The response of younger animals, piglets as well as broiler chickens and calves, to AFA is superior compared to responses in older animals. In piglets the growth responses to AFA varies between 9 and 30% and the feed efficiency responses between 6 and 12%, whereas for
There has been a tendency to increase the level of AFA with time (Rosen, 1995). Some studies indicate a decreasing effect of AFA on daily weight gain and feed efficiency over time (Gruber, 1986). However, Schneider (1992) was unable to find differences in growth rate and feed efficiency for tylosin in
A general opinion is that growth and feed efficiency responses of pigs and broiler chickens to AFA is lower under improved environmental conditions than in poorer environments. Rosen (1995) estimated the ratio in response between a very good and a poor environment to 1:2.
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 61 |
Table 3.IV. Percentage responses in growth performance and feed efficiency as a result of AFA usage in livestock production, compared with unsupplemented control diets, as reported by different authors (sources cit. by De Craene and Viaene, 1992; CEC, 1993)
4ABELL )6 3AMMANST¤LLNING AV PROCENTUELL EFFEKT AV !&4 P¥ TILLV¤XT OCH FODERUTNYTTJANDE HOS OLIKA HUSDJUR J¤MF¶RT MED OBEHANDLAD KONTROLL ENLIGT VAD SOM RAPPORTERATS AV OLIKA F¶RFATTARE K¤LLOR CIT AV $E #RAENE AND 6IAENE
#%#
!NIMAL SPECIES | 'ROWTH DAILY WEIGHT GAIN | &EED EFFICIENCY |
3OURCE | ||
0IGLETS | ||
CEC (1993) | 16 | 9 |
'ROWING PIGS KG | ||
CEC (1993) | 9 | 5.5 |
&INISHING PIGS KG SLAUGHTER | ||
CEC (1993) | 0 | 0 |
'ROWING FINISHING PIGS | ||
Bickel (1983) | ||
Hudd (1983) | ||
Mordenti et al. (1979) | 6.5 | 4.1 |
Weiss (1989) | ||
Robinson (1969) | ||
CEC (1993) | 3.5 | 3 |
"ROILER CHICKENS | ||
Birzer and Gropp (1991) | 4 | 4 |
Hudd (1983) | ||
Mordenti et al. (1979) | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Robinson (1969) | 5 | |
CEC (1993) | 4 | 4 |
,AYING HENS | ||
CEC (1993) | 2 | 1 |
6EAL CALVES | ||
Birzer and Gropp (1991) | 10 | 5 |
CEC (1993) | 7 | 4 |
Some discrepancy exists between different reports on the effect of AFA on sow performance. Speer (1974) concluded that the farrowing rate was improved by the use of AFA. However, others state AFA had no effects on oestrus, mating behaviour or breeding efficiency (Myers and Speer, 1973). Soma and Speer (1975) reported improved litter weights at birth and at
62 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
weaning This could not be corroborated by Frölich and
Based on the available literature data, Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) estimated the average response in growth rate to 17% and in feed efficiency to 9%, when piglet diets were supplemented with AFA. Corresponding responses for
Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) also tried to predict the responses on performance in the Swedish pig industry to a
3.3.2Growth and feed efficiency responses to AFA in poultry
In broiler production the administration of AFA can yield an effect in comparison with the unsupplemented control of between
Swedish and Danish experiments, performed during the period
In a comprehensive review, Rosen (1996), arrived at responses in growth rate and feed efficiency of 2 and 3%, respectively. It was also observed that AFA were more effective with respect to live weight gains when used in diseased than in apparently healthy birds. When including anticoccidials, the
Based on available literature data, Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) estimated the overall responses of broiler chickens to AFA as regards growth rate and feed efficiency and found it to be on average 3.9 and 2.9%, respectively.
A
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 63 |
In pigs the responses to AFA in terms of growth performance and feed efficiency are higher in piglets than in growing pigs and for finishing pigs the effects seem to be minute.
A
3.4Alternatives to AFA
Livestock performance and feed efficiency are closely interrelated with the qualitative and quantitative microbial load of the host animal, including the alimentary tract and the animal environment. Appropriate nutrient supply and choice of ingredients and their proper preparation with respect to the animal’s digestive capacity will minimise nutrient losses, overloading, disturbances and intestinal overcrowding by harmful microbial flora. Hence, improvements in feed composition and feeding strategies is an alternative to usage of AFA.
Despite a vast body of information, details on the mode of action of both enzymes and probiotics are still lacking. Obviously, more research is needed to develop more efficient enzymes and to find out efficient combinations of enzyme preparations suitable for individual and compounded feedstuffs
3.4.1Enzymes
Supplementing feed with enzymatic preparations may improve the digestive capacity, particularly in young animals. Thereby, nutrient utilisation in the anterior part of the gastrointestinal tract may be improved, possibly limiting the incidence of intestinal perturbation.
Some experiments demonstrate that the beneficial effects achieved by AFA can at least partly be obtained by the inclusion of dietary enzymes affecting
the physical properties of the ingested
1996).
Thomke and Elwinger (1997a) assessed the effects of various enzyme preparations on the nutrient digestibility and performance in pigs, based on available literature data, and arrived at a value for the average feed efficiency response of approximately 4% in piglets and about 2% in
64 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
pigs. For broiler chickens the average improvement of feed efficiency was about 4% (Thomke and Elwinger, 1997a) which is similar to the figure arrived at in the extensive compilation undertaken by Kronseder (1993).
In terms of improved digestibility and feed efficiency a fair estimate of the improvement by enzyme supplementation for young pigs and poultry according to the literature reviewed above would be approximately
3.4.2Probiotics
Fuller (1992) recently redefined ”probiotic” as a live microbial feed supplement that beneficially affects the host animal by improving its intestinal microbial balance.
The probiotic concept is generally based on a viable
The efficacy of administrating probiotics seems to be dependent on a number of conditions, e.g. the physiological or health status of the animal, environmental factors such as feed regimen and microbial load. Beneficial effects are more often observed in neonatal animals and in weaners than in older animals.
In evaluating the great number of reports on the efficacy of probiotic organisms and substances in poultry, Barrow (1992) points out a number of factors hampering a critical appraisal. The vast majority of results on the efficacy of probiotics in poultry is reported as abstracts with essential information lacking, e.g. on the identity of strains used and on experimental design. The implantation in the gastrointestinal tract of the strains used is rarely assessed. The microbiological results in
According to the review by Mead (1995), there are a number of
commercial preparations available that have been successfully used in the prophylaxis of #LOSTRIDIUM and 3ALMONELLA infections in poultry. Recently,
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 65 |
against salmonellosis. The prophylactic treatment of salmonellosis is based on the principle of early establishment of an adult intestinal microflora in the young bird by supplying a suspension of anaerobic cultures of intestinal material, thereby competitively excluding pathogenic organisms. However, criteria on which to select
Swedish experimental results when using the probiotic Broilact® have been
promising, with a significantly lowered mortality and lowered caecal counts of # PERFRINGENS (Elwinger ET AL , 1992).
Supplementing feed with enzymatic preparations may improve the digestive capacity, particularly in young animals.
Enzyme additives affect the physical properties of ingested polysaccharides.
Some probiotics have been demonstrated to improve piglet performance and health. The efficacy of probiotics is difficult to evaluate in many instances, since experimental details are poorly presented.
More research is needed both on enzymes and probiotics and their mode of action.
3.5Addendum: A benefit cost analysis of reintroduction of AFA in Sweden.
3.5.1Executive Summary
If antibacterial feed additives (AFA) were to be used in the Swedish production of pork, egg and broilers (poultry meat) the expected direct savings in the production costs would be between
The economic impact of AFA on the Community level should be scrutinised, having regard to all relevant factors and externalities including
(a) the results of the GATT and CAP reform, (b) the costs of increased antibiotic resistance, (c) the dynamic effects for the industry within the Community, and (d) the smaller distortions of the world market due to subsidised exports from the EU. Previous studies have not accounted for the increased opening of the EU internal market to the world market due to the
66 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
GATT/WTO agreement and the increased fickleness of the consumers with regard to the perceived safety of the food of animal origin. The gains from lower export restitutions and increased import levies could be used to compensate farmers if AFA were not to be used as feed additives.
In the final analysis one should, moreover, also consider the danger of losing the consumer confidence in the safety of meat and eggs for which the continued use of AFA could be a risk factor.
3.5.2Introductory comments
This benefit cost analysis will examine the monetary impact for Swedish farmers, if AFA were to be used in the pork and poultry sector.
The estimates presented were derived from the budget sheets from the Swedish University of Agricultural Science’s extension service (SLU- Kontakt, 1996) and the budget sheets were adopted to capture the variation of estimates concerning the effects of AFA under Swedish conditions. The results were presented as estimated savings in production costs in SEK per kg produced meat or eggs, and also as the estimated monetary gain for the whole segment of the industry.
Since Sweden is a member of the EU, the market prices could be assumed to be constant with regard to the putative use of AFA. In consequence, decreased production costs would benefit the Swedish agricultural industry as such. The distribution of benefits between the primary producers, and the industry was not possible to estimate, and was not within the purview of this report.
Another uncertainty was the consumer response if AFA were to be used in pig and poultry production. The assumption both in the CEC report (1993) and the De Crane and Viane report (1992), that the consumer will only respond to price changes, seems to be contradicted by the BSE experience within the EU and also by the scrapie experience in Norway. In both cases considerable drops in the consumption of meat occurred. There is a risk of damaging the Swedish consumer confidence if AFA were to be used in Swedish animal production. This should not be ignored.
This report presents the models based on the budget sheets for the pig industry, for the egg production and finally for the poultry meat production. Moreover, the De Crane and Viane (1992) report is elaborated on to show an alternative analysis of the impact of AFA on the Community level with the egg market as an example. This is because the GATT agreement resulted in a downward slope of prices within the EU and this exogenous downward pressure on prices was ignored by the same report.
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 67 |
3.5.3Gains if AFA were to be used in Sweden
Jonasson and Andersson (1996) indicated that the costs for AFA were approximately 0.02 SEK per kg feed for the pig sector, and the same estimate was also used in the poultry sector. The same authors noted that by using AFA, one should be able to use cheaper feed ingredients, thus lowering the net costs of AFA. However, they provided no estimate of this cost reduction.
Simulation of outcomes
All budget sheets were simulated 1000 times using @ Risk (Palisade Corp.) to capture the uncertainties with regard to the effect on growth and feed conversions if AFA were to be used in Swedish pig and poultry production.
Results
The results of the study appear in table 3.V, while the more detailed results for each kind of production appear in tables 3.VI - 3.IX. The detailed budget sheets used for the estimation of the putative benefits appear in Annex F, tables
The savings on the supply side is around 1% of the production costs. However, this benefit must in the final analysis be weighed against the possibility of disturbances on the demand side due to adverse consumer reactions and externalities such as the costs of the increased antibiotic resistance both for animals and humans. Based on the experience from the last 10 years of not using AFA, the Swedish pig and poultry meat market could be foreseen to experience disturbances on the demand side if AFA were to be used.
Table 3.V. Possible gains at the supply side if AFA were to be used in the Swedish pork and poultry industry
4ABELL 6
2EDUCED | #OST OF !&! | "ENEFIT | )NDUSTRY NET | |
PRODUCTION COSTS | MILLION 3%+ | COST RATIO | GAIN | |
MILLION 3%+ | MILLION 3%+ | |||
Piglet | 47 | 4 | 11 | 43 |
Slaughter pig | 47 | 16 | 3 | 31 |
Egg | 11 | 5 | 2.3 | 6 |
Broiler | 9 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
If consumers’ confidence in the safety of e.g. pig and poultry meat diminishes, then the consequences tend to result in decreased demand. Recent experiences suggest that a drop in demand of
68 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
foreseen. Given a price elasticity of
3.5.4The pig industry
Piglet production assumptions
The following assumptions concerning the effects of AFA in piglets were made: the number of sows in Sweden amounts to 237 355 in 1995 according to the official yearbook of agricultural statistics (SCB, 1997). However, not all piglets from these sows should be foreseen to receive AFA. Exemptions include e.g. elite breeding herds and organic farming. It was assumed that the offsprings of around 230 000 sows were candidates to receive AFA.
Earlier estimates of an increase in piglet mortality of 1.5% after the prohibition of AFA in 1986 (Robertsson and Lundeheim, 1994) had to be adjusted to the present Swedish situation (see chapter 2). It was assumed that AFA would lead to a decrease in piglet mortality by 0.6%, based on the calculations by Wierup (1996).
To incorporate all relevant information on feed efficacy and piglet growth weighted approaches were used in which 0% was set as the minimum.
Feed efficacy was assumed to improve on average by 4.6%. The estimated effect on feed efficiency (FEFAC according to CEC, 1993) for Danish piglets was 2%, while the average effect on feed efficiency within the EU was 7.3% according CEC. Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an effect of feed efficiency of 4.5% if AFA were to be used under current Swedish conditions, and the upper estimate given in the same report was 9%. The average of these estimates was used.
Piglet growth was assumed to improve on average by 6.8%. The estimated growth (FEFAC according to CEC, 1993) for Danish piglets was 2% and the average effect within the EU was 8.5%. Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an effect on growth of around 4.5% if AFA were to be used under the current Swedish conditions, and the upper estimate given in the same report was 16%. The average of these estimates was used.
Veterinary and therapeutic costs was assumed to be reduced by 2 SEK per piglet, if AFA was introduced (Jonasson and Andersson, 1996).
Table 3.VI: The results of 1000 simulations if AFA were to be used in Swedish piglet production, mean value, with the
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 69 |
4ABELL 6) 2ESULTATET AV SIMULERINGAR AV EFFEKTEN OM !&4 ¥TER B¶RJADE ANV¤NDAS I SVENSK SVINPRODUKTION MEDELV¤RDE MED E E PERCENTILEN INOM PARENTES
3AVED | #OST OF !&! | .ET BENEFIT | |
PRODUCTION COSTS | |||
SEK per piglet | 10.19 | 0.93 | 9.23 |
produced | |||
SEK per sow | 205.01 | 18.75 | 186.26 |
Savings in | 1.18 | 0.108 | 1.07 |
production costs (%) | |||
Industry benefits | 47.2 | 4.3 | 42.8 |
(million SEK) |
The expected benefit cost ratio was 11 (mean value of simulations) while the minimum benefit/cost ratio was 5.6, the maximum was 15.9 and the 5th to 95th percentile range was
Slaughter pig assumptions
It was assumed that around 3.5 million slaughter pigs would receive AFA. According to the official year book of agricultural statistics (SCB, 1997) the number of pigs slaughtered in Sweden was 3.7 million in 1995. However, not all herds would use AFA in their pig production. Moreover, it was assumed that if AFA were to be used in piglet production (production of pigs of 25 kg live weight), this would not interfere with the market for piglets and the piglet price which the pig farmers faced. No effect was foreseen on mortality by using AFA in the slaughter pig production stage.
To incorporate all relevant information on feed efficiency and growth, weighted approaches were used in which 0% was set as the minimum.
Feed efficacy was assumed to improve by, on average, 1.9%. The estimated effect for Danish slaughter pigs was 1.5% and the average effect within the EU was 2.1% according to CEC (1993). Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an effect of feed efficiency of 1.75%, and an upper estimate of 3.1%. The average of these estimates was used.
Table 3.VII. The results of 1000 simulations of the effect of AFA in the slaughter pig production, the values are represented as mean values
70 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
4ABELL 6)) 2ESULTATET AV SIMULERINGAR AV EFFEKTEN OM !&4 ¥TER B¶RJADE ANV¤NDAS I SVENSK SLAKTSVINPRODUKTION MEDELV¤RDE E E PERCENTILEN
3AVED PRODUCTION | #OSTS OF | .ET BENEFIT | |
COSTS | ANTIBIOTICS | ||
SEK per slaughter | 13.5 | 4.5 | 9.0 |
pig | |||
SEK per kg pig meat | 0.173 | 0.058 | 0.115 |
Savings in | 0.99 | 0.33 | 0.65 |
production costs (%) | |||
Industry benefits | 47.2 | 15.8 | 31.4 |
(million SEK) |
Growth was assumed to improve by on average 1.6%. The estimate on growth for Danish slaughter pigs was 1.5% and the average effect within EU was 2.4% (CEC, 1993). Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an effect on growth of 1.75%, with an upper estimate of the effect of 3.6%. The average of these estimates was used.
The expected benefit/cost ratio was 3 (mean value of simulations) while the minimum benefit/cost ratio was 0.58 with a maximum of 5.6 and a 5th to 95th percentile range of
A brief comment on the results
Gains of such magnitude, around 74 million SEK, for piglet and slaughter pig production could be questioned based on the variations in piglet prices in Sweden and Denmark. If the only difference were the usage of AFA, then the Swedish piglet could be foreseen to be 10 SEK more expensive than its Danish counterpart. However, the market prices have varied significantly and according to the agricultural paper Land, April 11, 1997, the Swedish piglets were 37 SEK more expensive than their Danish counterparts, while last November according to Land, November 29, 1996, the Swedish piglets were 53 SEK less expensive than their Danish counterparts.
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 71 |
3.5.5Egg production
Assumptions
No effect on the mortality of laying hens due to the use of AFA was foreseen, and the improvements in feed efficiency and laying performance were assumed to be in addition to the use of digestive enzymes and coccidiostats in the feed.
To incorporate all relevant information on feed efficiency and laying performance weighted approaches were used in which 0% was set as the minimum.
Feed efficacy was assumed to improve by on average 1.1%. The estimate by the food industry for Danish layers was 2.2% and the average effect within EU was 1.2% (CEC, 1993). Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an effect on feed efficiency of 1% using
Laying performance was assumed to improve by on average 1.4%. The estimate by the food industry for Danish laying hens was 3% and the average effect within EU was 1.3% (CEC, 1993). Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an effect on laying performance of 1%, using
Table 3.VIII: The results of 1000 simulations of the effect of AFA in the consumer egg production, the values are represented as mean values (5th- 95th percentile)
4ABELL 6))) 2ESULTATET AV SIMULERINGAR AV EFFEKTEN OM !&4 ¥TER B¶RJADE ANV¤NDAS I SVENSK ¤GGPRODUKTION MEDELV¤RDE E E PERCENTILEN
3AVING OF | #OSTS OF ANTIBIOTICS | .ET BENEFIT | |
PRODUCTION COSTS | |||
SEK/kg egg | 0.104 | 0.0455 | 0.0587 |
SEK/100 hens | 165 | 72 | 93 |
Savings of production | 1.20 | 0.52 | 0.68 |
costs (%) | |||
Industry benefits | 10.9 | 4.75 | 6.1 |
(million SEK) |
72 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
Results
The expected benefit/cost ratio was 2.3 (mean value of simulations) while the minimum benefit/cost ratio was 0.37. The maximum was 4.4 and the 5th to 95th percentile range was
3.5.6Production of poultry meat (broilers)
Assumptions
No effect of AFA on the mortality of broilers was foreseen. The effect of AFA on feed efficacy was assumed to be in addition to the use of digestive enzymes and coccidiostats.
To incorporate all relevant information on feed efficiency and growth promotion, weighted approaches were used in which 0% were set as the minimum.
Feed efficacy was assumed to improve by on average 1.4%. The estimate by the food industry for Danish layers was 1.85% and the average effect within the EU was 2.0% CEC (1993). Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an improved feed efficiency of between
Growth performance was assumed to improve by on average 2.1%. The estimate by the food industry for Danish broilers was 2.5% and the average effect within EU was 2.5% (CEC, 1993). Thomke and Elwinger (1997b) indicated an effect on growth performance of 2%, using
Results
The expected benefit/cost ratio was 3.2 (mean value of simulations) while the minimum benefit/cost ratio was negative and the maximum was 9.4, and the 5th to 95th percentile range was
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 73 |
such as the costs of increased resistance to antibiotics were not assessed in this analysis.
Table 3.IX. The results of 1000 simulations of the effect of AFA in the poultry meat production, the values are represented as mean values
4ABELL )8 2ESULTATET AV SIMULERINGAR AV EFFEKTEN OM !&4 ¥TER B¶RJADE ANV¤NDAS I SVENSK SLAKKYCKLINGPRODUKTION MEDELV¤RDE E E PERCENTILEN
3AVINGS OF | #OSTS OF ANTIBIOTICS | .ET BENEFIT | |
PRODUCTION COSTS | |||
SEK/ kg meat | 0.107 | 0.034 | 0.73 |
SEK/ batch of | 98000 | 31000 | 66700 |
80000 chicken | |||
Savings of | 1.5 | 0.47 | 1.0 |
production costs (%) | |||
Industry benefits | 8.5 | 2.7 | 5.8 |
(million SEK) |
3.5.7A brief comment on an earlier report
In the following, a brief comment on the report by De Crane and Viaene (1992) dealing with the economic effects of performance enhancers in food animal production will be given.
Two issues are elaborated here i. the impact on the market of the withdrawal of performance enhancers and ii. the impact of the
An alternative point of view is presented, in which the adaptation will fully be on the supply side, since prices are presumed to be constant and unchanged regardless of whether AFA are permitted or not within the EU. This assumption is based on the GATT agreement for agriculture and the CAP reform, where the previous variable import levies and export restitutions are fixed and thereafter shall be reduced annually. Moreover, the market shall be opened for a small, but increasing share of imported animal products including meat and eggs. Hence, there will be a downward pressure on the prices during the next years. The De Crane and Viaene report (1992) mentions these effects in an appendix, but does not account for them in the substantive analysis.
74 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
The removal of AFA will result in an upward shift in the supply curve, initially it is here assumed as a parallel shift of the curve. This means that for the same price a smaller quantity will be supplied, or that a higher price is required for the same quantity to be supplied. In the long run, dynamic effects will dominate, and possibly change the slope of the supply curve.
Notice that the producer surplus change is estimated as the increase in production cost times the decrease of the amount supplied, in the case of AFA being prohibited.
The impact on the market of the withdrawal of AFA
The report has examined the impact for each country and we will elaborate this for the egg market within the EU. The price elasticity of demand is assumed to be
&OR EGGS the impact would be an increase in production costs of 1.2%, which would result in an increase of market price of 0.6%, which would result in a decrease in supply of 5300 tonnes (0.1% of 4.466 million tonnes) while demand would also decrease 5200 tonnes (0.1% of 4.439 million tonnes). This would increase the need for export by 100 tonnes to 27700 tonnes, and a drop in economic surplus of 28.7 million ECU, i.e., the market
seems to be broadly in balance.
#OMMENTS: In other words, the impact of the use of AFA in addition to the use of coccidiostats and digestive enzymes would be hard to detect at the market level. Moreover, due to the CAP and GATT reform, an increase in prices is unlikely. The effect of increased production costs would thus be a decrease of supply, i.e., a shift of the supply curve, meaning less surplus export and less subsidies paid (Gardner, 1988). If the market price was kept unchanged, how much would the supply drop due to the cost increase?
If one could use the supply elasticity 0.5, i.e. % change in quantity/ % change in price, which is derived from the aggregate cost function as an estimate for the response to an increase in production costs, the supply would drop by roughly 1.2% * 0.5 which is 0.6%, or approximately 53000 tonnes, i.e., the surplus situation would change to an import situation, with 25300 tonnes of eggs in net import. If one assumed an import levy/export restitution of 10% or 90 ECU/tonne, this would lead to a savings at the community level of 53000 tonnes times 90 ECU/ tonne or 4.8 million ECU. In this case the consumer surplus would be unchanged, while the producer surplus would decrease by 4.4 million tonnes times 10 ECU/tonne or 44 million ECU. A net loss of 39 million ECU could be foreseen, if the prices were assumed unchanged or 0.9% for the producers.
In other words using De Crane and Vianes (1992) assumptions, not using AFA in egg production would have insignificant impact on the economics of egg production within the EU. This does not account for the possible costs of
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 75 |
a loss of consumer confidence, for which the continued use of AFA is a risk factor.
Economic studies of the use of AFA has often arrived at positive conclusions for the use of AFA. Nevertheless the assumptions underlying the studies, in particular about the ignorant consumer, are probably too restrictive and at variance with the experience in the beef market regarding BSE. Hence one could question whether the results are of any significant relevance for future decisions concerning AFA.
76 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
References
!BU 2UWAIDA ! 3 (USSEINI - AND "ANAT )
69.
!LLEN $ , 3TRAW " %
!NONYMOUS, 1980. Carbadox vs lincomycin in swine dysentery control.
"ARROW 0 ! 1992. 0ROBIOTICS FOR CHICKENS In: Probiotics - the scientific basis. Chapman & Hall, London. pp.
"ERTSCHINGER ( 5 , 1976. Chemotherapeutic efficacy of olaquindox in experimental coli diarrhoea and enterotoxaemia in piglets. 3CHWEIZER !RCHIV FUR 4IERHEILKUNDE
"IEHL ,
lincomycin and carbadox in the control of swine dysentery in commingled feeder pigs. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS Gent. p. 190.
"RENNINKMEIYER # , 1996. The use of antimicrobials as growth promoters in poultry. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 88 7ORLDtS 0OULTRY #ONGRESS September
124.
#ALDWELL * $ 5NDERDAHL . 2 AND 9OUNG ' ! , 1961. Swine repopulation. III. Performance of primary SPF pigs on farms. *OURNAL OF !MERICAN 6ETERINARY !SSOCIATION
#%#, 1993. The impact of animal husbandry in the European Community of the use of growth promoters in animal feed. Volume 1 and 2.pp. 319+142. Office for Official publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, Brussels.
#OATES - % 1980. 4HE GUT MICROFLORA AND GROWTH In: Growth in animals. Butterworths, Boston. pp.
$AVIS * 7 AND ,IBKE + ' , 1976. Bay VA 9391 for prevention of swine dysentery.
6ETERINARY
$E #RAENE ! AND 6IAENE * , 1992. Economic effects of technology in agriculture. Do performance enhancers for animals benefit consumers?pp. 162. University of Ghent, Ghent.
$EGR©
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 77 |
%LWINGER + , 1976. Sammanställning över danska och svenska försök med tillväxtstimulerande ämnen (främst zinkbacitracin och payzone i foder till fjäderfä (report). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
%LWINGER + %NGSTR¶M " "ERNDTSON % &OSSUM / AND 4EGL¶F " , 1993. Effect of Avotan (avoparcin) and Maxus (avilamycin) on the caecal growth of #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS and the occurrence of necrotic enteritis in broilers (report). Swedish
University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
%LWINGER + %NGSTR¶M " "ERNDTSON % &OSSUM / AND 7ALDENSTEDT , , 1995.
Effect of Maxus (avilamycin), Avotan (avoparcin), Monteban (narasin) and Elancoban
broilers (report). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
%LWINGER + %NGSTR¶M " "ERNDTSON % &OSSUM / AND 7ALDENSTEDT , , 1996.
Effect of growth promoters and coccidiostats on performance and growth of
#LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS in the caeca of broilers. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 88 7ORLD S 0OULTRY #ONGRESS
%LWINGER + 3CHNEITZ # "ERNDTSON % &OSSUM / 4EGL¶F " AND %NGSR¶M " ,
1992. Factors affecting the incidence of necrotic enteritis, caecal carriage of
#LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS and bird performance in broiler chickens. !CTA 6ETERINARIA 3CANDINAVICA
%LWINGER + AND 4EGL¶F " , 1991. Performance of broiler chickens as influenced by a
dietary enzyme complex with and without antibiotic supplementation. !RCHIV FUR 'EFLUGELKUNDE
%YSSEN ( AND $E 3OMER 0 , 1967. Effects of 3TREPTOCOCCUS FAECALIS and a filterable agent in growth and nutrient absorption in gnotobiotic chicks. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE
&LECK - + *ONES ' & 0OOMVISES 0 AND )NGKANINUN 0 , 1994. Porcine proliferative enteropathy outbreak and treatment using tylosin. )N PROCEEDINGS OFTH )063 #ONGRESS June
&ORBES - AND 0ARK * 9 , 1959. Growth of
&R¶HLICH ! +VARNFORS %
&ULLER 2 , 1992. History and development of probiotics. )N R. Fuller (ed.), 0ROBIOTICS 4HE SCIENTIFIC BASIS Chapman & Hall, London. pp.
&ULLER 2 , 1994. Microbial activity in the alimentary tract of birds (domestic chicken,
'ALLUS DOMESTICUS). 0ROCEEDINGS OF THE .UTRITION 3OCIETY
'ARDNER " , 1988. 4HE ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURAL POLICIES Macmillan Publishing
Company, New York. pp. 387.
78 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
'RUBER & , 1986. Einfluss der
'RUNFELD # :HAO # &ULLER * 0OLLOCK !
+ 2 , 1996. Endotoxin and cytokines induce expression of leptin, the OB gene product in hamsters. #LINICAL )NVESTIGATION
(OLMGREN . , 1994. Profylaktiska effekter av zinkoxid eller olaquindox mot avvänjningsdiarré hos svin. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING
(UNNEMAN 7 ! , 1980. Swine dysentery. From acute outbreaks to an almost subclinical situation. "ULLETIN DE L /FFICE )NTERNATIONAL DES %PIZOOTIES
*ACKS 4 - *UDITH & 2 &EIGHNER 3 $ AND ,IKOFF 2 / , 1986.
*ANSSON , %LWINGER + %NGSTR¶M " &OSSUM / AND 4EGL¶F " , 1992. Clinical test of the efficacy of virginiamycin and dietary enzyme supplementation against necrotic enteritis (NE) infection in broilers.638. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
*ENKINS % - AND &ROE $ , ))), 1985. Comparing carbadox and bacitracin in the prevention of clinical signs of swine dysentery. 6ETERINARY
*ONASSON , AND !NDERSSON ( , 1996. Kartläggning av den svenska modellen - hävstång eller ok för svensk svinproduktion. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
*ORGENSEN " , 1987. Epidemiologiska analyser af sygdomsdata fra svinavelns forsøgsstationer. $ANSK 6ETERINAERTIDSKRIFT
*UKES 4 ( (ILL $ # AND "RANION ( $ , 1956. Effect of feeding antibiotics on the intestinal wall of the chick. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE
+LASING + # ,AURIN $ % 0ENG 2 + AND &REY $
mediated growth depression in chicks: Influence in feed intake, corticosterone and
+RINKE ! , AND *AMROZ $ , 1996. Effect of feeding antibiotic avoparcin on organ morphology in broiler chickens. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE
+RONSEDER ' , 1993. Wirkung und Verträglichkeit einer kohlenhydratspaltenden Enzympräparation (Roxazyme R G) in Broilerrationen. (Thesis). Ludwig Maximilian University, München.
+YRIAKIS 3 # , 1989. The effects of avilamycin in the control of
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 79 |
+YRIAKIS 3 # 4SINAS ! ,EKKAS 3 3ARRIS + AND "OURTZIHATZOPOULOU % , 1996a.
Clinical evaluation of in feed zinc bacitracin for the control of porcine intestinal adenomatosis in growing/fattening pigs. 6ETERINARY 2ECORD
+YRIAKIS 3 # 4SINAS ! # ,EKKAS 3 3ARRIS + "OURTZI (ATZOPOULOU % "ERGE ' AND *ANSEGERS , , 1996b. Clinical evaluation of in feed zinc bacitracin for the control of porcine intestinal adenomatosis in growing/fattening pigs. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 CONGRESS
,EV - AND &ORBES
1997. Oral administration of tylosin phosphate for treatment and prevention of proliferative enteropathy in pigs. !MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH 136-
139.
in feed for the prevention and control of porcine proliferative enteropathies in commercial swine herds. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 CONGRESS July
Bologna. p. 263.
/LSON , $ , 1986. Probable elimination of swine dysentery after feeding ronidazole, carbadox or lincomycin and verification by feeding sodium arsanilate. #ANADIAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH
0RESCOTT * & AND "AGGOT * $ EDS , 1993. !NTIMICROBIAL THERAPY IN VETERINARY MEDICINE 2nd ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames. pp. 612.
80 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
0RESCOTT * & 3IVENDRA 2 AND "ARNUM $ ! , 1978. The use of bacitracin in the
prevention and treatment of
2AINIER 2 ( (ARRIS $ , #LOCK 2 $ +INYON * - AND "RAUER - ! , 1980a.
Carbadox and lincomycin in the treatment and carrier state control of swine dysentery 4REPONEMA HYODYSENTERIAE. !MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH
2AINIER 2 ( (ARRIS $ , 'LOCK 2 $ +INYON * - AND "RAUER - ! , 1980b.
Prevalence of asymptomatic carriers of swine dysentery following withdrawal of carbadox or lincomycin treatments. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS June 30-
July 3, Copenhagen.
2AYNAUD * 0 AND "RETHEAU ( , 1973. Essais a large echelle du carbadox dans les elevages porcins en France. Bilan en 1972. 2EVUE DE MEDICINE 6ETERINAIRE
2AYNAUD * 0 "RUNAULT ' AND 0ATTERSON % " , 1980a. A new swine dysentery
model for evaluation of drug prophylaxis: I. Model development - oral infection plus pen contamination. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS 30
Copenhagen. p. 248.
2AYNAUD * 0 "RUNAULT ' AND 0ATTERSON % " , 1980b. A new swine dysentery
model for evaluation of drug prophylaxis: II. Efficacy of various drugs in the control of swine dysentery. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS 30
Copenhagen. p. 249.
2OBERTSSON * … AND ,UNDEHEIM . , 1994. Prohibited use of antibiotics as a feed
additive for growth promotion - effect on piglet health and production parameters.
)N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS June
2ONNE ( AND *ENSEN * # % , 1992. Virginiamycin susceptibility of 3ERPULINA HYODYSENTERIAE, IN VITRO and IN VIVO. 6ETERINARY 2ECORD
2OSEN ' $ 1995. !NTIBACTERIALS IN POULTRY AND PIG NUTRITION In: Biotechnology in Animal Feeds and Feeding. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Weinheim. pp. 143- 172.
2OSEN ' $ , 1996. The nutritional effects of tetracyclines in broiler feeds. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 88 7ORLDtS 0OULTRY #ONGRESS New Delhi. pp.
2OURA % (OMEDES * AND +LASING + # , 1992. Prevention of immunologic stress
contributes to the
3#", 1997. Jordbruksstatistisk årsbok 1996. pp. 244. Statistiska centralbyrån, Örebro, Sweden.
3CHNEIDER 7 , 1992. Wirkung des Futterzusatztsoffes Tylan G in der Schweinemast. 2. Mitt. Leistungsfördernde Effekte. 3CHWEINESUCHT UND 3CHWEINEMAST
SOU 1997:132 | 3. Mode of action and effects | 81 |
3,5 +ONTAKT, 1996. Områdeskalkyler för slaktsvin, smågrisproduktion, värphöns och slaktkyckling. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
3OMA * ! AND 3PEER 6 # , 1975. Effects of PMS and chlortetracycline on the reproductive efficiency of sows. !NIMAL 3CIENCE
3PEER 6 # , 1974. Reducing farrowing intervals in sows. &EEDSTUFFS
3TAHLY 4 , 1996. Impact of immune system activation on growth and optimal dietary regimens of pigs. )N Gansworthy. (ed.), 2ECENT ADVANCES IN ANIMAL NUTRITION
Butterworths, London. pp.
3TAHLY 4 3 7ILLIAMS . ( AND 3WENSON 3 ' , 1996. Impact of carbadox on rate,
efficiency and composition of growth in pigs with a high or low genetic capacity for lean growth. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS
3TAHLY 4 3 7ILLIAMS . ( AND :IMMERMANN $ 2 , 1995. Impact of tylosin on rate,
efficiency and composition of growth in pigs with a low or high level of immune system activation. *OURNAL OF !NIMAL 3CIENCE SUPPLEMENT 84.
3TUTZ - 7 *OHNSON 3 , AND *UDITH & 2 , 1983a. Effects of diet and bacitracin on growth, feed efficiency, and populations of #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS in the intestine of broiler chicks. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE
3TUTZ - 7 *OHNSON 3 , *UDITH & 2 AND
4AYLOR $ * AND $AVEY , ! , 1980. Elimination of 4REPONEMA HYODYSENTERIAE infection from pigs by medication with carbadox. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS June
30- July 3, Copenhagen. p. 251.
4HOMKE 3 AND %LWINGER + , 1997a. Alternatives to antibiotic growth promotants. Report to to Commission on Antimicrobial Feed Additives. pp. 32. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
4HOMKE 3 AND %LWINGER + , 1997b. Growth and feed efficiency responses to antibiotic growth promotants in pigs and poultry. Report to the Commission on Antimicrobial Feed Additives. pp. 17. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
4HOMKE 3 AND %LWINGER + , 1997c. Mode of action of antibiotic growth promotants. Report to the Commission on Antimicrobial Feed Additives. pp. 18. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
4ROUTT ( & (OOPER " % AND (ARRINGTON 2 , 1974. Effect of carbadox in experimentally induced salmonellosis of swine. *OURNAL OF THE !MERICAN 6ETERINARY
7ALLGREN 0 , 1993a. Infections and immune functions of swine in fattening herds. (Thesis). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
82 | 3. Mode of action and effects | SOU 1997:132 |
7ALLGREN 0 , 1993b. Infektioners inflytande på tillväxthastigheten hos svin. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING
6%4 & 1997. &!33 6%4 3WEDISH LIST OF PERMITTED VETERINARY DRUGS Läkemedelinformation AB (Drug information service of pharmaceutical companies in Sweden), Stockholm.
6IAENE * , 1997. The Swedish animal production system. Could it be applied across the European Union. University of Gent, Gent.
7ICKER $ , )SGRIGG 7 . AND 4RAMMEL * ( , 1977. The control and prevention of necrotic enteritis in broilers with zinc bacitracin. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE
7IERUP
7ILLIAMS " * AND "ABCOCK 7 % , 1978. )N 6IVO and )N 6ITRO susceptibility of
4REPONEMA HYODYSENTERIAE to carbadox before and after repeated in vitro passage in sublethal concentrations of drug. 6ETERINARY
7ILLIAMS " * AND 3HIVELY * % , 1978. )N 6ITRO antitreponemal activities of carbadox,
virginiamycin, olaquindox, and tylosin as indices of their effectiveness for preventing swine dysentery. 6ETERINARY
7OOD % . , 1987. Financial aspects of swine dysentery eradication without depopulation. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )063 #ONGRESS Copenhagen. pp.
6RANJES - 6 AND 7ENK # , 1996. Influence of 4RICHODERMA VIRIDAE enzyme complex
on nutrient utilization and performance of laying hens in diets with and without antibiotic supplementation. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE
9OUNG ' ! 5NDERDAHL , * 3UMPTON , * 0EO , 3 /LSEN ' 7 +ELLY $ " (UDMAN $ " #ALDWELL * $ AND !DAMS # ( , 1959. Swine repopulation. I. Performance within a
SOU 1997:132 | 83 |
4Microbiological aspects on antibacterial feed additives
4.1Introduction
Antibacterial substances (antibiotics and synthetic substances) exert their activity by inhibiting or disturbing vital bacterial processes. The effect is concentration dependent. At levels above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), bacterial growth will cease or the bacteria will be killed. The only way for sensitive bacteria to avoid elimination is to develop resistance. This can be achieved by mutation or by acquisition of genes from other bacteria. Transfer of genes occurs by several mechanisms, namely transduction, transformation, and conjugation mediated by plasmids and/or transposons. The latter mechanism is the most studied and possibly the most important. Horizontal gene transfer between bacteria is a common event and an important factor in microbial evolution.
Antimicrobial resistance, leading to loss of effectiveness of antibacterial drugs, has been targeted by the WHO as one of the major emerging human health problems (WHO, 1994). The consequences of antimicrobial resistance are seen as an increase in morbidity and mortality due to bacterial diseases. Antimicrobial resistance also has a considerable economic impact and is estimated to cost at least US$ 4 billion annually in the United States alone.
The possible influence of antibacterial feed additives (AFA) on resistance in animal and human pathogens has been debated for almost four decades. The development of new techniques, particularly in the field of molecular biology, has provided new insights into these problems.
The antibacterial effect of AFA is also manifested in alterations of the intestinal microflora. The intact microflora is an important barrier against colonisation by enteric pathogens. Disruptions may lead to increased prevalence of zoonotic bacteria in food.
At the end of this chapter, a short glossary of terms used has been provided.
4.2Antibacterial activity of AFA
The concentrations of AFA used in feed for performance enhancement exceed the susceptibility ranges of naturally susceptible intestinal bacteria (table 4.I). Concentrations reached in various parts of the intestine using the approved dosages will depend on a number of factors. Most AFA are poorly,
84 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
if at all, absorbed from the gut. They are therefore likely to be present in concentrations well above the MIC of normally susceptible bacterial species at least in part of the intestine.
The fact that AFA exert an inhibitory effect on the intestinal microflora is evident from various types of experiments. Early studies showed that the growth promoting effect could be associated with changes in the microflora, especially the enterococci and the clostridia, of the animals (see chapter 3.1). This is further substantiated by the preventive effect of AFA against certain intestinal diseases (see chapter 3.2). For therapy, higher doses are generally needed. By definition, therapy will be instituted once the disease is overt. When the infectious agent to be combated is already established in tissues, higher doses will be needed in order to have a satisfactory effect. If the infectious process is located in an internal organ other than the intestine, the administered substance must reach this organ at concentrations well above MIC. As the amount of substance given will then have to be absorbed in adequate amounts and be distributed in a larger volume (the whole body as opposed to only the intestine), higher doses are needed.
Table 4.I. Normal susceptibility ranges of clostridia and enterococci for some AFA compared to permitted levels in feed for performance enhancement (modified from Dutta and Devriese, 1984; Devriese ET AL , 1993)
4ABELL ) +¤NSLIGHET HOS KLOSTRIDIER OCH ENTEROKOCKER F¶R N¥GRA !&4 J¤MF¶RT MED TILL¥TNA HALTER I FODER F¶R AVKASTNINGS¶KNING MODIFIERAT FR¥N $UTTA AND $EVRIESE $EVRIESE ET AL
!NTIBACTERIAL | 2ANGE OF MINIMUM INHIBITORY | $OSAGES USED FOR | |
SUBSTANCE | CONCENTRATION PPM FOR | PERFORMANCE | |
ENHANCEMENT | |||
PPM | |||
#LOSTRIDIA | %NTEROCOCCI | ||
Avilamycin | NA1 | ||
Avoparcin | |||
Bacitracin | |||
Flavomycin | |||
Monensin | |||
Spiramycin | |||
Tylosin | <1 | ||
Virginiamycin |
1 NA = no information available; 2Given in IU/ml
.! INFORMATION SAKNAS 5TTRYCKT I )% ML
The mechanisms of action of the different types of substances used as AFA have been studied in detail, with the exception of the quinoxalines. Currently approved AFA exert their effect on bacteria by one of four mechanisms (table 4.II):
SOU 1997:132 | 4.Microbiological aspects | 85 |
·inhibition of protein synthesis
·inhibition of cell wall synthesis
·inhibition of DNA synthesis
·alterations of the cytoplasmic membrane
Concerning information on resistance mechanisms and their genetic background, practically all published studies on resistance mechanisms have focused on substances, or classes, also used in human therapy and mostly on resistance in human pathogens. The characterised resistance genes and mechanisms are probably only ”the tip of the iceberg”.
It is often stated that the AFA used in animal production are not used as therapeuticals in humans. This is true only for avilamycin, flavomycin and the quinoxalines. Spiramycin is used in human therapy. So is bacitracin, although mainly for local application. Small chemical differences between substances within the same class of antibacterials may have profound effects on their pharmacokinetics but their mode of action on the bacterium will usually be the same. Therefore, the bacterial defence in the form of resistance will often confer
Old, presently not used substances may become valuable therapeuticals in the future. Such is the case with everninomycins, a substance of the orthosomycin class. This substance is presently undergoing trials as a new drug candidate. Another member of the orthosomycin class is avilamycin.
Most AFA are similar to, or identical with, antibacterials used for therapy.
AFA are, in concentrations given for performance enhancement, inhibitory to inherently susceptible intestinal bacteria.
4.3AFA and development of resistance
It has been argued that the concentrations of antibacterials used for performance enhancement are too low for any development of resistance to occur. As noted in 4.2, they are high enough to inhibit the growth of susceptible microorganisms. The usage of AFA would therefore be expected to favour the occurrence of resistant strains in exposed populations.
Table 4.II. Mode of action of substances used as AFA and known mechanisms of resistance (modified from Witte, 1996)
4ABELL )) 6ERKNINGSMEKANISMER HOS SUBSTANSER SOM ANV¤NDS SOM !&4 OCH K¤NDA RESISTENSMEKANISMER MODIFIERAD FR¥N 7ITTE
#LASS | 3UBSTANCE | %XAMPLES OF | +NOWN RESISTANCE | +NOWN GENETIC | #ROSS RESISTANCE | |
OTHER SUBSTANCES | MECHANISMS | BACKGROUND OF | TO SUBSTANCES OF | |||
IN THE CLASS | RESISTANCE | OTHER CLASSES | ||||
Glycopeptides | avoparcin | VANCOMYCIN | inhibition of cell wall | modification of binding site | VAN genes | |
ardacin | TEICOPLANIN | synthesis by preventing | (peptidoglycan precursor) | |||
DAPTOMYCIN | transglycosylation | |||||
Ionophores | monensin | other ionophores | disaggregation of | |||
salinomycin | cytoplasmic membrane | |||||
Macrolides | TYLOSIN | ERYTHROMYCIN | inhibition of protein | modification of binding site | ERM genes, point | LINCOSAMIDES |
SPIRAMYCIN | AZITHROMYCIN | synthesis by stalling the | (methylation of 23S rRNA) | mutation | STREPTOGRAMINS | |
CLARITHROMYCIN | ribosome | drug inactivation, efflux | ||||
Orthosomycins | avilamycin | everninomycins | inhibition of protein | |||
synthesis by preventing | ||||||
elongation | ||||||
Phospho- | flavomycin | inhibition of cell wall | no information | |||
glycolipids | synthesis by preventing | available | ||||
transglycosylation | ||||||
Polypeptides | BACITRACIN | inhibition of cell wall | active efflux, alteration of | BCR gene, BACA gene | no information | |
synthesis by preventing | binding site (IPP), reduced | available | ||||
transpeptidation | membrane permeability | |||||
Quinoxalines | OLAQUINDOX | cyadox | inhibition of DNA | no information | ||
CARBADOX | synthesis | available | ||||
Streptogramins | VIRGINIA | PRISTINAMYCIN | inhibition of protein | modification of binding site | ERM, SAT VAT, VGA SBH | MACROLIDES |
MYCIN | QUINUPRISTIN | synthesis by stalling the | (methylation of 23S rRNA), | genes | LINCOSAMIDES | |
DALFOPRISTIN | ribosome | drug inactivation, active | ||||
efflux |
Substances with well known therapeutic use in human and/or veterinary medicine are in bold characters.
3UBSTANSER MED V¤LK¤NDA TERAPEUTISKA APPLIKATIONER INOM HUMAN OCH ELLER VETERIN¤RMEDICINEN ¤R SKRIVNA MED FETSTIL
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 87 |
4.3.1Prospective studies
Experimental studies
Several studies by the research group of Linton (Hinton ET AL , 1986b; Kaukas ET AL , 1987; Kaukas ET AL , 1988) illustrate the influence of AFA on development of resistance in enterococci.
In two of these studies (Hinton ET AL , 1986b; Kaukas ET AL , 1987), the control groups were given a diet containing growth promoters (bacitracin or virginiamycin) and/or a coccidiostat with antibacterial activity. The confounding effect of growth promoters and anticoccidials in the control groups of these latter studies cannot be ignored. Consequently, only comparisons between the groups in the study from 1988 are deemed to be valid and will, in the following, be discussed in detail.
In this study (Kaukas ET AL , 1988), small groups of chickens were given feed containing either avoparcin, nitrovin, virginiamycin or bacitracin or a diet without AFA during the first three weeks of life. The resistance to virginiamycin, bacitracin or nitrovin in % FAECIUM increased in the groups receiving the respective substance. Moreover, the incidence of resistance to therapeutic antibiotics, expressed as Antibiotic Resistance Index (ARI), was
higher (p=0.003) in all groups receiving antibacterials. This increase could be associated with an increase in the proportion of % FAECIUM in the
enterococcal population of the treated birds.
An experimental study on
Dealy and Moeller (1977a) investigated the effect of
Observations on an apparent suppression of coliforms carrying resistance plasmids has been suggested in reports for both flavomycin, carbadox and bacitracin (Pohl ET AL , 1975; Walton, 1978; Sepulchre, 1979; Gedek, 1981; Walton, 1984; Walton and Wheeler, 1987; Brophy, 1988). Some of these reports, however, merely studied the synergistic effects of the AFA and other
88 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
antibacterials and in others, the information provided is not enough to fully evaluate the issue.
Only for flavomycin have the possible mechanisms for a direct effect on numbers of plasmid carrying strains been addressed. George and
Field studies
Linton and
The influence of virginiamycin on the prevalence of resistant enterococci within flocks of turkeys has recently been reported by Thal and
(1996). Different turkeys from the same flock were found to share the same type of
to both streptogramins and ampicillin increased over time. All flocks received
A study to monitor the development of olaquindox resistance in coliforms following the introduction of olaquindox as a feed additive was conducted in commercial farms in Suffolk by Linton and
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 89 |
coliforms from farms using olaquindox. Incidence and level of resistance increased on neighbouring farms not using olaquindox as well, but to a lesser extent. The latter finding is not surprising as the herds were not isolated from the environment.
Table 4.III. The average percentage of coliforms resistant to olaquindox in each year of the survey (from Linton ET AL , 1988)
4ABELL ))) 'ENOMSNITTLIG PROCENTANDEL AV KOLIFORMER RESISTENTA MOT OLAQUINDOX UNDER RESPEKTIVE STUDIE¥R FR¥N ,INTON ET AL
9EAR | 2ESISTANCE | |
#ONTROL FARMS | 4EST FARMS | |
19811 | 0.00 | - |
1982 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
1983 | 0.12 | 5.63 |
1984 | 0.68 | 6.14 |
1 Sampled before olaquindox was used in the UK
0ROVTAGNA INNAN OLAQUINDOX ANV¤NDES I 3TORBRITANNIEN
4.3.2Retrospective studies
Devriese and
found no notable increase in resistance between 1979 and 1992.
Ohmae and
An increase in carbadox resistance in salmonellae over time was noted in a study by Mills and Kelly (1986). The study included clinical isolates from necropsied swine in Kansas during
A strong association between the use of avoparcin and prevalence of vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) in animals has been reported. Bager and
cohort study. The relative risk for occurrence of vancomycin resistant %NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM was 3.3
The corresponding figure for poultry flocks was 2.9
90 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
VRE have yet been isolated from animals (Coque ET AL , 1996; Greko and Lindblad, 1996).
4.3.3
Shortly after the introduction of avoparcin, no glycopeptide resistance was found among 15 strains of % FAECIUM isolated on
(Dutta and Devriese, 1982), nor was resistance found in other enterococcal species. In table 4.IV, recent results concerning glycopeptide resistance from the Danish surveillance system are presented. As in the above mentioned study, the isolates investigated were obtained without the use of antibiotic containing media in the course of a monitoring programme.
Studies using media favouring resistant isolates indicate that enterococci with high level resistance to glycopeptides (VRE) are widespread among animals including pets and horses (Bates ET AL , 1994; Klare ET AL , 1995b; Devriese ET AL , 1996). The lack of earlier data on VRE in animals precludes conclusions on whether the resistance trait was present in animal populations at the time of introduction of avoparcin in animal husbandry.
As mentioned in 4.3.2, in studies from USA where avoparcin has never been used and from Sweden where avoparcin has not been used for 10 years no VRE were found in samples from animals using selective techniques (Coque ET AL , 1996; Greko, 1996). Thus, in the absence of avoparcin, the prevalence of VRE in animals is, at most, very low.
Table 4.IV. Frequency of resistance to glycopeptides (vancomycin) in % FAECIUM from different sources1
4ABELL )6 &REKVENS AV RESISTENS MOT GLYKOPEPTIDER VANCOMYCIN HOS Enterococcus faecium FR¥N OLIKA PROVTYPER
!NIMAL SOURCE | .O OF ISOLATES | 2ESISTANCE IN |
Cattle | 13 | 0 |
Beef | 40 | 0 |
Swine | 58 | 20 |
Pork | 23 | 0 |
Poultry | 54 | 59 |
Poultry meat | 71 | 18 |
1 Data from DANMAP (1997). In samples from food, only
$ATA FR¥N
It has often been assumed that resistance observed in animal bacteria is entirely a result of the use of therapeuticals. A comparison between the situation in countries where macrolides are used both for therapy and as
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 91 |
AFA, and where they are only used for therapy is therefore of interest. In table 4.V, results from investigations in Denmark, Finland and Sweden are presented. Spiramycin, being a
The tables above illustrate phenotypic expression of resistance. However, information on phenotype at best only permits inferential conclusions about the genes conferring these resistance traits. All the resistant isolates from Sweden and Finland were
Table 4.V. Resistance to MLSB antibacterials (indicated by spiramycin resistance) in enterococci from various species and countries (From Greko, 1996; DANMAP, 1997; Greko, 1997; MAF, 1997)
4ABELL 6 2ESISTENS MOT
"ACTERIAL SPECIES | !NIMAL | .O OF | 9EAR | 2ESISTANCE | #OUNTRY |
SOURCE | ISOLATES | IN | |||
% FAECIUM | poultry | 54 | Denmark | ||
% FAECIUM | poultry | 234 | 1996 | Finland | |
% FAECALIS | poultry | 299 | 1996 | Finland | |
%NTEROCOCCUS spp. | poultry | 207 | 1996 | Sweden | |
% FAECALIS | swine | 123 | Denmark | ||
% FAECIUM | swine | 58 | Denmark | ||
% FAECIUM | swine | 89 | 1996 | Finland | |
% FAECALIS | swine | 85 | 1996 | Finland | |
%NTEROCOCCUS spp. | swine | 92 | 1996 | Sweden |
Further information on frequency of resistance to AFA can be found in annexes
92 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
4.3.4Some comments on study design
Studies performed to date are extremely difficult to compare. Selection criteria, methods used and definition of resistance vary. Further, a serious limitation of most studies on antibacterial resistance is the restricted range of microbes surveyed (Salyers, 1995). This is particularly true if the question asked is how the use of a substance affects the evolution and spread of resistance genes in a certain environment. Inclusion of numerically predominant organisms, such as certain anaerobic genera, would give a more complete picture. For practical reasons, most studies focus on easily cultured bacteria. Until further knowledge about the role of the predominant part of the flora is obtained, we have to accept that much information concerning gene transfer in natural settings is missing (Salyers, 1995).
Some species are inherently (naturally) resistant to certain antibacterial substances. For example, # PERFRINGENS and % FAECIUM have been reported
to be inherently resistant to flavomycin and enterococci, apart from % FAECIUM are inherently resistant to streptogramin A. Such species will be favoured if a selective pressure is applied. Other species, that are inherently susceptible to the substance in question, may become resistant either by mutation or by the acquisition of already existing resistance genes. When the aim is to assess the influence of antibacterial usage on the prevalence of antibacterial resistance, bacterial populations with a potential for acquiring resistance should be targeted. Enterococci are inherently susceptible to most AFA and are known to easily acquire resistance genes. In view of this, and bearing the above mentioned limitations in mind, the choice of enterococci as one of the indicators of the development of resistance seems acceptable for most AFA.
The study time in both experimental and field exposure studies is generally short. Dissemination of antibacterial resistance will be governed by two main factors; presence of the antibacterial in concentrations high enough to inhibit susceptible bacteria and presence of resistance traits (intrinsic or acquired) in bacteria. If either is continually absent, a resistance problem will not emerge (Levy, 1996). Acquisition of the relevant gene and its subsequent adaptation to a new host bacterium may take time (years). As closed experimental herds are often used, resistance may in fact never appear, even if it would with time in a field situation where herds are expected to have numerous direct and indirect contacts with potential gene reservoirs.
Given the presence of both a selective pressure and resistance, the resistance trait will be selected for and propagated. The spread of resistant bacteria themselves, as well as cell to cell spread of genes conveying resistance, further adds to the equation. Longer study periods (years) would be expected to give more applicable results, but may be impractical for other reasons.
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 93 |
In view of the long standing debate on usage of AFA and resistance, there are surprisingly few studies including data on prevalence of resistance against the substances in question. Even less data is available on development over time.
Various types of studies show that exposure of bacterial populations to AFA in approved dosages favours resistant clones or subpopulations.
4.4Acquisition of resistance in bacteria
Acquired resistance can arise in a bacterium through mutation(s) in existing genes or through the uptake of a
Following uptake, acquired resistance genes may be modified, or optimised, by means of mutation. Once the optimal configuration has been accomplished, little change would be expected within the gene, although transfer to a new host species or genus may require some adaptation for maximum expression. ”Silent” resistance genes, i.e.
4.4.1Transfer of resistance genes
94 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
The plasmids and transposons mentioned are often of a conjugative type, meaning that in addition to the resistance genes, they carry the information necessary to initiate and complete their own transfer to new hosts.
Transfer of resistance determinants with relevance for AFA has been shown IN VITRO and, for some, IN VIVO.
Resistance to the A component of streptogramins is mediated by various genes carried on plasmids. The VATB gene has been shown to transfer between
Resistance to streptogramin B and
ERMB gene (also carrying resistance determinants for chloramphenicol, tetracycline and streptomycin) could transfer from ,ISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES to, among others, % FAECALIS and vice versa. The donor efficiency3 depended
on the combination of
enterococci and streptococci being the most and staphylococci the least efficient. The plasmid, originally identified in ,ISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES, was
suggested to have originated from streptococci or enterococci as it is similar to pAMb1, the prototype for
Acquisition of macrolide resistance through transfer of the chromosomally carried transposon Tn harbouring MLSB (ERMB), kanamycin (APH!3’) and tetracycline (TETM) resistance determinants from % FAECALIS to , MONOCYTOGENES has been demonstrated both in VITRO by mating experiments and IN VIVO in gnotobiotic mice
and IN VIVO transfer frequencies were around
1The donor efficiency expresses the number of successful transmissions from donors to recipients per total number of recipients. The donor:recipient ratio in experiments is often 1:1
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 95 |
Table 4.VI. Examples of resistance to macrolides and streptogramins by different mechanisms and genes1
Tabell 4.VI. Exempel på resistens mot makrolider och streptograminer, via olika mekanismer och gener1
Phenotype2 | Mechanism | Gene | Described | Examples of bacterial hosts |
localisation | ||||
MLSB | target modi- | ermA | Tn554 | S. aureus, coagulase negative |
fication | staphylococci | |||
ermB, | Tn551, pAMb1, | S. aureus, S. intermedius, S. | ||
ermAM | Tn917, Tn1545, | hyicus, Streptococcus spp, S. | ||
plus various other | pneumoniae, E. faecalis, | |||
plasmids and | Lactobacillus spp. | |||
transposons | ||||
ermC | pE194, plM13, | S. aureus, coagulase negative | ||
pE5, pNE131 | staphylococci, S. hyicus, | |||
Bacillus subtilis | ||||
emrCX | Tn5432 | Corynebacterium xerosis | ||
ermD | chromosome | B. licheniformis | ||
ermBC | pIP1527 | E. coli | ||
ermF | pBF4 | Bacteroides spp. | ||
ermE | chromosome | Streptomyces erythreus | ||
ermP, | Cl. perfringens | |||
ermQ | ||||
ermZ | Tn5398 | Cl. difficile | ||
ermJ | Bacillus anthracis | |||
ermM | S. epidermidis | |||
SB | drug | sbh | pIP524 | S. aureus |
inactivation | vgb | pIP680 | S. aureus | |
SA | satA | pAT424 | E. faecium | |
vat | pIP680, IS257 | S. aureus | ||
vatB | pIP1156 | S. aureus | ||
SA | active efflux | vga | plasmids | S. aureus, S. epidermidis |
1Data compiled from Leclercq and Courvalin, 1991a; 1991b; Brisson Noel et al, 1988; Arthur et al, 1987; Eady et al, 1993; Weisblum, 1995; Mullany et al, 1995; Allignet et al, 1996; Tauch et al, 1995
2 Resistance phenotype; MLSB =
1Data sammanställda från Leclercq and Courvalin, 1991a;1991b; Brisson Noel et al, 1988; Arthur et al, 1987; Eady et al, 1993; Weisblum, 1995; Mullany et al, 1995; Allignet et al, 1996; Tauch et al, 1995
2Resistensfenotyp; MLSB =
96 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
In the above cited experiment,
The fact that conjugal transfer was easily detectable within a relatively short time period in both IN VIVO experiments cited above confirms that the intestinal environment is highly conductive to conjugal transfer, even when the donor and recipient are of different genera. Further, they show that IN VITRO results on transfer and transfer rates can be predictive of IN VIVO results.
Transferable glycopeptide resistance is usually mediated by the gene clusters VANA or VANB. These are generally located on plasmids and/or transposons (Arthur and Courvalin, 1993). High level resistance to
glycopeptides mediated by the
cluster is mostly associated with the conjugative transposon Tn and/or
3TAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS, and various streptococci (Leclercq ET AL , 1989). Transfer frequencies were
transfer to other species. When resistance to MLS antibiotics was also present, the two traits were transferred EN BLOC (Leclercq ET AL , 1989).
Conjugal
of hairless obese mice was demonstrated in an experiment by Noble and coworkers (1992). The mice used cannot be regarded as ”normal” mice. Nonetheless, they are a better model for the IN VIVO situation than a petri dish.
Resistance to glycopeptides mediated by the VANB gene cluster has, in relation to AFA, attracted less attention. The
Quintiliani and Courvalin, 1996) at a low frequency. The
and Courvalin, 1993; Poyart ET AL , 1997). The gene usually confers inducible resistance to glycopeptides by a mechanism similar to that of the VANA genecluster. The
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 97 |
information, the VANB gene cluster does not seem to be inducible by
avoparcin. No information is available on the capacity of ardacin to induce
VANB.
)N VITRO as well as during therapy, mutants expressing the VANB gene constitutively have been reported (Hayden ET AL , 1993; Green ET AL , 1995). Recently, transfer experiments with a strain expressing VANB constitutively were reported (Hayden ET AL , 1997). The resulting transconjugants were either of constitutive or of inducible type. The use of a
4.4.2Bacterial interspecies transfer of resistance genes
As evident from 4.4.1, similar or identical resistance genes can be found in various bacterial species, indicating that transfer of resistance genes between different bacterial species is not uncommon in nature. Conjugal transfer systems are able to cross genus, phylogenetic, and even kingdom lines
As an example, high level resistance to MLSB antibacterials in a clinical isolate of % COLI was characterised by
The resistance trait was found to be due to the presence of an
pool of
4.4.3
A plasmid or transposon may gradually acquire one gene after another. Integrons and transposons appear to be largely responsible for this phenomenon. When they are located on the same transferable element, the transmission of different genes is linked and transfer leads to
98 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
governed by different genes.
The transmission of resistance genes with relevance for AFA can be linked to the transfer of other genes. The % COLI plasmid pNV13 conveys resistance to carbadox, streptomycin, spectinomycin and ampicillin (Ohmae ET AL , 1981; Ohmae ET AL , 1983). Conjugal transfer of resistance to streptogramin A, between 3 AUREUS strains, linked to lincosamide, trimethoprim and penicillin resistance has been reported (Allignet and El Solh, 1995; Allignet ET AL , 1996). Enterococcal plasmids from several host species have been shown to harbour and transfer MLSB, kanamycin, streptomycin and, sometimes, tetracycline resistance (Rollins ET AL , 1985; LeBlanc ET AL , 1986; Christie ET AL , 1987). The transposon Tn has been shown to carry and transfer resistance genes to kanamycin, macrolides and tetracycline (Doucet- Populaire ET AL , 1991). Genes conveying resistance to glycopeptides and macrolides have been found to
A similar linkage between different genes has been shown between some resistance and virulence genes, such as haemolysinor
tetracycline resistance and haemolysin production from % FAECALIS to "ACILLUS SUBTILIS. )N VIVO transfer of
genes conferring cytolytic properties and macrolide resistance (ERMB) between strains of % FAECALIS has been studied in a model using Syrian
hamsters (Huycke ET AL , 1992). Transfer occurred in high frequencies
resistance (ERMBZ) and toxin A, apparently carried on a transposon (Tn ) from # DIFFICILE to
reported by Mullaney (1995).
Consequently, a selection for antibacterial resistance may, in some cases, also select for virulence. The danger of transfer elements carrying multiple genes is evident; a single transfer event conveys not only resistance to the selector but also other properties to the recipient bacterium. The recipient may acquire multiresistance and/or increase its virulence. Any advantage given by one of the transferred genes helps to maintain all of the transferred genes in the new host.
4.4.4Resistance genes and animal hosts
Highly homologous resistance genes and their associated transfer elements have been found in natural isolates not only of different bacterial species but also in bacteria from a variety of host species. The macrolide resistance gene
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 99 |
ERMB has been demonstrated in bacteria of different species originating from pigs, chickens, cattle, dogs and humans (Rollins ET AL , 1985; Arthur ET AL , 1987; Stuart ET AL , 1992; Eady ET AL , 1993; Roberts and Brown, 1994; Wasteson ET AL , 1994).
As an example, the results of Eady and
for resistance determinants in macrolide resistant isolates of staphylococci (excluding 3 AUREUS) from humans, pigs and dogs are shown in table 4.VII.
Table 4.VII. Distribution of macrolide resistance genes in staphylococci from various hosts given as percent of total number of genes identified in isolates from respective animal host1 (modified from Eady ET AL , 1993)
4ABELL 6)) &¶RDELNINGEN AV MAKROLIDRESISTENSGENER HOS STAFYLOKOCKER FR¥N OLIKA V¤RDDJUR UTTRYCKT SOM PROCENT AV TOTALANTALET IDENTIFIERADE GENERMODIFIERAT FR¥N %ADY ET AL
'ENE1 | 3WINE | $OGS | (UMANS | ||
group 12 | group 22 | ||||
ERMA | 0 | 6 | 12 | 6 | |
ERMB | 20 | 65 | 0 | 0 | |
ERMC | 63 | 6 | 41 | 54 | |
MSRA | 6 | 6 | 38 | 39 | |
ERM untypable | 11 | 18 | 9 | 2 |
1No. of genes identified and No. of investigated isolates: swine 35 and 33, dogs 17 and 16, humans group 1 58 and 55, humans group 2 121 and 117, respectively.
2Group 1 includes isolates from patients undergoing ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (n=27)
and from blood cultures (n=28); group 2 includes patients with acne (n=117).
1 !NTAL IDENTIFIERADE GENER RESPEKTIVE ANTAL UNDERS¶KTA ISOLAT SVIN OCH HUNDAR
OCH M¤NNISKOR GRUPP OCH M¤NNISKOR GRUPP OCH
'RUPP INKLUDERAR ISOLAT FR¥N PATIENTER I AMBULATORISK PERITONEALDIALYS N SAMT BLODODLINGAR N GRUPP INKLUDERAR PATIENTER MED AKNE N
The suggested spread of vancomycin resistance between enterococci of various origin is another example of the spread of resistance among grampositive bacteria. VRE harbouring the VANA gene cluster have been isolated from humans, both in hospitals and community, from pig, rabbit, dog, cat,
horse chicken, turkey, pheasant, duck, food of animal origin and sewage (Bates ET AL , 1994; Torres ET AL , 1994; Klare ET AL , 1995b; Chadwick ET AL ,
1996; Devriese ET AL , 1996; DANMAP, 1997). A polyclonal nature of the VRE strains has been demonstrated (Klare ET AL , 1995b). The VANA gene cluster consists of 7 gene components and two transposition gene sequences. It is extremely unlikely that such a complicated gene should have developed separately in so many different host populations. Its occurrence therefore strongly suggests a spread between bacteria of different host species.
100 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
4.4.5The encumbrance of resistance for bacteria
In an environment that contains antibacterials, possession of a corresponding resistance gene is clearly beneficial for the bacterium. The resistance traits have, however, been considered to impose a burden on their bacterial hosts. Synthesis of plasmids require energy and metabolites. The products encoded for by resistance genes may interfere with the bacterium’s physiology; alterations of the cell wall may lead to loss of adhesive properties and alternative metabolic pathways may be less efficient. Constitutive expression of resistance genes encoding for such traits would be a handicap in the absence of antibacterials. For such reasons, resistant clones have been thought to suffer a competitive disadvantage in the absence of a selective pressure. Even so, this might not always be the case. Much evidence of the cost for the bacterium of harbouring the resistance trait has been obtained in laboratory experiments with bacteria that have recently acquired the resistance gene.
Other experiments show that, given time, bacteria can eliminate the cost of resistance by adapting their system in order to counteract the harmful sideeffects of the resistance genes. This will result in increased fitness of resistant strains with consequent persistence of the resistance trait in the microbial population even after the selective pressure is removed. Such adaptation has been shown for resistance acquired through mutations as well as through plasmids (for reviews see Lenski, 1996; Gillespie and McHugh, 1997). As an example, McConnell and
4.4.6Some remarks on horizontal transmission of genes
Transmission of genes between bacteria occurs readily IN VITRO. Experimental transfer of a conjugative element may require little manipulation besides the mixing of two cultures. The rates, or frequencies, of such transmissions will depend on the transfer element involved and the
Bacteria are equipped with very efficient gene transfer systems. Similar, or identical, resistance genes and associated transfer elements are present in field isolates from different host species as well as in different bacterial
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 101 |
species. A multitude of transfer elements are found in bacteria isolated from natural settings. Resistance traits arise within species that were formerly considered uniformly susceptible.
The experiments demonstrating IN VIVO transfer in laboratory animals have been conducted to test a hypothesis based on firm observations from ”real
life” of emerging resistance. An example of this is the studies on macrolide and tetracycline resistance in ,ISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES cited in 4.4.1. The
settings are, albeit artificial, certainly closer to the real situation than the test tube.
The opinion that the transfer rate in nature would be significantly lower than what is obtained IN VITRO is based on the assumption that laboratory
settings provide optimal conditions, and that such conditions are rare in real life. This is not necessarily true. The laboratory conditions normally used to test DNA transfer employ rapid growth, aerobic conditions and nutrient excess. Such conditions might enhance transfer rates, but it might also repress gene transfer in some bacteria (Salyers, 1995). Further, the event does not have to be frequent in order to have an effect. Once the resistance gene is present in a recipient, given a selective pressure the resistant clone will multiply.
Taken together, it is evident that transfer of genes does occur in nature (in/on living hosts or in their environments). The question that remains is how often it occurs.
Resistance mechanisms and resistance genes have only been investigated for AFA belonging to classes containing therapeuticals.
Described resistance genes are generally associated with transfer elements.
Transfer of resistance has been shown experimentally both IN VITRO and IN VIVO
Transfer of resistance has been shown between bacteria of different genera.
The same resistance genes are found in bacteria from different host species.
Resistant bacteria are not necessarily less competitive in the absence of a selective pressure.
4.5Transfer of resistance between various host species
There are two theoretically possible ways for transmission of antibiotic resistance from bacteria of one host species to those of another; firstly, direct
102 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
transmission of resistant bacteria, and secondly, transmission of resistance genes between bacteria colonising different host species. The debate has mostly been concerned with transmission of resistant bacteria from animals (taken as a group) to man. It has been questioned whether such transmission can occur. Logically, if transfer did not occur between bacteria from a specific animal species to man, then transfer between different animal species would not be expected to occur either. After all, humans are the only species in constant contact with all the other species.
4.5.1Transmission of bacteria
Studies concerning transmission of resistant bacteria from animal to man have mainly focused on
pathways from animals to man and subsequent infections have been clearly demonstrated (Bezanson ET AL , 1983; Holmberg ET AL , 1984; Spika ET AL , 1987; Mishu ET AL , 1991). Several reports suggest the transfer of other
Transfer of % COLI between various animals and humans has been demonstrated in various studies. The spread of a labelled multiresistant % COLI from cow to pig, mouse, fowl, fly, water and human, and from pig to fly, mouse, fowl, water and human was reported by Marshall and
Although the above cited studies concern resistance to antibacterials not used as AFA in the EU, they demonstrate that bacteria can be transmitted from animals to man directly, via food, or by other routes and in the case the bacterium carries resistance this trait will not disappear along the line.
Transfer of
workers and in occasional pigs on farms using
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 103 |
Direct transmission from chicken to man has been implicated in a recent report on a case of wound infection with a vancomycin resistant % FAECIUM
in a worker at a chicken packaging plant (Das ET AL , 1997). Available information strongly suggests that the infection was occupationally derived
(contracted from chicken carcasses).
Human % FAECIUM strains have been widely used as probiotics and do, at least transiently, colonise animal intestines. Further, human VRE have successfully been used to colonise mice experimentally (Whitman ET AL , 1996). This indicates that at least certain enterococcal strains can colonise, or transiently inhabit, a variety of hosts. Another report on occupational exposure provides further evidence (van den Bogaard ET AL , 1997). The prevalence of VRE in turkeys, turkey farmers, turkey slaughterers and urban residents was found to be 50%, 39%, 20% and 14%, respectively. Further investigations showed that VRE isolated from one of the farmers and his turkeys could not be differentiated by phenotypic or genotypic
4.5.2Transfer of genes
The majority of the bacteria in the animal intestinal microflora are relatively host specific and would not be expected to colonise other animal species or man. Similar restrictions do not apply to the bacterial host range of resistance genes. Therefore, transfer of genes between animal and human bacteria is more likely to have an impact on interspecies exchange of resistance. Transfer of resistance genes between animal and human microflora has been shown in several studies. Again, many of those deal with resistance genes related to therapeutical antibacterials.
However, in the light of the close relatedness between resistance genes in human and animal bacteria and the current knowledge of gene transfer mechanisms and genetic drift, it would be naïve to presume that there is no exchange of resistance genes between animal and human microflora. On the contrary, this is the most, if not the only, plausible explanation for the spread of antibacterial resistance against both therapeuticals and AFA in various populations. The majority of the studies addressing this topic concern resistance in
104 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
Resistance genes identified in both animal and human bacteria
Levy and
The spread of streptothricin resistance from animal to human bacteria has been documented in former Eastern Germany. A streptothricin antibiotic, nourseothricin, was commonly used in pig feed from the beginning of the 80s. A novel
Another example is the spread of
hygromycin B are used exclusively in animals. The gene AACC4, conferring
Dancla ET AL , 1986; Wray ET AL , 1986). It has since been demonstrated in various enterobacteria, including salmonella, from human as well as
environmental sources in different countries (Threlfall ET AL , 1986; Chaslus- Dancla ET AL , 1989; Hunter ET AL , 1993; Hunter ET AL , 1994). A high degree
of genetic homology between plasmids harbouring AACC4 and HPHB of human and animal origin has been demonstrated (Salauze ET AL , 1990;
(1994) demonstrated a widespread dissemination of plasmids harbouring AACC4 in % COLI from pigs, calves, the stockman and a variety of
environmental sources including rainwater puddles and water from a stream nearby. +LEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE with a slightly smaller conjugative plasmid
and similar resistance pattern was isolated from the stockman's wife.
As mentioned in 4.3.4, investigations concerning antimicrobial resistance tend to focus on a limited range of microbes. Few investigations concerning transfer of genes between the predominant, anaerobic, part of the microflora of man and animals are available. Nikolich and
using the TETQ gene, conveying tetracycline resistance, as indicator. By DNA sequencing of the gene from "ACTEROIDES spp. and 0REVOTELLA INTERMEDIA of human origin and 0REVOTELLA RUMINICOLA of bovine origin, they showed
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 105 |
identical, or nearly identical, gene sequences in bacteria of the two hosts from different geographic origin. The findings indicate that extensive transmission of the TETQ gene has occurred in nature between bacteria normally colonising different hosts and that the transfer is recent.
No similar investigations with direct relevance for AFA used in Europe have been found, nor studies concerning dominant microflora of other animal
species. )N VITRO
"ACTEROIDES spp. and 0REVOTELLA RUMINICOLA has been shown (Shoemaker ET AL , 1992), indicating a strong possibility of similar IN VIVO transfer events
related to macrolides and streptogramins. Further, successful transfer of
ERMF genes from 4REPONEMA DENTICOLA to %NTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS has been demonstrated (Roberts ET AL , 1996a)
The question of ”identity” of genes has been a matter of debate in relation to the discussion on the use of avoparcin in animal husbandry. It is important to point out that the bacterial genome is subject to changes over time. Mobile
The VANA gene cluster contains 9 genes (7 VAN and two transposition genes). Between those genes are intergenic,
In a study from Norway (Haaheim ET AL , 1997), PCR for the VANA and VANB genes combined with restriction fragment analysis of a long PCR covering the entire gene cluster and sequencing of the intergenic
Kirk and
supermarkets. By PCR, three intergenic regions and three genes of the VANA- cluster were investigated
and VANZ) In the chicken isolates, all three investigated genes were amplified as well as the three intergenic regions. Evidence of a not previously described insertion sequence in various locations of the intergenic region between VANX and VANY was found in some of the chicken isolates. The gene sequences of the strains from humans in this study were clearly atypical.
106 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
The focus of a Danish study, reported by Jensen (1996), was slightly different. In order to investigate the degree of variation within the VANA gene cluster, isolates from different animals and humans from a wider geographic range were investigated. Similar to Kirk and
designation of one of the groups was based on the presence of a point mutation in VANX and an insertion sequence (IS 6) in a specific position
in the transposon (Tn ). The group contained isolates from humans (Denmark and USA) and pigs (Denmark and UK). Mutations within the coding regions appear to be rare. Insertion sequences are highly mobile, and frequently vary in their location. The occurrence of an insertion sequence in the same location in strains of different origin could either be interpreted as evidence of an epidemiological relationship, or as the site being a ”hot spot” for insertion of the specific sequence. However, the likelihood of both a point mutation and an insertion in a specific location occurring independently in different strains is extremely low. Therefore, the genes present in those isolates must be very closely related and their presence the result of horizontal transfer.
Experimental transfer studies
Lacey (1980) examined the possibility of transfer of macrolide resistance between animal and human isolates of 3TAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS. Transfer by
phage conjugation from human to animal isolates was shown at low frequencies
was attempted is not known. The same author also investigated transfer of resistance between animal and human streptococci, including 3TREPTOCOCCUS group D (now %NTEROCOCCUS) (Lacey, 1984). In about 10% of the animal
strains investigated, transfer to human recipients was demonstrated. Transfer of resistance occurred more readily from the enterococci. No transfer to group A or group C streptococci was demonstrated. The most common transfer frequencies were between
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 107 |
(Malke, 1979; Horodniceanu ET AL , 1981; Ravdonikas, 1983; Horaud ET AL , 1985). This indicates that the conditions of the experiment may not have allowed optimal transfer rates.
4.5.3Routes of transmission - food as a vehicle
Direct contact with animals carrying resistance genes provides excellent opportunity for uptake of these genes. Examples of farmers carrying the same resistance genes in their microflora as do their animals have been given in 4.5.1 and 4.5.2. Logically, this transfer works both ways, resistance genes may also spread from humans to animals. However, as animals are in many ways part of the human food chain, transfer from animals to humans would be expected to occur more easily.
Enteric pathogens are readily transmitted through foods as are antibiotic resistant pathogens and commensals. It has been suggested that, in the normal human population, most resistant enterobacteria in faeces come from contaminated food (Corpet, 1988). In an experiment (Corpet, 1988), 7 healthy volunteers were given a control diet for 3 weeks followed by a sterile
diet for 2.5 weeks. During both periods, total and antibiotic resistant %NTEROBACTERIACEAE in stools were counted. A drastic drop in faecal
concentrations of antibiotic resistant enterobacteria was observed during the sterile diet period (p<0.05).
Antibiotic resistant
transferable resistance genes, including
isolated from food (Bates ET AL , 1994; Aarestrup, 1995; Klare ET AL , 1995a; Perreten and Teuber, 1995; Roberts ET AL , 1996b; Perreten ET AL , 1997).
Most foods are heat treated before consumption and hence, no viable resistant bacteria would be expected to be present in the final product. However,
common and viable bacteria can be present in relatively large numbers in food when consumed. Certain bacteria, such as % FAECIUM may also have an
increased heat tolerance (Panagea and Chadwick, 1996).
The origin of these resistant bacteria is difficult to determine but there can be no doubt that they at least partly originate from contamination of meat and vegetables with animal bacteria. Exchange of resistance genes between bacterial species has been demonstrated in water, soil, on kitchen towels, on cutting boards, and on the surface of food (Kruse and Sørum, 1994).
108 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
Epidemiological studies comparing the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria in vegetarians and
4.5.4Likelihood of resistance being transferred from animals to man
It has been proposed that both types of transfer discussed above are extremely rare events (Knothe, 1977; Lacey, 1980; Lacey, 1984; Lacey, 1988; Shah ET AL , 1993). The basis for this opinion is the rarity of isolation of the same bacteria from animals and man (Lacey, 1988; Shah ET AL , 1993), the rarity of gene transfer IN VITRO between human and animal isolates of some bacterial species (Lacey, 1980; Lacey, 1984) and lack of association between drug consumption in veterinary medicine and resistance patterns in human pathogens (Knothe, 1977). Acknowledging the logic of these arguments, they are mainly based on observations on staphylococci and to a lesser extent streptococci and enterococci. Staphylococci and streptococci are indeed rather host specific, and transfer frequencies between staphylococci are, compared to other genera, rather low irrespective of host origin. Nevertheless, it is doubtful whether the finding of a low number of animal isolates capable of transferring resistance to human isolates, and vice versa, in the laboratory at a frequency in the order of
large number of successful transfer events. The rarity of macrolide resistance in #AMPYLOBACTER spp. isolated from humans has also been pointed out
(Lacey, 1988). The species distribution of the bacterial isolates investigated was not given, but as the vast majority of human isolates are # JEJUNI this
species can be assumed to be the predominant in the material. It was stated that in animal husbandry, macrolides are mainly used as AFA in pigs. As the main animal host of # JEJUNI is poultry, prevalence of macrolide resistance in this bacterial species provides little information about the effects of macrolide use in pigs. In # COLI, which is mainly found in pigs, a high prevalence of macrolide resistance has been reported (Wang ET AL , 1984; Burridge ET AL , 1986;
As stated by Lacey (1988), it is known that animal bacteria can colonise man, at least transiently, and that resistance genes can be transferred between animal and human bacteria, but the frequency of these events in nature is unknown.
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 109 |
Transmission of resistant bacteria between host species occurs, although depending on bacterial species the resulting colonisation may be transient.
Transmission of resistance genes can and does occur in a variety of surroundings.
The question that remains is how often successful transfers cause clinical problems.
4.6Epidemiology of antibacterial resistance
The causal relationship between use of antibacterials and resistance has been shown both for human and animal bacteria (among others Richmond, 1972; Levy ET AL , 1976; Seppälä ET AL , 1997). In evolutionary terms, exposure to antibacterials exert a selective pressure on bacterial populations, giving bacteria with advantageous traits a competitive advantage (survival of the fit).
All factors influencing the usage of antibacterials and/or the spread of infectious agents will also affect the emergence of resistance. In human medicine, such factors are; changes in human demographics and behaviour, changes in technology and industry, economic development and land use, international travel and commerce, microbial adaptation and change and breakdown of public health measures (Cohen, 1996). Corresponding factors are known to influence epidemiology of contagious diseases in animals. Apart from the two latter, these factors all influence the degree of contact between individuals, either by affecting the population density or by providing new contact routes. This emphasises the similarity between spread of resistance and spread of infectious diseases.
4.6.1Reservoirs - the gene pool
As noted in 4.3.4, dissemination of resistance requires both presence of the antibacterial in concentrations high enough to inhibit growth of normally susceptible bacteria and presence of resistance genes (Levy, 1996). This spread involves a variety of commensals and environmental bacteria (see 4.3, 4.4 and 6.4) which act as reservoirs.
In order to create a problem, or even to be noticed, the resistance genes have to pass from the reservoirs into clinically relevant bacterial hosts. The size and accessibility of the reservoir available will determine the likelihood of such events. The prevalence of resistance genes (i.e. the size of the
110 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
reservoir) will primarily depend on the selective pressure applied in different microbial habitats. In most surveys on antibacterial resistance, only potential pathogens are included and thus, the bulk of the resistance gene pool will go unnoticed.
4.6.2Risk factors for spread of resistance
The kinetics of resistance spread in bacterial populations will be dependent on the total time and degree of exposure to risk factors, and on the sizes and numbers of populations exposed (Levy, 1996).
The selective pressure
The main risk factor for increased resistance is, as mentioned, exposure of bacteria to the specific antimicrobial under study. The selective pressure can be defined as the product of exposure dose and exposure time. The importance of time is illustrated by the investigations by Garber (1989) on the association between antibacterial use and the nosocomial spread of infections with resistant
The number of bacteria exposed is important, but even more so the number of separate bacterial subpopulations. Orally administered antibacterials will exert a larger selective pressure than for instance if locally applied on the skin, as the intestine contains a larger number of various bacterial species (Salyers, 1995).
The proportion of individuals exposed in a subpopulation, as well as the number of subpopulations exposed, is of importance for the spread of resistance between the microflora of individuals.
When antibacterials are used as AFA, they are administered for a long period of time, and usually to all individuals in a group or even herd. As discussed in 4.2, the doses given are certainly inhibitory enough to disrupt the initial balance between resistant and susceptible strains in the normal flora. With time, resistance will and does evolve (see 4.3).
Population factors
The spread of resistance genes between the microflora of different individuals depends on the number of direct or indirect contacts between the bacteria of the individuals. As for infectious diseases, the incidence of resistance genes will depend on size, and structure of the host population.
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 111 |
The degree of contact between individuals and subpopulations, population density, is also crucial (Schwabe ET AL , 1977). As an example, studies on human skin flora show that sequential therapy for acne promotes the carriage of resistant staphylococci on the skin of close contacts (Miller ET AL , 1996).
In animal husbandry, high stocking densities, frequent indirect contacts with other herds, frequent trading of animals, and a low level of hygiene will favour the spread and maintenance of resistance traits. Other factors such as feeding practices, management, temperature, humidity and light intensity may influence the composition of the bacterial population and thus, to some extent, influence the incidence of resistance.
Individual factors
Transfer of resistance and/ or colonisation with resistant strains appears to occur more readily in the intestine of young animals as compared to adults (Langlois, 1988). McConnell and
Individual features of the combination of bacterial species and specific
antibacterial involved also play a role. For example, penicillin resistance developed rapidly in human 3TAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS following the
introduction of penicillin, whilst in group A streptococci, such resistance has not yet been demonstrated in spite of 4 decades of use of the drug. On the other hand, group A streptococci seem to readily acquire resistance to macrolides
4.6.3Persistence of resistance
Field observations indicate that the relation between antibacterial use and resistance is not as
112 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
cages, over several months, the resistance level did not decline. However, when the cages were relocated to different sites, the flora slowly returned to more susceptible levels. This was interpreted as the first environment lacking susceptible strains to replace the resistant ones.
The concept that susceptible strains will replace the resistant ones once the selective event has passed relies on the idea that resistant strains will be at a disadvantage once the antibacterial is withdrawn. This might not always be the case, as a
Another factor to be considered is
4.6.4 Some comments on epidemiology
While each single use of an antibiotic has only a small effect on the probability of a resistant strain developing, the consequences add up across all other users in the community. Logically, the selective pressure within a dense population, such as patients in a hospital or animals in a herd, is the major factor contributing to amplification of resistance genes within that particular population. However, very few populations of either animals and humans are isolated from others and transmission of resistance genes can easily occur between groups. This is illustrated in the findings of Linton (1988 see 4.3.1). A resistance gene originating in an animal population may spread to a population of humans and persist there, under the selective pressure from antimicrobials used for human therapy (for example apramycin resistance, see 4.5.2), and vice versa.
Disproportions in the usage of antibacterials between different populations of humans or animals may cause
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 113 |
subsequently maintained within the hospital population. This illustrates the fact that although the antimicrobial usage within a certain population contributes to most of the antimicrobial resistance within that population, other populations serve as reservoirs for resistance genes.
Commensals and environmental bacteria act as reservoirs for resistance genes.
In the presence of antimicrobials, resistant bacteria will have a competitive advantage.
The effects of the selective pressure on bacterial populations will depend on the exposure dose and exposure time, and on the sizes and numbers of populations exposed.
If susceptible strains are available in the environment, these may replace the resistant ones when the selective pressure is removed.
Bacterial adaptation may result in increased fitness of resistant strains.
Factors influencing the usage of antibacterials and/or the spread of infectious agents will also affect the emergence of resistance.
Microbiota of animals serve as resistance gene reservoirs for human bacteria and vice versa.
4.7Effects of an increase in resistance
Presence of resistance genes in the human or animal microflora is not in itself a problem. The problem arises when bacteria causing a disease withstand antibiotic therapy.
For substances that are used both as AFA and for therapy or prevention (tylosin, spiramycin, virginiamycin, olaquindox, carbadox) the consequences
for animals of resistance in animal pathogens are obvious. As an example, for important swine pathogens such as 3ERPULINA HYODYSENTERIAE and ,AWSONIA INTRACELLULARIS tylosin or tiamulin are the drugs of choice
(Fellström, 1996; McOrist ET AL , 1996; McOrist ET AL , 1997). Tylosin resistance in 3 HYODYSENTERIAE is already widespread, leaving tiamulin as the
only available alternative (Gunnarsson ET AL , 1991; Buller and Hampson, 1994; Molnar, 1996). In table 3.III (chapter 3) some indications for treatment and prophylaxis with substances also used as AFA are listed.
In human medicine, macrolides, streptogramins and glycopeptides all have important indications such as respiratory infections, mycoplasmas, chlamydiae (macrolides only) and other infections with staphylococci, streptococci enterococci and clostridia, (see annexes D and E ). For some of
114 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
these indications, other drugs might be the first choice but substances in the groups listed constitute valuable secondor even
An increase in resistance against these drugs may lead to therapeutic failures and will substantially diminish the available therapeutic arsenal. As long as there are alternative drugs available, the situation can still be managed, although possibly at a higher cost.
The relative importance of the different therapeutical substances is subject to change over time. Vancomycin became a last resort antibiotic as a consequence of the spread of multiresistant staphylococci in hospitals. Emergence of resistance is one explanation, but also that new pathogens emerge due to a combination of technological and societal changes (Cohen, 1992).
Some potential alternatives have not yet been introduced into human medicine. Old, underexploited antibiotic classes such as orthosomycins, phosphoglycolipids and elfamycins as well as antimicrobial peptides all have modes of action that make them interesting as templates for therapeutic substances (van den Bogaard and Stobberingh, 1996; Chopra ET AL , 1997).
Although safe and effective new antibacterial substances may still be found, the efficacy of the older drugs is imperative in keeping fatal infections at bay.
Resistance becomes a problem when bacteria causing a disease withstand antibiotic therapy.
Some substances used as AFA are also used for therapy in animals and humans. Increased resistance to AFA may therefore cause clinical problems
Other substances used as AFA may serve as templates for future drugs. An increase in resistance may shorten the
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 115 |
4.8Other effects on the microflora
The normal intestinal flora of healthy animals and humans does not cause the host any harm. On the contrary, it protects against colonisation with enteric pathogens. Intensive livestock production systems can, however, induce imbalance in this normal flora, thereby making way for enteric disease (McOrist, 1997). All exposure of the normal flora to antibacterials, for growth promotion or for therapy, will disturb its balance (Corpet, 1996). Depending on the antibacterial spectrum, different microbes will be suppressed. This may lead to a loss of the protective role of the normal flora, impairing resistance to colonisation. As many of the enteric pathogens are of zoonotic character and are known to cause foodborne infections, this might present a hazard for human health.
If the antibacterial feed additive is effective against certain pathogenic bacteria, it would be expected to prevent intestinal colonisation by these organisms and perhaps even remove already established infections. In this case, however, feeding the antibacterial substance must be regarded as prophylaxis or therapy and cannot be categorised as growth promotion.
4.8.1Salmonella
Concern over potential salmonella contamination of human food has led to the instigation of various measures for its control. Reports in the medical literature that antibiotics may prolong the course of salmonella colonisation has led to the scrutiny of the effects of AFA on salmonella in animals.
The protective effect of the normal microflora against salmonella infection was demonstrated by Nurmi and Rantala in the early 70s (Nurmi and Rantala, 1973). As most AFA, apart from quinoxalines and perhaps flavomycin, are not active against salmonella, their presence in the intestine would be expected to favour rather than disfavour salmonella colonisation.
The main concern regarding human health is contamination of the animal products. There are numerous ways by which salmonellae can contaminate animal products. Stress during transportation may lead to translocation of enteric bacteria with subsequent contamination of internal organs at slaughter. Faecal material on skin or from the intestine can spread to the meat of several carcasses along the processing line (Lillard, 1990). This problem is particularly important when chickens are slaughtered. Rigorous measures following Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) may reduce the problem.
The important factor when assessing the overall risk of contamination of food is the total amount of salmonella organisms brought into the processing plant by animals (Jordon, 1990). Thus, the epidemiological unit of concern is the flock or herd.
116 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
Theoretical effects of AFA on salmonella colonisation could be a lowering of the infectious dose necessary to achieve colonisation, an increase in the amount of organisms shed by colonised animals or a prolonged duration of shedding by colonised animals.
A lowered infectious dose will increase the probability of the flock becoming infected by exposure to low doses of salmonella. Moreover, a lowered infectious dose will facilitate the subsequent spread within the flock.
Likewise, an increased amount of organisms shed will contribute to the spread of the infection within the flock. More importantly, animals shedding a large amount of salmonella organisms can have a substantial impact on the
A prolonged duration of shedding also contributes to the spread within the flock, as well as the proportion of animals shedding salmonella at slaughter.
A substantial amount of studies have been performed on the effects of AFA on salmonella colonisation. Most of these studies are, however, inconclusive and while some are excellent, many have considerable shortcomings regarding study design and conclusions drawn. As the study designs used are very different, it is almost impossible to compare the results of one study to those of another. Further comments on the different studies can be found in annexes
Table 4.VIII. Results from various studies on the effects of AFA on No. of animals shedding salmonella.
Tabell 4.VIII. Resultat från olika studies avseende effekten av antibakteriella fodertillsatser på antal djur som utsöndrar sal monella
Study | Animal | Serovar | AFA | Conclusions drawn1 | Comment | |
species | ||||||
swine | S. Typhimurium | virginiamycin | ➙ | No statistical difference between | ||
1979 | medicated and controls | |||||
Abou Youssef et al, | chickens | S. Typhimurium | virginiamycin | ➙ | No statistical difference between | |
1983 | medicated and controls | |||||
Barrow, 1989 | chickens | S. Typhimurium, | avoparcin | ➚ | Increased No. of birds shedding | |
S. Pullorum, | salmonella in medicated group | established for avoparcin | ||||
S. Choleraesuis, | ||||||
S. Dublin, | ||||||
S. Arizonae | ||||||
Dealy and Moeller, | swine | S. Typhimurium | flavomycin | ➘ | Reduced duration and prevalence of | Infecting organism susceptible to |
1976 | salmonella shedding by medicated | flavomycin | ||||
animals | ||||||
Dealy and Moeller, | calves | S. Typhimurium | flavomycin | ➘ | Reduced duration and prevalence of | Infecting organism susceptible to |
1977 | salmonella shedding by medicated | flavomycin | ||||
animals | ||||||
George et al, 1982 | chickens | S. Typhimurium | flavomycin | ➙ | No statistical difference between | |
medicated and controls | ||||||
Gustafson et al, 1981 | chickens | S. Typhimurium | avoparcin, | ➙ | No statistical difference between | All birds also received monensin |
virginiamycin | ➙ | medicated and controls |
Gustafson et al, 1983 | chickens S. Typhimurium | avoparcin | ➙ No statistical difference between |
medicated and controls |
Also tested effect of clean versus used litter
Table VIII. Continued
4ABELL 6))) &ORTS¤TTNING
Study | Animal | Serovar | AFA | Conclusions drawn1 | Comment | |
species | ||||||
Hinton et al, 1986 | chickens | S. Bredeney, | avoparcin, | ? | Results inconclusive | All birds also received monensin |
S. Cubana, | virginiamycin | |||||
natural infection | ||||||
via feed | ||||||
Hinton, 1988 | chickens | S. Kedougo | avilamycin | ➙ | No statistical difference between | |
medicated and controls |
Humbert et al, 1991 | chickens S. Typhimurium | avoparcin, | ➙ No significant effect of AFA alone, |
bacitracin, | ➙ interaction with CE treatment | ||
flavomycin, | ➙ | ||
virginiamycin | ➙ |
All birds shed salmonellae, comparisons based on amount of organisms in faeces
Jacks et al, 1988 | swine | S. Typhimurium | efrotomycin | ➙ | No statistical difference between | Both quantity, duration and |
medicated and controls | prevalence of shedding evaluated | |||||
Latour and Barnum, | ducks | S. Typhimurium | bacitracin | ➚ | Increased prevalence in medicated | |
1981 | ➙ | group in 2 experiments, no statis- | ||||
tical difference in 2 experiments | ||||||
Leuchtenberger, 1981 | chickens | S. Typhimurium | avoparcin, | ➚ | Increased prevalence and duration | |
tylosin, | ➚ | of shedding in medicated groups | ||||
virginiamycin | ➚ |
Linton et al, 1985 | chickens Various, natural | avoparcin | ➙ No statistical difference between |
infection via | medicated and controls | ||
contaminated feed |
All groups except one of the controls also received monensin
Manning et al, 1994 | chickens S. Enteritidis | bacitracin | ➚ Increased prevalence of salmonella All birds kept on used litter |
shedding in medicated group |
Table 4.VIII. Continued
4ABELL 6))) &ORTS¤TTNING
Study | Animal Serovar | AFA | Conclusions drawn1 | Comment |
species |
Matthes et al, 1981 | chickens | not given | avoparcin, | ➚ | Prolonged salmonella shedding in |
tylosin, | ➚ | medicated groups | |||
virginiamycin | ➚ | ||||
Nurmi and Rantala, | chickens | S. Infantis | bacitracin | ➘ | Reduced prevalence and amount of |
1974 | salmonella shedding in medicated | ||||
group | |||||
Smith and Tucker, | chickens | S. Typhimurium | bacitracin, | ➙ | Small or no increase in prevalence |
1975 | flavomycin, | ➚ | of shedding in groups fed | ||
tylosin, | ➚ | virginiamycin or bacitracin. Larger | |||
virginiamycin | ➙ | increase in most groups fed | |||
flavomycin and tylosin |
Possibly identical to one of the experiments reported by Leuchtenberger
Smith and Tucker, | chickens | S. Typhimurium | avoparcin, | ➚ | Increased prevalence of salmonella |
1978 | tylosin | ➚ | shedding in medicated groups | ||
Smith and Tucker, | chickens | S. Typhimurium, | avoparcin, | ➚ | Increased prevalence and duration |
1980 | S. Heidelberg, | bacitracin | ➙ | of shedding in groups fed | |
S. Oranienburg, | avoparcin. Little or no increase in | ||||
S. Infantis, | groups fed bacitracin | ||||
S. Senftenberg |
Effect of infectious dose, poultry breed and feed type also investigated
Troutt et al, 1974 | swine | S. Choleraesuis | carbadox | ➘ Diminished clinical signs in |
medicated group |
1 Arrows indicate conclusions as drawn by the authors regarding effect of AFA on colonisation; ➙ denotes no difference,➘ denotes a decrease, ➚ indicate an increase in shedding time and/or prevalence when medicated groups were compared to control groups
120 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
The interest in these studies has mainly been focused on prevalence and duration of salmonella shedding in experimentally infected animals. Most studies have been conducted for
Three studies (Nurmi and Rantala, 1974; Barrow, 1989; Humbert ET AL , 1991) evaluate the amount of organisms shed. Two indicate a possible decrease in numbers shed by
Regarding changes in the infectious dose, or increased susceptibility of infected animals, the prevalence of salmonella in the different experimental groups shortly after infection may give a hint. One study, by Smith and Tucker (1980) clearly showed, by
Some substances do appear to affect the course of salmonella infection within an animal herd. Gustafson and
Comments on study design
One problem with many of the studies in the table above is that the groups of animals are too small. Population size and density are important factors influencing the spread and persistence of an infection within a herd (Schwabe ET AL , 1977). Studies performed on small groups of chickens are not necessarily applicable to real poultry flocks with tens of thousands of birds.
The need for a study design as realistic as possible must be balanced against the need for a controlled environment. Practices vary in animal husbandry and what is a realistic study design in one part of the world may
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 121 |
be unrealistic in another area. For example, Gustafson (1983) conducted a series of studies on the effect on salmonella shedding if chickens were raised on clean or used litter and found a higher prevalence of shedding among birds raised on clean litter.
As evident from table 4.VIII, most investigators use 3.Typhimurium for the experimental inoculation, and most strains are laboratory mutants resistant to nalidixic acid. It is unclear whether the results obtained with such strains are applicable to all salmonella serovars. Further, the properties of an old laboratory strain are not necessarily comparable to wild strains. 3. Enteritidis is currently the main cause of
Titration of infectious dose and establishment of
Doses used for inoculation are often large enough to cause colonisation of almost every animal in the control groups. While this allows for a maximum number of animals to monitor the shedding time, differences in susceptibility or epidemic curves are impossible to detect.
From a statistical point of view, these studies were designed to demonstrate differences between experimental groups, not to prove the absence of differences. In the former type of experiments, the null hypothesis is that there is no difference. In such cases, most statistical analyses use figures for significance and power that accept a 5% risk of falsely rejecting the null hypothesis (type I error) and a 20% risk of falsely maintaining the null hypothesis (type II error). Consequently, results calculated under these assumptions cannot simply be reversed to argue that the null hypothesis is true. When trying to prove safety, the allowances for type I and type II errors should be reversed. Alternatively, other statistical methods can be used, such as the detection level (a parameter indicating the minimum effect that could have been detected) suggested by Hansson (1995).
122 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
4.8.2Other pathogens
In addition to various 3ALMONELLA spp., colonisation of the animals with other
zoonotic and animal pathogens could also be affected. Little is known of such effects in relation to pathogens such as #AMPYLOBACTER spp., 9ERSINIA spp.,
in the animal intestine of these bacteria could have serious consequences for either human or animal health. No studies specifically addressing this topic have been found.
4.8.3Other alterations of the microflora
Resistant bacteria may carry other traits that are disadvantageous for the host, such as other resistance genes, or virulence genes. An increase of the population of naturally resistant bacteria following exposure to antibacterial substances can be expected. Moreover, the prevalence of species with a high capacity for acquisition of resistance genes can be expected to increase. Although this may indirectly lead to an overall increase in resistance, this issue has not attracted much attention.
In an earlier cited study by Kaukas and
generally more resistant than the other enterococcal species, the ARI
increased in groups fed AFA. Resistance to the antibiotics studied is mainly conferred by acquired resistance genes in % FAECIUM
AFA cause disruption of the intestinal microflora which may increase the susceptibility to colonisation by enteric pathogens.
Avoparcin enhances intestinal colonisation with salmonella.
Some other AFA also affect salmonella colonisation.
Information on enteric pathogens other than salmonella is scarce.
Published studies do not directly address the influence of AFA on contamination of food of animal origin with zoonotic pathogens.
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 123 |
4.9Summary comments
Use of AFA results in dissemination of resistance to AFA and related substances. Resistance against AFA can and does transfer between different bacteria and between different human and animal hosts. The use of AFA will thereby contribute to the increase of the environmental pool of resistance genes. The relative importance of this contribution for the increased resistance in animal and human pathogens cannot be determined. In a situation where the substance in question is not used for therapy, the bulk of the resistance genes will be directly attributable to AFA usage. At least two of the classes formerly primarily used as AFA are today options for new therapeutical drugs.
The possible effects of AFA on prevalence of
low, or where control programs are in force. Regarding other pathogens, such as #AMPYLOBACTER spp. and 9ERSINIA spp., no information has been found.
124 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
Glossary
ACTIVE EFFLUX - active transportation of a substance out of the bacterial cell, mostly by a membrane "pump"
CHROMOSOME - circular DNA structure, the major part of the bacterial genome
CO RESISTANCE - simultaneous resistance to several different antibacterials by different mechanisms, encoded by different genes
CO TRANSFER - simultaneous transfer of different resistance genes, located on the same mobile element
CONJUGATION OR CONJUGAL TRANSFER - direct transfer of plasmids or transposons between different bacteria via
CONJUGATIVE PLASMIDS AND TRANSPOSONS - mobile DNA elements that carry genes encoding the mechanisms for their own conjugal transfer
CONSTITUTIVE EXPRESSION - the gene product is synthesised regardless of the presence of an inducer
CROSS RESISTANCE - resistance to different antimicrobials by the same resistance mechanism
DELETION - disappearance of DNA within or between genes
GENE DNA sequence that encodes a single protein; promoter plus open reading frame
GENE CASSETTE - gene lacking promoter, that encodes a specific mechanism, and can be inserted into integrons
GENE CLUSTER - several genes located together, forming a functional gene with products acting together to exert an effect
INDUCIBLE RESISTANCE - the product of the resistance gene is only synthesised in the presence of the inducing substance, usually the antimicrobial that the resistance mechanism counteracts
INSERTION - addition of DNA within or between genes
INTEGRON - small mobile element carrying gene cassettes and genes encoding its own transfer and insertion into the bacterial genome, as well as genes encoding rearrangement, expression and uptake of gene cassettes
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 125 |
INTERGENIC SEQUENCE - DNA sequence separating functional genes
MULTIRESISTANCE - resistance to a large number of different antimicrobials by various resistance mechanisms encoded by different genes
MUTATION random change in DNA sequence, can change the amino acid of an encoded protein
OPEN READING FRAME (ORF) - DNA sequence that encodes a single protein
OPERON - gene plus the operator controlling its expression
PHAGE - virus that infects bacteria and inserts its own DNA into the bacterial genome
PLASMID - extrachromosomal small, covalently closed, usually circular DNA element that can replicate autonomously and be transferred between bacteria
RIBOSOME - cytoplasmic structure where protein synthesis takes place through translation of mRNA
TRANSDUCTION - phage mediated gene transfer
TRANSFORMATION - gene transfer via bacterial uptake of free, extracellular DNA
TRANSPOSON - small, mobile DNA element that carry one or several genes, plus genes encoding for its on transposition between various locations in the bacterial genome
126 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
References
!ARESTRUP &
!BOU 9OUSSEF - ( #UOLLO # * D &REE 3 - 3COTT ' # AND $I #UOLLO # * , 1983.
The influence of a feed additive level of virginiamycin on the course of an experimentally induced 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM infection in broilers. 0OULTRY 3CIENCE
!BOU 9OUSSEF - ( $I#UOLLO # *
3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM in experimentally infected swine. *OURNAL OF !NIMAL 3CIENCE
!LLIGNET * !UBERT 3
encoding resistance to streptogramin A and related compounds among staphylococci resistant to these antibiotics. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
!LLIGNET * AND %L 3OLH . , 1995. Diversity among the
inactivating streptogramin A and structurally related compounds and characterization of a new staphylococcal determinant, VATB. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
!MABILE #UEVAS # & AND #HICUREL - % , 1992. Bacterial plasmids and gene flux. #ELL
!RTHUR - "RISSON .OEL ! AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1987. Origin and evolution of genes
specifying resistance to macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin antibiotics: data and hypothesis. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY
!RTHUR - AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1993. Genetics and mechanisms of glycopeptide resistance in enterococci. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
!RTHUR - 2EYNOLDS 0 AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1996. Glycopeptide resistance in enterococci. 4RENDS IN
"AGER &
a growth promoter is associated with the occurrence of
%NTEROCOCCUS FACECIUM on Danish poultry and pig farms. 0REVENTIVE 6ETERINARY
"ARROW 0 ! , 1989. Further observations on the effect of feeding diets containing
avoparcin on the excretion of salmonellas by experimentally infected chickens.
%PIDEMIOLOGY AND )NFECTION
"ARROW 0 ! AND ,OVELL - ! , 1991. Experimental infection of
3ALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS phage type 4. !VIAN 0ATHOLOGY
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 127 |
"ATES * *ORDENS * : AND 'RIFFITHS $ 4 , 1994. Farm animals as a putative reservoir for
"EZANSON ' 3 +HAKHRIA 2 AND "OLLEGRAAF % , 1983. Nosocomial outbreak caused by
#ANADIAN
"RISSON .OEL ! !RTHUR - AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1988. Evidence for natural gene transfer from
"ROPHY 0 / , 1988. Antibiotics on the farm: the UCD Lyons experience. )RISH 6ETERINARY *OURNAL
"ULLER . " AND (AMPSON $ * , 1994. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 3ERPULINA HYODYSENTERIAE. !USTRALIAN 6ETERINARY *OURNAL
"URRIDGE 2 7ARREN # AND 0HILLIPS ) , 1986. Macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin resistance in #AMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI COLI. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY
#HADWICK 0 2 7OODFORD . +ACZMARSKI % " 'RAY 3 "ARRELL 2 ! AND /PPENHEIM " ! , 1996.
#HASLUS $ANCLA %
3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM isolated from animals in France. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
#HASLUS $ANCLA % 0OHLA 0
genetic homology between plasmids of human and animal origins conferring resistance to the aminoglycosides, gentamicin and apramycin. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
#HASLUS $ANCLA % 9 'LUPCZYNSKI ' 'ERBAUD ' ,AGORCE
#HOPRA ) (ODGSON *
#HRISTIE 0 * +ORMAN 2 : :AHLER 3 ! !DSIT * # AND $UNNY '
identification of a conjugative transposon that transfers between 3 FAECALIS and
"ACILLUS SUBTILIS. *OURNAL OF "ACTERIOLOGY
#OHEN
128 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
#OHEN
pp.
#OQUE 4 - 4OMAYKO * & 2ICKE 3 # /KHYUSEN 0 # AND
#ORANAGLIA ' ,IGOZZI -
2 , 1996. Rapid increase of resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin in
3TREPTOCOCCUS PYOGENES in Italy,
#ORPET $ % , 1984. The effect of bambermycin, carbadox, chlortetracycline and
olaquindox on antibiotic resistance in intestinal coliforms: a new animal model.
!NNALES DE
#ORPET $ % , 1986. Ecological factors influencing the transfer of plasmids IN VITRO and IN VIVO. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY 3UPPL #
#ORPET $ % , 1988. Antibiotic resistance from food. .EW %NGLAND *OURNAL OF
#ORPET $ % , 1996. Microbiological hazards for humans of antimicrobial growth promoter use in animal production. 2EVUE
#OURVALIN 0 , 1994. Transfer of antibiotic resistance genes between
$AS ) &RAISE ! AND 7ISE 2 , 1997. Are
$EALY * AND
$EALY * AND
$EALY * AND
$EVRIESE , ! $AUBE ' (OMMEZ * AND (AESEBROUCK & , 1993. In vitro susceptibility of #LOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS isolated from farm animals to growthenhancing antibiotics. *OURNAL OF !PPLIED "ACTERIOLOGY
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 129 |
$EVRIESE , ! )EVEN - 'OOSSENS ( 6ANDAMME 0 0OT " (OMMEZ * AND (AESEBROUCK & , 1996. Presence of
$OUCET 0OPULAIRE & 4RIEU #OUT 0 $OSBAA ) !NDREMONT ! AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1991. Inducible transfer of conjugative transposon Tn from %NTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS to ,ISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES in the digestive tract of gnotobiotic mice.
!NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
$UTTA ' . AND $EVRIESE , ! , 1982. Susceptibility of fecal streptococci of poultry origin to nine
$UTTA ' . AND $EVRIESE , ! , 1984. Observations on the in vitro sensitivity and
resistance of Gram positive intestinal bacteria of farm animals to growth promoting antimicrobial agents. *OURNAL OF !PPLIED "ACTERIOLOGY
%ADY % ! 2OSS * ) 4IPPER * , 7ALTERS # % #OVE * ( AND .OBLE 7 # , 1993. Distribution of genes encoding erythromycin ribosomal methylases and an
erythromycin efflux pump in epidemiologically distinct groups of staphylococci.
*OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY
%NDTZ ( 0 2UIIS ' * VAN +LINGEREN " *ANSEN 7 ( VAN DER 2EYDEN 4 AND
poultry following the introduction of fluoroquinolones in veterinary medicine.
*OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY
&ELLSTR¶M # , 1996. Phenotypic classification, detection and phylogeny of 3ERPULINA species in swine. (Thesis). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
&RANCO !BUIN # - 1UINTO &ERNANDEZ % * &ENTE 3AMPAYO # 2ODRIGUEZ /TERO * , $OMINGUEZ 2ODRIGUEZ , AND #EPEDA 3AEZ ! , 1994. Susceptibilities of
,ISTERIA species isolated from food to nine antimicrobial agents. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
&RANKLIN ! AND
plasmids encoding for
147.
'ARBER !
'EDEK " , 1981. Factors influencing multiple resistance in enteric bacteria in animals. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 4EN YEARS ON FROM 3WANN
'EORGE " ! AND &AGERBERG $ * , 1984. Effect of bambermycins, in vitro, on plasmidmediated antimicrobial resistance. !MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH
'EORGE " ! &AGERBERG $ * 1UARLES # , &ENTON * - AND
130 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
resistance of 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM in experimentally infected broiler chickens.
!MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH
'ILLESPIE 3 AND
4RENDS IN
'REEN - 3HLAES * ( "ARBADORA + AND 3HLAES $
714.
'REKO # , 1996. Inventering av resistens mot antibakteriella medel hos enterokocker från kyckling (rapport). National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala.
'REKO # , 1997. Sensitivity to antibacterials in % COLI and enterococci isolated from piglets in Sweden (in manuscript). .
'REKO # AND ,INDBLAD * , 1996. Vancomycin sensitivity of enterococci from Swedish poultry and pigs. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 3YMPOSIUM &OOD !SSOCIATED 0ATHOGENS Dept.
of Food Hygiene, SLU, Uppsala, May
'UNNARSSON ! &RANKLIN ! (ORN AF 2ANTZIEN
- ( A , 1991. Resistensundersökning av svenska isolat av Treponema hyodysenteriae. 3VENSK 6ETERIN¤RTIDNING
'USTAFSON 2 ( , 1983. Salmonella shedding and feed additives. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )NTERNATIONAL 3YMPOSIUM ON !NTIBIOTICS IN !GRICULTURE "ENEFITS AND
'USTAFSON 2 ( "ECK * 2 AND +OBLAND * $ , 1981. The influence of Avoparcin on the establishment of Salmonella in chickens. :ENTRALBLATT FUR 6ETERIN¤RMEDIZIN REIHE "
(AAHEIM ( 3IMONSEN ' 3 $AHL + ( ,OVESETH ! /LSVIK / +RUSE ( AND 3UNDSFJORD ! , 1997. 6ANA glycopeptide resistant enterococci: Identical VANA
gene cluster in glycopeptide resistant enterococi from man and
(AMILTON
(ANSSON 3 / , 1995. The detection level. 2EGULATORY 4OXICOLOGY AND 0HARMACOLOGY
(AYDEN - + 0ICKEN 2 . AND 3AHM $ & , 1997. Heterogeneous expression of
glycopeptide resistance in enterococci associated with transfer of VANB.
!NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
(AYDEN - + 4REHOLME * % 3CHULTZ * % AND 3AHM $ & , 1993. )N VIVO development of teicoplanin resistance in a VANB %NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM isolate.
*OURNAL OF )NFECTIOUS $ISEASES
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 131 |
(INTON
(INTON - !L #HALABY : ! - AND ,INTON ! ( , 1986a. The influence of dietary
protein and antimicrobial feed additives on salmonella carriage by broiler chickens.
6ETERINARY 2ECORD
(INTON - +AUKAS ! ,IM 3 + AND ,INTON ! ( , 1986b. Preliminary observations on the influence of antibiotics on the ecology of %SCHERICHIA COLI and the enterococci in the faecal flora of healthy young chickens. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY
(OLMBERG 3 $ /STERHOLM - 4 3ENGER + ! AND #OHEN
(ORAUD 4 ,E "OUGENEC # AND 0EPPER + , 1985. Molecular genetics of resistance to
macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramin B (MLS) in streptococci. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY SUPPL !
(ORODNICEANU 4 "OUGUELERET , AND "IETH ' , 1981. Conjugative transfer of multiple antibiotic resistance markers in
(UMBERT & ,ALANDE & L (OSPITALIER 2 3ALVAT ' AND "ENNEJEAN ' , 1991. Effect
of four antibiotic additives on the Salmonella contamination of chicks protected by an adult caecal flora. !VIAN 0ATHOLOGY
(UMMEL 2 AND 7ITTE 7 , 1981. Zum Problem der Resistenzentwicklung bei Staphylococcus aureus des Menschen infolge der Anwendung von Oxytetrazyklin
und Tylosin in den industriemä bigen Schweineproduktionsanlagen. !RCHIV F¼R %XPERIMENTELLE 6ETERIN¤RMEDIZIN
(UNTER * % " "ENNETT - (ART # ! 3HELLEY * # AND 7ALTON * 2 , 1994.
%PIDEMIOLOLGY AND )NFECTION
(UNTER * % " (ART # ! 3HELLEY * # 7ALTON * 2 AND "ENNETT
(UOVINEN 0 3EPP¤L¤ ( +ATAJA * AND +LAUKA 4 , 1996. The relationship between erythromycin consumption and resistance in Finland. )N PROCEEDINGS OF !NTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE ORIGINS EVOLUTION SELECTION AND SPREAD Whiley, Chichester (Ciba
Foundation Symposium 207), July
(UYCKE - - 'ILMORE - 3 *ETT " $ AND "OOTH * , , 1992. Transfer of
132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
*ACKS 4 - &RAZIER % *UDITH & 2 AND /LSON ' , 1988. Effect of efrotomycin in
feed on the quantity, duration, and prevalance of shedding and antibacterial susceptibility of 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM in experimentally infected swine.
!MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH
*ACOBS 2EITMA 7 & +OENRAAD 0 - & * "OLDER . - AND
*ENSEN , " , 1996. Characterization of the VANA gene cluster in vancomycin resistant %NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM (preliminary report
Serumlaboratorium, Copenhagen.
*ORDON & 4 7 ED 1990. 0OULTRY $ISEASES. Cambridge University Press, Great Britain.
+AUKAS ! (INTON - AND ,INTON ! ( , 1987. The effect of ampicillin and tylosin on the faecal enterococci of healthy young chickens. *OURNAL OF !PPLIED "ACTERIOLOGY
+AUKAS ! (INTON - AND ,INTON ! ( , 1988. The effect of
+IRK - #HEN ( 9 (ILL 2 #ASEWELL - 7 AND "EIGHTON $ , 1997. Novel instertion sequences from
+LARE ) (EIER ( #LAUS ( "¶HME '
mediated high level glycopeptide resistance isolated from animal
272.
+LARE ) (EIER ( #LAUS ( 2EISSBRODT 2 AND 7ITTE 7 , 1995b.
+NOTHE ( , 1977. A review of the medical considerations of the use of tylosin and other macrolide antibiotics as additives in animal feeds. )NFECTION
+RUSE ( AND 3¸RUM ( , 1994. Transfer of multiple drug resistance plasmids between bacteria of diverse origins in natural microenvironments. !PPLIED %NVIRONMENTAL
,ACEY 2 7 , 1980. Rarity of gene transfer between animal and human isolates of
3TAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS IN VITRO. *OURNAL OF 'ENERAL
,ACEY 2 7 , 1984. Are resistant
pp.
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 133 |
,ACEY 2 7 , 1988. Rarity of tylosin resistance in human pathogenic bacteria. 6ETERINARY 2ECORD
,ANGLOIS " % , 1988. Effect of age and housing location on antibiotic resistance of fecal coliforms from pigs in a
,ATOUR 0 " AND "ARNUM $ ! , 1981. Use of ducks as a model to study the effect of antibiotics in feed on the fecal shedding of 3ALMONELLA. !MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH
,EAK " % ,ANGLOIS " % AND $AWSON + ! , 1986. Antibiotic resistance of fecal
coliforms from various age pigs under different housing conditions in a swine herd not fed antimicrobials for over 12 years. *OURNAL OF !NIMAL 3CIENCE SUPPL
239.
,E"LANC $ * )NAMINE * - AND ,EE , . , 1986. Broad geographical distribution of
homologous erythromycin, kanamycin and streptomycin resistance determinants among group D streptococci of human and animal origin. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
,ECLERCQ 2 AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1991a. Bacterial resistance to macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin antibiotics by target modification. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
,ECLERCQ 2 AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1991b. Intrinsic and unusual resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin antibiotics in bacteria. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
,ECLERCQ 2 $ERLOT % 7EBER - $UVAL * AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1989. Transferable vancomycin and teicoplanin resistance in %NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
,ENSKI 2 % , 1996. The cost of antibiotic resistance - from the perspective of the bacterium. )N PROCEEDINGS OF !NTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE ORIGINS EVOLUTION SELECTION AND SPREAD Chichester (Ciba Foundation Symposium 207), July
151.
,EUCHTENBERGER 7 ' , 1981. Einfluss antibiotischer Futterzusatze auf die Darmflora von Huhnerkuken und auf die Persistenz von 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM Infektionen.
(Thesis). Tierarztliche Hochschule, Hannover.
,EVY 3 , 1996. Antibiotic resistance: an ecological imbalance. )N PROCEEDINGS OF !NTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE ORIGINS EVOLUTION SELECTION AND SPREAD Whiley, Chichester
(Ciba Foundation Symposium 207), July
,EVY 3 " , 1983. Antibiotic resistant bacteria in food of man and animals. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )NTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTIBIOTICS IN AGRICULTURE BENEFITS AND
MALEFITS Butterworths, London,Nottingham. pp.
134 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
,EVY 3 " &ITZ'ERALD ' " AND
,ILLARD ( 3 , 1990. The impact of commercial processing procedures on the bacterial
contamination and
,INTON ! ( !L #HALABY : ! - AND (INTON - ( , 1985a. Natural subclinical
salmonella infection in chickens: a potential model for testing the effects of various procedures on salmonella shedding. 6ETERINARY 2ECORD
,INTON ! ( (EDGES ! * AND "ENNETT 0
antimicrobial resistance during the use of olaquindox as a feed additive on commercial pig farms. *OURNAL OF !PPLIED "ACTERIOLOGY
,INTON ! ( (INTON - ( AND !L #HALABY : !
resistance in enterococci consequent upon feeding growth promoters active against
,INTON ! ( (OWE + "ENNETT 0 - AND 2ICHMOND - ( , 1977. The colonization of the human gut by antibiotic resistant %SCHERICHIA COLI from chickens. *OURNAL OF !PPLIED "ACTERIOLOGY
licosamides and streptogramin B type antibiotics among group A, B, D and H streptococci.
%SCHERICHIA COLI in a farm environment in the absence of antibiotic usage.
0ROCEEDINGS OF THE .ATIONAL !CADEMY OF 3CIENCE 53!
feed additives on the gut flora and the persistence of Salmonellae in experimentally infected chickens. )N PROCEEDINGS OF 6))TH )NTERNATIONAL #ONGRESS OF THE 760! 1-
3 July, Oslo. p. 74.
inhabiting the murine digestive tract and modification of the plasmid in a
,ACTOBACILLUS REUTERI host.
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 135 |
1997. Oral administration of tylosin phosphate for treatment and prevention of proliferative enteropathy in pigs. !MERICAN *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 2ESEARCH 136-
139.
Treatment and prevention of porcine proliferative entheropathy with oral tiamulin.
6ETERINARY 2ECORD
1996. Sequential antibiotic therapy for acne promotes the carriage of resistant staphylococci on the skin of contacts. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY
2350.
homologous with toxin A and is mediated by a conjugative transposon, Tn5398.
*OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY
.ICAS 4 ) :ECKEL
.IKOLICH - 0 (ONG ' 3HOEMAKER . " AND 3ALYERS ! ! , 1994. Evidence for
natural horiosontal transfer of TETQ between bacteria that normally colonize humans and bacteria that normally colonize livestock. !PPLIED AND %NVIRONMENTAL
.OBLE 7 # 6IRANI : AND #REE 2 ' , 1992.
.URMI % AND 2ANTALA
.URMI % AND 2ANTALA
3ALMONELLA INFANTIS in the intestine of broiler chickens. 2ESEARCH IN 6ETERINARY 3CIENCE
136 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
/HMAE + 9ONEZAWA 3 AND 4ERAKADO . , 1981. R plasmid with carbadox resistance from %SCHERICHIA COLI of porcine origin. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
/HMAE + 9ONEZAWA 3 AND 4ERAKADO . , 1983. Epizootiological studies on R plasmid with carbadox resistance. *APANESE *OURNAL OF 6ETERINARY 3CIENCE 165-
170.
0ANAGEA 3 AND #HADWICK 0 2 , 1996. Heat tolerance of vancomycin resistant
%NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM. *OURNAL OF #LINICAL 0ATHOLOGY
0EREZ 4RALLERO % :IGORRAGA # #ILLA ' )DIGORAS 0 ,OPEZ ,OPATEGUI # AND 3OLAUN , , 1988. Animal origin of the antibiotic resistance of human pathogenic
9ERSINIA ENTEROCOLITICA. 3CANDINAVIAN *OURNAL OF )NFECTIOUS $ISEASES 573.
0ERRETEN 6 +OLL¶FFEL " AND 4EUBER
0ERRETEN 6 AND 4EUBER
Brussels,Kiel. pp.
0OHL 0 ,AUB +UPERSZTEJN 2 4HOMAS * AND VAN 2OBAEYS ' , 1975. Effets de la
flavomycine et de quelques agents antiparasitaires sur une souche colibacillaire hébergeant divers
0OWER % ' - !BDULLA 9 ( 4ALSANIA ( ' 3PICE 7 !ATHITHAN 3 AND &RENCH ' , , 1995. VANA genes in
0OYART # 0IERRE # 1UESNE ' 0RON " "ERCHE 0 AND 4RIEU #UOT 0 , 1997. Emergence of vancomycin resistance in the genus 3TREPTOCOCCUS: characterisation of a VANB transferable determinant in 3TREPTOCOCCUS BOVIS. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
0OYART 3ALMERON # #ARLIER # 4RIEU #UOT 0 #OURTIEU ! , AND #OURVALIN 0 ,
1990. Transferable
1UINTILIANI 2 * AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1994. Conjugal transfer of the vancomycin
resistance determinant VANB between enterococci is associated with the movement of large elements from chromosome to chromosome.
1UINTILIANI 2 * AND #OURVALIN 0 , 1996. Charachterization of Tn , a composite
transposon flanked by the IS and IS
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 137 |
2AVDONIKAS , % , 1983. The genetic control of virulence in group A streptococci I.
Conjugal transfer of plasmids and their effect on expression of some host cell properties. !CTA 0ATHOLOGICA
2EINA * "ORRELL . AND 3ERRA ! , 1992. Emergence of resistance to erythromycin and
fluoroquinolones in thermotolerant Campylobacter strains isolated from faeces
2ICHMOND - ( , 1972. Some environmental consequences of the use of antibiotics: or "what goes up must come down". *OURNAL OF !PPLIED "ACTERIOLOGY
2OBERTS - # AND "ROWN - " , 1994.
2OBERTS - # #HUNG 7 / AND 2OE $ % , 1996a. Charachterization of tetracycline and erythromycin resistance determinants in 4REPONEMA DENTICOLA. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
2OBERTS - # &ACINELLI " 'IOVANETTI % AND 6ARALDO 0 % , 1996b. Transferable erythromycin resistance in ,ISTERIA spp. isolated from food. !PPLIED AND %NVIRONMENTAL
2OLLINS , $ ,EE , . AND ,E"LANC $ * , 1985. Evidence for a disseminated
erythromycin resistance determinant mediated by Tn
2OOSEN & "LAZY
3ALAUZE $ /TAL ) 'OMEZ ,US 2 AND $AVIES * , 1990. Aminoglycoside
acetyltransferase
3ALYERS ! ! 1995. !NTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE TRANSFER IN THE MAMMALIAN INTESTINAL TRACT IMPLICATIONS FOR HUMAN HEALTH FOOD SAFETY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Molecular Biology
Intelligence Unit. R. G. Landes Company, Austin. pp. 191.
3CHWABE # 7 2EIMANN ( 0 AND &RANTI # % 1977. %PIDEMIOLOGY IN 6ETERINARY
0RACTICE Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia.
3EPP¤L¤ ( +LAUKKA 4 6UOPIO 6ARKILA *
antibiotics on erythromycin resistance in group A streptococci in Finland. .EW %NGLAND *OURNAL OF
138 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
3EPULCHRE
3HAH 0 - 3CHAFER 6 AND +NOTHE ( , 1993. Medical and veterinary use of
antimocrobial agents: implications for public health. A clinician’s view on antimicrobial resistance. 6ETERINARY
3HOEMAKER . " 7ANG ' AND 3ALYERS ! ! , 1992. Evidence for natural transfer of a
tetracycline resistance gene between bacteria from the human colon and bacteria from the bovine rumen. !PPLIED %NVIRONMENTAL
3MITH ( 7 AND 4UCKER * & , 1978. The effect of antimicrobial feed additives on the colonization of the alimentary tract of chickens by 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM.
*OURNAL OF (YGIENE
3MITH 7 ( AND 4UCKER * & , 1975. The effect of feeding diets containing permitted antibiotics on the faecal excretion of 3ALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM by experimentally infected chickens. *OURNAL OF (YGIENE
3MITH 7 ( AND 4UCKER * & , 1980. Further observations on the effect of feeding diets
containing avoparcin, bacitracin and sodium arsenilate on the colonization of the alimentary tract of poultry by salmonella organisms. *OURNAL OF (YGIENE 137-
150.
3PIKA * 3 7ATERMAN 3 ( 3OO (OO ' 7 3T ,OUIS - % 0AGER 2 % *AMES 3 - "ISSETT
3TUART * ' :IMMERER % * AND
4AUCH ! +ASSING & +ALINOWSKI * AND 0UHLER ! , 1995. The #ORYNEBACTERIUM XEROSIS composite transposon Tn consists of two identical insertion sequences, designated IS1249, flanking the erythromycin resistance gene ERMCX. 0LASMID
4HAL , ! 7ELTON , ! 0ERRI - " $ONABEDIAN 3
:ERVOS - * , 1996. Antimicrobial resistance in enterococci isolated from turkeys fed virginiamycin. )N PROCEEDINGS OF TH )#!!# New Orleans.
4HRELFALL % * 2OWE " &ERGUSSON * , AND 7ARD , 2 , 1986. Characterization of plasmids conferring resistance to gentamicin and apramycin in strains of 3ALMONELLA THYPHIMURIUM phage type 204c isolated in Britain. *OURNAL OF (YGIENE
4ORRES # 2EGUERA * ! 3ANMARTIN M * 0EREZ $IAZ * # AND "AQUERO & , 1994.
SOU 1997:132 | 4. Microbiological aspects | 139 |
4ROUTT ( & (OOPER " % AND (ARRINGTON 2 , 1974. Effect of carbadox in experimentally induced salmonellosis of swine. *OURNAL OF THE !MERICAN 6ETERINARY
7ALTON * 2 , 1978. The effect of zinc bacitracin on the susceptibility of selected gram negative and gram positive bacteria to therapeutic antibiotics. :ENTRALBLATT F¼R 6ETERIN¤RMEDIZINE 2EIHE "
7ALTON * 2 , 1984. The effect of dietary zinc bacitracin on the resistance status of intestinal %SCHERICHIA COLI and enterococci from broiler chickens. :ENTRALBLATT F¼R 6ETERIN¤RMEDIZINE 2EIHE "
7ALTON * 2 AND 7HEELER * % , 1987. Loss of resistance to the tetracyclines from porcine %SCHERICHIA COLI in contact with dietary bacitracin methylene disalicylate.
:ENTRALBLATT F¼R 6ETERIN¤RMEDIZINE 2EIHE "
VAN DEN "OGAARD ! % AND 3TOBBERINGH % % , 1996. Time to ban all antibiotics as animal
VAN DEN "OGAARD ! * *ENSEN , " AND 3TOBBERING % % , 1997. An identical VRE isolated from a turkey and a farmer (letter). SUBMITTED.
7ANG 7 , 2ELLER , " AND "LASER - * , 1984. Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of #AMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI and #AMPYLOBACTER COLI. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
7ASTESON 9 (OIE 3 AND 2OBERTS - # , 1994. Characterization of antibiotic resistance in 3TREPTOCOCCUS SUIS. 6ETERINARY
7EGENER ( #
7EISBLUM " , 1995. Erythromycin resistance by ribosome modification. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
7HITMAN - # 0ITSAKIS 0 ' $E*ESUS % /SBORNE ! * ,EVINSON - % AND
*OHNSON # # , 1996. Gastrointestinal tract colonisation with
%NTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM in an animal model. !NTIMICROBIAL !GENTS AND #HEMOTHERAPY
7(/, 1994. WHO calls for action on spread of drug
$ECEMBER http://www.
7ITTE 7 , 1996. Impact of antibiotic use in animal feeding on resistance of bacterial pathogens in humans. )N PROCEEDINGS OF !NTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE ORIGINS EVOLUTION SELECTION AND SPREAD Whiley, Chichester (Ciba Foundation Symposium 207), July
140 | 4. Microbiological aspects | SOU 1997:132 |
7OODFORD . *ONES " "ACCUS : ,UDLAM ( AND "ROWN $ , 1995. Linkage of
vancomycin and high level gentamicin resistance genes on the same plasmid in a clinical isolate of %NTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS. *OURNAL OF !NTIMICROBIAL #HEMOTHERAPY
7RAY # (EDGES 2 7 3HANNON + 0 AND "RADLEY $ % , 1986. Apramycin and gentamicin resistance in %SCHERICHIA COLI and salmonellas isolated from farm animals. *OURNAL OF (YGIENE